{
  "trx_id": "22be965228f4ca57a893130fb1560f438e0ab474",
  "block": 106150795,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2026-05-18T06:24:09",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "shannongibson",
      "vesting_shares": "5920.595487 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "a374a183d936eb82d8482d6a7f48a375b8dc05b5",
  "block": 106005662,
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2026-05-13T04:51:33",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "shannongibson",
      "vesting_shares": "3208.385082 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "257a8e1daf8e2e31ee79ccdbb8ca3cb39a2735c8",
  "block": 105518275,
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2026-04-26T05:35:42",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "shannongibson",
      "vesting_shares": "5933.111243 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "ffd2805f89bbcd622dd256ce60a6769be903a358",
  "block": 102871658,
  "trx_in_block": 9,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2026-01-24T00:22:15",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "shannongibson",
      "vesting_shares": "3249.931901 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "52110d22d9dd21cc89afb7e5346cc33ea54569ae",
  "block": 91317870,
  "trx_in_block": 14,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2024-12-17T19:32:06",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "shannongibson",
      "vesting_shares": "3414.151098 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "b7553fd2c68641498f05c4c6319be8b2523cba09",
  "block": 88113014,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2024-08-28T03:53:54",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "keod3025",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "fakebook",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "cd9fd4bebc1253d427d057a8b3f754c871633fcd",
  "block": 79872016,
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2023-11-14T11:13:09",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "shannongibson",
      "vesting_shares": "3583.284630 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "be7400e69db5ce041156931ca419e37927887e5d",
  "block": 78363041,
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2023-09-22T10:32:18",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "shannongibson",
      "vesting_shares": "6520.193416 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "0b83946fc5eeb1925367f434c06a47706715898f",
  "block": 69120750,
  "trx_in_block": 9,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-11-03T17:58:27",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "shannongibson",
      "vesting_shares": "6742.244854 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "e3b16220587c0137ad5363d9f81670b1260c65d0",
  "block": 68187121,
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-10-02T04:11:39",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "shannongibson"
      ],
      "id": "notify",
      "json": "[\"setLastRead\",{\"date\":\"2022-10-02T04:11:35\"}]"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "873c50d8c1a3744171bd44de9f8751f25e6c82ec",
  "block": 66444105,
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-08-02T05:19:27",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "evidence-of-contagious-most-exhaustive-research-today-concerning-covid",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "3b33ef0e1b54259817272b6e2c34d1aa693c766b",
  "block": 66444099,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-08-02T05:19:09",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "contagious",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "evidence-of-contagious-most-exhaustive-research-today-concerning-covid",
      "title": "EVIDENCE OF CONTAGIOUS MOST EXHAUSTIVE RESEARCH TODAY CONCERNING COVID",
      "body": "The source...,\n\n \n\nFROM THEIR MOUTH THESE 5 Sources THERE IS NO TEST that proves anything:\n\n \n\nNothing I said was according to me...I show the source..., the WORDS of\n\n \n\n1) CDC:\n\n \n\n2) Leading pathologists\n\n \n\n3) the inventor of the ONLY tests used  Dr. Kary Mullis\n\n \n\n4) government and the\n\n \n\n5) National Institute of Health\n\n \n\nFROM THEIR MOUTH THESE 5 Sources THERE IS NO TEST that proves anything.\n\n \n\nIn the WORDS of the\n\n \n\n1) CDC:\n\n \n\nThere is no test that verifies a contagious virus...\n\n \n\nthe problem is when you look on\n\n \n\nthe CDC website it says right on the\n\n \n\ndescription for Research Use Only...\n\n \n\nNot for diagnostic purposes for\n\n \n\nResearch Use Only... not for diagnostic\n\n \n\npurposes... and then it says the CDC is\n\n \n\nmaking no claims for their validity  https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/rt-pcr-panel-primer-probes.html\n\n \n\nWHO IS THE CDC?\n\n \n\nCDC: Is a non profit that sells fear to sell vaccinations\n\n \n\nCDC Members Own More Than 50 Patents Connected to Vaccinations\n\n \n\nThe CDC Immunization Safety Office is  responsible for investigating  the safety and effectiveness of all new vaccinations; once an investigation is considered complete, a recommendation is then made to the  CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) who then  determines whether the new vaccine will be added to the current  vaccination schedule. Members of the  ACIP  committee include physicians such as Dr. Paul  Offit, who also serves as the  chief of infectious diseases at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.  Offit  and other  CDC members  own  numerous patents associated with vaccinations and regularly receive funding for their research work  from the very same  pharmaceutical companies who  manufacturer  vaccinations which are ultimately sold to the public. This situation creates an obvious conflict of interest, as  members of the  ACIP  committee  benefit financially every time a new vaccination is released to  the market.\n\n \n\nMembers of the  ACIP  Committee  Directly Influence Public Health\n\n \n\nEach of the 12  members of the CDC's  ACIP  Committee has a significant influence on the health of nearly every member of the American population. Because they are responsible for adding to  and/or altering the national vaccine schedule, it is of critical importance that they remain objective and unbiased before determining whether a new vaccination is appropriate for use, particularly in the bodies of vulnerable young children. Unfortunately, a significant number of  ACIP  committee members  receive direct financial returns when more vaccinations are added to the current schedule. Many own  vaccination related patent(s) and/or stock shares of the pharmaceutical companies  responsible for supplying  new vaccines  to the public. Others receive research grant money, funding for their academic departments, or payments for the oversight of vaccine safety trials.\n\n \n\n2) Leading pathologists:\n \n ESP Webinar video recordings – COVID-19: Unprecedented Daily Challenges in Pathology Departments across Europe\n  May 8 2020  Important revelations shared by Dr Stoian Alexov, \n President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association\n \n https://bpa-pathology.com/esp-webinar-video-recordings-covid-19-unprecedented-daily-challenges-in-pathology-departments-across-europe-2/\n\n \n\n“No one has died from the coronavirus”\n\n \n\nImportant revelations shared by Dr Stoian Alexov, President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association\n\n \n\nA high-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent.\n\n \n\nDr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.\n\n \n\nAnother stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA) president Dr. Alexov is that he believes it’s currently “impossible” to create a vaccine against the virus.\n\n \n\nHe also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.\n\n \n\nThese stunning statements raise major questions, including about officials’ and scientists’ claims regarding the many vaccines they’re rushing into clinical trials around the world.\n\n \n\nThey also raise doubt about the veracity of claims of discovery of anti-novel-coronavirus antibodies (which are beginning to be used to treat patients).\n\n \n\nNovel-coronavirus-specific antibodies are supposedly the basis for the expensive serology test kits being used in many countries (some of which have been found to be unacceptably inaccurate).\n\n \n\nAnd they’re purportedly key to the immunity certificates coveted by Bill Gates that are about to go into widespread use — in the form of the COVI-PASS — in 15 countries including the UK, US, and Canada.\n\n \n\nDr. Alexov made his jaw-dropping observations in a video interview summarizing the consensus of participants in a May 8, 2020, European Society of Pathology (ESP) webinar on COVID-19.\n\n \n\nThe May 13 video interview of Dr. Alexov was conducted by Dr. Stoycho Katsarov, chair of the Center for Protection of Citizens’ Rights in Sofia and a former Bulgarian deputy minister of health. The video is on the BPA’s website, which also highlights some of Dr. Alexov’s main points.\n\n \n\nWe asked a native Bulgarian speaker with a science background to orally translate the video interview into English. We then transcribed her translation. The video is here and our English transcript is here.\n\n \n\nAmong the major bombshells Dr. Alexov dropped is that the leaders of the May 8 ESP webinar said no novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies have been found.\n\n \n\nThe body forms antibodies specific to pathogens it encounters. These specific antibodies are known as monoclonal antibodies and are a key tool in pathology.\n\n \n\nThis is done via immunohistochemistry, which involves tagging antibodies with colours and then coating the biopsy- or autopsy-tissue slides with them. After giving the antibodies time to bind to the pathogens they’re specific for, the pathologists can look at the slides under a microscope and see the specific places where the coloured antibodies — and therefore the pathogens they’re bound to – are located.\n\n \n\nTherefore, in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel coronavirus, pathologists cannot verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body, or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else.\n\n \n\nIt would be easy to dismiss Dr. Alexov as just another crank ‘conspiracy theorist.’ After all many people believe they’re everywhere these days, spreading dangerous misinformation about COVID-19 and other issues.\n\n \n\nIn addition, little of what Dr. Alexov alleges was the consensus from the May 8 webinar is in the publicly viewable parts of the proceedings.\n\n \n\nBut keep in mind that whistleblowers often stand alone because the vast majority of people are afraid to speak out publicly.\n\n \n\nAlso, Dr. Alexov has an unimpugnable record and reputation. He’s been a physician for 30 years. He’s president of the BPA, a member of the ESP’s Advisory Board and head of the histopathology department at the Oncology Hospital in the Bulgarian capital of Sofia.\n\n \n\nOn top of that, there’s other support for what Dr. Alexov is saying.\n\n \n\nFor example, the director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany said in media interviews that there’s a striking dearth of solid evidence for COVID-19’s lethality.\n\n \n\n“COVID-19 is a fatal disease only in exceptional cases, but in most cases it is a predominantly harmless viral infection,” Dr. Klaus Püschel told a German paper in April. Adding in another interview:\n\n \n\nIn quite a few cases, we have also found that the current corona infection has nothing whatsoever to do with the fatal outcome because other causes of death are present,\n\n \n\nfor example, a brain hemorrhage or a heart attack […] [COVID-19 is] not particularly dangerous viral disease […] All speculation about individual deaths that have not been expertly examined only fuel anxiety.”\n\n \n\nAlso, one of us (Rosemary) and another journalist, Amory Devereux, documented in a June 9 Off-Guardian article that the novel coronavirus has not fulfilled Koch’s postulates.\n\n \n\nThese postulates are scientific steps used to prove whether a virus exists and has a one-to-one relationship with a specific disease.\n\n \n\nWe showed that to date no one has proven SARS-CoV-2 causes a discrete illness matching the characteristics of all the people who ostensibly died from COVID-19. Nor has the virus has been isolated, reproduced and then shown to cause this discrete illness.\n\n \n\nIn addition, in a June 27 Off-Guardian article two more journalists, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, added to the evidence that “the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact.”\n\n \n\nThe pair also confirmed “there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences [deemed to match that of the novel coronavirus] are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.”\n\n \n\nDr. Alexov stated in the May 13 interview that:\n\n \n\nthe main conclusion [of those of us who participated in the May 8 webinar] was that the autopsies that were conducted in Germany, Italy, Spain, France and Sweden do not show that the virus is deadly.”\n\n \n\nHe added that:\n\n \n\nWhat all of the pathologists said is that there’s no one who has died from the coronavirus. I will repeat that: no one has died from the coronavirus.”\n\n \n\nDr. Alexov also observed there is no proof from autopsies that anyone deemed to have been infected with the novel coronavirus died only from an inflammatory reaction sparked by the virus (presenting as interstitial pneumonia) rather than from other potentially fatal diseases.\n\n \n\nAnother revelation of his is that:\n\n \n\n“We need to see exactly how the law will deal with immunization and that vaccine that we’re all talking about, because I’m certain it’s [currently] not possible to create a vaccine against COVID. I’m not sure what exactly Bill Gates is doing with his laboratories – is it really a vaccine he’s producing, or something else?”\n\n \n\nAs pointed to above, the inability to identify monoclonal antibodies for the virus suggests there is no basis for the vaccines, serological testing and immunity certificates being rolled out around the globe at unprecedented speed and cost. In fact, there is no solid evidence the virus exists.\n\n \n\nDr. Alexov made still more important points. For example, he noted that, in contrast to the seasonal influenza, SARS-CoV-2 hasn’t been proven to kill youth:\n\n \n\n[With the flu] we can find one virus which can cause a young person to die with no other illness present […] In other words, the coronavirus infection is an infection that does not lead to death. And the flu can lead to death.”\n\n \n\n(There have been reports of severe maladies such as Kawasaki-like disease and stroke in young people who were deemed to have a novel-coronavirus infection. However, the majority of published papers on these cases are very short and include only one or only a small handful of patients.\n\n \n\nMoreover, commenters on the papers note it’s impossible to determine the role of the virus because the papers’ authors did not control sufficiently, if at all, for confounding factors. It’s most likely that children’s deaths attributed to COVID-19 in fact are from multiple organ failure resulting from the combination of the drug cocktail and ventilation that these children are subjected to.)\n\n \n\nDr. Alexov therefore asserted that:\n\n \n\nthe WHO is creating worldwide chaos, with no real facts behind what they’re saying.”\n\n \n\nAmong the myriad ways the WHO is creating that chaos is by prohibiting almost all autopsies of people deemed to have died from COVID-19. As a result, reported Dr. Alexov, by May 13 only three such autopsies had been conducted in Bulgaria.\n\n \n\nAlso, the WHO is dictating that everyone said to be infected with the novel coronavirus who subsequently dies must have their deaths attributed to COVID-19.\n\n \n\n“That’s quite stressful for us, and for me in particular, because we have protocols and procedures which we need to use,” he told Dr. Katsarov. “…And another pathologist 100 years from now is going to say, ‘Hey, those pathologists didn’t know what they were doing [when they said the cause of death was COVID-19]!’ So we need to be really strict with our diagnoses, because they could be proven [or disproven], and they could be checked again later.”\n\n \n\nHe disclosed that pathologists in several countries in Europe, as well as in China, Australia and Canada are strongly resisting the pressure on them to attribute deaths to COVID-19 alone:\n\n \n\nI’m really sad that we need to follow the [WHO’s] instructions without even thinking about them. But in Germany, France, Italy and England they’re starting to think that we shouldn’t follow the WHO so strictly, and [instead] when we’re writing the cause of death we should have some pathology [results to back that up] and we should follow the protocol. [That’s because] when we say something we need to be able to prove it.”\n\n \n\n(He added that autopsies could have helped confirm or disprove the theory that many of the people deemed to have died of COVID-19 in Italy had previously received the H1N1 flu vaccine. Because, as he noted, the vaccine suppresses adults’ immune systems and therefore may have been a significant contributor to their deaths by making them much more susceptible to infection.)\n\n \n\nDrs. Alexov and Katsarov agreed that yet another aspect of the WHO-caused chaos and its fatal consequences is many people are likely to die soon from diseases such as cancer because the lockdowns, combined with the emptying of hospitals (ostensibly to make room for COVID-19 patients), halted all but the most pressing procedures and treatments.\n\n \n\nThey also observed these diseases are being exacerbated by the fear and chaos surrounding COVID-19.\n\n \n\nWe know that stress significantly suppresses the immune system, so I can really claim 200% that all the chronic diseases will be more severe and more acute per se.\n\n \n\nSpecifically in situ carcinoma – over 50% of these are going to become more invasive […] So I will say that this epidemic isn’t so much an epidemic of the virus, it’s an epidemic of giving people a lot of fear and stress.”\n\n \n\nIn addition, posited Dr. Alexov, as another direct and dire result of the pandemic panic many people are losing faith in physicians.\n\n \n\nBecause in my opinion the coronavirus isn’t that dangerous, and how are people going to have trust in me doing cancer pathology, much of which is related to viruses as well? But nobody is talking about that.”\n\n \n\nWe emailed Dr. Alexov several questions, including asking why he believes it’s impossible to create a vaccine against COVID-19.\n\n \n\nHe didn’t answer the questions directly. Dr. Alexov instead responded:\n\n \n\nWe also emailed five of Dr. Alexov’s colleagues in the ESP asking them to confirm Dr. Alexov’s revelations. We followed up by telephone with two of them. None responded.\n\n \n\nWhy didn’t Dr. Alexov or his five colleagues answer our questions?\n\n \n\nWe doubt it’s due to lack of English proficiency.\n\n \n\nIt’s more likely because of the pressure on pathologists to follow the WHO’s directives and not speak out publicly. (And, on top of that, pathology departments depend on governments for their funding.)\n\n \n\nNonetheless, pathologists like Drs. Alexov and Püschel appear to be willing to step out and say that no one has died from a novel-coronavirus infection.\n\n \n\nPerhaps that’s because pathologists’ records and reputations are based on hard physical evidence rather than on subjective interpretation of tests, signs and symptoms. And there is no hard physical evidence that COVID-19 is deadly.\n\n \n\nCOVID-19:\n\n \n\nUnprecedented Daily Challenges in Pathology\n\n \n\nDepartments across Europe\n\n \n\nDiscover more in the link following in the original post, full interview, full webinar, full disclosure, unlike your government’s.\n\n \n\nhttps://www.esp-pathology.org/_Resources/Persistent/939c263db24f0ffb3aca1f12f6a1484046574027/Webinar%20links%20website.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3whkrJ5G8vw-AwxxhKlWnjgpRyAZm-uYS__Ve9fJeruiOmF7DcH1IFBw0\n\n \n\n3) the inventor of the ONLY tests used Dr. Kary Mullis :\n\n \n\nKary Mullis was a scientist. He never spoke like a globalist, and said once, memorably, when accused of making statements about HIV that could endanger lives: “I’m a scientist. I’m not a lifeguard.” That’s a very important line in the sand.  Somebody who goes around claiming they are “saving lives,” is a very dangerous animal, and you should run in the opposite direction when you encounter them.\n\n \n\nTheir weapon is fear, and their favorite word is “could.” They entrap you with a form of bio-debt, creating simulations of every imaginable thing that “could” happen, yet hasn’t. \n Bill Gates has been waiting a long time for a virus with this much, as he put it, “pandemic potential.” But Gates has a problem, and it’s called PCR.\n\n \n\nWas the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus?https://youtu.be/vaMZ4NyNCwI\n\n \n\nWhat does HIV have to do with Covid-19?\n\n \n\nPCR played a central role in the HIV war (a war you don’t know about, that lasted 22 years, between Globalist post-modern HIV scientists and classical scientists.)\n\n \n\nThe latter lost the war. Unless you count being correct as winning. The relentless violence finally silenced the opposition, and it seemed nobody would ever learn who these scientists were, or why they fought this thing so adamantly and passionately.\n\n \n\nAnd PCR, though its inventor died last year, and isn’t here to address it, plays a central role in Corona terrorism.\n\n \n\nHere is an outtake from an article I published in SPIN, in 1994, about Kary Mullis, PCR, HIV and…Tony Fauci:\n\n \n\n“PCR has also had a great impact on the field of AIDS, or rather, HIV research. PCR can, among other things, detect HIV in people who test negative to the HIV antibody test.\n\n \n\nThe word “eccentric” seems to come up often in connection with Mullis’ name: His first published scientific paper, in the premier scientific journal Nature in 1986, described how he viewed the universe while on LSD – pocked with black holes containing antimatter, for which time runs backward.\n\n \n\nBut it is his views on AIDS that have really set the scientific establishment fuming.\n\n \n\nMullis, like his friend and colleague Dr. Peter Duesberg, does not believe that AIDS is caused by the retrovirus HIV. He is a long-standing member of the Group for the Reappraisal of the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis, the 500-member protest organization pushing for a re-examination of the cause of AIDS.\n\n \n\nOne of Duesberg’s strongest arguments in the debate has been that the HIV virus is barely detectable in people who suffer from AIDS. Ironically, when PCR was applied to HIV research, around 1989, researchers claimed to have put this complaint to rest. Using the new technology, they were suddenly able to see viral particles in the quantities they couldn’t see before.\n\n \n\nScientific articles poured forth stating that HIV was now 100 times more prevalent than was previously thought. But Mullis himself was unimpressed. “PCR made it easier to see that certain people are infected with HIV,” he told Spin in 1992, “and some of those people came down with symptoms of AIDS. But that doesn’t begin even to answer the question, ‘Does HIV cause it?'”\n\n \n\nMullis then went on to echo one of Duesberg’s most controversial claims. “Human beings are full of retroviruses,” he said, “We don’t know if it is hundreds or thousands or hundreds of thousands. We’ve only recently started to look for them. But they’ve never killed anybody before. People have always survived retroviruses.”\n\n \n\nMullis challenged the popular wisdom that the disease-causing mechanisms of HIV are simply too “mysterious” to comprehend. “The mystery of that damn virus,” he said at the time, “has been generated by the $2 billion a year they spend on it. You take any other virus, and you spend $2 billion, and you can make up some great mysteries about it too.”\n\n \n\nLike so many great scientific discoveries, the idea for PCR came suddenly, as if by direct transmission from another realm. It was during a late-night drive in 1984, the same year, ironically, that HIV was announced to be the “probable” cause of AIDS.\n\n \n\n“I was just driving and thinking about ideas and suddenly I saw it,” Mullis recalls. “I saw the polymerase chain reaction as clear as if it were up on a blackboard in my head, so I pulled over and started scribbling.” A chemist friend of his was asleep in the car, and, as Mullis described in a recent special edition of Scientific American: “Jennifer objected groggily to the delay and the light, but I exclaimed I had discovered something fantastic. Unimpressed, she went back to sleep.”\n\n \n\nMullis kept scribbling calculations, right there in the car, until the formula for DNA amplification was complete. The calculation was based on the concept of “reiterative exponential growth processes,” which Mullis had picked up from working with computer programs.\n\n \n\nAfter much table-pounding, he convinced the small California biotech company he was working for, Cetus, that he was on to something. Good thing they finally listened: They sold the patent for PCR to Hoffman-LaRoche for the staggering sum of $300 million – the most money ever paid for a patent. Mullis meanwhile received a $10,000 bonus.\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nOur talk focused on AIDS. Though Mullis has not been particularly vocal about his HIV skepticism, his convictions have not, to his credit, been muddled or softened by his recent success and mainstream acceptability. He seems to revel in his newly acquired power. “They can’t pooh-pooh me now, because of who I am,” he says with a chuckle – and by all accounts, he’s using that power effectively.\n\n \n\nWhen ABC’s “Nightline” approached Mullis about participating in a documentary on himself, he instead urged them to focus their attention on the HIV debate. “That’s a much more important story,” he told the producers, who up to that point had never acknowledged the controversy. In the end, “Nightline” ran a two-part series, the first on Kary Mullis, the second on the HIV debate. Mullis was hired by ABC for a two-week period, to act as their scientific consultant and direct them to sources.\n\n \n\nThe show was superb, and represented a historic turning point, possibly even the end of the seven-year media blackout on the HIV debate. But it still didn’t fulfill Mullis’ ultimate fantasy. “What ABC needs to do,” says Mullis, “is talk to [Chairman of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony] Fauci and [Dr. Robert] Gallo [one of the discoverers of HIV] and show that they’re assholes, which I could do in ten minutes.”\n\n \n\nBut I point out, Gallo will refuse to discuss the HIV debate, just as he’s always done.\n\n \n\n“I know he will,” Mullis shoots back, anger rising in his voice. “But you know what? I would be willing to chase the little bastard from his car to his office and say, ‘This is Kary Mullis trying to ask you a goddamn simple question,’ and let the cameras follow. If people think I’m a crazy person, that’s okay. But here’s a Nobel Prize-winner trying to ask a simple question from those who spent $22 billion and killed 100,000 people. It has to be on TV. It’s a visual thing. I’m not unwilling to do something like that.”\n\n \n\nHe pauses, then continues. “And I don’t care about making an ass of myself because most people realize I am one.”\n\n \n\nWhile many people, even within the ranks of the HIV dissidents, have of late tried to distance themselves from the controversial Duesberg, Mullis defends him passionately and seems genuinely concerned about his fate.\n\n \n\n“I was trying to stress this point to the ABC people” he says, “that Peter has been abused seriously by the scientific establishment, to the point where he can’t even do any research. Not only that, but his whole life is pretty much in disarray because of this, and it is only because he has refused to compromise his scientific moral standards.\n\n \n\nThere ought to be some goddamn private foundation in the country, that would say, ‘Well, we’ll move in where the NIH [National Institutes of Health] dropped off. We’ll take care of it. You just keep right on saying what you’re saying, Peter. We think you’re an asshole, and we think you are wrong, but you’re the only dissenter, and we need one, because it’s science, it’s not religion.’ And that was one of the reasons why I cooperated with ABC.”\n\n \n\n“I am waiting to be convinced that we’re wrong,” Mullis continues. “I know it ain’t going to happen. But if it does, I will tell you this much – I will be the first person to admit it. A lot of people studying this disease are looking for the clever little pathways they can piece together, that will show how this works. Like, ‘What if this molecule was produced by this one and then this one by this one, and then what if this one and that one induces this one’ – that stuff becomes, after two molecules, conjecture of the rankest kind.\n\n \n\nPeople who sit there and talk about it don’t realize that molecules themselves are somewhat hypothetical, and that their interactions are more so, and that the biological reactions are even more so.\n\n \n\nYou don’t need to look that far. You don’t discover the cause of something like AIDS by dealing with incredibly obscure things. You just look at what the hell is going on. Well, here’s a bunch of people that are practicing a new set of behavioral norms. Apparently, it didn’t work because a lot of them got sick. That’s the conclusion. You don’t necessarily know why it happened. But you start there.”\n\n \n\nhttp://aidswiki.net/index.php?title=Document:Farber_interviews_Mullis\n\n \n\nThat was a historical detour, shared in hopes of rooting this conversation historically.\n\n \n\nWhen you see the word “cases” on your TV screen, in this world that has now been hijacked by one single event, one dread, one Idol, you will be forgiven for thinking those are cases of Covid-19.\n\n \n\nThe number of “cases” is often a very big number, back-lit in red. Today for example, the number of “total cases,” in the US, according to Worldometer, is 309,728. The total death figure is 8,441. “Active cases,” is 286,546, of which 8,206 are “Serious, Critical.” The number of “new deaths” is 1,037, and the number of “total recovered” is 14,741.\n\n \n\nI’m not clear what an “active” case is. Does that mean fully symptomatic? Partially symptomatic? If the latter, it surely encompasses influenza/pneumonia, which has magically, as many have observed, dropped off a cliff for 2020.\n\n \n\nIn China, generally, they diagnose ‘Corona’ with CT scans and one or two positive PCR tests.  In the US, it’s difficult to find out what makes a “case,” ie what the case definition is. Absent CT scans, we are in a bio-tech free-fall.\n\n \n\nOne website offers this distressingly unclear definition: “The novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, has been spreading worldwide, resulting in growing numbers of infected individuals since late 2019 and increased mortality numbers since early 2020. So far, experts have seen that while there are severe cases, the infection is usually mild with non-specific symptoms. And there are no trademark clinical features of COVID-19 infection.”\n\n \n\nThere are no trademark clinical features? What then, collapsed the world? I sure hope this isn’t all riding on a “test,” as bio-tech Oracle.\n\n \n\nA few graphs down, my fears are confirmed: “Diagnosis of COVID-19 involves laboratory tests. Once someone has been diagnosed with the coronavirus, additional diagnostic tests may be done to determine the severity of the infection.”\n\n \n\nI accept that “something is going on” that overlaps with flu, but reportedly worse than a normal flu. That’s what we’re hearing.  It involves an acute lack of oxygen, for reasons unclear. People can’t breathe. Intubation is a serious, potentially dangerous procedure that begs many questions—but that’s for a future article.\n\n \n\nWhat is the relationship between the spread of testing and the “spread” of a new virus? How do we know what we are experiencing, in comparison to what we are assuming we are experiencing?\n\n \n\nOne study in Austria found that increased testing correlated with, no surprise, increased “cases.”\n\n \n\nIn an email discussion between a group of international scientists, academics and MD’s, the question was posed whether the daily number of new cases would track with the daily number of tests.\n\n \n\n“Yes, they do,” wrote Austrian MD Christian Fiala. “Here are the data from Austria. In other words if they want to further increase the number of ‘infected‘ people, they have to also increase the number of tests. However, that is physically impossible.\n\n \n\nAnother aspect: during the first weeks most tests were done on sick people. Therefore, the percentage of positive tests was relatively high. But there are not so many sick people and with the general roll out of tests, the vast majority of those tested will be healthy.\n\n \n\nConsequently, the percentage of positive tests will be low, and most will be false positive.\n\n \n\nIn other words, it is impossible to continue the increase of positive test results.”\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNo Clinical Virological research since 1933 has been able to demonstrate or prove a link between a virus and contagion. NOT ONE!\n\n \n\nCOVID TEST DOESN’T TEST FOR COVID\n\n \n\n10 Things You Should Know About COVID Testing\n\n \n\n1. The process used for COVID testing has always been deemed “an invention”, as it was never qualified as a test. This invention is called PCR, standing for polymerase chain reaction.\n\n \n\n2. The inventor of PCR, Kary B. Mullis, said “these PCR tests cannot detect infectious free viruses at all.” That’s direct from the inventor of PCR.\n\n \n\n3. The PCR was invented to merely have bits of genetic material in a sample multiply until those small broken pieces were numerous enough to see under a microscope. PCR just helps scientists observe small things in greater quantity. Where those bits of genetic material came from, what they do, do they make people sick etc…..the PCR process is not involved in that determination what so ever.\n\n \n\n4. In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, the entire virus (the complete genetic sequence) must be isolated in its entirety. This has not yet been done with COVID 19. This is correct. No complete virus has yet to be isolated and that’s supposed to be the first step before any other steps are taken in such a process that ends with a viral declaration…let alone a pandemic declaration.\n\n \n\n5. In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, the entire virus (which has never been isolated for COVID) must be transferred over to another animal or human host…..and that virus MUST cause the exact same illness in the host. This has not yet been done with COVID-19. The COVID19 virus has not yet been proven to cause disease, person to person. Why are these steps being bypassed?\n\n \n\n6. In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, the entire virus (which has never been isolated for COVID-19) must not only infect the host with the exact same disease, you must also find the complete genetic viral sequence in the infected tissue of the host and then re-isolate the entire genetic sequence from infected tissues of the host. This has not yet been done with COVID-19. Disease transmission person to person, has not been proven for COVID-19. This is the easiest criteria to organize yet it remains undone.\n\n \n\n7. In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, you must also have a control group, so you can make sure that what you call a virus isn’t just regular human genetic material, shared by all humans. If you find the exact same 80% genetic material strand in the samples of HEALTHY CONTROLS, what you’re looking at CAN’T be the cause of the disease because it’s just regular genetic material found in all humans…both sick and healthy. In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, you need to find that particular complete viral sequence IN THE SICK ONLY and not in the healthy. This has not yet been done for COVID-19. Why is the gold standard of testing (having a control group) being bypassed?\n\n \n\n8. In the case of COVID-19, scientists have indeed found a string of genetic material (not a complete sequence) that shares 80% similarities with SARS-COVID (a sequence said to cause SARS) and therefore the original Chinese scientists have declared that this string of material reflects a COVID infection. (but also did that without testing any healthy people, to see if healthy people also have the same genetic material) Humans share 97% genetic material with chimpanzees, 80% genetic material with cats and 50% genetic material with a banana and that’s why shared genetic material IS NEVER the standard used to diagnose any disease. This is why the Tanzanian President recently found positive PCR results when he secretly tested a goat, fruit and motor oil….because most things on earth share similar genetic sequences.\n\n \n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/RonnyakaSoniC/videos/10218867134043289/\n\n \n\nWe share 61% genetic material with fruit flies and 85% genetic material with mice. Shared material is never good enough to declare anything as concrete in real science. To declare viral disease you always need a full 100% viral genetic match to a past 100% viral genetic sequence in the past. This so far has not been done for COVID19. Why?\n\n \n\n9. The PCR INVENTION shouldn’t be used as a way to diagnose any disease because it’s simply designed to make small bits of genetic material more visible under a microscope. Those small bits were always designed to be studied, not to conclude disease or no disease, winners or losers, black or white, go home or go to “a camp” etc. Where that genetic material comes from (from you or from a large number of friendly organisms that live inside you) in no way reflects if that genetic material is making you sick. This is why the PCR process has already been shown (in its current misused way) to declare 8 out of 10 people positive with COVID, when they’re perfectly healthy. Out of 10 people in a COVID testing area, 8 will be told they have COVID, 2 will not…..and there’s absolutely no basis to any of those declarations what so ever. The PCR can’t test for COVID, it never could and the inventor said so. So why are we using it?\n\n \n\n10. This is the testing process being used to remove children from their parents, remove adults from their homes, destroy the economy, shut down the food supply, enforce martial law, destroy civil liberties, criminalize normal human activity and force an untested vaccine onto the public, while government officials have inserted into mandates (which are not laws) that both government officials and vaccine companies are not legally responsible for any “failures” in this system where citizens are killed or injured,…..all the while knowing that the COVID death and infection figures (and the testing) are already proven fraudulent.\n\n \n\nAre you ready to go bankrupt based on COVID death numbers proven to be fabricated by government and media? Are you ready to have a child removed from your care based on a test that’s proven completely fraudulent? Are you willing to take an untested vaccine, while giving full legal immunity for death and permanent injury (and future cancers autoimmune diseases etc) to government officials and vaccine makers, based on fabricated death and infection numbers plus a fraudulent testing process?\n\n \n\nFROM THE INVENTOR OF THE PCR INVENTION The only VIRUS TEST which was invented in 1983 said the hypothesis is false, unproductive, and unethical in 1996!\n\n \n\nThis statement  nullifies any virus test and nullifies the CDC and the Mask:\n\n \n\n“The HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake”, wrote Kary Mullis in 1996 [(1), p. 14]. Mullis – Nobel Laureate in Chemistry, 1993 – and other distinguished scientists have claimed the HIV-causes-AIDS hypothesis is false, unproductive, and unethical.\n\n \n\nThey have done so since 1984, when the hypothesis was proposed. Thirty years after countless studies, resources, and attempts to cure have been poured into the HIV-AIDS hypothesis, it may be fruitful to ask: What happened to those views and voices that once disagreed? Have the past three decades, with their scientific, technological, and public health developments, been sufficient to convince critics of the hypothesis’ value?\n\n \n\nHave these advances been able to silence the questioning?\n\n \n\nHere, I synthesize the main criticisms aimed at the HIV-AIDS hypothesis, alongside select unorthodox1 theories proposing non-viral cause(s) for AIDS, to argue: far from being condemned to extinction, competing explanations for, and thorough questioning of the mainstream premise persist. Perhaps better known by the lay public than by health professionals, many explanations are, in fact, attracting a growing number of sympathizers.\n\n \n\nTo support the argument, I employ historical research and data synthesis methods. I utilize, as data, trade and professional publications in tandem with authoritative scientific sources.\n\n \n\nIt is important to note that my purpose is not to review the state of the science regarding HIV/AIDS, nor to persuade readers to reject the mainstream hypothesis. Instead, I aim to expose readers to the persisting controversies, and to motivate them to raise questions of their own. Ultimately, then, this article invites the public health workforce to reflect on prevailing assumptions and practices regarding HIV-AIDS.\n\n \n\nReflecting on assumptions and practices represents a central task for public health professionals; a vital step to ensure their (our) practice continually grounds itself in the most rigorous ethical standards (3).\n\n \n\nA link to the Nation Institute of Health, a US government website article:\n\n \n\nWhere Dr. Kary Mullis is quoted.\n\n \n\nhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4172096/\n\n \n\n4) government and the\n\n \n\n5) National Institute of Health:\n\n \n\nThe advantages of PCR are several. Compared to techniques such as cell culturing for detection of viruses, the time required for the assay can be reduced from days or weeks to hours. Both the initial and recurring costs of PCR are substantially less than the costs of cell culture techniques, and PCR is easily performed.\n\n \n\n|\n\n \n\nIn addition, PCR can be used to identify a specific pathogen found in water. It cannot, however, be used to determine the infectious state of an organism; it can only determine the presence or absence of pathogen-specific DNA or RNA sequences.\n\n \n\n( It does not detect a virus nor can it, it only looks for a RNA )\n\n \n\nPCR assays have been used to detect enterovirus nucleic acid sequences in clinical (5, 13) and environmental samples (1, 3, 12).\n\n \n\nA link to the Nation Institute of Health, a US government website article:\n\n \n\nhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC91045/\n\n \n\nThere are only a few methods of\n\n \n\ntesting for kovat 19 here they are the\n\n \n\nfirst one is the most common and\n\n \n\nremember during the first two months\n\n \n\nthat's all there was people were being\n\n \n\ndiagnosed by symptoms only, the precise\n\n \n\npresentation of the seasonal flu, those\n\n \n\nare the symptoms that created this\n\n \n\nphenomenon that has brought the world to\n\n \n\na halt.\n\n \n\nThe second way of testing for\n\n \n\nkovat 19 antibody tests blood tests\n\n \n\nlooking for antibodies... now the problem\n\n \n\nwith this is that the philosophy of\n\n \n\nobserving antibodies in the blood has\n\n \n\nchanged a hundred and eighty degrees 15\n\n \n\nyears ago the presence of antibodies in\n\n \n\nthe blood could mean that the person had\n\n \n\njust recovered from some health\n\n \n\nchallenges and that their their immune\n\n \n\nsystem had created antibodies which was\n\n \n\nevidence of their recovery.\n\n \n\nNow the presence of antibodies in the blood\n\n \n\nmeans that this patient is afflicted\n\n \n\nwith a pathogen that is potentially\n\n \n\nfatal and is in need of some heroic\n\n \n\ntreatment?\n\n \n\nSo this is the way the\n\n \n\nantibody testing for covin 19 was\n\n \n\nconducted they would take the blood\n\n \n\nsample if they observed any kind of\n\n \n\nantibodies whether they were viral or\n\n \n\nbacterial or whatever they did not\n\n \n\ndifferentiate, that was a positive test\n\n \n\nfor kovat 19!\n\n \n\nAny kind of unidentifiable\n\n \n\nviral or otherwise debris in the blood\n\n \n\nwas also counted as a positive test.\n\n \n\nOkay let's look at the third type of testing\n\n \n\nthe PCR the polymerase chain reaction\n\n \n\ntest this is the test where you had to\n\n \n\nsend up sample into CDC and then they would test\n\n \n\nit with the PCR test and they would send\n\n \n\nyou back the result positive or negative\n\n \n\nit's a completely unverifiable test as\n\n \n\nwe're going to see and we're going to go\n\n \n\ninto the specifics of why that is.\n\n \n\nNext came the test kits now the test kits\n\n \n\nwere only sent out about a month ago\n\n \n\nthey were sent out actually in them\n\n \n\naround the middle of around the middle\n\n \n\nof March, the CDC sent the new test kits\n\n \n\nto hundreds of hospitals and clinics\n\n \n\nacross the country and these test kits\n\n \n\nwere supposedly to screen out people for\n\n \n\nkovat 19, the problem is when you look on\n\n \n\nthe CDC website it says right on the\n\n \n\ndescription for experimental use only...\n\n \n\nNot for diagnostic purposes for\n\n \n\nexperimental use only... not for diagnostic\n\n \n\npurposes and then it says the CDC is\n\n \n\nmaking no claims for their validity\n\n \n\nSo after those test kits went out to all\n\n \n\nthe hospitals about three weeks ago\n\n \n\nthat's when we saw this enormous spike\n\n \n\nbecause of course right away when the\n\n \n\nhospitals finally got a testing\n\n \n\nprocedure that they didn't have to send\n\n \n\nin to you know Atlanta they could report\n\n \n\na lot more positive tests the next thing\n\n \n\nthat happened was after those first test\n\n \n\nkits went out to the hospitals the most\n\n \n\nrecent thing that only happened a week\n\n \n\nor so ago now is the on-site test kits\n\n \n\nand these supposedly are claiming to be\n\n \n\nable to take a sample from a patient and\n\n \n\nto screen them for kovat 19 in five or\n\n \n\nten minutes this is completely ludicrous\n\n \n\nit is impossible it is scientifically\n\n \n\nuntenable, these will not work at all, no\n\n \n\none even claims that these on-site tests\n\n \n\ncan validly differentiate anything let\n\n \n\nalone covert 19.\n \n \n\n \n\nThe 1918 flu was not caused by a virus.\n\n \n\nThe 1918 flu was not contagious and did not spread by direct human-to-human contact.\n\n \n\nEfforts by doctors working for the U.S. Public Health Service to prove the contagious nature of the 1918 flu were heroic and resulted in resounding and repeated failure. In November and December 1918 and in February and March 1919, they attempted to infect one hundred healthy volunteers with influenza in the following ways:\n\n \n\nThey put secretions from the mouth, nose, throat and bronchi from hospitalized influenza patients into the nose, throat and eyes of volunteers;\n\n \n\nThey injected blood from sick patients into volunteers;\n\n \n\nThey filtered mucous material from sick patients and injected it under the skin of volunteers;\n\n \n\nThey had volunteers shake hands with sick patients, talk to them, faces close together, for five minutes, then had the patient breathe out as hard as he could while the volunteer, two inches away, was breathing in, then had the patient cough directly into the face of the volunteer, five times.\n\n \n\nNone of the volunteers in any of these experiments got sick in any way.\n\n \n\nAll of this is documented in the book:  the Invisible  Rainbow\n\n \n\n‣ Viruses do not ‘exist’ outside of petri-dish solutions or a living body.\n\n \n\n‣ Viruses cannot enter through the skin or eyes. Such vectors do not work because the mucus membranes and the immune system discard small amounts of foreign proteins such as viruses.\n\n \n\n‣ Viruses cannot enter through wounds because we bleed outwardly, not inwardly.\n\n \n\n‣ Viruses cannot function without a host cell that manufactures them and encodes them, and viruses cannot replicate without a host cell.\n\n \n\n‣ Viruses do not ‘infect’ or ‘invade’ cells. They are not alive to do so in the first place.\n\n \n\n‣ Viruses almost never dissolve living tissue, unless in specific circumstances such as polio and degenerative nervous system diseases where metal toxicity is present.\n\n \n\n‣ Viruses’ primary function is to dissolve dead matter.\n\n \n\n‣ Cells produce different viral strains depending on the condition of the tissue involved.\n\n \n\n‣ There are 320,000 viral strains inherent to the human body, and each cell contains the viral protein makeup to manufacture each strain when the body calls for it.\n\n \n\n‣ Viruses are sequenced/encoded by blood cells via RNA/DNA to break down specific dead and dying tissue and waste.\n\n \n\n‣ Viruses are very specific protein structures.\n\n \n\n‣ Coughing, sneezing, and spitting is not a vector for the transmission of viruses. Saliva and mucus membranes break down any such particles.\n\n \n\n‣ Skin is not a vector either because viruses cannot cross dead skin layers.\n\n \n\n‣ Viruses are a result of internal toxicity caused by the environment.\n\n \n\n‣ Viruses are not living organisms or living microbes.\n\n \n\n‣ Viruses do not have a respiratory system, nor do they have a nucleus or digestive system.\n\n \n\n‣ Viruses are not alive.\n\n \n\n‣ Viruses are not contagious.\n\n \n\n⸞ • ⸞ • ⸞ • ⸞ • ⸞ • ⸞ • ⸞ • ⸞\n\n \n\nReferences:\n\n \n\nthebernician.net\n\n \n\nBéchamp Or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology by E. Douglas Hume, 1923\n\n \n\nThe Blood and Its Third Element by Antoine Béchamp, 1912\n\n \n\nImmunization: The Reality Behind the Myth, by Walene James, 1942 (discusses Béchamp’s ‘Terrain Theory’ of bacteria and viruses.)\n\n \n\nThe Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur, R.B. Pearson, 1942 (First published in 1942 under the title ‘Pasteur Plagiarist Imposter!-the Germ Theory Exploded’.)\n\n \n\nThe source of the germ theory from Louis Pasteur it is the same age as Béchamp’s ‘Terrain Theory’ of bacteria and viruses the topic of this status ....they came from two different people who worked together and disagreed ...\n\n \n\n-------------------------------------------------\n GOVERNMENTS AND MEDIA ALL OVER THE WORLD PROVEN TO BE LYING TO PUBLIC ABOUT COVID PANDEMIC\n\n \n\nThere are  two Posts:   With over 70 links   1) All the comments in this post Click\n\n \n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/shannon.gibson.547/posts/3076381275741708 2)\n\n \n\nOver 60 links in the comments: https://www.facebook.com/shannon.gibson.547/posts/3108477095865459?\n\n \n\n(#1) Information regarding Viruses not being able to live outside of a host and how they are truly transmitted.\n ⬇️\n https://youtu.be/dEQQBI4i-Hw\n \n https://www.streetdirectory.com/travel_guide/26611/health/are_germs_and_viruses_the_real_cause_of_disease.html?fbclid=IwAR3zFeZkD1aX5XMrieFUATPxAAUwEeHnHZkITXuyPGnPL1f5WrIbQ_caFwY\n \n https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-viruses-alive-2004/?fbclid=IwAR2CCAoGzpUr6y_o1wOj8AsYgASkxTRQ8DFMeenaYmlCftjftr7NwDWcQ3M\n \n DISMANTLING THE VIRAL THEORY\n https://phoreveryoung.wordpress.com/2020/01/25/dismantling-the-viral-theory/?fbclid=IwAR0ER7vjBJ2IBKpMG9qI0G2BNpUMd13PwmwYXudRZTzXmfsPKFPpwIOdjtg\n \n NIH ADMITS 5G CAN ACTUALLY CREATE CORONAVIRUS WITHIN HUMAN CELLS\n https://www.infowars.com/nih-admits-5g-can-actually-create-coronavirus-within-human-cells/?fbclid=IwAR066OKxpU2mLHySZ8jNpwK_uYTWl7gH6agS9UJ4hiuvJyGqvFHXo9rcOIA\n \n germ Theory vs. terrain Theory\n https://www.google.com/search?q=germ+Theory+vs.+terrain+Theory&gs_ivs=1\n \n The National institute of health, The National Library of Medicine\n\n \n\nThis is from the people you trust to keep you safe...the Government.\n\n \n\nAbstract\n In this research, we show that 5G millimeter waves could be absorbed by dermatologic cells acting like antennas, transferred to other cells and play the main role in producing Coronaviruses in biological cells.\n \n https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32668870/\n \n \n The Deception of Virology — Why Coronavirus Is Not Contagious\n \n https://www.facebook.com/notes/shannon-gibson/the-deception-of-virology-why-coronavirus-is-not-contagious/3344102162289374/\n \n A video that will show you it is 9 minutes...\n\n \n\nthe video is validated with credits at the end https://youtu.be/uDDE3PH5SA0\n\n \n\nYou know you can spend 9 minutes to see a different perspective.\n \n Why The “Coronavirus” Pandemic is The Biggest Lie in Human History\n Table of Contents:\n \n  1. The Interview the Whole World Should Hear: Dr. Andrew Kaufman, M.D. Blows this Hoax Out of the Water\n \n  2. Testimonials from Nurses and Patients Exposing Empty Hospitals, False Recording of “COVID-19” Deaths, And Other Lies \n \n 3. Are “Viruses” Contagious? Quotations and Revelations About Germ Theory: The Lynchpin Holding the Entire Hoax Together\n \n  4. Vaccine Fraud: Centuries of Testimonials from Doctors and Researchers Proving that Vaccines are Dangerous and Profitable \n \n 5. Videos: Medical Doctors, Whistleblowers, and Researchers Prove Deception and Agenda Beyond Any Shadow of Doubt\n \n  6. More Resources: eBooks, Videos, Articles and Papers Proving Deception  \n \n 7. Proof of a Pre-Planned Agenda: Event 201 – A Global Pandemic Exercise… From October 2019? \n \n 8. Connecting the Dots: Other Strong Circumstantial Evidence\n \n Wild viruses have never been proven to cause disease, or be infectious. “The culprit however, is not the microbe. It is the level of toxicity you have in your own blood stream.” -- Good-Bye Germ Theory, Dr. William P. Trebing 2006\n\n \n\nGerm Theory is pushed as fact by the nasty big pharma medical mafia that, ever since John Rockefeller used his oil baron money to control schools and institutions, steered legislation and public belief toward holistic medicine being seen as \"quackery\" because they couldn't patent and profit from it.\n\n \n\nTerrain theory says we are expressing bacteria and viruses as solvents and alarm-messenger agents to other cells when our bodies are deficient and or poisoned.\n\n \n\nScurvy was blamed on infection and proven to be a lack of vitamin C. When kids ate asbestos laden wall chips docs and scientists blamed their parents for being stupid, rather than themselves for blanketing the planet with harmful drugs, toxins and chemicals.\n\n \n\nThe \"progress\" driven by the big money in the last couple centuries saw a lot of toxins from lead, arsenic, DDT, asbestos and many pesticides be splayed upon the public. When people got injured or sick their corrupt scientists blamed it on an \"infectious\" agent that is present during the very toxicity caused by their employers.\n\n \n\nThese people are sick! They cause 500k deaths a yr. in America alone due to \"medical errors\" and over 100k due to legal drugs.\n\n \n\n\"The most stunning statistic, however,  is that the total number of deaths caused by conventional medicine is an astounding 783,936 per year. It is now evident that the American medical system is the leading cause of death and injury in the US.\" Dr. Gary Null, Death by Medicine\n\n \n\n\"Allopathic doctors began amassing power as early as 1759. At that time, legislation was drafted to protect an ‘unsuspecting public’ against quacks or ‘snake oil salesmen.” - Death by Modern Medicine, Dr. Carolyn Dean\n\n \n\nThe medical system in which modern MDs are trained (with Rockefeller, Carnegie. etc. blood money) makes fundamental assumptions about disease and health based on the profitable THEORIES ingrained into their minds as fact.\n\n \n\nLinks to articles, books and videos that refute the Germ Theory: Virus Mania Foreword by Dr. Etienne de Harven (2008)\n\n \n\nhttp://whale.to/a/virus_mania1.html\n\n \n\nBiochemistry Debunks Corona\n\n \n\nhttps://youtu.be/l20Jzzhjp1k\n\n \n\nhttps://youtu.be/sVDuMk-WZqE\n\n \n\nVideo - 150 U.S. Public Health Service Experiments from 1919 prove that disease is not transmittable\n\n \n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khec-jvZx9E\n\n \n\nArticle – \"You cannot Catch Bugs, Pasteur Debunked\"\n\n \n\nhttps://www.healingnaturallybybee.com/you-cannot-catch-bugs-germs-bacteria-or-candidafungi/\n\n \n\nBook / PDF – \"Virus Mania: How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics, Making Billion-Dollar Profits At Our Expense\" – Torsten Engelbrecht\n\n \n\nhttps://groups.io/g/RBTIclub/attachment/6/0/Virus%20Mania%20%20Torsten%20Engelbrecht.pdf\n\n \n\nBook – ‘Good-Bye Germ Theory’ is a book refuting the Germ Theory and talking about Vaccine Scam\"\n\n \n\nhttps://www.amazon.com/Good-Bye-Germ-Theory-century-medical/dp/1413454402\n\n \n\nArticle – \"Viruses. How Much Is That Dogma In The Window?\" https://www.newmedicineonline.com/viruses/\n\n \n\nArticle - \"Doctors refuting the Germ Theory\" - By Dr. Bernarr, D.C., D.D :https://realrawfood.com/sites/default/files/article/CONTAGIOUS%20DISEASES%20and%20the%20GERM%20THEORY.pdf\n\n \n\nThe Germ Theory Deception Part 1 of 4\n\n \n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BN8iKDjUoA&\n\n \n\nhttps://youtu.be/uAUQiI0xWZo\n\n \n\nArticle - Dismantling the Virus Theory by Dr. Stefan Lanka, virologist\n\n \n\nhttps://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/Dismantling-the-Virus-Theory.pdf\n\n \n\nBook / PDF – Béchamp or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology by Ethel Douglas Hume\n\n \n\nhttp://www.mnwelldir.org/docs/history/biographies/Bechamp-or-Pasteur.pdf\n\n \n\nBook - What Really Makes You Ill?: Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong, by Dawn Lester and David Parker\n\n \n\nhttps://www.amazon.com/What-Really-Makes-You-Ill/dp/1673104037\n\n \n\nThe Deception of Virology & Vaccines — Why Coronavirus Is Not Contagious\n\n \n\nhttps://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/fcjwrg/the_deception_of_virology_vaccines_why/?sort=new\n\n \n\nDoes the 2019 Coronavirus Exist?\n\n \n\nhttps://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/does-2019-coronavirus-exist\n \n \n The Infectious Myth\n\nA Book Project by David Crowe\nThe Infectious Myth\n \n\nMost people believe that every disease on the following list has an infectious cause:\n\nHIV/AIDS(audio) Harry Haverkos on Kaposis Sarcoma, Poppers and AIDS\nCoronaviruses David Crowe Writings\n Critique of COVID-19 ‘science’ (also in Czech, French, German, Spanish, Korean).\n Antibody Testing Critique (also in Spanish and Korean).\n Isolation versus Purification: Explainer (also in Spanish).\n Should you wear a mask? What does the science say? (also in Spanish).\n Comparison of 33 FDA-approved RT-PCR COVID-19 tests. Version published on British skeptic website lockdownsceptics.org (Czech).\n Rarely Asked Questions (RAQ) on COVID-19 (also in Español, Korean).\n Problems with the Current UK Lockdown Policy (Kevin Corbett and David Crowe). Journal of Advanced Nursing blog.\nWhy I do not think 5G is causing COVID-19 (also in Spanish).\n English translation of Chinese false positive article\nSARS draft book chapter\nSARS timeline\nAudio and Video Interviews and Podcasts\n (video) Interview by Aditya Sangore, Pune, India.\n (video) Facebook interview with Meryl Dorey of the Australian Vaccination Risks Network.\n (video) Video based on critical analysis of Coronavirus.\n (audio) Remington Nevin MD on Chloroquine and Hydroxchloroquine.\n (audio) Simplified discussion of RT-PCR for Coronavirus Testing.\n (audio) Interview on RT-PCR with Professor Stephen Bustin (Spanish transcript). Read the following short article to help put the issues in context.\n Issues with the RT-PCR Coronavirus Test (also in Spanish and Korean).\n (audio) Retired nurse Kevin Corbett on HIV, AIDS and the Coronavirus\n(audio) Chemist David Rasnick on the Coronavirus\n(audio) David Crowe tackles the Coronavirus Panic\n(audio) James Lyons-Weiler on Coronavirus Science\n(video) David on Truther Talk Radio.\n Writings by Peers\n Plandemia en España (Plandemic in Spain). From “STOP Confiniamiento” (Stop the Lockdown) in Spanish (and English).\n A Rapidly Changing View of Covid-19 by Matt Irwin, MD, MSW.\n Rethinking COVID-19 Mortality Statistics by Chuck Dinerstein MD and Charles Geshekter PhD.\n The Nazification of the UK’s National Health Service by Kevin Corbett.\n \n The Peculiar Reality of COVID-19 by John Hardie, BDS, MSc, PhD, FRCDC, “Oral Health”.\n Thoughts and Concerns Regarding the New Corona Virus by John Hardie, BDS, MSc, PhD, FRCDC.\n Where is the Evidence for the Existence of the Novel Coronavirus? By Kevin Corbett.\n \nWest Nile\nMad Cow, CJD and other Spongiform Encephalopathies ( timeline ).\nFoot and Mouth\nHepatitis C\nPolio ( timeline )\nAvian Flu Engelbrecht T, Crowe D. Avian flu virus H5N1: No proof for existence, pathogenicity, or pandemic potential; non-‘H5N1’ causation omitted. Med Hypotheses. 2005 Dec 16.\n \nThe 1918 ‘Spanish’ Flu\nEbola Crowe D. “Ebola Ça Suffit!” is not enough to Prove Efficacy of an Ebola Vaccine. American Journal of Immunology. 2017 Jul 4; 13(3): 165-72.\n \n\nThere is considerable scientific evidence that these diseases do not just have non-infectious co-factors, but that they are environmental in nature, not infectious.\n\n \n\nIn fact, with viruses, it is possible to question their very existence (also in Spanish).\n\n \n\nThe book “The Infectious Myth” will investigate provide the scientific evidence that the normally accepted infectious cause is not, in fact, valid and, in will identify more plausible environmental causes.\n\n \n\nThe book will be written by David Crowe.\n\n \n\nStay tuned for updates. The project started in 2006 and is still ongoing.\n\n \n\nCheck out my radio show and podcast that started in 2014 and is now over 250 episodes.\n\n \n\nFor more information on David Crowe, including his extensive writing on medical topics, please see DavidCrowe.ca .\n\nTimelines\nSARS Timeline\nPolio Timeline\nMad Cow Disease Timeline\nContribute\n \n\nYou can contribute to David's work on a book and radio show at patreon.com/InfectiousMyth or liberapay.com/InfectiousMyth or email funds via PayPal to [email protected]\n\ncompiled by ~Shannon Gibson",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"contagious\",\"fraud\",\"covid\",\"proof\"],\"image\":[\"https://img.youtube.com/vi/vaMZ4NyNCwI/0.jpg\",\"https://img.youtube.com/vi/dEQQBI4i-Hw/0.jpg\",\"https://img.youtube.com/vi/uDDE3PH5SA0/0.jpg\",\"https://img.youtube.com/vi/l20Jzzhjp1k/0.jpg\",\"https://img.youtube.com/vi/sVDuMk-WZqE/0.jpg\",\"https://img.youtube.com/vi/khec-jvZx9E/0.jpg\",\"https://img.youtube.com/vi/4BN8iKDjUoA/0.jpg\",\"https://img.youtube.com/vi/uAUQiI0xWZo/0.jpg\"],\"links\":[\"https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/rt-pcr-panel-primer-probes.html\",\"https://bpa-pathology.com/esp-webinar-video-recordings-covid-19-unprecedented-daily-challenges-in-pathology-departments-across-europe-2/\",\"https://www.esp-pathology.org/_Resources/Persistent/939c263db24f0ffb3aca1f12f6a1484046574027/Webinar%20links%20website.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3whkrJ5G8vw-AwxxhKlWnjgpRyAZm-uYS__Ve9fJeruiOmF7DcH1IFBw0\",\"https://youtu.be/vaMZ4NyNCwI\",\"http://aidswiki.net/index.php?title=Document:Farber_interviews_Mullis\",\"https://www.facebook.com/RonnyakaSoniC/videos/10218867134043289/\",\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4172096/\",\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC91045/\",\"https://www.facebook.com/shannon.gibson.547/posts/3076381275741708\",\"https://www.facebook.com/shannon.gibson.547/posts/3108477095865459?\",\"https://youtu.be/dEQQBI4i-Hw\",\"https://www.streetdirectory.com/travel_guide/26611/health/are_germs_and_viruses_the_real_cause_of_disease.html?fbclid=IwAR3zFeZkD1aX5XMrieFUATPxAAUwEeHnHZkITXuyPGnPL1f5WrIbQ_caFwY\",\"https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-viruses-alive-2004/?fbclid=IwAR2CCAoGzpUr6y_o1wOj8AsYgASkxTRQ8DFMeenaYmlCftjftr7NwDWcQ3M\",\"https://phoreveryoung.wordpress.com/2020/01/25/dismantling-the-viral-theory/?fbclid=IwAR0ER7vjBJ2IBKpMG9qI0G2BNpUMd13PwmwYXudRZTzXmfsPKFPpwIOdjtg\",\"https://www.infowars.com/nih-admits-5g-can-actually-create-coronavirus-within-human-cells/?fbclid=IwAR066OKxpU2mLHySZ8jNpwK_uYTWl7gH6agS9UJ4hiuvJyGqvFHXo9rcOIA\",\"https://www.google.com/search?q=germ+Theory+vs.+terrain+Theory&gs_ivs=1\",\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32668870/\",\"https://www.facebook.com/notes/shannon-gibson/the-deception-of-virology-why-coronavirus-is-not-contagious/3344102162289374/\",\"https://youtu.be/uDDE3PH5SA0\",\"http://whale.to/a/virus_mania1.html\",\"https://youtu.be/l20Jzzhjp1k\",\"https://youtu.be/sVDuMk-WZqE\",\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khec-jvZx9E\",\"https://www.healingnaturallybybee.com/you-cannot-catch-bugs-germs-bacteria-or-candidafungi/\",\"https://groups.io/g/RBTIclub/attachment/6/0/Virus%20Mania%20%20Torsten%20Engelbrecht.pdf\",\"https://www.amazon.com/Good-Bye-Germ-Theory-century-medical/dp/1413454402\",\"https://www.newmedicineonline.com/viruses/\",\"https://realrawfood.com/sites/default/files/article/CONTAGIOUS%20DISEASES%20and%20the%20GERM%20THEORY.pdf\",\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BN8iKDjUoA&\",\"https://youtu.be/uAUQiI0xWZo\",\"https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/Dismantling-the-Virus-Theory.pdf\",\"http://www.mnwelldir.org/docs/history/biographies/Bechamp-or-Pasteur.pdf\",\"https://www.amazon.com/What-Really-Makes-You-Ill/dp/1673104037\",\"https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/fcjwrg/the_deception_of_virology_vaccines_why/?sort=new\",\"https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/does-2019-coronavirus-exist\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "30645a3d2c40c22d1d1384eff4ceb97e0a74a60a",
  "block": 66444000,
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-08-02T05:14:09",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "shannongibson"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"shannongibson\",\"following\":\"schoolofminnows\",\"what\":[\"blog\",\"\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "cc1060f8b7fa47d5b177c67716c4328993d474e6",
  "block": 64812916,
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-06-06T05:33:57",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "shannongibson",
      "vesting_shares": "26122.246119 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "f2022a82efdfa435703af6a8b5f0c3afbefc665d",
  "block": 64518896,
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-05-26T23:31:54",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "remembering-the-dead-remembering-the-lies",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "a292389bb73fc19886f67109136e0f1518eb4c50",
  "block": 64516565,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-05-26T21:34:39",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "shannongibson",
      "parent_permlink": "remembering-the-dead-remembering-the-lies",
      "author": "schoolofminnows",
      "permlink": "som0f6y9kkeni8m",
      "title": "",
      "body": "This is a one-time notice from SCHOOL OF MINNOWS, a free value added service on steem.\nGetting started on steem can be super hard on these social platforms 😪 but luckily there is some communities that help support the little guy 😊, you might like school of minnows, we join forces with lots of other small accounts to help each other grow! \nFinally a good curation trail that helps its users achieve rapid growth, its fun on a bun! check it out. https://plug.sh/somlanding/",
      "json_metadata": "{}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "53ddfea45fc5aecc1f5b5bb254879a851b6649fc",
  "block": 64516515,
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-05-26T21:32:06",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "war",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "remembering-the-dead-remembering-the-lies",
      "title": "Remembering the Dead  REMEMBERING THE LIES",
      "body": "The lies and fudges and mistakes that took us to war in Iraq in 2003 were not unique; they were policy. There is a template for every American war since 1945, from novelties like the invasion of Grenada to the seemingly never-ending conflicts post-9/11. Unless and until we talk about that on some Memorial Day, we will be talking about Iraq, or wherever next year’s war is, on another Memorial Day.\n\nTell me why would I ...an American Soldier obey the LIARS? \n\nYes, it is another Memorial Day and we are still talking about Iraq.\n\nThe facts are in front of us. The Iraq War of 2003-2011 killed 4491 Americans. The Pentagon states 32,226 Americans were wounded “in action,” a number which does not include an estimated 200,000 soldiers who will suffer PTSD or major depression, or the 285,000 of them who experienced a probable traumatic brain injury.\n\nOn the Iraqi side of the equation, no one knows. Most of the Iraqis died more of the war — well-after then-president Bush declared “Mission Accomplished” and an end of major hostilities — than in the war per se. Estimates run from some 200,000 up to a million dead.\n\nArgue with any of the numbers you like. Agree that the “real” numbers are big.\n\nThere are similar sets of numbers for Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon and many other places America makes war, overtly, covertly and via drone.\n\nLessons from Iraq\n\nAnd that is why we should, on Memorial Day, still be talking about Iraq. We haven’t learned anything from our mistakes there and it is time we did.\n\nThe lessons of Iraq are not limited to bad decision making, falsifying intelligence reports, and exaggerated claims about smoking guns and mushroom clouds.\n\nThose are just details, and they come and go with wars: the Gulf of Tonkin incident that brought America into the Vietnam War was false. So were the stories out of Gulf War 1.0 of Iraqi troops throwing Kuwaiti infants from their incubators. Same for the “we’re just on a humanitarian mission to save the Yazidi people” that reopened American involvement in Iraq less than a year ago. Just as false are the “we are invading ______ (fill in the blank with any number of locations) to liberate the people” there from a thug government, an evil dictator, another bad guy.\n\nWe’ve eliminated a lot of Qaddafis and Saddams, and you’d be hard pressed to find anyone on the ground in their old countries happy about what resulted from that. War after war we need to fight back against barbarians who seek to impose an evil philosophy across an entire region (Communism? Terrorism?) War after war we need to fight “over there” to prevent them from attacking us here.\n\nMaybe as late as the Vietnam War we accepted it all. That was the way of it. You could call it patriotism, or you could call it naivety, or even faith. Most hadn’t yet realized our leaders would lie to us about things as important as war. There had been no Watergate, no fake WMDs. American Exceptionalism was not a right-wing trope twirled inside the confection of “Morning in America.” But we of the September 12 group of Americans have no excuse.\n\nAlone at Night\n\nI think about that mom who wonders what her son died for in Ramadi. She is not alone; there are lots of moms whose sons died in Ramadi, and Fallujah, and Helmand Province, and Hue and Danang, even Grenada. Late at night, perhaps after a third glass of white wine failed again to let them sleep, those moms may try and console themselves thinking their sons and daughters died for “something.” I can’t criticize or begrudge them for that, they having lost a child. Ghosts are terrible things to follow you through life.\n\nThe kids who will serve in our military into the “commitment” to Afghanistan that extends into 2024 are currently in elementary school. They are out on the lawn right now this Memorial Day, playing at being ghosts.\n\nWhat I would like to do on this Memorial Day is ask all the moms who have not yet lost a child in a war that does not matter to think about those unthinkable things while they are waving a flag, and while their kids are still alive.\n\nIf we think about that this Memorial Day, maybe we can start to learn the real lesson of Iraq.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"war\",\"lies\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "193ca661632e58667a3446bf2781a88f2813b910",
  "block": 60527605,
  "trx_in_block": 17,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-01-07T14:49:27",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "shannongibson",
      "vesting_shares": "6970.646953 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "babfb885f147ccdf986b24c11eb00e90b3fed524",
  "block": 59993539,
  "trx_in_block": 8,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-12-19T23:13:30",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "shannongibson",
      "vesting_shares": "26515.123852 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "eda6ef665697b7e54a6511bdd866a083663dc2c9",
  "block": 59911331,
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-12-17T02:20:18",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "shannongibson"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"shannongibson\",\"following\":\"arbitration\",\"what\":[\"blog\",\"\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "ea0618386148961882520346aaae99c77c6175a0",
  "block": 59885704,
  "trx_in_block": 12,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-12-16T04:36:06",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "freedom-of-speech",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "233ddc8480a66e4f18d701f2cb71c02375823d12",
  "block": 58771798,
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-11-06T21:33:24",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "shannongibson"
      ],
      "id": "notify",
      "json": "[\"setLastRead\",{\"date\":\"2021-11-06T15:31:13\"}]"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "c24d0078bebbd6af0011e040d643e50281ce9638",
  "block": 57999799,
  "trx_in_block": 7,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-10T22:22:24",
  "op": [
    "transfer",
    {
      "from": "dobartim",
      "to": "shannongibson",
      "amount": "0.001 STEEM",
      "memo": "Welcome to the business group Creative Millionaires for idea development, creative projects and support https://t.me/joinchat/8vzzUQqdjeE4NzQ0"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "098be9b76443d06d4652228be7fa36fd0111c158",
  "block": 57932609,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T14:01:30",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "sqube",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "the-infectious-myth",
      "weight": 100
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "0276932c34bc106ab965964727af2912d74e8afa",
  "block": 57932606,
  "trx_in_block": 14,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T14:01:21",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "cov",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "the-infectious-myth",
      "title": "The infectious myth",
      "body": "The Infectious Myth\nA Book Project by David Crowe\nThe Infectious Myth\nHome\tUpdates\tEmail\tTimelines \nMost people believe that every disease on the following list has an infectious cause:\n\nHIV/AIDS\n(audio) Harry Haverkos on Kaposis Sarcoma, Poppers and AIDS\nCoronaviruses\nDavid Crowe Writings\nCritique of COVID-19 ‘science’ (also in Czech, French, German, Spanish, Korean).\nFlaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory1\nDavid\tCrowe\[email protected]\nVersion\t8.5.\tJune\t6,\t2020\t\n\nhttps://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf\n\nFlaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory1\nDavid Crowe\[email protected]\nVersion 8.5. June 6, 2020\nhttps://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf\n1. Executive Summary\nThe world is suffering from a massive delusion based on the belief that a test for\nRNA2 is a test for a deadly new virus, a virus that has emerged from wild bats or\nother animals in China, supported by the western assumption that Chinese people\nwill eat anything that moves.\nIf the virus exists, then it should be possible to purify viral particles. From these\nparticles RNA can be extracted and should match the RNA used in this test. Until this\nis done it is possible that the RNA comes from another source, which could be the\ncells of the patient, bacteria, fungi etc. There might be an association with elevated\nlevels of this RNA and illness, but that is not proof that the RNA is from a virus.\nWithout purification and characterization of virus particles, it cannot be accepted\nthat an RNA test is proof that a virus is present.\nDefinitions of important diseases are surprisingly loose, perhaps embarrassingly so.\nA couple of symptoms, maybe contact with a previous patient, and a test of\nunknown accuracy, is all you often need. While the definition of SARS, an earlier\ncoronavirus panic, was self-limiting, the definition of COVID-19 disease is openended,\nallowing the imaginary epidemic to grow. Putting aside the existence of the\nvirus, if the COVID-19 test has a problem with false positives (as all biological tests\ndo) then testing an uninfected population will produce only false-positive tests, and\nthe definition of the disease will allow the epidemic to go on forever.\nThis strange new disease, officially named COVID-19, has none of its own symptoms.\nFever and cough, previously blamed on uncountable viruses and bacteria, as well as\nenvironmental contaminants, are most common, as well as abnormal lung images,\ndespite those being found in healthy people. Yet, despite the fact that only a\nminority of people tested will test positive (often less than 5%), it is assumed that\nthis disease is easily recognized. If that were truly the case, the majority of people\nselected for testing by doctors should be positive.\nThe COVID-19 test is based on PCR, a DNA manufacturing technique. When used as a\ntest it does not produce a positive/negative result, but simply the number of cycles\n1 Officially the virus is called SARS-CoV-2 and the disease it is believed to caused, COVID-19. We will\njust refer to COVID-19 for the current virus panic, and SARS for the 2003 panic.\n2 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) is chemically very similar to DNA, except that one of the four bases,\nThymine, is replaced by Uracil. In function it is very different, being created from DNA for a\ntemporary use such as creating a protein molecule. It is also found in a single strand rather than a\ndouble-helix.\n2\nrequired to detect sufficient material to beat the arbitrary cutoff between positive\nand negative. If positive means infected and negative means uninfected, then there\nare cases of people going from infected to uninfected and back to infected again in a\ncouple of days.\nA lot of people say it is better to be safe than sorry. Better that some people are\nquarantined who are uninfected than risk a pandemic. But once people test positive,\nthey are likely to be treated, with treatments similar to SARS. Doctors faced with\nwhat they believe is a deadly virus treat for the future, for anticipated symptoms,\nnot for what they see today. This leads to the use of invasive oxygenation, high dose\ncorticosteroids, antiviral drugs and more. In this case, some populations of those\ndiagnosed (e.g. in China) are older and sicker than the general population and much\nless able to withstand aggressive treatment. After the SARS panic had subsided\ndoctors reviewed the evidence, and it showed that these treatments were often\nineffective, and all had serious side effects, such as persistent neurologic deficit,\njoint replacements, scarring, pain and liver disease. As well as higher mortality.\n3\n2. Introduction\nThe COVID-19 scare that emanated from Wuhan, China in December of 2019 is an\nepidemic of testing, as the graph below with test statistics from Austria shows.\nThere is no proof that a virus is being detected by the test and, while there should\nbe, there is absolutely no concern about whether there are a significant number of\nfalse positives on the test. What is being published in medical journals is not science,\nevery paper has the goal of enhancing the panic by interpreting the data only in\nways that benefit the viral theory, even when the data is confusing or contradictory.\nIn other words, the medical papers are propaganda.\nIt is also an epidemic by definition. The definition, which assumes perfection from\nthe test, does not have the safety valve that the definition of SARS did, thus the scare\ncan go on until public health officials change the definition or realize that the test is\nnot reliable. SARS, according to CDC, required a respiratory symptom; close contact\nwith another SARS case or travel to a designated epidemic area; and a positive SARS\ntest (or lack of antibodies believed to be protective) [48]. Once everyone had been\nquarantined, the second criterion was difficult to achieve outside of a hospital, and\nnumbers plummeted.\n0\n1000\n2000\n3000\n4000\n5000\n6000\n2/26 2/28 3/1 3/3 3/5 3/7 3/9 3/11 3/13 3/15 3/17 3/19 3/21 3/23 3/25 3/27 3/29 3/31\nNumber of Tests Performed and Positive Results, Austria\nTests Positive\n4\nWhat I learned from studying SARS, the previous big coronavirus scare, after the\n2003 epidemic, was that nobody had proved a coronavirus existed, let alone was\npathogenic. There was evidence against transmission, and afterwards, negative\nassessments of the extreme treatments that patients were subjected to, the\nnucleoside analog antiviral drug Ribavirin, high dose corticosteroids, invasive\nrespiratory assistance, and sometimes oseltamivir (Tamiflu). This is documented in\nmy draft book chapter (mostly complete) that you can find here:\nhttp://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/SARS.pdf\n5\n3. Virus Existence\nScientists are detecting novel RNA in multiple patients with influenza or\npneumonia-like conditions, and are assuming that the detection of RNA (which is\nbelieved to be wrapped in proteins to form an RNA virus, as coronaviruses are\nbelieved to be) is equivalent to isolation of the virus. It is not, and one of the groups\nof scientists was honest enough to admit this:\n“we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood” [2]\nBut, despite this admission, earlier in the paper they repeatedly referred to the 41\ncases (out of 59 similar cases) that tested positive for this RNA as, “41 patients…\nconfirmed to be infected with 2019-nCoV.”\nAnother paper quietly admitted that:\n“our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates” [1]\nKoch’s postulates, first stated by the great German bacteriologist Robert Koch in the\nlate 1800s, are simple logic, and can be stated as:\n• Purify the pathogen (e.g. virus) from many cases with a particular illness.\n• Expose susceptible animals (obviously not humans) to the pathogen.\n• Verify that the same illness is produced.\n• Some add that you should also re-purify the pathogen, just to be sure that it\nreally is creating the illness.\nFamous virologist Thomas Rivers stated in a 1936 speech, “It is obvious that Koch's\npostulates have not been satisfied in viral diseases”. That was a long time ago, but\nthe problem continues. And Rivers’ guidance was considered important enough to\nbe cited by papers claiming (falsely) that Koch’s Postulates had been met during the\nSARS era (2003). None of the papers referenced in this article have even attempted\nto purify the virus. And the word ‘isolation’ has been so debased by virologists it\nmeans nothing (e.g. adding impure materials to a cell culture and seeing cell death is\n‘isolation’).\nReference [1] did publish electron micrographs, but it can clearly be seen in the\nlesser magnified photo, that the particles believed to be COVID-19 are not purified,\nas the quantity of material that is cellular is much greater. The paper notes that the\nphotos are from “human airway epithelial cells”. Also consider that the photo\nincluded in the article will certainly be the “best” photo, i.e. the one with the greatest\nnumber of particles. Lab technicians may be encouraged to spend hours to look\naround to find the most photogenic image, the one that most looks like pure virus.\nThere is no way to tell that the RNA being used in the COVID-19 PCR test is found in\nthose particles seen in the electron micrograph, because you cannot see what the\ncontents are, they could be protein, RNA or DNA. There is thus no connection\nbetween the test, and the particles, and no proof that the particles are viral.\nA similar situation was revealed in March 1997 concerning HIV, when two papers\npublished in the same issue of the journal “Virology” revealed that the vast majority\nof what had previously been called “pure HIV” was impurities that were clearly not\n6\nHIV, and the mixture also included micro-vesicles that look very similar to HIV\nunder an electron microscope, but are of cellular origin. [5][6]\n7\n4. Disease Definition\nInfectious diseases always have a definition, but they are usually not publicized too\nwidely because then they would be open to ridicule. They usually have a “suspect\ncase” category based on symptoms and exposure, and a “confirmed” category that\nadds some kind of testing.\nReference [13] describes a suspect case definition for COVID-19, derived from WHO\ndefinitions for SARS and MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome). This definition\nwas in effect until January 18, 2020, and required all four of the following criteria:\n• “Fever, with or without recorded temperature”. Note that there is\nno universal definition of fever, so this may just be the opinion of a\nphysician or nurse. With SARS a fever was defined as 38C even though\nnormal body temperature is considered to be 37C (98.6F).\n• “Radiographic evidence of pneumonia”. This can occur without\nillness, as was seen in a 10 year old boy with no clinical symptoms [3].\nHe was diagnosed with pneumonia despite this.\n• “Low or normal white-cell count or low lymphocyte count”. This is\nnot really a criterion as every healthy person is included. This is also\nstrange because people suffering from an infection normally have\nelevated white blood cell counts (although they may drop in people\ndying from an infection).\n• One of the following three:\no “No reduction in symptoms after antimicrobial treatment\nfor 3 days”. This is a standard indication of a ‘viral’\npneumonia, i.e. one that does not resolve with antibiotics.\no “Epidemiologic link to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale\nMarket”. This, and the next criterion, create the illusion of an\ninfectious disease, as it prefers the diagnosis of connected\ncases.\no “Contact with other patients with similar symptoms”.\nOn January 18th the last, three-part category was changed to:\n• One of the following:\no “travel history to Wuhan”\no “direct contact with patients from Wuhan who had fever or\nrespiratory symptoms, within 14 days before illness onset”\nThe big problem is that, in contrast to the definition for SARS, a “confirmed case” of\nCOVID-19 did not originally require the criteria for a suspect case to be met, but\nsimply a positive RNA test. It did not require any symptoms or evidence of contact\nwith previous cases, illustrating total faith in the PCR technology used in the test.\nThe World Health Organization definition has the same flaw [15].\nIt was the fact that the SARS definition required both a reasonable possibility of\ncontact with a previous case, and symptoms, that allowed the epidemic to burn out.\n8\nOnce everyone was quarantined, contact with an existing case was highly unlikely,\ntesting stopped, and doctors could declare victory.\nThe Chinese eventually woke up and, around February 16th required confirmed\ncases to meet the requirements for a suspected case, as well as a positive test. They\nmay have put this new definition into practice earlier because after a massive\naddition of almost 16,000 confirmed cases on February 12th, the number fell\ndramatically each day and, by February 18th was under 500 cases, and continued to\nstay low.\nBut other countries did not learn. Korea, Japan and Italy (and perhaps other\ncountries) have started doing tests on people with no epidemiological link,\nencouraging people with the vague symptoms that are part of the definition to come\nto hospital to get checked, and obviously following up with anybody with a\nconnection to them, most of whom will be asymptomatic. Consequently, in mid to\nlate February, cases in those and other countries started to skyrocket.\nA New Disease?\nCOVID-19 is described as a distinct new disease. But it clearly is not. There are no\ndistinctive symptoms, for a start. Reference [2] showed that, among 41 early cases,\nthe only symptoms found in more than half, were fever (98%) and cough (76%).\n98% had CT Scan imaging showing problems in both lungs (although it is possible to\nhave shadowing on a CT scan without symptoms). The high percentage of cases with\nfever and shadowing in both lungs is an artefact of the disease definition, fever and\n“radiographic evidence of pneumonia” are two of the diagnostic criteria for a\nprobable case.\nThe low rate of people testing positive on the COVID-19 test is further evidence that\nthere are no obvious symptoms. If there were recognizable symptoms, doctors\nshould have a better than 3-5% chance of guessing who has the virus. While some of\nthe people may have been tested, without symptoms, because they were on a flight\nor cruise, countries outside China are encouraging people with the non-specific\nsymptoms of fever and cough to get tested, so increasingly people have symptoms of\nthe flu or pneumonia, but are still testing negative in high numbers.\nFor example, as of March 9th, Korea had found 7,382 positive cases out of 179,160\npeople tested (4.1%) [20]. In Washington State, where they appear to be reluctant\nto test anyone, only 1 out of 27 tested by February 24th had tested positive (3.7%)\n[21]. Perhaps if they had tested all 438 who were then under quarantine, the\nepidemic would have exploded from 1 to about 16 cases (3.7% of 438). By March\n9th, 1,246 tests had been performed in Washington with 136 found positive (11%).\nObviously, in neither location can doctors recognize cases clinically.\n9\n5. Testing\nAssuming, for a moment, the existence of a new coronavirus, what would a test tell\nus, at this stage? Or rather, what does it not tell us?\n• Without purification and exposing animals to viral particles we do not know\nif the virus is pathogenic (disease causing). It could be an opportunistic\ninfection (invades unhealthy people with weakened immune systems) or a\npassenger virus (that is carried along by risky behavior, such as eating an\nanimal carrier of a virus).\n• We don’t know the false positive rate of the test without validating a large\nnumber of positive tests by attempting to purify virus. Every positive test for\nwhich virus could not be purified would be a false positive, and every\nnegative test for which virus could be purified would be a false negative. But\nthe virus has not yet been purified, so test validation is impossible.\n• If someone is sick there is no proof that any or all of their symptoms are due\nto the virus, even if it is present. Some people may be immune, some may\nhave some symptoms caused by the virus, but others caused by the drugs\nthey are given, by pre-existing health conditions, and so on.\n• We don’t know if the people who test negative are infected or not, especially\nwhen they show up with similar symptoms. For example, in [2], out of 59\npatients with similar symptoms, only 41 tested positive, but the researchers\nwere clearly not sure whether the remaining 18 were truly uninfected. If they\ntruly are not, they lend weight to COVID-19 not being the cause of any of the\nillnesses, as they had symptoms indistinguishable from the 41 positives.\nTesting at such an early stage of knowledge is incredibly dangerous. It spreads\npanic, it can put people on dangerous medications, other circumstances of their\ntreatment can be physically and psychologically damaging (such as intubation and\nisolation, and even seeing all the doctors and nurses in special suits emphasizing\nhow deathly sick you are).",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"covid\",\"scamdemic\"],\"links\":[\"https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf\",\"http://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/SARS.pdf\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "2e97f46fee35b56287ce398e3336e2b5da6d6814",
  "block": 57932562,
  "trx_in_block": 35,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T13:59:09",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "sqube",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "the-infectious-myth",
      "weight": 100
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "46aa509539ff3bca34d33ac1ba52fa5dc184dfb8",
  "block": 57932560,
  "trx_in_block": 12,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T13:59:03",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "cov",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "the-infectious-myth",
      "title": "The infectious myth",
      "body": "The Infectious Myth\nA Book Project by David Crowe\nThe Infectious Myth\nHome\tUpdates\tEmail\tTimelines \nMost people believe that every disease on the following list has an infectious cause:\n\nHIV/AIDS\n(audio) Harry Haverkos on Kaposis Sarcoma, Poppers and AIDS\nCoronaviruses\nDavid Crowe Writings\nCritique of COVID-19 ‘science’ (also in Czech, French, German, Spanish, Korean).\nFlaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory1\nDavid\tCrowe\[email protected]\nVersion\t8.5.\tJune\t6,\t2020\t\n\nhttps://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf\n\nFlaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory1\nDavid Crowe\[email protected]\nVersion 8.5. June 6, 2020\nhttps://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf\n1. Executive Summary\nThe world is suffering from a massive delusion based on the belief that a test for\nRNA2 is a test for a deadly new virus, a virus that has emerged from wild bats or\nother animals in China, supported by the western assumption that Chinese people\nwill eat anything that moves.\nIf the virus exists, then it should be possible to purify viral particles. From these\nparticles RNA can be extracted and should match the RNA used in this test. Until this\nis done it is possible that the RNA comes from another source, which could be the\ncells of the patient, bacteria, fungi etc. There might be an association with elevated\nlevels of this RNA and illness, but that is not proof that the RNA is from a virus.\nWithout purification and characterization of virus particles, it cannot be accepted\nthat an RNA test is proof that a virus is present.\nDefinitions of important diseases are surprisingly loose, perhaps embarrassingly so.\nA couple of symptoms, maybe contact with a previous patient, and a test of\nunknown accuracy, is all you often need. While the definition of SARS, an earlier\ncoronavirus panic, was self-limiting, the definition of COVID-19 disease is openended,\nallowing the imaginary epidemic to grow. Putting aside the existence of the\nvirus, if the COVID-19 test has a problem with false positives (as all biological tests\ndo) then testing an uninfected population will produce only false-positive tests, and\nthe definition of the disease will allow the epidemic to go on forever.\nThis strange new disease, officially named COVID-19, has none of its own symptoms.\nFever and cough, previously blamed on uncountable viruses and bacteria, as well as\nenvironmental contaminants, are most common, as well as abnormal lung images,\ndespite those being found in healthy people. Yet, despite the fact that only a\nminority of people tested will test positive (often less than 5%), it is assumed that\nthis disease is easily recognized. If that were truly the case, the majority of people\nselected for testing by doctors should be positive.\nThe COVID-19 test is based on PCR, a DNA manufacturing technique. When used as a\ntest it does not produce a positive/negative result, but simply the number of cycles\n1 Officially the virus is called SARS-CoV-2 and the disease it is believed to caused, COVID-19. We will\njust refer to COVID-19 for the current virus panic, and SARS for the 2003 panic.\n2 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) is chemically very similar to DNA, except that one of the four bases,\nThymine, is replaced by Uracil. In function it is very different, being created from DNA for a\ntemporary use such as creating a protein molecule. It is also found in a single strand rather than a\ndouble-helix.\n2\nrequired to detect sufficient material to beat the arbitrary cutoff between positive\nand negative. If positive means infected and negative means uninfected, then there\nare cases of people going from infected to uninfected and back to infected again in a\ncouple of days.\nA lot of people say it is better to be safe than sorry. Better that some people are\nquarantined who are uninfected than risk a pandemic. But once people test positive,\nthey are likely to be treated, with treatments similar to SARS. Doctors faced with\nwhat they believe is a deadly virus treat for the future, for anticipated symptoms,\nnot for what they see today. This leads to the use of invasive oxygenation, high dose\ncorticosteroids, antiviral drugs and more. In this case, some populations of those\ndiagnosed (e.g. in China) are older and sicker than the general population and much\nless able to withstand aggressive treatment. After the SARS panic had subsided\ndoctors reviewed the evidence, and it showed that these treatments were often\nineffective, and all had serious side effects, such as persistent neurologic deficit,\njoint replacements, scarring, pain and liver disease. As well as higher mortality.\n3\n2. Introduction\nThe COVID-19 scare that emanated from Wuhan, China in December of 2019 is an\nepidemic of testing, as the graph below with test statistics from Austria shows.\nThere is no proof that a virus is being detected by the test and, while there should\nbe, there is absolutely no concern about whether there are a significant number of\nfalse positives on the test. What is being published in medical journals is not science,\nevery paper has the goal of enhancing the panic by interpreting the data only in\nways that benefit the viral theory, even when the data is confusing or contradictory.\nIn other words, the medical papers are propaganda.\nIt is also an epidemic by definition. The definition, which assumes perfection from\nthe test, does not have the safety valve that the definition of SARS did, thus the scare\ncan go on until public health officials change the definition or realize that the test is\nnot reliable. SARS, according to CDC, required a respiratory symptom; close contact\nwith another SARS case or travel to a designated epidemic area; and a positive SARS\ntest (or lack of antibodies believed to be protective) [48]. Once everyone had been\nquarantined, the second criterion was difficult to achieve outside of a hospital, and\nnumbers plummeted.\n0\n1000\n2000\n3000\n4000\n5000\n6000\n2/26 2/28 3/1 3/3 3/5 3/7 3/9 3/11 3/13 3/15 3/17 3/19 3/21 3/23 3/25 3/27 3/29 3/31\nNumber of Tests Performed and Positive Results, Austria\nTests Positive\n4\nWhat I learned from studying SARS, the previous big coronavirus scare, after the\n2003 epidemic, was that nobody had proved a coronavirus existed, let alone was\npathogenic. There was evidence against transmission, and afterwards, negative\nassessments of the extreme treatments that patients were subjected to, the\nnucleoside analog antiviral drug Ribavirin, high dose corticosteroids, invasive\nrespiratory assistance, and sometimes oseltamivir (Tamiflu). This is documented in\nmy draft book chapter (mostly complete) that you can find here:\nhttp://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/SARS.pdf\n5\n3. Virus Existence\nScientists are detecting novel RNA in multiple patients with influenza or\npneumonia-like conditions, and are assuming that the detection of RNA (which is\nbelieved to be wrapped in proteins to form an RNA virus, as coronaviruses are\nbelieved to be) is equivalent to isolation of the virus. It is not, and one of the groups\nof scientists was honest enough to admit this:\n“we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood” [2]\nBut, despite this admission, earlier in the paper they repeatedly referred to the 41\ncases (out of 59 similar cases) that tested positive for this RNA as, “41 patients…\nconfirmed to be infected with 2019-nCoV.”\nAnother paper quietly admitted that:\n“our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates” [1]\nKoch’s postulates, first stated by the great German bacteriologist Robert Koch in the\nlate 1800s, are simple logic, and can be stated as:\n• Purify the pathogen (e.g. virus) from many cases with a particular illness.\n• Expose susceptible animals (obviously not humans) to the pathogen.\n• Verify that the same illness is produced.\n• Some add that you should also re-purify the pathogen, just to be sure that it\nreally is creating the illness.\nFamous virologist Thomas Rivers stated in a 1936 speech, “It is obvious that Koch's\npostulates have not been satisfied in viral diseases”. That was a long time ago, but\nthe problem continues. And Rivers’ guidance was considered important enough to\nbe cited by papers claiming (falsely) that Koch’s Postulates had been met during the\nSARS era (2003). None of the papers referenced in this article have even attempted\nto purify the virus. And the word ‘isolation’ has been so debased by virologists it\nmeans nothing (e.g. adding impure materials to a cell culture and seeing cell death is\n‘isolation’).\nReference [1] did publish electron micrographs, but it can clearly be seen in the\nlesser magnified photo, that the particles believed to be COVID-19 are not purified,\nas the quantity of material that is cellular is much greater. The paper notes that the\nphotos are from “human airway epithelial cells”. Also consider that the photo\nincluded in the article will certainly be the “best” photo, i.e. the one with the greatest\nnumber of particles. Lab technicians may be encouraged to spend hours to look\naround to find the most photogenic image, the one that most looks like pure virus.\nThere is no way to tell that the RNA being used in the COVID-19 PCR test is found in\nthose particles seen in the electron micrograph, because you cannot see what the\ncontents are, they could be protein, RNA or DNA. There is thus no connection\nbetween the test, and the particles, and no proof that the particles are viral.\nA similar situation was revealed in March 1997 concerning HIV, when two papers\npublished in the same issue of the journal “Virology” revealed that the vast majority\nof what had previously been called “pure HIV” was impurities that were clearly not\n6\nHIV, and the mixture also included micro-vesicles that look very similar to HIV\nunder an electron microscope, but are of cellular origin. [5][6]\n7\n4. Disease Definition\nInfectious diseases always have a definition, but they are usually not publicized too\nwidely because then they would be open to ridicule. They usually have a “suspect\ncase” category based on symptoms and exposure, and a “confirmed” category that\nadds some kind of testing.\nReference [13] describes a suspect case definition for COVID-19, derived from WHO\ndefinitions for SARS and MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome). This definition\nwas in effect until January 18, 2020, and required all four of the following criteria:\n• “Fever, with or without recorded temperature”. Note that there is\nno universal definition of fever, so this may just be the opinion of a\nphysician or nurse. With SARS a fever was defined as 38C even though\nnormal body temperature is considered to be 37C (98.6F).\n• “Radiographic evidence of pneumonia”. This can occur without\nillness, as was seen in a 10 year old boy with no clinical symptoms [3].\nHe was diagnosed with pneumonia despite this.\n• “Low or normal white-cell count or low lymphocyte count”. This is\nnot really a criterion as every healthy person is included. This is also\nstrange because people suffering from an infection normally have\nelevated white blood cell counts (although they may drop in people\ndying from an infection).\n• One of the following three:\no “No reduction in symptoms after antimicrobial treatment\nfor 3 days”. This is a standard indication of a ‘viral’\npneumonia, i.e. one that does not resolve with antibiotics.\no “Epidemiologic link to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale\nMarket”. This, and the next criterion, create the illusion of an\ninfectious disease, as it prefers the diagnosis of connected\ncases.\no “Contact with other patients with similar symptoms”.\nOn January 18th the last, three-part category was changed to:\n• One of the following:\no “travel history to Wuhan”\no “direct contact with patients from Wuhan who had fever or\nrespiratory symptoms, within 14 days before illness onset”\nThe big problem is that, in contrast to the definition for SARS, a “confirmed case” of\nCOVID-19 did not originally require the criteria for a suspect case to be met, but\nsimply a positive RNA test. It did not require any symptoms or evidence of contact\nwith previous cases, illustrating total faith in the PCR technology used in the test.\nThe World Health Organization definition has the same flaw [15].\nIt was the fact that the SARS definition required both a reasonable possibility of\ncontact with a previous case, and symptoms, that allowed the epidemic to burn out.\n8\nOnce everyone was quarantined, contact with an existing case was highly unlikely,\ntesting stopped, and doctors could declare victory.\nThe Chinese eventually woke up and, around February 16th required confirmed\ncases to meet the requirements for a suspected case, as well as a positive test. They\nmay have put this new definition into practice earlier because after a massive\naddition of almost 16,000 confirmed cases on February 12th, the number fell\ndramatically each day and, by February 18th was under 500 cases, and continued to\nstay low.\nBut other countries did not learn. Korea, Japan and Italy (and perhaps other\ncountries) have started doing tests on people with no epidemiological link,\nencouraging people with the vague symptoms that are part of the definition to come\nto hospital to get checked, and obviously following up with anybody with a\nconnection to them, most of whom will be asymptomatic. Consequently, in mid to\nlate February, cases in those and other countries started to skyrocket.\nA New Disease?\nCOVID-19 is described as a distinct new disease. But it clearly is not. There are no\ndistinctive symptoms, for a start. Reference [2] showed that, among 41 early cases,\nthe only symptoms found in more than half, were fever (98%) and cough (76%).\n98% had CT Scan imaging showing problems in both lungs (although it is possible to\nhave shadowing on a CT scan without symptoms). The high percentage of cases with\nfever and shadowing in both lungs is an artefact of the disease definition, fever and\n“radiographic evidence of pneumonia” are two of the diagnostic criteria for a\nprobable case.\nThe low rate of people testing positive on the COVID-19 test is further evidence that\nthere are no obvious symptoms. If there were recognizable symptoms, doctors\nshould have a better than 3-5% chance of guessing who has the virus. While some of\nthe people may have been tested, without symptoms, because they were on a flight\nor cruise, countries outside China are encouraging people with the non-specific\nsymptoms of fever and cough to get tested, so increasingly people have symptoms of\nthe flu or pneumonia, but are still testing negative in high numbers.\nFor example, as of March 9th, Korea had found 7,382 positive cases out of 179,160\npeople tested (4.1%) [20]. In Washington State, where they appear to be reluctant\nto test anyone, only 1 out of 27 tested by February 24th had tested positive (3.7%)\n[21]. Perhaps if they had tested all 438 who were then under quarantine, the\nepidemic would have exploded from 1 to about 16 cases (3.7% of 438). By March\n9th, 1,246 tests had been performed in Washington with 136 found positive (11%).\nObviously, in neither location can doctors recognize cases clinically.\n9\n5. Testing\nAssuming, for a moment, the existence of a new coronavirus, what would a test tell\nus, at this stage? Or rather, what does it not tell us?\n• Without purification and exposing animals to viral particles we do not know\nif the virus is pathogenic (disease causing). It could be an opportunistic\ninfection (invades unhealthy people with weakened immune systems) or a\npassenger virus (that is carried along by risky behavior, such as eating an\nanimal carrier of a virus).\n• We don’t know the false positive rate of the test without validating a large\nnumber of positive tests by attempting to purify virus. Every positive test for\nwhich virus could not be purified would be a false positive, and every\nnegative test for which virus could be purified would be a false negative. But\nthe virus has not yet been purified, so test validation is impossible.\n• If someone is sick there is no proof that any or all of their symptoms are due\nto the virus, even if it is present. Some people may be immune, some may\nhave some symptoms caused by the virus, but others caused by the drugs\nthey are given, by pre-existing health conditions, and so on.\n• We don’t know if the people who test negative are infected or not, especially\nwhen they show up with similar symptoms. For example, in [2], out of 59\npatients with similar symptoms, only 41 tested positive, but the researchers\nwere clearly not sure whether the remaining 18 were truly uninfected. If they\ntruly are not, they lend weight to COVID-19 not being the cause of any of the\nillnesses, as they had symptoms indistinguishable from the 41 positives.\nTesting at such an early stage of knowledge is incredibly dangerous. It spreads\npanic, it can put people on dangerous medications, other circumstances of their\ntreatment can be physically and psychologically damaging (such as intubation and\nisolation, and even seeing all the doctors and nurses in special suits emphasizing\nhow deathly sick you are).",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"covid\",\"scamdemic\"],\"links\":[\"https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf\",\"http://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/SARS.pdf\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "cc192a6ac4086732e95c3fc9f628d6fdc3a4b39b",
  "block": 57932268,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T13:44:24",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "sqube",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "fakebook",
      "weight": 100
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "43de435eb342707c5619a71b2df20639dcfd39be",
  "block": 57932265,
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T13:44:15",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "censored",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "fakebook",
      "title": "FAKEBOOK",
      "body": "\"Your annoying, incessant desire to think for yourself and have your own opinions goes against our community standards!\"\n\n~Larken Rose",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"censored\",\"thought\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "e9b7e046595616e7cc477642490354df945d01ad",
  "block": 57918504,
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T02:12:27",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "drink-it-up",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "fd2acca3f16ab8df0fa7b9994905ad280d9ceaee",
  "block": 57918497,
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T02:12:06",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "freedom-of-speech",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "dd890615c11ccb00f5e9ceb916338696e0917263",
  "block": 57917485,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T01:21:00",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "facebook-blocks-australian-users-from-viewing-or-sharing-news",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "8acb87a3b52ecf6462070619066397cac101dd75",
  "block": 57917473,
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T01:20:24",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "watch-near-miss-as-truck-careers-over-8-lanes",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "6dbf9d0eac56ed85957176b09454c916fe06dc38",
  "block": 57917472,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T01:20:21",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "sqube",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "facebook-blocks-australian-users-from-viewing-or-sharing-news",
      "weight": 100
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "c2fb133c9e121f349fb811b30058e2f496e9456b",
  "block": 57917470,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T01:20:15",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "breaking",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "facebook-blocks-australian-users-from-viewing-or-sharing-news",
      "title": "Facebook blocks Australian users from viewing or sharing news",
      "body": "https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-56099523?fbclid=IwAR09HnIKE5yLIyjpAEV_R4UACXHpRRtDUt3Y7wKrEPFfWhE6e9wxUq-iU54",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"breaking\",\"news\",\"australia\"],\"links\":[\"https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-56099523?fbclid=IwAR09HnIKE5yLIyjpAEV_R4UACXHpRRtDUt3Y7wKrEPFfWhE6e9wxUq-iU54\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "043b6ffd12426b83323bb3408c297dcd1a653256",
  "block": 57917445,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T01:19:00",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "shannongibson"
      ],
      "id": "community",
      "json": "[\"subscribe\",{\"community\":\"hive-139765\"}]"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "c4dbbd32066e3c5fc4e328243c5e43dfa521cee9",
  "block": 57917440,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T01:18:45",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "shannongibson"
      ],
      "id": "community",
      "json": "[\"subscribe\",{\"community\":\"hive-166629\"}]"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "204eab78fc65fc8b490453181dbba6d5f746603b",
  "block": 57917438,
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T01:18:39",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "shannongibson"
      ],
      "id": "community",
      "json": "[\"subscribe\",{\"community\":\"hive-167622\"}]"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "f1d6eda53c984ed72e2f75bee43c60e66c1280df",
  "block": 57917431,
  "trx_in_block": 9,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T01:18:18",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "shannongibson"
      ],
      "id": "community",
      "json": "[\"subscribe\",{\"community\":\"hive-138364\"}]"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "c15f05826fa7b5b38a255d5edf057f3f2ef45ef2",
  "block": 57917429,
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T01:18:12",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "shannongibson"
      ],
      "id": "community",
      "json": "[\"subscribe\",{\"community\":\"hive-152587\"}]"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "784872f077ee60b4ea145cbb2f55bc7356bd6705",
  "block": 57917424,
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T01:17:57",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "shannongibson"
      ],
      "id": "community",
      "json": "[\"subscribe\",{\"community\":\"hive-193552\"}]"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "0445241701f7d571ef53029df1cdce9cc63ccf83",
  "block": 57917422,
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T01:17:51",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "shannongibson"
      ],
      "id": "community",
      "json": "[\"subscribe\",{\"community\":\"hive-153970\"}]"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "1a2f155f42c44d289fb9d10e2fa6785e51bfda48",
  "block": 57917418,
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T01:17:39",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "shannongibson"
      ],
      "id": "community",
      "json": "[\"subscribe\",{\"community\":\"hive-109286\"}]"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "1d5834b0d552af45a4266fde65af81b898e1fa71",
  "block": 57917361,
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-08T01:14:48",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "breaking",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "watch-near-miss-as-truck-careers-over-8-lanes",
      "title": "Watch near miss as truck careers over 8 lanes!",
      "body": "https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-australia-58712739",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"breaking\",\"news\",\"australia\"],\"links\":[\"https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-australia-58712739\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "c0f78b5ec6a664ab6ac0ef1b9f810245d8f923f2",
  "block": 57876983,
  "trx_in_block": 13,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-06T15:24:27",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "edgar-winter-and-ronnie-montrose-free-ride",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "2c189d472996c216b9903d8652d0d3aa3c02ccff",
  "block": 57876974,
  "trx_in_block": 9,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-06T15:24:00",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "drink-it-up",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "e493c970706027699257707fcd43db0b2891f218",
  "block": 57876971,
  "trx_in_block": 14,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-06T15:23:51",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "freedom-of-speech",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "e8a3f58ae83e4d147b664d0bb1cab5e1454814a6",
  "block": 57876970,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-06T15:23:48",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "so-my-question-for-those-who-are-following-the-government",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "6933520cce6f6b01e4ef0ab0abc3ec355c3e954b",
  "block": 57876968,
  "trx_in_block": 12,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-06T15:23:42",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "283e354e363a3f35492f924295ae8f1f7263250f",
  "block": 57876962,
  "trx_in_block": 16,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-06T15:23:24",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "mandates",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "102fe70e6d2a381d0a9300f106b9236bff85bdb5",
  "block": 57876938,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-06T15:22:12",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "sqube",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "mandates",
      "weight": 100
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "64ba2b9baa1aab01cf39d178befc92bc92af2da4",
  "block": 57876931,
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-06T15:21:51",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "covid",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "mandates",
      "title": "Mandates",
      "body": "![clot2.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmT1Tn6bX8AcrZUNFPwnhoWsEBKmfWBG89kkZJTcthcFQJ/clot2.png)",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"covid\",\"fraud\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmT1Tn6bX8AcrZUNFPwnhoWsEBKmfWBG89kkZJTcthcFQJ/clot2.png\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "06f65ce11eefe63484948eb3fc118ed38ab28f04",
  "block": 57823078,
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-04T18:11:48",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "test",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless",
      "title": "COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless",
      "body": "On the 27th of June OffGuardian published an article by Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter titled “COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless”, on July 7th Politifact published a “fact check” response to this article, without contacting either OffGuardian or the authors for comment. Below is the author’s response, an email to which no member of the PolitiFact team has yet responded.\nDear Angie Drobnic Holan, Daniel Funke & Aaron Sharockman\n\nMy name is Torsten Engelbrecht and I am journalist in Hamburg, Germany. On July 7, you claim in a piece that my OffGuardian article “COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless” (co-authored by Konstantin Demeter) is “inaccurate.”\n\nUnfortunately, your piece is unsubstantiated from start to finish. This is a very serious issue, not least because Facebook has flagged our article as false news. To clarify this issue please answer the following questions (at least in short):\n\n1. You claim that our assertion that “The existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact” is “inaccurate.” To compare the DNA of the alleged father and the child one must ensure that the DNAs are extracted from the bodies of the alleged father and the child. This entails forensic precautions to identify two separate individuals prior to obtaining their blood or other tissue samples for analysis. The same standard applies to the identification of virus particle RNA and proteins.\n\nWhen cells, cellular debris and particles are mixed in a culture, the only way of determining which RNA and proteins are viral is by separation of the particles from all the non-viral material. In a paternity suit the genome can be obtained from a single “particle” (father/child).\n\nHowever, since the viral genome cannot be procured from a single particle, one must obtain it from a large mass of identical, that is, purified particles. Or at least material that does not contain extraneous RNA. This is an extremely simple concept readily understood even by the layman.\n\nThat is to say, if there is no evidence for purification (as we outline in our OffGuardian article), how is it possible to claim that the RNA obtained is a viral genome?\n\nHow can such RNA be widely used for the diagnosis of infection with a new virus? And then, how can the PCR test be “eminently suitable for viral detection”?\n\n2. You claim that our “article is inaccurate” because “polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests are among the most common and reliable ways to test for the coronavirus.”\n\nDo you really want to say that “common” is proof for accuracy?\n\nAs outlined in our article, so-called SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests are meaningless because…\n\n… there is no proof that they are “calibrated” with a sequence coming from the genome of a new pathogenic virus, because such virus has never been purified.\n… they do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with.\n… in April the WHO changed the algorithm, recommending that from then on a test can be regarded as “positive” even if just the E-gene assay gives a “positive” result; but according to Corman et al. (who developed the assay) propably reacts positive to all Asian viruses (see point 3.3 as well)*\n… many tests have a Cq well above (up to 45) of what is regarded as reliable in the MIQE guidelines.\nIn which ways are these statements wrong?\n\n3. To back your claim you are citing a fact sheet of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) saying “the test is ‘designed to detect the virus that causes COVID-19 in respiratory specimens, for example nasal or oral swabs.'”\n\nWhy should a statement of the CDC be evidence that anything is factually correct? Do you have complete faith in what the CDC says?\n\nIn our article we cite instruction manuals of RT-PCR tests which say exactly the opposite, among them the “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel” file in which it says:\n\nDetection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”\n\nDoes that not contradict what you claim?\n\nWhy does the CDC test, as well as all others, have a “Research Use Only” approval if they supposedly are so reliable?\n\nAs we also mention in our article, on April 4 2020 the WHO officially advised that all tests using the E-gene assay (which usually is one of two or three assays used in many tests) should be regarded as positive even if just the E-gene assay resulted positive.\n\nBut how can one draw that conclusion when one considers alone that the E-gene assay likely detects all Asian viruses, as stated in Corman et al., for example?\n\n4. As outlined in our article:\n\nAnother essential problem is that many PCR tests have a ‘cycle quantification’ (Cq) value of over 35, and some, including the ‘Drosten PCR test’, even have a Cq of 45… The inventor himself, Kary Mullis… stated: ‘If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR.’… In a recent podcast interview [Stepehn. A.] Bustin points out that… a Cq in the 20s to 30s should be aimed at and there is concern regarding the reliability of the results for any Cq over 35.”\n\nSo how can so-called SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests be “not scientifically meaningless,” as you claim, if they have a Cg of over 35 or even 45?\n\n5. You claim that our assertion that inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, “regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection” is “false.” And to back this claim you write:\n\nIn a fact-check, Reuters rated that claim false — the source is a 1996 article about HIV/AIDS. It does not say PCR tests are ineffective for detecting viruses.”\n\nHow can a so-called “fact-check” by Reuters based on a 1996 article as source show that our assertion about Mullis is false when the source of the mentioned statement in our article is not the source your quoted Reuters piece is based on (which is the 2020 article “The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The ‘Corona Test’ Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus” written by Celia Farber)?\n\nWe write that Kary Mullis “regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection,” while you claim that the Reuters piece on which your claim is based on “does not say PCR tests are ineffective for detecting viruses.”\n\nBut “to detect a viral infection” and “to detect viruses” are not the same thing.\n\nThis also shows how imprecise your reasoning is. You don’t seem to know that to detect a viral infection, you need to find millions and millions of viral particles, not just one or a few viruses or fragments of them.\n\nAnd the Reuters piece you are referring to states very well and clearly what we write, that Mullis said that “the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection” because in the Reuters article it says [emphasis added]:\n\nPCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all.”\n\nSo why is it not correct to state that Kary Mullis “regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection”?\n\nAgainst this background we also state in our article that the term “viral load” is deception” and also that the experiment “to prove beyond any doubt that the PCR can measure how much a person is ‘burdened’ with a disease-causing virus…has not yet happened.”\n\nDo you know of any such solid experiment?\n\n6. You claim that we lay “out several (inaccurate) theories about PCR tests. None of them prove that the tests are ‘scientifically meaningless.'” But in fact, we lay out technical facts.\n\nWhich “inaccurate theories” are you referring to?\n\n7. You claim that our assertion that “There are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19” is “inaccurate.”\n\nWhich are the distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19 that has never been observed in another known disease?\n\n8. You claim that in our OffGuardian article we make\n\nseveral…inaccurate claims…including:… Between 22% and 77% ‘of the ‘positive’ tests are false ‘positives.’ Currently, about 92% of tests in the United States produce negative results.”\n\nIn contrast to your claim, we never stated that “Between 22% and 77% ‘of the ‘positive’ tests are false ‘positives.'” Instead, we just cited two hypothetical scenarios presented in the orthodox publication Ärztezeitung.\n\nWould you rate their article as “Pants on Fire” as well?\n\nIf yes, what exactly is wrong with the calculation of the Positive Predictive Value with the different scenarios presented by the Ärztezeitung?\n\nOne scenario outlined in the Ärztezeitung using a prevalence of 20% is most probably higher than the prevalence of what is called SARS-CoV-2 in the general population. Hence, presuming a specificity of 95%, a false positive rate of 22% would be more than realistic. Don’t you think so?\n\nWhy are you are confusing the “positive rate” with the “positive predictive value”, i.e. inversely the percentage of the false positives among all the positive results, the latter being 8% in your source?\n\n9. In our OffGuardian article we write:\n\nMoreover, among other factors that can alter the result, before starting with the actual PCR, in case you are looking for presumed RNA viruses such as SARS-CoV-2, the RNA must be converted to complementary DNA (cDNA) with the enzyme Reverse Transcriptase… But this transformation process is “widely recognized as inefficient and variable, as Jessica Schwaber from the Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine in Toronto and two research colleagues pointed out in a 2019 paper. Stephen A. Bustin acknowledges problems with PCR in a comparable way.”\n\nDoesn’t this alone seriously undermine the validity of the tests?\n\n10. As an argument for the fact that our article in which we outline that COVID19 PCR tests are scientifically meaningless is incorrect, you also state that “Health care providers have also used them for detecting viruses like HIV.”\n\nBut in fact, the PCR test is not sufficient to detect an HIV infection, so why should it be good enough to detect a SARS-CoV-2 infection?\n\n11. You claim the “OffGuardian has a track record of publishing conspiracy theories.”\n\nAre you not aware of the fact that the term “conspiracy theory” has been introduced by the CIA in 1967 with the sole purpose of discrediting politically unpopular views?\n\nWhy do you use this term which is nothing else than an ad hominem reasoning instead of focussing on what is factualy right or wrong?\n\n12. You write, “There are three main coronavirus tests: diagnostic, antibody and antigen. Diagnostic tests, also known as PCR tests,…” This is not correct.\n\nDidn’t you know that any test to determine the cause of a disease is a “diagnostic test”–and that PCR tests are also called “molecular tests” (and that to say that “diagnostic tests are also known as PCR tests” is not correct)?\n\n13. At the very beginning of your article you write “Bloggers stated on June 27, 2020 in an article.”\n\nHow do you get round naming us “bloggers”?\n\nI am first of all a journalist, and my co-author Konstantin has never acted as blogger. And this term “blogger” has not been mentioned in the brief curriculum vitae on our OffGuardian article, either!\n\n[NB. This question was added in a follow-up email sent a few days later – ed.]\n\n… please allow me to add another question:\n\n14.How can you deliver unbiased results if you are financed by major corporations such as Facebook or the The E.W. Scripps Company (see here) and if even the Poynter Institute which acquired you in 2018 cannot, with all the will in the world, be described as unaffected by major capital interests (see here)?\n\nI am looking forward to receiving your answers.\n\nBest wishes,\nTorsten Engelbrecht\n\nThis e-mail was originally sent on the 23rd of July, with a follow up on the 28th. Since then, neither OffGuardian nor the author have received any reply.\n\nhttps://off-guardian.org/2020/07/31/open-letter-refuting-politifacts-fact-check/ \n\nCORONAVIRUS TEST: A total fraud, gives up to 80% false positives, can be adjusted to produce any result\nhttp://stateofthenation.co/?p=11173\n\nSmoking gun: Fauci states COVID PCR test has fatal flaw; confession from the “beloved” expert of experts Aug\n27\nby Jon Rappoport\nThe COVID PCR test is a complete fraud\nhttps://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/08/27/smoking-gun-fauci-states-covid-pcr-test-has-fatal-flaw/\n\nThe PCR Test Fraud\nhttps://rforresistance.wordpress.com/2021/02/25/the-pcr-test-fraud/\n\nMultiple sources \nthe pcr covid test is fraud\nhttps://duckduckgo.com/?q=the+pcr+covid+test+is+fraud+&ia=web",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"covid\",\"pcr\"],\"links\":[\"https://off-guardian.org/2020/07/31/open-letter-refuting-politifacts-fact-check/\",\"http://stateofthenation.co/?p=11173\",\"https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/08/27/smoking-gun-fauci-states-covid-pcr-test-has-fatal-flaw/\",\"https://rforresistance.wordpress.com/2021/02/25/the-pcr-test-fraud/\",\"https://duckduckgo.com/?q=the+pcr+covid+test+is+fraud+&ia=web\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "c7ca6065015f0f33551f4f18b1125b57eec4d7e7",
  "block": 57822954,
  "trx_in_block": 7,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-04T18:05:33",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "kosmatimuc",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "25fee0b86906f580850703ecd21d2ca1063e6381",
  "block": 57822867,
  "trx_in_block": 10,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-04T18:01:12",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "sqube",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless",
      "weight": 100
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "ac705e6d7aa849a9a836446beb78cc406196df06",
  "block": 57822864,
  "trx_in_block": 34,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-04T18:01:03",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "test",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless",
      "title": "COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless",
      "body": "On the 27th of June OffGuardian published an article by Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter titled “COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless”, on July 7th Politifact published a “fact check” response to this article, without contacting either OffGuardian or the authors for comment. Below is the author’s response, an email to which no member of the PolitiFact team has yet responded.\nDear Angie Drobnic Holan, Daniel Funke & Aaron Sharockman\n\nMy name is Torsten Engelbrecht and I am journalist in Hamburg, Germany. On July 7, you claim in a piece that my OffGuardian article “COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless” (co-authored by Konstantin Demeter) is “inaccurate.”\n\nUnfortunately, your piece is unsubstantiated from start to finish. This is a very serious issue, not least because Facebook has flagged our article as false news. To clarify this issue please answer the following questions (at least in short):\n\n1. You claim that our assertion that “The existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact” is “inaccurate.” To compare the DNA of the alleged father and the child one must ensure that the DNAs are extracted from the bodies of the alleged father and the child. This entails forensic precautions to identify two separate individuals prior to obtaining their blood or other tissue samples for analysis. The same standard applies to the identification of virus particle RNA and proteins.\n\nWhen cells, cellular debris and particles are mixed in a culture, the only way of determining which RNA and proteins are viral is by separation of the particles from all the non-viral material. In a paternity suit the genome can be obtained from a single “particle” (father/child).\n\nHowever, since the viral genome cannot be procured from a single particle, one must obtain it from a large mass of identical, that is, purified particles. Or at least material that does not contain extraneous RNA. This is an extremely simple concept readily understood even by the layman.\n\nThat is to say, if there is no evidence for purification (as we outline in our OffGuardian article), how is it possible to claim that the RNA obtained is a viral genome?\n\nHow can such RNA be widely used for the diagnosis of infection with a new virus? And then, how can the PCR test be “eminently suitable for viral detection”?\n\n2. You claim that our “article is inaccurate” because “polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests are among the most common and reliable ways to test for the coronavirus.”\n\nDo you really want to say that “common” is proof for accuracy?\n\nAs outlined in our article, so-called SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests are meaningless because…\n\n… there is no proof that they are “calibrated” with a sequence coming from the genome of a new pathogenic virus, because such virus has never been purified.\n… they do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with.\n… in April the WHO changed the algorithm, recommending that from then on a test can be regarded as “positive” even if just the E-gene assay gives a “positive” result; but according to Corman et al. (who developed the assay) propably reacts positive to all Asian viruses (see point 3.3 as well)*\n… many tests have a Cq well above (up to 45) of what is regarded as reliable in the MIQE guidelines.\nIn which ways are these statements wrong?\n\n3. To back your claim you are citing a fact sheet of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) saying “the test is ‘designed to detect the virus that causes COVID-19 in respiratory specimens, for example nasal or oral swabs.'”\n\nWhy should a statement of the CDC be evidence that anything is factually correct? Do you have complete faith in what the CDC says?\n\nIn our article we cite instruction manuals of RT-PCR tests which say exactly the opposite, among them the “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel” file in which it says:\n\nDetection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”\n\nDoes that not contradict what you claim?\n\nWhy does the CDC test, as well as all others, have a “Research Use Only” approval if they supposedly are so reliable?\n\nAs we also mention in our article, on April 4 2020 the WHO officially advised that all tests using the E-gene assay (which usually is one of two or three assays used in many tests) should be regarded as positive even if just the E-gene assay resulted positive.\n\nBut how can one draw that conclusion when one considers alone that the E-gene assay likely detects all Asian viruses, as stated in Corman et al., for example?\n\n4. As outlined in our article:\n\nAnother essential problem is that many PCR tests have a ‘cycle quantification’ (Cq) value of over 35, and some, including the ‘Drosten PCR test’, even have a Cq of 45… The inventor himself, Kary Mullis… stated: ‘If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR.’… In a recent podcast interview [Stepehn. A.] Bustin points out that… a Cq in the 20s to 30s should be aimed at and there is concern regarding the reliability of the results for any Cq over 35.”\n\nSo how can so-called SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests be “not scientifically meaningless,” as you claim, if they have a Cg of over 35 or even 45?\n\n5. You claim that our assertion that inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, “regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection” is “false.” And to back this claim you write:\n\nIn a fact-check, Reuters rated that claim false — the source is a 1996 article about HIV/AIDS. It does not say PCR tests are ineffective for detecting viruses.”\n\nHow can a so-called “fact-check” by Reuters based on a 1996 article as source show that our assertion about Mullis is false when the source of the mentioned statement in our article is not the source your quoted Reuters piece is based on (which is the 2020 article “The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The ‘Corona Test’ Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus” written by Celia Farber)?\n\nWe write that Kary Mullis “regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection,” while you claim that the Reuters piece on which your claim is based on “does not say PCR tests are ineffective for detecting viruses.”\n\nBut “to detect a viral infection” and “to detect viruses” are not the same thing.\n\nThis also shows how imprecise your reasoning is. You don’t seem to know that to detect a viral infection, you need to find millions and millions of viral particles, not just one or a few viruses or fragments of them.\n\nAnd the Reuters piece you are referring to states very well and clearly what we write, that Mullis said that “the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection” because in the Reuters article it says [emphasis added]:\n\nPCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all.”\n\nSo why is it not correct to state that Kary Mullis “regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection”?\n\nAgainst this background we also state in our article that the term “viral load” is deception” and also that the experiment “to prove beyond any doubt that the PCR can measure how much a person is ‘burdened’ with a disease-causing virus…has not yet happened.”\n\nDo you know of any such solid experiment?\n\n6. You claim that we lay “out several (inaccurate) theories about PCR tests. None of them prove that the tests are ‘scientifically meaningless.'” But in fact, we lay out technical facts.\n\nWhich “inaccurate theories” are you referring to?\n\n7. You claim that our assertion that “There are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19” is “inaccurate.”\n\nWhich are the distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19 that has never been observed in another known disease?\n\n8. You claim that in our OffGuardian article we make\n\nseveral…inaccurate claims…including:… Between 22% and 77% ‘of the ‘positive’ tests are false ‘positives.’ Currently, about 92% of tests in the United States produce negative results.”\n\nIn contrast to your claim, we never stated that “Between 22% and 77% ‘of the ‘positive’ tests are false ‘positives.'” Instead, we just cited two hypothetical scenarios presented in the orthodox publication Ärztezeitung.\n\nWould you rate their article as “Pants on Fire” as well?\n\nIf yes, what exactly is wrong with the calculation of the Positive Predictive Value with the different scenarios presented by the Ärztezeitung?\n\nOne scenario outlined in the Ärztezeitung using a prevalence of 20% is most probably higher than the prevalence of what is called SARS-CoV-2 in the general population. Hence, presuming a specificity of 95%, a false positive rate of 22% would be more than realistic. Don’t you think so?\n\nWhy are you are confusing the “positive rate” with the “positive predictive value”, i.e. inversely the percentage of the false positives among all the positive results, the latter being 8% in your source?\n\n9. In our OffGuardian article we write:\n\nMoreover, among other factors that can alter the result, before starting with the actual PCR, in case you are looking for presumed RNA viruses such as SARS-CoV-2, the RNA must be converted to complementary DNA (cDNA) with the enzyme Reverse Transcriptase… But this transformation process is “widely recognized as inefficient and variable, as Jessica Schwaber from the Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine in Toronto and two research colleagues pointed out in a 2019 paper. Stephen A. Bustin acknowledges problems with PCR in a comparable way.”\n\nDoesn’t this alone seriously undermine the validity of the tests?\n\n10. As an argument for the fact that our article in which we outline that COVID19 PCR tests are scientifically meaningless is incorrect, you also state that “Health care providers have also used them for detecting viruses like HIV.”\n\nBut in fact, the PCR test is not sufficient to detect an HIV infection, so why should it be good enough to detect a SARS-CoV-2 infection?\n\n11. You claim the “OffGuardian has a track record of publishing conspiracy theories.”\n\nAre you not aware of the fact that the term “conspiracy theory” has been introduced by the CIA in 1967 with the sole purpose of discrediting politically unpopular views?\n\nWhy do you use this term which is nothing else than an ad hominem reasoning instead of focussing on what is factualy right or wrong?\n\n12. You write, “There are three main coronavirus tests: diagnostic, antibody and antigen. Diagnostic tests, also known as PCR tests,…” This is not correct.\n\nDidn’t you know that any test to determine the cause of a disease is a “diagnostic test”–and that PCR tests are also called “molecular tests” (and that to say that “diagnostic tests are also known as PCR tests” is not correct)?\n\n13. At the very beginning of your article you write “Bloggers stated on June 27, 2020 in an article.”\n\nHow do you get round naming us “bloggers”?\n\nI am first of all a journalist, and my co-author Konstantin has never acted as blogger. And this term “blogger” has not been mentioned in the brief curriculum vitae on our OffGuardian article, either!\n\n[NB. This question was added in a follow-up email sent a few days later – ed.]\n\n… please allow me to add another question:\n\n14.How can you deliver unbiased results if you are financed by major corporations such as Facebook or the The E.W. Scripps Company (see here) and if even the Poynter Institute which acquired you in 2018 cannot, with all the will in the world, be described as unaffected by major capital interests (see here)?\n\nI am looking forward to receiving your answers.\n\nBest wishes,\nTorsten Engelbrecht\n\nThis e-mail was originally sent on the 23rd of July, with a follow up on the 28th. Since then, neither OffGuardian nor the author have received any reply.\n\nhttps://off-guardian.org/2020/07/31/open-letter-refuting-politifacts-fact-check/ \n\nCORONAVIRUS TEST: A total fraud, gives up to 80% false positives, can be adjusted to produce any result\nhttp://stateofthenation.co/?p=11173\n\nSmoking gun: Fauci states COVID PCR test has fatal flaw; confession from the “beloved” expert of experts Aug\n27\nby Jon Rappoport\nThe COVID PCR test is a complete fraud\nhttps://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/08/27/smoking-gun-fauci-states-covid-pcr-test-has-fatal-flaw/\n\nThe PCR Test Fraud\nhttps://rforresistance.wordpress.com/2021/02/25/the-pcr-test-fraud/\n\nMultiple sources \nthe pcr covid test is fraud\nhttps://duckduckgo.com/?q=the+pcr+covid+test+is+fraud+&ia=web",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"test\",\"pcr\",\"covid\"],\"links\":[\"https://off-guardian.org/2020/07/31/open-letter-refuting-politifacts-fact-check/\",\"http://stateofthenation.co/?p=11173\",\"https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/08/27/smoking-gun-fauci-states-covid-pcr-test-has-fatal-flaw/\",\"https://rforresistance.wordpress.com/2021/02/25/the-pcr-test-fraud/\",\"https://duckduckgo.com/?q=the+pcr+covid+test+is+fraud+&ia=web\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "043794e2c6135d4bc614805df4b590d21a6d7038",
  "block": 57822730,
  "trx_in_block": 22,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-04T17:54:21",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "sqube",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "so-my-question-for-those-who-are-following-the-government",
      "weight": 100
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "dd4f95fa2eb7c58fad8b324db5cdbb219b36c74f",
  "block": 57822727,
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-04T17:54:12",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "covid",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "so-my-question-for-those-who-are-following-the-government",
      "title": "So my question for those who are following the government :",
      "body": "When did you come to the conclusion that people you don't trust are telling you the truth?",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"covid\",\"vaccination\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "e18707dc756e845d96e60e5f1d79033f455eb076",
  "block": 57810405,
  "trx_in_block": 10,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-10-04T07:34:42",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "shannongibson",
      "vesting_shares": "26699.446440 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "50eb1a36550bf862f325713335d142c98ebeb662",
  "block": 55744365,
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-07-24T00:31:06",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "shannongibson",
      "vesting_shares": "26884.959396 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "dfa0ad2538828db053c3250870d3563d31fc4a10",
  "block": 55349471,
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-07-10T04:05:48",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "constitution",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "freedom-of-speech",
      "title": "Freedom of Speech",
      "body": "![image.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmd43gski7ibYuVtPoy4UZYYzjtcMXUKpHfcUP4N5rdFDH/image.png)",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"constitution\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmd43gski7ibYuVtPoy4UZYYzjtcMXUKpHfcUP4N5rdFDH/image.png\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "a703d53ef4d337e80a59a83b41e9dd46f4b53dd3",
  "block": 55285283,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-07-07T22:14:12",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "bullshit",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "drink-it-up",
      "title": "Drink it up",
      "body": "![image.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUhi5i9juz6mZzZFejx3Sn7dwKzZPWposDGzKQzEmMari/image.png)",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"bullshit\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUhi5i9juz6mZzZFejx3Sn7dwKzZPWposDGzKQzEmMari/image.png\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "87a1acd2477f4b698b6fe22cbeb09dcaa5f3c18c",
  "block": 55267672,
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-07-07T07:27:27",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "edgar-winter-group-w-ronnie-montrose-keep-playin-that-rock-and-roll-live-1972",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "32bdf8ad424659f0dd20677658e5dd7668145f1d",
  "block": 55267671,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-07-07T07:27:24",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "that-it-wasn-t-like-anything-else-that-wasn-t-like-other-psychedelics",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "d0d149bcf59df0cfc9a0edbb7ece268ef9614cf4",
  "block": 55267670,
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-07-07T07:27:21",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "doctors-are-the-only-ones-that-kill-more-than-those-shot-and-killed-by-police",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "bb7ebc10ca211aad801e22f0d63bc98070a1c698",
  "block": 55267669,
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-07-07T07:27:18",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "wow-who-knew-cdc-admits-at-least-94-of-deaths-from-covid19-were-actually-deaths-from-other-causes-factsnotfear",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "29b6fd9c0d18ba415e2ca55548670a63a963ed00",
  "block": 55267666,
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-07-07T07:27:09",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "shannongibson",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "independence-day",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "2e8a15531e2723073c93034daaa575bedeb42f54",
  "block": 55260930,
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-07-07T01:48:12",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "fourth",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "independence-day",
      "title": "Independence Day",
      "body": "A person only pays taxes, because of a threat of violence by law enFORCEment, forced to pay taxes and they call that freedom.\nIf there was no threat a person would not pay...this is not volunteering at all.\nIn the greatest country in the world, there is something very wrong. And you feel good about it.\n![image.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmXLdsBPbfdVobzTvWzVWME1gBn1z87sS3TMpnz5isTJSH/image.png)",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"fourth\",\"of\",\"july\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmXLdsBPbfdVobzTvWzVWME1gBn1z87sS3TMpnz5isTJSH/image.png\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "cdada19bda62368a3842b54d3b97976c679065d3",
  "block": 55260752,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-07-07T01:39:15",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "vax",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "wow-who-knew-cdc-admits-at-least-94-of-deaths-from-covid19-were-actually-deaths-from-other-causes-factsnotfear",
      "title": "Wow. Who knew?!? CDC ADMITS AT LEAST 94% OF “DEATHS FROM COVID19”WERE ACTUALLY DEATHS FROM OTHER CAUSES. #FactsNotFear",
      "body": "https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/QJDYCVPMV2G2M5M",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"vax\",\"covid\"],\"links\":[\"https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/QJDYCVPMV2G2M5M\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "6cc7086e17bb9cd952c79ea402ec47ea61dc4a8d",
  "block": 55099016,
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-07-01T09:56:33",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "law",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "doctors-are-the-only-ones-that-kill-more-than-those-shot-and-killed-by-police",
      "title": "Doctors are the only ones that kill more than those shot and killed by police",
      "body": "@@ -5043,16 +5043,119 @@\n Y3VFA/image.png)\n+%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmZCAid5YKjKwGVuCmAqPodGDRKfgXQgZMMrnyRu18ECwj/image.png)\n",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"authority\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcTPEXfwE7XjrW3HQYv2qYDGwfZuvCsjzFnBzZ2kGsSt1/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUK5ce8SBNahmptrP1wMqjNGXmUeK92YA63PxXy18Hvmc/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNV8GwKwbhh8VHUjM5UX8yijQykEPKik7fEE4zihGENNf/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYfY2HECYBfnvb5auo1JHe9S3RNm2L7J6odQLXVaqUeLw/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQAbWNbfj3ozJQ29PHDuwVryQKw5bFhhzUXRULPvZ8F4i/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmP14xWnqFD7E9VtGBPqwhHArzWj2Mt5WvaZxb1KpPywYZ/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPfL9tqCMj4voXsSc8EBHm2QcpCJpnU37HkG1A3bq2KTs/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmSuKjv1aJnMdDrdZURHp1CimzBDQaKDRLW91muXwouuKR/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPBYpfEiTuP4AHEhrrfPoL478iTGNyL5owuMdUHPAmTqy/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmayJHNJmVpAeookuxYzjNYic1VTmehhGLfnZ7HWzkadqP/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmP27sPzaXBoQv2qo1C4gn61YpmDtVCK884DvxDrgzRSbo/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmeXeT1nBZy6R5jgTTCBt51UTEzMGHV7FkyAQ2BzWs2NDo/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmeiJHmLvLQQYy2mPDVr7PkYMx2VDcwcEbzRTgtBvtpZp1/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUFoZggabuTG5VdvwzJm6bx84CZszN7Rgiqo9o2V3TTjf/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmY5j5jHEfAFENGak8E1RX1Rm5Hg43Ua16CdYGKxRxEmcu/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmXbbkUtqx2kCb6B36ZBNVxz7mLsz8LGWjfiSVpbTfYZ6R/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmf5Gu4vQGUKjE7UnL2DYKgaWtPY7sKm7kHraBefmZqHHq/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzYpW2s9n6vseyWsU7jE3n8y8jJkgcEjaQS3EAsswQk3/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTmX3vJxGVanskXkk4TmL2HqiQwsC6NnHKirGkL4hz25Y/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRCQaDX2gvmVJZ3vma4E82r1uEUJkHk7BytD7YKUrvyhq/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmZtiZy2enYr4qdsAqgoyE57dScQ9CTRsNTbNrwCf7po3w/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTRsnV4hEJVBZGPNMdnsvsBuZkHybvntdduAiy4vJuUaC/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdz2rmbPjrWTEgN9VMgyMzRp6Lvwurdm4cbt6Dnbi8VUo/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmY8MiGYMQvvzZ4d1RExXBNMZA8HWk23hSbnvHrFKmEkXC/sold.jpg\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQngvaM1CGitHSLZgSnT4edU6iGLRZHAvWYet5ZVkEEeL/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbD1UcVq6jgfofBZ6o1eUAN1GuAiSVan3TD7tMtBVUEbL/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGeAA8UkeE6QohcsMCtAcNGe9ZXKfUkZqRdrVZo21LJ8/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcJAc3RfRYF3Hk9HDNjeyPce4cMbsqbEbE8vgPn1J6NvW/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbsxj9TweMNeWxptJ3HCPtoH1gnRscGpt6FPfpHKUFQFR/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmeCBeCJNEQHBA8PAHkHDvoeZRxjGnSUKNqehm9k4TwSL3/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNNZf1pyfxyqWJ24wRVVQJ7yikYq795JQoFqiGMaMaHiJ/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmP38ezqngMCus1rbsFdphJNCZyCfjYfUpNVVy48v8heno/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbTNvWS4HbwthuJBdThA655DJE3wvgXJMSCNSFE7Z35sv/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmb2E19ksaNRRPA1mUdjpSNptaFPbcprvX7fDTzah1hh56/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTn7izhgTh5XVANZjtJcj1HPFqVBfLX5aCB5HB1WBquiS/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdcbY7SH3YGFh9NfyoAJnERrdzNxmyp6yU4zdAWpxY91u/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbPeUDF79Mat1odQCW4v1KyQthPjqL24Z2T3pDPbY3VFA/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmZCAid5YKjKwGVuCmAqPodGDRKfgXQgZMMrnyRu18ECwj/image.png\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "956ef6773daec6eb7edc2a4f0d12abad821fc2be",
  "block": 55089415,
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-07-01T01:35:39",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "law",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "doctors-are-the-only-ones-that-kill-more-than-those-shot-and-killed-by-police",
      "title": "Doctors are the only ones that kill more than those shot and killed by police",
      "body": "@@ -2030,16 +2030,3029 @@\n ouuKR/image.png)\n+%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPBYpfEiTuP4AHEhrrfPoL478iTGNyL5owuMdUHPAmTqy/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmayJHNJmVpAeookuxYzjNYic1VTmehhGLfnZ7HWzkadqP/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmP27sPzaXBoQv2qo1C4gn61YpmDtVCK884DvxDrgzRSbo/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmeXeT1nBZy6R5jgTTCBt51UTEzMGHV7FkyAQ2BzWs2NDo/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmeiJHmLvLQQYy2mPDVr7PkYMx2VDcwcEbzRTgtBvtpZp1/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUFoZggabuTG5VdvwzJm6bx84CZszN7Rgiqo9o2V3TTjf/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmY5j5jHEfAFENGak8E1RX1Rm5Hg43Ua16CdYGKxRxEmcu/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmXbbkUtqx2kCb6B36ZBNVxz7mLsz8LGWjfiSVpbTfYZ6R/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmf5Gu4vQGUKjE7UnL2DYKgaWtPY7sKm7kHraBefmZqHHq/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzYpW2s9n6vseyWsU7jE3n8y8jJkgcEjaQS3EAsswQk3/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTmX3vJxGVanskXkk4TmL2HqiQwsC6NnHKirGkL4hz25Y/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRCQaDX2gvmVJZ3vma4E82r1uEUJkHk7BytD7YKUrvyhq/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmZtiZy2enYr4qdsAqgoyE57dScQ9CTRsNTbNrwCf7po3w/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTRsnV4hEJVBZGPNMdnsvsBuZkHybvntdduAiy4vJuUaC/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdz2rmbPjrWTEgN9VMgyMzRp6Lvwurdm4cbt6Dnbi8VUo/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bsold.jpg%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmY8MiGYMQvvzZ4d1RExXBNMZA8HWk23hSbnvHrFKmEkXC/sold.jpg)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQngvaM1CGitHSLZgSnT4edU6iGLRZHAvWYet5ZVkEEeL/image.png)%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbD1UcVq6jgfofBZ6o1eUAN1GuAiSVan3TD7tMtBVUEbL/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGeAA8UkeE6QohcsMCtAcNGe9ZXKfUkZqRdrVZo21LJ8/image.png)%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcJAc3RfRYF3Hk9HDNjeyPce4cMbsqbEbE8vgPn1J6NvW/image.png)%0A%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbsxj9TweMNeWxptJ3HCPtoH1gnRscGpt6FPfpHKUFQFR/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmeCBeCJNEQHBA8PAHkHDvoeZRxjGnSUKNqehm9k4TwSL3/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNNZf1pyfxyqWJ24wRVVQJ7yikYq795JQoFqiGMaMaHiJ/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmP38ezqngMCus1rbsFdphJNCZyCfjYfUpNVVy48v8heno/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbTNvWS4HbwthuJBdThA655DJE3wvgXJMSCNSFE7Z35sv/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmb2E19ksaNRRPA1mUdjpSNptaFPbcprvX7fDTzah1hh56/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTn7izhgTh5XVANZjtJcj1HPFqVBfLX5aCB5HB1WBquiS/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdcbY7SH3YGFh9NfyoAJnERrdzNxmyp6yU4zdAWpxY91u/image.png)%0A%0A%0A!%5Bimage.png%5D(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbPeUDF79Mat1odQCW4v1KyQthPjqL24Z2T3pDPbY3VFA/image.png)\n",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"authority\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcTPEXfwE7XjrW3HQYv2qYDGwfZuvCsjzFnBzZ2kGsSt1/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUK5ce8SBNahmptrP1wMqjNGXmUeK92YA63PxXy18Hvmc/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNV8GwKwbhh8VHUjM5UX8yijQykEPKik7fEE4zihGENNf/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYfY2HECYBfnvb5auo1JHe9S3RNm2L7J6odQLXVaqUeLw/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQAbWNbfj3ozJQ29PHDuwVryQKw5bFhhzUXRULPvZ8F4i/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmP14xWnqFD7E9VtGBPqwhHArzWj2Mt5WvaZxb1KpPywYZ/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPfL9tqCMj4voXsSc8EBHm2QcpCJpnU37HkG1A3bq2KTs/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmSuKjv1aJnMdDrdZURHp1CimzBDQaKDRLW91muXwouuKR/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPBYpfEiTuP4AHEhrrfPoL478iTGNyL5owuMdUHPAmTqy/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmayJHNJmVpAeookuxYzjNYic1VTmehhGLfnZ7HWzkadqP/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmP27sPzaXBoQv2qo1C4gn61YpmDtVCK884DvxDrgzRSbo/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmeXeT1nBZy6R5jgTTCBt51UTEzMGHV7FkyAQ2BzWs2NDo/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmeiJHmLvLQQYy2mPDVr7PkYMx2VDcwcEbzRTgtBvtpZp1/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUFoZggabuTG5VdvwzJm6bx84CZszN7Rgiqo9o2V3TTjf/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmY5j5jHEfAFENGak8E1RX1Rm5Hg43Ua16CdYGKxRxEmcu/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmXbbkUtqx2kCb6B36ZBNVxz7mLsz8LGWjfiSVpbTfYZ6R/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmf5Gu4vQGUKjE7UnL2DYKgaWtPY7sKm7kHraBefmZqHHq/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzYpW2s9n6vseyWsU7jE3n8y8jJkgcEjaQS3EAsswQk3/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTmX3vJxGVanskXkk4TmL2HqiQwsC6NnHKirGkL4hz25Y/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRCQaDX2gvmVJZ3vma4E82r1uEUJkHk7BytD7YKUrvyhq/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmZtiZy2enYr4qdsAqgoyE57dScQ9CTRsNTbNrwCf7po3w/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTRsnV4hEJVBZGPNMdnsvsBuZkHybvntdduAiy4vJuUaC/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdz2rmbPjrWTEgN9VMgyMzRp6Lvwurdm4cbt6Dnbi8VUo/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmY8MiGYMQvvzZ4d1RExXBNMZA8HWk23hSbnvHrFKmEkXC/sold.jpg\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQngvaM1CGitHSLZgSnT4edU6iGLRZHAvWYet5ZVkEEeL/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbD1UcVq6jgfofBZ6o1eUAN1GuAiSVan3TD7tMtBVUEbL/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGeAA8UkeE6QohcsMCtAcNGe9ZXKfUkZqRdrVZo21LJ8/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcJAc3RfRYF3Hk9HDNjeyPce4cMbsqbEbE8vgPn1J6NvW/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbsxj9TweMNeWxptJ3HCPtoH1gnRscGpt6FPfpHKUFQFR/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmeCBeCJNEQHBA8PAHkHDvoeZRxjGnSUKNqehm9k4TwSL3/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNNZf1pyfxyqWJ24wRVVQJ7yikYq795JQoFqiGMaMaHiJ/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmP38ezqngMCus1rbsFdphJNCZyCfjYfUpNVVy48v8heno/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbTNvWS4HbwthuJBdThA655DJE3wvgXJMSCNSFE7Z35sv/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmb2E19ksaNRRPA1mUdjpSNptaFPbcprvX7fDTzah1hh56/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTn7izhgTh5XVANZjtJcj1HPFqVBfLX5aCB5HB1WBquiS/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdcbY7SH3YGFh9NfyoAJnERrdzNxmyp6yU4zdAWpxY91u/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbPeUDF79Mat1odQCW4v1KyQthPjqL24Z2T3pDPbY3VFA/image.png\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "0463787d6c4f461f2e5a0638537e4e5aba775cac",
  "block": 55089085,
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-07-01T01:18:06",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "law",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "doctors-are-the-only-ones-that-kill-more-than-those-shot-and-killed-by-police",
      "title": "Doctors are the only ones that kill more than those shot and killed by police",
      "body": "@@ -1938,16 +1938,17 @@\n .png)%0A%0A%0A\n+!\n %5Bimage.p\n",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"authority\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcTPEXfwE7XjrW3HQYv2qYDGwfZuvCsjzFnBzZ2kGsSt1/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUK5ce8SBNahmptrP1wMqjNGXmUeK92YA63PxXy18Hvmc/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNV8GwKwbhh8VHUjM5UX8yijQykEPKik7fEE4zihGENNf/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYfY2HECYBfnvb5auo1JHe9S3RNm2L7J6odQLXVaqUeLw/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQAbWNbfj3ozJQ29PHDuwVryQKw5bFhhzUXRULPvZ8F4i/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmP14xWnqFD7E9VtGBPqwhHArzWj2Mt5WvaZxb1KpPywYZ/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPfL9tqCMj4voXsSc8EBHm2QcpCJpnU37HkG1A3bq2KTs/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmSuKjv1aJnMdDrdZURHp1CimzBDQaKDRLW91muXwouuKR/image.png\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "2c9699b791f86a8c106130363bbbd67fe3ac52fb",
  "block": 55088989,
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-07-01T01:13:03",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "law",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "doctors-are-the-only-ones-that-kill-more-than-those-shot-and-killed-by-police",
      "title": "Doctors are the only ones that kill more than those shot and killed by police",
      "body": "There were only 18 days in 2020 that the police didn't kill somebody, according to police accountability data.\n\n447 people have been shot and killed by police in 2019\n\n Police officers killed 1,129 people in 2017. More people died from police violence in 2017 than the total number of U.S. soldiers killed in action around the globe . More people died at the hands of police in 2017 than the number of black people who were lynched in the worst year of Jim Crow ( 161 in 1892).\n\nLets only allow the police to have guns! \n\nPolice have killed way more than ANYONE who has broken the law...\n\nLet's play a game: I will point to large-scale injustice violence and murder. that was the direct result of the belief in authority, then you point to an example of large-scale injustice violence and murder that was not the direct result of the belief in authority, but was done by breaking the law.\n\nI will start with Mow China... 42 million dead.\n\nShow me something that was anywhere near that, that was a result of people breaking the law, or disobeying authority, you will find literally a millionth the scale, of the evil done that was done in the name of government and authority.\n~Larken Rose\n\nLet the government have the guns!\n![image.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcTPEXfwE7XjrW3HQYv2qYDGwfZuvCsjzFnBzZ2kGsSt1/image.png)\n\n![image.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUK5ce8SBNahmptrP1wMqjNGXmUeK92YA63PxXy18Hvmc/image.png)\n\n![image.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNV8GwKwbhh8VHUjM5UX8yijQykEPKik7fEE4zihGENNf/image.png)\n\n![image.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYfY2HECYBfnvb5auo1JHe9S3RNm2L7J6odQLXVaqUeLw/image.png)\n\n![image.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQAbWNbfj3ozJQ29PHDuwVryQKw5bFhhzUXRULPvZ8F4i/image.png)\n\n![image.png(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmP14xWnqFD7E9VtGBPqwhHArzWj2Mt5WvaZxb1KpPywYZ/image.png)\n\n![image.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPfL9tqCMj4voXsSc8EBHm2QcpCJpnU37HkG1A3bq2KTs/image.png)\n\n\n[image.png(https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmSuKjv1aJnMdDrdZURHp1CimzBDQaKDRLW91muXwouuKR/image.png)",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"law\",\"authority\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcTPEXfwE7XjrW3HQYv2qYDGwfZuvCsjzFnBzZ2kGsSt1/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUK5ce8SBNahmptrP1wMqjNGXmUeK92YA63PxXy18Hvmc/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNV8GwKwbhh8VHUjM5UX8yijQykEPKik7fEE4zihGENNf/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYfY2HECYBfnvb5auo1JHe9S3RNm2L7J6odQLXVaqUeLw/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQAbWNbfj3ozJQ29PHDuwVryQKw5bFhhzUXRULPvZ8F4i/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmP14xWnqFD7E9VtGBPqwhHArzWj2Mt5WvaZxb1KpPywYZ/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPfL9tqCMj4voXsSc8EBHm2QcpCJpnU37HkG1A3bq2KTs/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmSuKjv1aJnMdDrdZURHp1CimzBDQaKDRLW91muXwouuKR/image.png\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "4b4b80c3e16b0829588d8504d0f950aca986c8b2",
  "block": 55085650,
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-06-30T22:16:33",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "dmt",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "that-it-wasn-t-like-anything-else-that-wasn-t-like-other-psychedelics",
      "title": "That it wasn't like anything else. That wasn't like other psychedelics.",
      "body": "I mean, I remember almost getting the sense that is was a kind of like a, like a psychedelic bungee jump.\nhttps://youtu.be/fwZqVqbkyLM",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"dmt\",\"psychedelics\"],\"image\":[\"https://img.youtube.com/vi/fwZqVqbkyLM/0.jpg\"],\"links\":[\"https://youtu.be/fwZqVqbkyLM\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "b9a9cd356b6ecca25c5d3ea1e312f39a85f3ea70",
  "block": 55082061,
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-06-30T19:06:18",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "rockandroll",
      "author": "shannongibson",
      "permlink": "edgar-winter-and-ronnie-montrose-free-ride",
      "title": "Edgar Winter and Ronnie Montrose FREE RIDE",
      "body": "https://youtu.be/nIBOG8BRcdY",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"rockandroll\",\"music\"],\"image\":[\"https://img.youtube.com/vi/nIBOG8BRcdY/0.jpg\"],\"links\":[\"https://youtu.be/nIBOG8BRcdY\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}