VOTING POWER100.00%
DOWNVOTE POWER100.00%
RESOURCE CREDITS100.00%
REPUTATION PROGRESS0.00%
Net Worth
0.281USD
STEEM
0.000STEEM
SBD
0.000SBD
Own SP
6.230SP
Detailed Balance
| STEEM | ||
| balance | 0.000STEEM | STEEM |
| market_balance | 0.000STEEM | STEEM |
| savings_balance | 0.000STEEM | STEEM |
| reward_steem_balance | 0.000STEEM | STEEM |
| STEEM POWER | ||
| Own SP | 6.230SP | SP |
| Delegated Out | 0.000SP | SP |
| Delegation In | 0.000SP | SP |
| Effective Power | 6.230SP | SP |
| Reward SP (pending) | 0.000SP | SP |
| SBD | ||
| sbd_balance | 0.000SBD | SBD |
| sbd_conversions | 0.000SBD | SBD |
| sbd_market_balance | 0.000SBD | SBD |
| savings_sbd_balance | 0.000SBD | SBD |
| reward_sbd_balance | 0.000SBD | SBD |
{
"balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"savings_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"reward_steem_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"vesting_shares": "10130.751578 VESTS",
"delegated_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
"received_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
"sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"savings_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"reward_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"conversions": []
}Account Info
| name | skylerjcollins |
| id | 75640 |
| rank | 196,521 |
| reputation | 14938367 |
| created | 2016-08-25T23:46:57 |
| recovery_account | steem |
| proxy | None |
| post_count | 2 |
| comment_count | 0 |
| lifetime_vote_count | 0 |
| witnesses_voted_for | 0 |
| last_post | 2016-08-26T02:22:33 |
| last_root_post | 2016-08-26T00:02:15 |
| last_vote_time | 2017-08-29T16:12:42 |
| proxied_vsf_votes | 0, 0, 0, 0 |
| can_vote | 1 |
| voting_power | 9,800 |
| delayed_votes | 0 |
| balance | 0.000 STEEM |
| savings_balance | 0.000 STEEM |
| sbd_balance | 0.000 SBD |
| savings_sbd_balance | 0.000 SBD |
| vesting_shares | 10130.751578 VESTS |
| delegated_vesting_shares | 0.000000 VESTS |
| received_vesting_shares | 0.000000 VESTS |
| reward_vesting_balance | 0.000000 VESTS |
| vesting_balance | 0.000 STEEM |
| vesting_withdraw_rate | 0.000000 VESTS |
| next_vesting_withdrawal | 1969-12-31T23:59:59 |
| withdrawn | 0 |
| to_withdraw | 0 |
| withdraw_routes | 0 |
| savings_withdraw_requests | 0 |
| last_account_recovery | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
| reset_account | null |
| last_owner_update | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
| last_account_update | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
| mined | No |
| sbd_seconds | 0 |
| sbd_last_interest_payment | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
| savings_sbd_last_interest_payment | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
{
"id": 75640,
"name": "skylerjcollins",
"owner": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM5py8ayVZN9qhiEdoqYXDTPF7U3RyeTbGk91Xk37nWHX6tvu5SY",
1
]
]
},
"active": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM6cSrVNvfndtAFBsBmPjAkmRCcoT1K55qLj173edyYXL8YKqU5h",
1
]
]
},
"posting": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM7FbMpyN8YQmoqkVPzBSuusKHe5zhXjMiXzEwzU95cTCkZ35aFc",
1
]
]
},
"memo_key": "STM6bQHAYHRuy4qKXH8C3ELLvEKTZdZzvmQbbqbnPaCCUoWbdjJHS",
"json_metadata": "",
"posting_json_metadata": "",
"proxy": "",
"last_owner_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"last_account_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"created": "2016-08-25T23:46:57",
"mined": false,
"recovery_account": "steem",
"last_account_recovery": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"reset_account": "null",
"comment_count": 0,
"lifetime_vote_count": 0,
"post_count": 2,
"can_vote": true,
"voting_manabar": {
"current_mana": 9800,
"last_update_time": 1504023162
},
"downvote_manabar": {
"current_mana": 0,
"last_update_time": 1472168817
},
"voting_power": 9800,
"balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"savings_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"sbd_seconds": "0",
"sbd_seconds_last_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"sbd_last_interest_payment": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"savings_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"savings_sbd_seconds": "0",
"savings_sbd_seconds_last_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"savings_sbd_last_interest_payment": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"savings_withdraw_requests": 0,
"reward_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"reward_steem_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"reward_vesting_balance": "0.000000 VESTS",
"reward_vesting_steem": "0.000 STEEM",
"vesting_shares": "10130.751578 VESTS",
"delegated_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
"received_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
"vesting_withdraw_rate": "0.000000 VESTS",
"next_vesting_withdrawal": "1969-12-31T23:59:59",
"withdrawn": 0,
"to_withdraw": 0,
"withdraw_routes": 0,
"curation_rewards": 0,
"posting_rewards": 0,
"proxied_vsf_votes": [
0,
0,
0,
0
],
"witnesses_voted_for": 0,
"last_post": "2016-08-26T02:22:33",
"last_root_post": "2016-08-26T00:02:15",
"last_vote_time": "2017-08-29T16:12:42",
"post_bandwidth": 10000,
"pending_claimed_accounts": 0,
"vesting_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"reputation": 14938367,
"transfer_history": [],
"market_history": [],
"post_history": [],
"vote_history": [],
"other_history": [],
"witness_votes": [],
"tags_usage": [],
"guest_bloggers": [],
"rank": 196521
}Withdraw Routes
| Incoming | Outgoing |
|---|---|
Empty | Empty |
{
"incoming": [],
"outgoing": []
}From Date
To Date
2019/08/26 00:42:21
2019/08/26 00:42:21
| parent author | skylerjcollins |
| parent permlink | the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism |
| author | steemitboard |
| permlink | steemitboard-notify-skylerjcollins-20190826t004221000z |
| title | |
| body | Congratulations @skylerjcollins! You received a personal award! <table><tr><td>https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@skylerjcollins/birthday3.png</td><td>Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 3 years!</td></tr></table> <sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@skylerjcollins) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=skylerjcollins)_</sub> ###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes! |
| json metadata | {"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png"]} |
| Transaction Info | Block #35875910/Trx 76edefb9ab4b7f7a5a84a946068bf2582e2e7c80 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "76edefb9ab4b7f7a5a84a946068bf2582e2e7c80",
"block": 35875910,
"trx_in_block": 17,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2019-08-26T00:42:21",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "skylerjcollins",
"parent_permlink": "the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism",
"author": "steemitboard",
"permlink": "steemitboard-notify-skylerjcollins-20190826t004221000z",
"title": "",
"body": "Congratulations @skylerjcollins! You received a personal award!\n\n<table><tr><td>https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@skylerjcollins/birthday3.png</td><td>Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 3 years!</td></tr></table>\n\n<sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@skylerjcollins) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=skylerjcollins)_</sub>\n\n\n###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes!",
"json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png\"]}"
}
]
}2018/08/26 02:08:57
2018/08/26 02:08:57
| parent author | skylerjcollins |
| parent permlink | the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism |
| author | steemitboard |
| permlink | steemitboard-notify-skylerjcollins-20180826t020856000z |
| title | |
| body | Congratulations @skylerjcollins! You have received a personal award! [](http://steemitboard.com/@skylerjcollins) 2 Years on Steemit <sub>_Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor._</sub> > Do you like [SteemitBoard's project](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard)? Then **[Vote for its witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1)** and **get one more award**! |
| json metadata | {"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png"]} |
| Transaction Info | Block #25393358/Trx 547401a1b677ec52d24b2cb36017d68f1661702f |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "547401a1b677ec52d24b2cb36017d68f1661702f",
"block": 25393358,
"trx_in_block": 1,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2018-08-26T02:08:57",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "skylerjcollins",
"parent_permlink": "the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism",
"author": "steemitboard",
"permlink": "steemitboard-notify-skylerjcollins-20180826t020856000z",
"title": "",
"body": "Congratulations @skylerjcollins! You have received a personal award!\n\n[](http://steemitboard.com/@skylerjcollins) 2 Years on Steemit\n<sub>_Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor._</sub>\n\n\n> Do you like [SteemitBoard's project](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard)? Then **[Vote for its witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1)** and **get one more award**!",
"json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png\"]}"
}
]
}skylerjcollinsremoved vote from (0.00%) @larkenrose / what-s-wrong-with-free-money2017/08/29 16:12:42
skylerjcollinsremoved vote from (0.00%) @larkenrose / what-s-wrong-with-free-money
2017/08/29 16:12:42
| voter | skylerjcollins |
| author | larkenrose |
| permlink | what-s-wrong-with-free-money |
| weight | 0 (0.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #15003154/Trx 917bf73accbd39676e65c1c719de78167c680d87 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "917bf73accbd39676e65c1c719de78167c680d87",
"block": 15003154,
"trx_in_block": 1,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-29T16:12:42",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "skylerjcollins",
"author": "larkenrose",
"permlink": "what-s-wrong-with-free-money",
"weight": 0
}
]
}skylerjcollinsupvoted (100.00%) @larkenrose / what-s-wrong-with-free-money2017/08/29 16:12:33
skylerjcollinsupvoted (100.00%) @larkenrose / what-s-wrong-with-free-money
2017/08/29 16:12:33
| voter | skylerjcollins |
| author | larkenrose |
| permlink | what-s-wrong-with-free-money |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #15003151/Trx 02025b28b68e465cc322ab85be96b325e12934b6 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "02025b28b68e465cc322ab85be96b325e12934b6",
"block": 15003151,
"trx_in_block": 20,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-29T16:12:33",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "skylerjcollins",
"author": "larkenrose",
"permlink": "what-s-wrong-with-free-money",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}2017/08/26 01:02:21
2017/08/26 01:02:21
| parent author | skylerjcollins |
| parent permlink | the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism |
| author | steemitboard |
| permlink | steemitboard-notify-skylerjcollins-20170826t010223000z |
| title | |
| body | Congratulations @skylerjcollins! You have received a personal award! [](http://steemitboard.com/@skylerjcollins) Happy Birthday - 1 Year on Steemit Happy Birthday - 1 Year on Steemit Click on the badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard. For more information about this award, click [here](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-update-8-happy-birthday) > By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how [here](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/http-i-cubeupload-com-7ciqeo-png)! |
| json metadata | {"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notifications.png"]} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14898584/Trx 53e1db9df8be52fb68ef0f98327d457b46d7d54e |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "53e1db9df8be52fb68ef0f98327d457b46d7d54e",
"block": 14898584,
"trx_in_block": 15,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-26T01:02:21",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "skylerjcollins",
"parent_permlink": "the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism",
"author": "steemitboard",
"permlink": "steemitboard-notify-skylerjcollins-20170826t010223000z",
"title": "",
"body": "Congratulations @skylerjcollins! You have received a personal award!\n\n[](http://steemitboard.com/@skylerjcollins) Happy Birthday - 1 Year on Steemit Happy Birthday - 1 Year on Steemit\nClick on the badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.\n\nFor more information about this award, click [here](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-update-8-happy-birthday)\n> By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how [here](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/http-i-cubeupload-com-7ciqeo-png)!",
"json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notifications.png\"]}"
}
]
}scottermonkeyupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
scottermonkeyupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
| voter | scottermonkey |
| author | skylerjcollins |
| permlink | the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #9194800/Trx 7f3f2ef9f4a398dea21a61bbb754c277bc8cbac9 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "7f3f2ef9f4a398dea21a61bbb754c277bc8cbac9",
"block": 9194800,
"trx_in_block": 0,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-02-08T18:01:30",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "scottermonkey",
"author": "skylerjcollins",
"permlink": "the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}crystalgeometryupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
crystalgeometryupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
| voter | crystalgeometry |
| author | skylerjcollins |
| permlink | the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #8421009/Trx 7d53b8079918429e813cc6e85e14053f3e1f75d9 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "7d53b8079918429e813cc6e85e14053f3e1f75d9",
"block": 8421009,
"trx_in_block": 0,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-01-12T20:24:21",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "crystalgeometry",
"author": "skylerjcollins",
"permlink": "the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}skylerjcollinsfollowed @larkenrose
skylerjcollinsfollowed @larkenrose
| required auths | [] |
| required posting auths | ["skylerjcollins"] |
| id | follow |
| json | ["follow",{"follower":"skylerjcollins","following":"larkenrose","what":["blog"]}] |
| Transaction Info | Block #7763331/Trx 341bc77fed26cf6109acfda035420efd39963da0 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "341bc77fed26cf6109acfda035420efd39963da0",
"block": 7763331,
"trx_in_block": 1,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2016-12-20T23:02:45",
"op": [
"custom_json",
{
"required_auths": [],
"required_posting_auths": [
"skylerjcollins"
],
"id": "follow",
"json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"skylerjcollins\",\"following\":\"larkenrose\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
}
]
}trappistupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
trappistupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
| voter | trappist |
| author | skylerjcollins |
| permlink | the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #4436843/Trx a65fee865a4417cd2d5bc5166b1177ec0ac2c160 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "a65fee865a4417cd2d5bc5166b1177ec0ac2c160",
"block": 4436843,
"trx_in_block": 0,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2016-08-27T04:48:27",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "trappist",
"author": "skylerjcollins",
"permlink": "the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}jaylavoluntaryupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
jaylavoluntaryupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
| voter | jaylavoluntary |
| author | skylerjcollins |
| permlink | the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #4423095/Trx 8c9e67c97759f0374406b8a15d0854d436b47a20 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "8c9e67c97759f0374406b8a15d0854d436b47a20",
"block": 4423095,
"trx_in_block": 1,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2016-08-26T17:07:36",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "jaylavoluntary",
"author": "skylerjcollins",
"permlink": "the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}tsbloyerupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
tsbloyerupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
| voter | tsbloyer |
| author | skylerjcollins |
| permlink | the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #4405558/Trx 56f072b50457bfb073d32bb4324a6b1850cc07d3 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "56f072b50457bfb073d32bb4324a6b1850cc07d3",
"block": 4405558,
"trx_in_block": 2,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2016-08-26T02:29:24",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "tsbloyer",
"author": "skylerjcollins",
"permlink": "the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}| parent author | fascinate |
| parent permlink | re-skylerjcollins-the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism-20160826t013253754z |
| author | skylerjcollins |
| permlink | re-fascinate-re-skylerjcollins-the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism-20160826t022231611z |
| title | |
| body | Lots of interesting thoughts and questions. Thank you for sharing and asking. A lot to think about... voluntarily. :) |
| json metadata | {"tags":["voluntaryism"]} |
| Transaction Info | Block #4405421/Trx c24632c8a4b19a1fe3f753676dc38ee972888990 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "c24632c8a4b19a1fe3f753676dc38ee972888990",
"block": 4405421,
"trx_in_block": 3,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2016-08-26T02:22:33",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "fascinate",
"parent_permlink": "re-skylerjcollins-the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism-20160826t013253754z",
"author": "skylerjcollins",
"permlink": "re-fascinate-re-skylerjcollins-the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism-20160826t022231611z",
"title": "",
"body": "Lots of interesting thoughts and questions. Thank you for sharing and asking. A lot to think about... voluntarily. :)",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"voluntaryism\"]}"
}
]
}| parent author | skylerjcollins |
| parent permlink | the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism |
| author | fascinate |
| permlink | re-skylerjcollins-the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism-20160826t013253754z |
| title | |
| body | This seems like a roundabout way of describing liberty (the freedom to do as one pleases so long as you do not infringe upon another's person, property or freedom). Would you consider this voluntaryism more operant as opposed to liberty being more of a passive opportunity? For many philosophical discussions you need to presuppose free-will. How does this philosophy hold up if it turns out that free will is nothing but a fairy tale we tell ourselves to help us sleep at night? Also this concept can be difficult to fully embrace on the social level. Our interactions should be voluntary. Okay. What about family. It's not always convenient to cut ties when coercion occurs. I personally feel a debt of due gratitude to my parents. Or how about employment. If you got a decent job and that your feel fortunate to have, but that there a certain people there that either coerce, are non-productive or just plain annoying, it may not necessarily be in my best interest to cut ties. I get that every day that you show up to work you are "voluntarily" accepting that situation. I've applied the concept myself at jobs before to my advantage. I remind the less desirable employee, "There's the door! Nobody is forcing you to be here." Needless to say we had a pretty high turnover rate. Another angle to be considered too. This isn't for everyone. Some people want to be sheep. They may not want to admit it, but they are comfortable being told what to do, and the more subtle the better. Some people want to coerce others. Why not? Some people are tools and should be used as such. I'm not here to cut you down. I'm trying to spark up some conversation. I liked the mention of non-violent communication. I never heard of that before. |
| json metadata | {"tags":["voluntaryism"]} |
| Transaction Info | Block #4404430/Trx e07fc442127d2356e0bf2a7d0024f68f06257cd5 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "e07fc442127d2356e0bf2a7d0024f68f06257cd5",
"block": 4404430,
"trx_in_block": 0,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2016-08-26T01:32:57",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "skylerjcollins",
"parent_permlink": "the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism",
"author": "fascinate",
"permlink": "re-skylerjcollins-the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism-20160826t013253754z",
"title": "",
"body": "This seems like a roundabout way of describing liberty (the freedom to do as one pleases so long as you do not infringe upon another's person, property or freedom). Would you consider this voluntaryism more operant as opposed to liberty being more of a passive opportunity? For many philosophical discussions you need to presuppose free-will. How does this philosophy hold up if it turns out that free will is nothing but a fairy tale we tell ourselves to help us sleep at night? Also this concept can be difficult to fully embrace on the social level. Our interactions should be voluntary. Okay. What about family. It's not always convenient to cut ties when coercion occurs. I personally feel a debt of due gratitude to my parents. Or how about employment. If you got a decent job and that your feel fortunate to have, but that there a certain people there that either coerce, are non-productive or just plain annoying, it may not necessarily be in my best interest to cut ties. I get that every day that you show up to work you are \"voluntarily\" accepting that situation. I've applied the concept myself at jobs before to my advantage. I remind the less desirable employee, \"There's the door! Nobody is forcing you to be here.\" Needless to say we had a pretty high turnover rate. Another angle to be considered too. This isn't for everyone. Some people want to be sheep. They may not want to admit it, but they are comfortable being told what to do, and the more subtle the better. Some people want to coerce others. Why not? Some people are tools and should be used as such. I'm not here to cut you down. I'm trying to spark up some conversation. I liked the mention of non-violent communication. I never heard of that before.",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"voluntaryism\"]}"
}
]
}fascinateupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
fascinateupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
| voter | fascinate |
| author | skylerjcollins |
| permlink | the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #4403909/Trx b799ebc702d34141ccdbb646b100eb7b258faa3d |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "b799ebc702d34141ccdbb646b100eb7b258faa3d",
"block": 4403909,
"trx_in_block": 1,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2016-08-26T01:06:51",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "fascinate",
"author": "skylerjcollins",
"permlink": "the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}justinschwalmupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
justinschwalmupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
| voter | justinschwalm |
| author | skylerjcollins |
| permlink | the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #4402734/Trx 7197d37fdb60af94caec744be4b8163656bbaa48 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "7197d37fdb60af94caec744be4b8163656bbaa48",
"block": 4402734,
"trx_in_block": 4,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2016-08-26T00:08:03",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "justinschwalm",
"author": "skylerjcollins",
"permlink": "the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}skylerjcollinsupvoted (100.00%) @larkenrose / all-i-am-asking
skylerjcollinsupvoted (100.00%) @larkenrose / all-i-am-asking
| voter | skylerjcollins |
| author | larkenrose |
| permlink | all-i-am-asking |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #4402705/Trx 2f72f6c0375b22180fd5b6564b99dad8cdf2538c |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "2f72f6c0375b22180fd5b6564b99dad8cdf2538c",
"block": 4402705,
"trx_in_block": 2,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2016-08-26T00:06:36",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "skylerjcollins",
"author": "larkenrose",
"permlink": "all-i-am-asking",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}robmosisupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
robmosisupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
| voter | robmosis |
| author | skylerjcollins |
| permlink | the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #4402704/Trx 4a4732cc4c32c26f9ca9e88512d82959a0385c34 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "4a4732cc4c32c26f9ca9e88512d82959a0385c34",
"block": 4402704,
"trx_in_block": 6,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2016-08-26T00:06:33",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "robmosis",
"author": "skylerjcollins",
"permlink": "the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}skylerjcollinsupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
skylerjcollinsupvoted (100.00%) @skylerjcollins / the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
| voter | skylerjcollins |
| author | skylerjcollins |
| permlink | the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #4402618/Trx 2c27650be817fa4ba85d3e11089dbef4c6864ff5 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "2c27650be817fa4ba85d3e11089dbef4c6864ff5",
"block": 4402618,
"trx_in_block": 0,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2016-08-26T00:02:15",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "skylerjcollins",
"author": "skylerjcollins",
"permlink": "the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}skylerjcollinspublished a new post: the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
skylerjcollinspublished a new post: the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism
| parent author | |
| parent permlink | voluntaryism |
| author | skylerjcollins |
| permlink | the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism |
| title | The Philosophy of Voluntaryism |
| body | Philosophy is, <a href="http://etymonline.com/index.php?term=philosophy&allowed_in_frame=0">etymologically</a>, the "love of wisdom". One of the best ways I've read to define wisdom is this saying, "Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit; wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad." In other words, knowledge is what is known, and wisdom is the proper use of that knowledge in relation to one's purposes. The discovery and application of wisdom is the purpose of philosophy. And because wisdom is useful in all sorts of endeavors, there are different types of philosophies. Voluntaryism is a multifaceted philosophy with broad application. <b>Voluntaryism</b> The foundation of the philosophy of voluntaryism is <a href="http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2014/09/the-voluntary-principle.html">the voluntary principle</a>, which states that *all human relations should happen voluntarily, or not at all.* Like all principles, the voluntary principle is only useful if it's application leads to the ends desired by the individual observing it. Voluntaryists, those who practice voluntaryism, do so because they believe that the voluntary principle is the proper means to achieve their desired ends. Which ends are those? And why is the voluntary principle the proper means to achieve them? Or rather, what is so wise about practicing voluntaryism? And just how far does it go? How "broad" is it, really? And even, is it ever wise to disregard the voluntary principle? <b>Self-Improvement</b> I think that the beginning of any desire to live by the principles espoused in a given philosophy is the intention to improve one's life. If following a philosophy means anything, it means becoming wiser about how to go about obtaining one's valued ends. And desires and values necessarily imply <a href="http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/individualism-and-freedom-vital-pillars-of-true-communities">individualism</a>, the belief that the individual has needs and wants and deserves to have them met so long as he allows every other individual to do likewise. And so, the human relation that every voluntaryist must start with is the self. He must recognize his right and ability to adopt whatever philosophy or philosophies that he wants for himself, and to do so voluntarily. One should not shame or guilt or otherwise coerce himself into accepting the voluntary principle, for it would then be a violation of said principle, thereby showing by his actions that he does not really consider it valid. No, committing to be a voluntaryist must be made voluntarily. And further, if the voluntary principle is a valid principle for self-improvement, then self-reflection and self-actualization on the basis of non-coercion will aid in improving one's mental health (mood, confidence, outlook, *et cetera*). <b>Virtue</b> Along the lines of self-improvement, many value the virtues. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtue">Virtue</a> is "a positive trait or quality deemed morally good." Wisdom, love, courage, patience, temperance, justice, *et cetera*, are virtues, but how virtuous is the action if it's coerced? As Murray Rothbard wrote (<a href="http://mises.org/books/newliberty.pdf">p. 128</a>), "The concept of 'morality' makes no sense unless the moral act is freely chosen." Thus, if you value virtuous living, then you must allow the virtues to be expressed voluntarily, both by yourself and others. Otherwise, the only thing being freely chosen is the act to coerce others into virtue, and that seems immoral, the opposite of virtue. It's a peculiar person who values virtue to the point of violating it. <b>Interpersonal Relations</b> What are the chances that someone utilizing coercion, the "political means" as Franz Oppenheimer calls it (<a href="http://library.mises.org/books/Franz%20Oppenheimer/The%20State%20Its%20History%20and%20Development%20Viewed%20Sociologically.pdf">p. 25</a>), in their interpersonal relations will ever find peace and happiness? Quite unlikely, for the use of coercion puts one at odds with the rest of society. Coercion is predation, and predators are often hunted down and slaughtered in order to make society safer. We'll get to political predation, which is far safer for the predator, but for now I'm talking about what is often called private crime. Murder, robbery, rape, battery, and the like, are incompatible with the values that most people hold. The voluntary principle clearly prohibits crimes of this sort, with the benefits to the individual and society obvious to all. However, what is not always so clear is who owns what. This matters if we are to know if a murder, robbery, rape, or battery has actually occurred. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property">Different theories of ownership abound</a>, some more defensible than others, but most people accept <a href="http://mises.org/daily/2291">self-ownership</a> and the right of personal possession. The less directly used something is, the more uncertain things are in property rights theory. In any event, the voluntary principle is very encouraging toward first agreeing on who owns what with all involved parties, before commencing to murder, rob, rape, or batter. And actually, why are we even considering such actions? What moves us to desire ends that require these means? Where has the voluntary principle been violated toward us by others or by us toward ourselves that we would resort to actions of this nature? Consider also the Golden Rule. There have been <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule">many formulations of the Golden Rule</a> over the centuries, but they all have on thing in common: consideration of others as individuals, rather than as means to be manipulated and coerced. When we coerce others, we are inviting coercion upon ourselves. If that sounds unpleasant or undesirable to you, then your relations with others should happen in accordance with the voluntary principle. <b>Communication</b> Another area of application of the voluntary principle is in communication, both intra- and interpersonal. The words we use can be very powerful and come across as either friendly or unfriendly. If unfriendly, they'll have a coercive effect if those we are communicating to feel threatened in some unexpected and undesired way. Psychologist Marshall Rosenberg coined the term "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonviolent_Communication">nonviolent communication</a>" (NVC) to teach the principles of self-empathy, empathy toward others, and honest self-expression. The presupposition of NVC theory is that "all human behavior stems from attempts to meet universal human needs and that these needs are never in conflict. Rather, conflict arises when strategies for meeting needs clash. NVC proposes that if people can identify their needs, the needs of others, and the feelings that surround these needs, harmony can be achieved." As it pertains to voluntaryism, NVC is a useful tool in preventing conflict that, by its nature, is likely to violate the voluntary principle, with the resulting undesirable end for those who value the peaceful meeting of their needs. <b>Education</b> How did humans evolve to learn? Are our educational needs best met through compulsory learning and regimentation, ie. <a href="http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2012/05/everything-voluntary-chapter-17.html">schooling</a>? Or are we best served by the voluntary principle, that is, through *free play*? Free play is the pursuit of one's own interests without interference by others. Adults engage in free play when they engage in activities that interest them. Children do likewise so long as the adults in their lives observe the voluntary principle, with <a href="http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201202/the-benefits-unschooling-report-i-large-survey">fantastic results</a>. As Peter Gray shows in *<a href="http://amzn.to/YZuzVk">Free to Learn</a>*, free play is how our evolutionary ancestors learned every skill necessary for survival, at least, and why unleashing the instinct to play in modern children will make kids "happier, more self-reliant, and better students for life." <a href="http://www.everything-voluntary.com/p/unschooling.html">Radical unschooling</a> is the education philosophy most compatible with free play, and is thus an integral part of voluntaryism, now and for the future. Radical unschooling is "radical" in the sense that it extends individual choice to everything a child does, not just to academics. Contrary to popular belief, when children are allowed to "<a href="http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2014/09/whatever-they-want.html">do whatever they want</a>", so long as they don't violate anyone's rights, destroy anyone's property, or unintentionally hurt themselves, the results are entirely positive. Many a radical unschooled former child will tell how empowering and enlightening it was for them to be free to choose what to eat, where to sleep and when, what to consume media-wise and how much, and other such choices that they were allowed to make on a daily basis because their parents were adhering to the voluntary principle. Parents likewise benefit from a stronger bond with their children because they aren't <a href="http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2013/02/control-is-war.html">at war</a> with their children's instincts and desires. As radical unschoolers, parents become their children's partners through life as a facilitator of needs and wants, educational or otherwise, and as a trusted mentor, instead of being there to stop them from experiencing life on their own terms. As such, things like "<a href="http://sandradodd.com/generosity">spoiled kids</a>" and "<a href="http://sandradodd.com/rebellion">teenage rebellion</a>" or nonexistent features in a radical unschooling home. <b>Parenting</b> What about child discipline? The voluntary principle demands that parents approach their children on the basis of nonviolence and mutual consent. Like their learning, our evolutionary ancestors, and modern hunter-gatherers, were <a href="http://evolutionaryparenting.com/">peaceful and respectful</a> toward those who are still developing empathy and self-control. The first few years were filled with breastfeeding to foster the mother/baby bond, babywearing to bond with the other adults in baby's life, and bedsharing to keep baby safe (<a href="http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201110/why-young-children-protest-bedtime-evolutionary-mismatch">from predators</a>) and close to the rest of the family. As kids aged and began exploring the world around them, they're met with patience and love by those who'd already learned not to hurt other people. As such, they're never spanked or put in time-out or otherwise punished for acting like inexperienced and developing children. The voluntary principle applied in parenting, along with other <a href="http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2012/06/permissive-parenting.html">positive discipline practices</a> like <a href="http://www.great-grandma.com/aquakeys/parent-effectiveness-training/">Parent Effectiveness Training</a>, works better at nurturing empathy, teaching self-control, and promoting independence while strengthening family bonds, than the various coercion-based alternatives. <b>Economics</b> My first step toward becoming a voluntaryist was in <a href="http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2013/03/my-road-to-liberty-went-through.html">learning the laws of economics</a> and how a market works. Once I understood the negative (toward peace and prosperity) <a href="http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/UnintendedConsequences.html">consequences</a> of third-party (state) interference in trade, I began rejecting the use of coercion in the market. For example, when the state sets a minimum wage, <a href="http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/minimum-wage-maximum-folly">low-skilled workers are priced out of the market</a>. Low-skilled jobs like theater escort or gas station attendant disappear, and those unable to find work fall behind in terms of developing skills and a work ethic. This leads to agitation among the lower class and a falling standard of living. Likewise for <a href="http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/RentControl.html">rent control</a>, <a href="https://mises.org/books/prohibition.pdf">prohibitions</a>, and <a href="http://blog.independent.org/2014/04/29/why-occupational-licensing-is-unjust/">occupational licensing</a>. When markets aren't free, meaning, aren't based on the voluntary principle, then prosperity slows, and can even <a href="http://mises.org/daily/1959">reverse</a>. The <a href="http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/the-law-of-supply-and-demand">laws of supply and demand</a> are inviolate. When states restrict supply (coercion), prices rise, hurting the poorest in society. When trade is voluntary, all else being equal, supply and demand find its equilibrium, meaning, the price charged for the good or service is just high enough to be profitable and keep the business in operation (and people employed), and just low enough to be affordable (by its intended customer base). The money earned by the business goes toward innovation and capital investment (lowering costs), and the money saved by the customer is either invested or spent with other businesses. Violating the voluntary principle in the market has disastrous effects in society. <a href="http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Unemployment.html">Unemployment</a>, <a href="http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/lets-not-promote-dependency">welfare dependency</a>, <a href="http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/scratching-by-how-government-creates-poverty-as-we-know-it">poverty</a>, <a href="http://mises.org/daily/3194">recessions</a>, <a href="http://library.mises.org/books/Murray%20N%20Rothbard/Economic%20Depressions%20Their%20Cause%20and%20Cure.pdf">depressions</a>, and more are all the result of a violation of the voluntary principle by the state through economic and monetary regulations. <b>Politics</b> Most people in society value the provision of law and order, of government, while simultaneously valuing competition in the market. They understand that <a href="http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Monopoly.html">monopolies</a> charge higher prices while providing poorer quality goods and services, because their monopoly protects them from losing customers to competition. Unfortunately, this understanding is lost when it comes to <a href="http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2012/05/everything-voluntary-chapter-4.html">the state</a>, the institution in society that monopolizes the provision of law and order in a given territorial boundary. If the laws of economics tell us that monopolies tend toward higher prices and poorer quality, then this is as much true for the provision of law and order as it is for any service provision or good production. Monopoly is the <a href="http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/the-irresistible-force-of-market-competition/">exclusive right of sell</a>, enforced by coercion. If the voluntary principle were practiced in the political arena, the state would not exist. Instead, law and order would be provided through competition, <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/09/william-norman-grigg/call-the-anti-police/">by entrepreneurs</a>. As in any other industry, competition ensures lower prices and better quality. Political theorists and economists continue to debate whether or not this holds true for government, but there are other considerations to make as it concerns voluntaryism. How does one go about monopolizing the provision of law and order, of making competition illegal? This can only happen through conquest, with superior might, and maintained through lies and propaganda. Conquest is clearly a violation of the voluntary principle, and is also a violation of many of the values that people hold, values like peace, cooperation, fraternity, and community. Conquest amounts to the extremely dangerous doctrine that "<a href="http://c4ss.org/content/32570">might makes right</a>". So long as you are powerful enough, you have the right to take what you want from others. Society can't survive under such a doctrine for obvious reasons. Once conquered, people must be taught that their new political arrangements are good, or at the very least, a "<a href="http://libertarianpapers.org/article/37-garner-minarchy-considered/">necessary evil</a>", or else they are likely to one day rebel from the injustice they see. Lies and propaganda are thus circulated, beginning in newly formed <a href="http://library.mises.org/books/Murray%20N%20Rothbard/Education%20Free%20and%20Compulsory.pdf">compulsory government schools</a>, to maintain the illusion of legitimacy by the ruling class, and to keep the extracted wealth flowing in the forms of taxation and economic regulation. A few generations pass away, and the ruling class fully believes its rule is good and necessary, the natural order of things. And so long as taxation and economic regulation have remained relatively low, society prospers. Hans Hoppe calls it the "<a href="http://mises.org/daily/2383">paradox of imperialism</a>". Lower taxation and less economic interference, the wealthier society becomes, and the more the state can extract to use in expanding its footprint in the world. Indeed, this has been the case with the United States, once the freest nation on Earth (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Freedom_in_the_World">but no longer</a>), and now the largest and, arguably, most dangerous to <a href="http://mises.org/rothbard/warpeace.asp">world peace and stability</a>. <b>Wisdom Goes Both Ways</b> As important as understanding the wisdom in observing the voluntary principle, I don't think that as a philosophy, voluntaryism would be complete without also understanding when observing the voluntary principle may be foolish. If you value your life and that life is being threatened, then it's foolish to practice the voluntary principle toward your attacker. Rather, it would be wise to defend yourself. This is also true for other lives that you value, such as family, friends, and possibly your fellow countrymen. Now, while it may be foolish to allow others to walk over you, that's not to say that direct retaliatory aggression is always the wisest course of action to take. <a href="http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2012/11/the-power-of-non-violent-resistance.html">Nonviolent resistance</a> to both crime and conquest have a track record with varying degrees of success. It seems to me that since the philosophy of voluntaryism is about the wisdom of practicing the voluntary principle, voluntaryists must give due consideration to all forms of resistance in any given situation. However, it would not go against voluntaryism to use force when only force can protect you and your loved ones. The voluntary principle says that all human relations *should* happen voluntarily, but *should* only applies when the voluntary principle is useful in protecting one's values, which as explored above, is most of the time when those values include self-improvement, virtue, communication, education, family bond, society, prosperity, and world peace. <b>Final Thoughts</b> And there you have it, the philosophy of voluntaryism. While this exposition was lengthy, it was still brief when we consider how complex each area of human existence is as they concern the possible application of voluntaryism. Right and wrong are largely a matter of means and ends, ends which are desired on the basis of one's values. I consider voluntaryism to be right, and it's opposite to be wrong. But of course, my values are my own, and they've certainly changed, and will change, over time. That's partly what it means to be human. We value some things, and then others, and all the while learn wisdom from knowledge and experience. The philosophy that works for us today might not work for us tomorrow, but not because their effects on the world have changed, but because we've changed. I can't imagine the day I might not value the things that voluntaryism secures, but I must remain open-minded if I value adhering to principles for the right reasons. |
| json metadata | {"tags":["voluntaryism","anarchism","parenting","economy","unschooling"],"links":["http://etymonline.com/index.php?term=philosophy&allowed_in_frame=0","http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2014/09/the-voluntary-principle.html","http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/individualism-and-freedom-vital-pillars-of-true-communities","http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtue","http://mises.org/books/newliberty.pdf","http://library.mises.org/books/Franz%20Oppenheimer/The%20State%20Its%20History%20and%20Development%20Viewed%20Sociologically.pdf","http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property","http://mises.org/daily/2291","http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule","http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonviolent_Communication","http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2012/05/everything-voluntary-chapter-17.html","http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201202/the-benefits-unschooling-report-i-large-survey","http://amzn.to/YZuzVk","http://www.everything-voluntary.com/p/unschooling.html","http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2014/09/whatever-they-want.html","http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2013/02/control-is-war.html","http://sandradodd.com/generosity","http://sandradodd.com/rebellion","http://evolutionaryparenting.com/","http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201110/why-young-children-protest-bedtime-evolutionary-mismatch","http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2012/06/permissive-parenting.html","http://www.great-grandma.com/aquakeys/parent-effectiveness-training/","http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2013/03/my-road-to-liberty-went-through.html","http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/UnintendedConsequences.html","http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/minimum-wage-maximum-folly","http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/RentControl.html","https://mises.org/books/prohibition.pdf","http://blog.independent.org/2014/04/29/why-occupational-licensing-is-unjust/","http://mises.org/daily/1959","http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/the-law-of-supply-and-demand","http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Unemployment.html","http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/lets-not-promote-dependency","http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/scratching-by-how-government-creates-poverty-as-we-know-it","http://mises.org/daily/3194","http://library.mises.org/books/Murray%20N%20Rothbard/Economic%20Depressions%20Their%20Cause%20and%20Cure.pdf","http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Monopoly.html","http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2012/05/everything-voluntary-chapter-4.html","http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/the-irresistible-force-of-market-competition/","http://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/09/william-norman-grigg/call-the-anti-police/","http://c4ss.org/content/32570","http://libertarianpapers.org/article/37-garner-minarchy-considered/","http://library.mises.org/books/Murray%20N%20Rothbard/Education%20Free%20and%20Compulsory.pdf","http://mises.org/daily/2383","http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Freedom_in_the_World","http://mises.org/rothbard/warpeace.asp","http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2012/11/the-power-of-non-violent-resistance.html"]} |
| Transaction Info | Block #4402618/Trx 2c27650be817fa4ba85d3e11089dbef4c6864ff5 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "2c27650be817fa4ba85d3e11089dbef4c6864ff5",
"block": 4402618,
"trx_in_block": 0,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2016-08-26T00:02:15",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "",
"parent_permlink": "voluntaryism",
"author": "skylerjcollins",
"permlink": "the-philosophy-of-voluntaryism",
"title": "The Philosophy of Voluntaryism",
"body": "Philosophy is, <a href=\"http://etymonline.com/index.php?term=philosophy&allowed_in_frame=0\">etymologically</a>, the \"love of wisdom\". One of the best ways I've read to define wisdom is this saying, \"Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit; wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.\" In other words, knowledge is what is known, and wisdom is the proper use of that knowledge in relation to one's purposes. The discovery and application of wisdom is the purpose of philosophy. And because wisdom is useful in all sorts of endeavors, there are different types of philosophies. Voluntaryism is a multifaceted philosophy with broad application.\n\n<b>Voluntaryism</b>\n\nThe foundation of the philosophy of voluntaryism is <a href=\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2014/09/the-voluntary-principle.html\">the voluntary principle</a>, which states that *all human relations should happen voluntarily, or not at all.* Like all principles, the voluntary principle is only useful if it's application leads to the ends desired by the individual observing it. Voluntaryists, those who practice voluntaryism, do so because they believe that the voluntary principle is the proper means to achieve their desired ends. Which ends are those? And why is the voluntary principle the proper means to achieve them? Or rather, what is so wise about practicing voluntaryism? And just how far does it go? How \"broad\" is it, really? And even, is it ever wise to disregard the voluntary principle?\n\n<b>Self-Improvement</b>\n\nI think that the beginning of any desire to live by the principles espoused in a given philosophy is the intention to improve one's life. If following a philosophy means anything, it means becoming wiser about how to go about obtaining one's valued ends. And desires and values necessarily imply <a href=\"http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/individualism-and-freedom-vital-pillars-of-true-communities\">individualism</a>, the belief that the individual has needs and wants and deserves to have them met so long as he allows every other individual to do likewise. And so, the human relation that every voluntaryist must start with is the self. He must recognize his right and ability to adopt whatever philosophy or philosophies that he wants for himself, and to do so voluntarily.\n\nOne should not shame or guilt or otherwise coerce himself into accepting the voluntary principle, for it would then be a violation of said principle, thereby showing by his actions that he does not really consider it valid. No, committing to be a voluntaryist must be made voluntarily. And further, if the voluntary principle is a valid principle for self-improvement, then self-reflection and self-actualization on the basis of non-coercion will aid in improving one's mental health (mood, confidence, outlook, *et cetera*).\n\n<b>Virtue</b>\n\nAlong the lines of self-improvement, many value the virtues. <a href=\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtue\">Virtue</a> is \"a positive trait or quality deemed morally good.\" Wisdom, love, courage, patience, temperance, justice, *et cetera*, are virtues, but how virtuous is the action if it's coerced? As Murray Rothbard wrote (<a href=\"http://mises.org/books/newliberty.pdf\">p. 128</a>), \"The concept of 'morality' makes no sense unless the moral act is freely chosen.\" Thus, if you value virtuous living, then you must allow the virtues to be expressed voluntarily, both by yourself and others. Otherwise, the only thing being freely chosen is the act to coerce others into virtue, and that seems immoral, the opposite of virtue. It's a peculiar person who values virtue to the point of violating it.\n\n<b>Interpersonal Relations</b>\n\nWhat are the chances that someone utilizing coercion, the \"political means\" as Franz Oppenheimer calls it (<a href=\"http://library.mises.org/books/Franz%20Oppenheimer/The%20State%20Its%20History%20and%20Development%20Viewed%20Sociologically.pdf\">p. 25</a>), in their interpersonal relations will ever find peace and happiness? Quite unlikely, for the use of coercion puts one at odds with the rest of society. Coercion is predation, and predators are often hunted down and slaughtered in order to make society safer. We'll get to political predation, which is far safer for the predator, but for now I'm talking about what is often called private crime. Murder, robbery, rape, battery, and the like, are incompatible with the values that most people hold. The voluntary principle clearly prohibits crimes of this sort, with the benefits to the individual and society obvious to all.\n\nHowever, what is not always so clear is who owns what. This matters if we are to know if a murder, robbery, rape, or battery has actually occurred. <a href=\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property\">Different theories of ownership abound</a>, some more defensible than others, but most people accept <a href=\"http://mises.org/daily/2291\">self-ownership</a> and the right of personal possession. The less directly used something is, the more uncertain things are in property rights theory. In any event, the voluntary principle is very encouraging toward first agreeing on who owns what with all involved parties, before commencing to murder, rob, rape, or batter. And actually, why are we even considering such actions? What moves us to desire ends that require these means? Where has the voluntary principle been violated toward us by others or by us toward ourselves that we would resort to actions of this nature?\n\nConsider also the Golden Rule. There have been <a href=\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule\">many formulations of the Golden Rule</a> over the centuries, but they all have on thing in common: consideration of others as individuals, rather than as means to be manipulated and coerced. When we coerce others, we are inviting coercion upon ourselves. If that sounds unpleasant or undesirable to you, then your relations with others should happen in accordance with the voluntary principle.\n\n<b>Communication</b>\n\nAnother area of application of the voluntary principle is in communication, both intra- and interpersonal. The words we use can be very powerful and come across as either friendly or unfriendly. If unfriendly, they'll have a coercive effect if those we are communicating to feel threatened in some unexpected and undesired way. Psychologist Marshall Rosenberg coined the term \"<a href=\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonviolent_Communication\">nonviolent communication</a>\" (NVC) to teach the principles of self-empathy, empathy toward others, and honest self-expression. The presupposition of NVC theory is that \"all human behavior stems from attempts to meet universal human needs and that these needs are never in conflict. Rather, conflict arises when strategies for meeting needs clash. NVC proposes that if people can identify their needs, the needs of others, and the feelings that surround these needs, harmony can be achieved.\" As it pertains to voluntaryism, NVC is a useful tool in preventing conflict that, by its nature, is likely to violate the voluntary principle, with the resulting undesirable end for those who value the peaceful meeting of their needs.\n\n<b>Education</b>\n\nHow did humans evolve to learn? Are our educational needs best met through compulsory learning and regimentation, ie. <a href=\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2012/05/everything-voluntary-chapter-17.html\">schooling</a>? Or are we best served by the voluntary principle, that is, through *free play*? Free play is the pursuit of one's own interests without interference by others. Adults engage in free play when they engage in activities that interest them. Children do likewise so long as the adults in their lives observe the voluntary principle, with <a href=\"http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201202/the-benefits-unschooling-report-i-large-survey\">fantastic results</a>. As Peter Gray shows in *<a href=\"http://amzn.to/YZuzVk\">Free to Learn</a>*, free play is how our evolutionary ancestors learned every skill necessary for survival, at least, and why unleashing the instinct to play in modern children will make kids \"happier, more self-reliant, and better students for life.\" <a href=\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/p/unschooling.html\">Radical unschooling</a> is the education philosophy most compatible with free play, and is thus an integral part of voluntaryism, now and for the future.\n\nRadical unschooling is \"radical\" in the sense that it extends individual choice to everything a child does, not just to academics. Contrary to popular belief, when children are allowed to \"<a href=\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2014/09/whatever-they-want.html\">do whatever they want</a>\", so long as they don't violate anyone's rights, destroy anyone's property, or unintentionally hurt themselves, the results are entirely positive. Many a radical unschooled former child will tell how empowering and enlightening it was for them to be free to choose what to eat, where to sleep and when, what to consume media-wise and how much, and other such choices that they were allowed to make on a daily basis because their parents were adhering to the voluntary principle. Parents likewise benefit from a stronger bond with their children because they aren't <a href=\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2013/02/control-is-war.html\">at war</a> with their children's instincts and desires. As radical unschoolers, parents become their children's partners through life as a facilitator of needs and wants, educational or otherwise, and as a trusted mentor, instead of being there to stop them from experiencing life on their own terms. As such, things like \"<a href=\"http://sandradodd.com/generosity\">spoiled kids</a>\" and \"<a href=\"http://sandradodd.com/rebellion\">teenage rebellion</a>\" or nonexistent features in a radical unschooling home.\n\n<b>Parenting</b>\n\nWhat about child discipline? The voluntary principle demands that parents approach their children on the basis of nonviolence and mutual consent. Like their learning, our evolutionary ancestors, and modern hunter-gatherers, were <a href=\"http://evolutionaryparenting.com/\">peaceful and respectful</a> toward those who are still developing empathy and self-control. The first few years were filled with breastfeeding to foster the mother/baby bond, babywearing to bond with the other adults in baby's life, and bedsharing to keep baby safe (<a href=\"http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201110/why-young-children-protest-bedtime-evolutionary-mismatch\">from predators</a>) and close to the rest of the family.\n\nAs kids aged and began exploring the world around them, they're met with patience and love by those who'd already learned not to hurt other people. As such, they're never spanked or put in time-out or otherwise punished for acting like inexperienced and developing children. The voluntary principle applied in parenting, along with other <a href=\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2012/06/permissive-parenting.html\">positive discipline practices</a> like <a href=\"http://www.great-grandma.com/aquakeys/parent-effectiveness-training/\">Parent Effectiveness Training</a>, works better at nurturing empathy, teaching self-control, and promoting independence while strengthening family bonds, than the various coercion-based alternatives.\n\n<b>Economics</b>\n\nMy first step toward becoming a voluntaryist was in <a href=\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2013/03/my-road-to-liberty-went-through.html\">learning the laws of economics</a> and how a market works. Once I understood the negative (toward peace and prosperity) <a href=\"http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/UnintendedConsequences.html\">consequences</a> of third-party (state) interference in trade, I began rejecting the use of coercion in the market. For example, when the state sets a minimum wage, <a href=\"http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/minimum-wage-maximum-folly\">low-skilled workers are priced out of the market</a>. Low-skilled jobs like theater escort or gas station attendant disappear, and those unable to find work fall behind in terms of developing skills and a work ethic. This leads to agitation among the lower class and a falling standard of living. Likewise for <a href=\"http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/RentControl.html\">rent control</a>, <a href=\"https://mises.org/books/prohibition.pdf\">prohibitions</a>, and <a href=\"http://blog.independent.org/2014/04/29/why-occupational-licensing-is-unjust/\">occupational licensing</a>. When markets aren't free, meaning, aren't based on the voluntary principle, then prosperity slows, and can even <a href=\"http://mises.org/daily/1959\">reverse</a>.\n\nThe <a href=\"http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/the-law-of-supply-and-demand\">laws of supply and demand</a> are inviolate. When states restrict supply (coercion), prices rise, hurting the poorest in society. When trade is voluntary, all else being equal, supply and demand find its equilibrium, meaning, the price charged for the good or service is just high enough to be profitable and keep the business in operation (and people employed), and just low enough to be affordable (by its intended customer base). The money earned by the business goes toward innovation and capital investment (lowering costs), and the money saved by the customer is either invested or spent with other businesses. Violating the voluntary principle in the market has disastrous effects in society. <a href=\"http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Unemployment.html\">Unemployment</a>, <a href=\"http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/lets-not-promote-dependency\">welfare dependency</a>, <a href=\"http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/scratching-by-how-government-creates-poverty-as-we-know-it\">poverty</a>, <a href=\"http://mises.org/daily/3194\">recessions</a>, <a href=\"http://library.mises.org/books/Murray%20N%20Rothbard/Economic%20Depressions%20Their%20Cause%20and%20Cure.pdf\">depressions</a>, and more are all the result of a violation of the voluntary principle by the state through economic and monetary regulations.\n\n<b>Politics</b>\n\nMost people in society value the provision of law and order, of government, while simultaneously valuing competition in the market. They understand that <a href=\"http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Monopoly.html\">monopolies</a> charge higher prices while providing poorer quality goods and services, because their monopoly protects them from losing customers to competition. Unfortunately, this understanding is lost when it comes to <a href=\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2012/05/everything-voluntary-chapter-4.html\">the state</a>, the institution in society that monopolizes the provision of law and order in a given territorial boundary. If the laws of economics tell us that monopolies tend toward higher prices and poorer quality, then this is as much true for the provision of law and order as it is for any service provision or good production.\n\nMonopoly is the <a href=\"http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/the-irresistible-force-of-market-competition/\">exclusive right of sell</a>, enforced by coercion. If the voluntary principle were practiced in the political arena, the state would not exist. Instead, law and order would be provided through competition, <a href=\"http://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/09/william-norman-grigg/call-the-anti-police/\">by entrepreneurs</a>. As in any other industry, competition ensures lower prices and better quality. Political theorists and economists continue to debate whether or not this holds true for government, but there are other considerations to make as it concerns voluntaryism.\n\nHow does one go about monopolizing the provision of law and order, of making competition illegal? This can only happen through conquest, with superior might, and maintained through lies and propaganda. Conquest is clearly a violation of the voluntary principle, and is also a violation of many of the values that people hold, values like peace, cooperation, fraternity, and community. Conquest amounts to the extremely dangerous doctrine that \"<a href=\"http://c4ss.org/content/32570\">might makes right</a>\". So long as you are powerful enough, you have the right to take what you want from others. Society can't survive under such a doctrine for obvious reasons.\n\nOnce conquered, people must be taught that their new political arrangements are good, or at the very least, a \"<a href=\"http://libertarianpapers.org/article/37-garner-minarchy-considered/\">necessary evil</a>\", or else they are likely to one day rebel from the injustice they see. Lies and propaganda are thus circulated, beginning in newly formed <a href=\"http://library.mises.org/books/Murray%20N%20Rothbard/Education%20Free%20and%20Compulsory.pdf\">compulsory government schools</a>, to maintain the illusion of legitimacy by the ruling class, and to keep the extracted wealth flowing in the forms of taxation and economic regulation. A few generations pass away, and the ruling class fully believes its rule is good and necessary, the natural order of things. And so long as taxation and economic regulation have remained relatively low, society prospers. Hans Hoppe calls it the \"<a href=\"http://mises.org/daily/2383\">paradox of imperialism</a>\". Lower taxation and less economic interference, the wealthier society becomes, and the more the state can extract to use in expanding its footprint in the world. Indeed, this has been the case with the United States, once the freest nation on Earth (<a href=\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Freedom_in_the_World\">but no longer</a>), and now the largest and, arguably, most dangerous to <a href=\"http://mises.org/rothbard/warpeace.asp\">world peace and stability</a>.\n\n<b>Wisdom Goes Both Ways</b>\n\nAs important as understanding the wisdom in observing the voluntary principle, I don't think that as a philosophy, voluntaryism would be complete without also understanding when observing the voluntary principle may be foolish. If you value your life and that life is being threatened, then it's foolish to practice the voluntary principle toward your attacker. Rather, it would be wise to defend yourself. This is also true for other lives that you value, such as family, friends, and possibly your fellow countrymen.\n\nNow, while it may be foolish to allow others to walk over you, that's not to say that direct retaliatory aggression is always the wisest course of action to take. <a href=\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2012/11/the-power-of-non-violent-resistance.html\">Nonviolent resistance</a> to both crime and conquest have a track record with varying degrees of success. It seems to me that since the philosophy of voluntaryism is about the wisdom of practicing the voluntary principle, voluntaryists must give due consideration to all forms of resistance in any given situation. However, it would not go against voluntaryism to use force when only force can protect you and your loved ones. The voluntary principle says that all human relations *should* happen voluntarily, but *should* only applies when the voluntary principle is useful in protecting one's values, which as explored above, is most of the time when those values include self-improvement, virtue, communication, education, family bond, society, prosperity, and world peace.\n\n<b>Final Thoughts</b>\n\nAnd there you have it, the philosophy of voluntaryism. While this exposition was lengthy, it was still brief when we consider how complex each area of human existence is as they concern the possible application of voluntaryism. Right and wrong are largely a matter of means and ends, ends which are desired on the basis of one's values. I consider voluntaryism to be right, and it's opposite to be wrong. But of course, my values are my own, and they've certainly changed, and will change, over time. That's partly what it means to be human. We value some things, and then others, and all the while learn wisdom from knowledge and experience. The philosophy that works for us today might not work for us tomorrow, but not because their effects on the world have changed, but because we've changed. I can't imagine the day I might not value the things that voluntaryism secures, but I must remain open-minded if I value adhering to principles for the right reasons.",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"voluntaryism\",\"anarchism\",\"parenting\",\"economy\",\"unschooling\"],\"links\":[\"http://etymonline.com/index.php?term=philosophy&allowed_in_frame=0\",\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2014/09/the-voluntary-principle.html\",\"http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/individualism-and-freedom-vital-pillars-of-true-communities\",\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtue\",\"http://mises.org/books/newliberty.pdf\",\"http://library.mises.org/books/Franz%20Oppenheimer/The%20State%20Its%20History%20and%20Development%20Viewed%20Sociologically.pdf\",\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property\",\"http://mises.org/daily/2291\",\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule\",\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonviolent_Communication\",\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2012/05/everything-voluntary-chapter-17.html\",\"http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201202/the-benefits-unschooling-report-i-large-survey\",\"http://amzn.to/YZuzVk\",\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/p/unschooling.html\",\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2014/09/whatever-they-want.html\",\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2013/02/control-is-war.html\",\"http://sandradodd.com/generosity\",\"http://sandradodd.com/rebellion\",\"http://evolutionaryparenting.com/\",\"http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201110/why-young-children-protest-bedtime-evolutionary-mismatch\",\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2012/06/permissive-parenting.html\",\"http://www.great-grandma.com/aquakeys/parent-effectiveness-training/\",\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2013/03/my-road-to-liberty-went-through.html\",\"http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/UnintendedConsequences.html\",\"http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/minimum-wage-maximum-folly\",\"http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/RentControl.html\",\"https://mises.org/books/prohibition.pdf\",\"http://blog.independent.org/2014/04/29/why-occupational-licensing-is-unjust/\",\"http://mises.org/daily/1959\",\"http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/the-law-of-supply-and-demand\",\"http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Unemployment.html\",\"http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/lets-not-promote-dependency\",\"http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/scratching-by-how-government-creates-poverty-as-we-know-it\",\"http://mises.org/daily/3194\",\"http://library.mises.org/books/Murray%20N%20Rothbard/Economic%20Depressions%20Their%20Cause%20and%20Cure.pdf\",\"http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Monopoly.html\",\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2012/05/everything-voluntary-chapter-4.html\",\"http://fee.org/the_freeman/detail/the-irresistible-force-of-market-competition/\",\"http://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/09/william-norman-grigg/call-the-anti-police/\",\"http://c4ss.org/content/32570\",\"http://libertarianpapers.org/article/37-garner-minarchy-considered/\",\"http://library.mises.org/books/Murray%20N%20Rothbard/Education%20Free%20and%20Compulsory.pdf\",\"http://mises.org/daily/2383\",\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Freedom_in_the_World\",\"http://mises.org/rothbard/warpeace.asp\",\"http://www.everything-voluntary.com/2012/11/the-power-of-non-violent-resistance.html\"]}"
}
]
}steemcreated a new account: @skylerjcollins
steemcreated a new account: @skylerjcollins
| fee | 3.000 STEEM |
| creator | steem |
| new account name | skylerjcollins |
| owner | {"weight_threshold":1,"account_auths":[],"key_auths":[["STM5py8ayVZN9qhiEdoqYXDTPF7U3RyeTbGk91Xk37nWHX6tvu5SY",1]]} |
| active | {"weight_threshold":1,"account_auths":[],"key_auths":[["STM6cSrVNvfndtAFBsBmPjAkmRCcoT1K55qLj173edyYXL8YKqU5h",1]]} |
| posting | {"weight_threshold":1,"account_auths":[],"key_auths":[["STM7FbMpyN8YQmoqkVPzBSuusKHe5zhXjMiXzEwzU95cTCkZ35aFc",1]]} |
| memo key | STM6bQHAYHRuy4qKXH8C3ELLvEKTZdZzvmQbbqbnPaCCUoWbdjJHS |
| json metadata | |
| Transaction Info | Block #4402312/Trx f0baa727e888ea245c89dc9f5aeb7e48b4421552 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "f0baa727e888ea245c89dc9f5aeb7e48b4421552",
"block": 4402312,
"trx_in_block": 2,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2016-08-25T23:46:57",
"op": [
"account_create",
{
"fee": "3.000 STEEM",
"creator": "steem",
"new_account_name": "skylerjcollins",
"owner": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM5py8ayVZN9qhiEdoqYXDTPF7U3RyeTbGk91Xk37nWHX6tvu5SY",
1
]
]
},
"active": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM6cSrVNvfndtAFBsBmPjAkmRCcoT1K55qLj173edyYXL8YKqU5h",
1
]
]
},
"posting": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM7FbMpyN8YQmoqkVPzBSuusKHe5zhXjMiXzEwzU95cTCkZ35aFc",
1
]
]
},
"memo_key": "STM6bQHAYHRuy4qKXH8C3ELLvEKTZdZzvmQbbqbnPaCCUoWbdjJHS",
"json_metadata": ""
}
]
}Manabar
Voting Power100.00%
Downvote Power100.00%
Resource Credits100.00%
Reputation Progress0.00%
{
"voting_manabar": {
"current_mana": 9800,
"last_update_time": 1504023162
},
"downvote_manabar": {
"current_mana": 0,
"last_update_time": 1472168817
},
"rc_account": {
"account": "skylerjcollins",
"rc_manabar": {
"current_mana": "12151500551",
"last_update_time": 1537887600
},
"max_rc_creation_adjustment": {
"amount": "2020748973",
"precision": 6,
"nai": "@@000000037"
},
"max_rc": "12151500551"
}
}Account Metadata
| POSTING JSON METADATA | |
| None | |
| JSON METADATA | |
| None |
{
"posting_json_metadata": {},
"json_metadata": {}
}Auth Keys
Owner
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM5py8ayVZN9qhiEdoqYXDTPF7U3RyeTbGk91Xk37nWHX6tvu5SY1/1
Active
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM6cSrVNvfndtAFBsBmPjAkmRCcoT1K55qLj173edyYXL8YKqU5h1/1
Posting
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM7FbMpyN8YQmoqkVPzBSuusKHe5zhXjMiXzEwzU95cTCkZ35aFc1/1
Memo
STM6bQHAYHRuy4qKXH8C3ELLvEKTZdZzvmQbbqbnPaCCUoWbdjJHS
{
"owner": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM5py8ayVZN9qhiEdoqYXDTPF7U3RyeTbGk91Xk37nWHX6tvu5SY",
1
]
]
},
"active": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM6cSrVNvfndtAFBsBmPjAkmRCcoT1K55qLj173edyYXL8YKqU5h",
1
]
]
},
"posting": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM7FbMpyN8YQmoqkVPzBSuusKHe5zhXjMiXzEwzU95cTCkZ35aFc",
1
]
]
},
"memo": "STM6bQHAYHRuy4qKXH8C3ELLvEKTZdZzvmQbbqbnPaCCUoWbdjJHS"
}Witness Votes
0 / 30
No active witness votes.
[]