Ecoer Logo
VOTING POWER100.00%
DOWNVOTE POWER100.00%
RESOURCE CREDITS100.00%
REPUTATION PROGRESS49.83%
Net Worth
3.332USD
STEEM
0.003STEEM
SBD
6.675SBD
Effective Power
5.001SP
├── Own SP
0.630SP
└── Incoming Deleg
+4.371SP

Detailed Balance

STEEM
balance
0.003STEEM
market_balance
0.000STEEM
savings_balance
0.000STEEM
reward_steem_balance
0.000STEEM
STEEM POWER
Own SP
0.630SP
Delegated Out
0.000SP
Delegation In
4.371SP
Effective Power
5.001SP
Reward SP (pending)
14.267SP
SBD
sbd_balance
0.000SBD
sbd_conversions
0.000SBD
sbd_market_balance
0.000SBD
savings_sbd_balance
0.000SBD
reward_sbd_balance
6.675SBD
{
  "balance": "0.003 STEEM",
  "savings_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "reward_steem_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "vesting_shares": "1025.299862 VESTS",
  "delegated_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "received_vesting_shares": "7118.359944 VESTS",
  "sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
  "savings_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
  "reward_sbd_balance": "6.675 SBD",
  "conversions": []
}

Account Info

nameprfrnir
id502899
rank458,921
reputation408250697847
created2017-12-18T01:10:27
recovery_accountsteem
proxyNone
post_count7
comment_count0
lifetime_vote_count0
witnesses_voted_for0
last_post2019-06-30T19:27:48
last_root_post2019-06-30T19:27:48
last_vote_time1970-01-01T00:00:00
proxied_vsf_votes0, 0, 0, 0
can_vote1
voting_power0
delayed_votes0
balance0.003 STEEM
savings_balance0.000 STEEM
sbd_balance0.000 SBD
savings_sbd_balance0.000 SBD
vesting_shares1025.299862 VESTS
delegated_vesting_shares0.000000 VESTS
received_vesting_shares7118.359944 VESTS
reward_vesting_balance28424.516916 VESTS
vesting_balance0.000 STEEM
vesting_withdraw_rate0.000000 VESTS
next_vesting_withdrawal1969-12-31T23:59:59
withdrawn0
to_withdraw0
withdraw_routes0
savings_withdraw_requests0
last_account_recovery1970-01-01T00:00:00
reset_accountnull
last_owner_update1970-01-01T00:00:00
last_account_update1970-01-01T00:00:00
minedNo
sbd_seconds0
sbd_last_interest_payment1970-01-01T00:00:00
savings_sbd_last_interest_payment1970-01-01T00:00:00
{
  "active": {
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM64HgZB9XxtXEX1H6S13AB95cau3DS7CgiXQw98SpHCZu39ggYG",
        1
      ]
    ],
    "weight_threshold": 1
  },
  "balance": "0.003 STEEM",
  "can_vote": true,
  "comment_count": 0,
  "created": "2017-12-18T01:10:27",
  "curation_rewards": 0,
  "delegated_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "downvote_manabar": {
    "current_mana": 2035914951,
    "last_update_time": 1779081288
  },
  "guest_bloggers": [],
  "id": 502899,
  "json_metadata": "",
  "last_account_recovery": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "last_account_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "last_owner_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "last_post": "2019-06-30T19:27:48",
  "last_root_post": "2019-06-30T19:27:48",
  "last_vote_time": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "lifetime_vote_count": 0,
  "market_history": [],
  "memo_key": "STM6FEBkyN3DBcRqVHn1f4y9djXMQwhPvTQsF9k4NjXCa7ysa5dom",
  "mined": false,
  "name": "prfrnir",
  "next_vesting_withdrawal": "1969-12-31T23:59:59",
  "other_history": [],
  "owner": {
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM65ZTpdennXMT4Y57EmFXNCsVKdtavof5FmTC93ZRTCfXNCKggr",
        1
      ]
    ],
    "weight_threshold": 1
  },
  "pending_claimed_accounts": 0,
  "post_bandwidth": 0,
  "post_count": 7,
  "post_history": [],
  "posting": {
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM6kaGxryXKW4YFXQqNTcmxog4Rm2rV1oxxy8s5Gz5Jdbzy5JHBB",
        1
      ]
    ],
    "weight_threshold": 1
  },
  "posting_json_metadata": "",
  "posting_rewards": 28532,
  "proxied_vsf_votes": [
    0,
    0,
    0,
    0
  ],
  "proxy": "",
  "received_vesting_shares": "7118.359944 VESTS",
  "recovery_account": "steem",
  "reputation": "408250697847",
  "reset_account": "null",
  "reward_sbd_balance": "6.675 SBD",
  "reward_steem_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "reward_vesting_balance": "28424.516916 VESTS",
  "reward_vesting_steem": "14.267 STEEM",
  "savings_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "savings_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
  "savings_sbd_last_interest_payment": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "savings_sbd_seconds": "0",
  "savings_sbd_seconds_last_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "savings_withdraw_requests": 0,
  "sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
  "sbd_last_interest_payment": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "sbd_seconds": "0",
  "sbd_seconds_last_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "tags_usage": [],
  "to_withdraw": 0,
  "transfer_history": [],
  "vesting_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "vesting_shares": "1025.299862 VESTS",
  "vesting_withdraw_rate": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "vote_history": [],
  "voting_manabar": {
    "current_mana": "8143659806",
    "last_update_time": 1779081288
  },
  "voting_power": 0,
  "withdraw_routes": 0,
  "withdrawn": 0,
  "witness_votes": [],
  "witnesses_voted_for": 0,
  "rank": 458921
}

Withdraw Routes

IncomingOutgoing
Empty
Empty
{
  "incoming": [],
  "outgoing": []
}
From Date
To Date
steemdelegated 4.371 SP to @prfrnir
2026/05/18 05:14:48
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares7118.359944 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #106149413/Trx 32f2e377f55ac55743a39dde6b455a2f459e7098
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 106149413,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "7118.359944 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2026-05-18T05:14:48",
  "trx_id": "32f2e377f55ac55743a39dde6b455a2f459e7098",
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemdelegated 2.706 SP to @prfrnir
2026/05/13 00:06:09
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares4406.149539 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #105999971/Trx 518af8be1874d759a2b96032c32700d9eef0490b
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 105999971,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "4406.149539 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2026-05-13T00:06:09",
  "trx_id": "518af8be1874d759a2b96032c32700d9eef0490b",
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemdelegated 4.379 SP to @prfrnir
2026/04/26 04:28:09
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares7130.875700 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #105516928/Trx 08bd4f0769b4c490027fb29d48562549bd90d6aa
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 105516928,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "7130.875700 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2026-04-26T04:28:09",
  "trx_id": "08bd4f0769b4c490027fb29d48562549bd90d6aa",
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemdelegated 2.731 SP to @prfrnir
2026/01/23 21:13:00
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares4447.696358 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #102867882/Trx 43e5254636f389a477fff207bbd5e8d4699b058a
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 102867882,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "4447.696358 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2026-01-23T21:13:00",
  "trx_id": "43e5254636f389a477fff207bbd5e8d4699b058a",
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemdelegated 2.832 SP to @prfrnir
2024/12/17 16:24:06
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares4611.915555 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #91314117/Trx 9552a43492906025e78989bd590905a3ddc246c9
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 91314117,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "4611.915555 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2024-12-17T16:24:06",
  "trx_id": "9552a43492906025e78989bd590905a3ddc246c9",
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemdelegated 2.936 SP to @prfrnir
2023/11/14 08:05:30
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares4781.049087 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #79868277/Trx e5f023cb95a520b290ae254a24d01032826a503c
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 79868277,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "4781.049087 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2023-11-14T08:05:30",
  "trx_id": "e5f023cb95a520b290ae254a24d01032826a503c",
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemdelegated 4.740 SP to @prfrnir
2023/09/22 09:09:00
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares7717.957873 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #78361381/Trx 78a14146a3a01a14286eb1bfd28e6b88f73a6b3e
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 78361381,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "7717.957873 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2023-09-22T09:09:00",
  "trx_id": "78a14146a3a01a14286eb1bfd28e6b88f73a6b3e",
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemdelegated 4.876 SP to @prfrnir
2022/11/03 16:46:33
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares7940.009311 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #69119321/Trx d942f67b03450a1a7751edcefc96dc26651bcfd1
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 69119321,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "7940.009311 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-11-03T16:46:33",
  "trx_id": "d942f67b03450a1a7751edcefc96dc26651bcfd1",
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemdelegated 5.011 SP to @prfrnir
2022/01/17 22:05:06
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares8160.116912 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #60822697/Trx 92caf4e54db30e19fa8e6b8db34d135e023f1af5
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 60822697,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "8160.116912 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-01-17T22:05:06",
  "trx_id": "92caf4e54db30e19fa8e6b8db34d135e023f1af5",
  "trx_in_block": 36,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemdelegated 5.124 SP to @prfrnir
2021/06/14 05:18:36
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares8344.311200 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #54613080/Trx 4999ed4d327cc2b428165d4027e17d028c441c1a
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 54613080,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "8344.311200 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-06-14T05:18:36",
  "trx_id": "4999ed4d327cc2b428165d4027e17d028c441c1a",
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemdelegated 5.239 SP to @prfrnir
2020/12/11 15:31:45
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares8531.733174 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #49360373/Trx f00b710427c49cd98a2c4de81cb27dca7fe1a5fd
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 49360373,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "8531.733174 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2020-12-11T15:31:45",
  "trx_id": "f00b710427c49cd98a2c4de81cb27dca7fe1a5fd",
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemdelegated 1.174 SP to @prfrnir
2020/12/06 09:07:54
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares1912.543513 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #49211904/Trx 1719df92bc79c35626eea2ff0276cd162be8a3c5
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 49211904,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "1912.543513 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2020-12-06T09:07:54",
  "trx_id": "1719df92bc79c35626eea2ff0276cd162be8a3c5",
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemdelegated 5.243 SP to @prfrnir
2020/12/05 19:09:39
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares8537.941028 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #49195456/Trx 41d6588408f18f3ed931f5fcaca1eb11f56d816f
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 49195456,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "8537.941028 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2020-12-05T19:09:39",
  "trx_id": "41d6588408f18f3ed931f5fcaca1eb11f56d816f",
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemdelegated 1.179 SP to @prfrnir
2020/11/03 00:45:51
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares1920.017158 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #48268547/Trx b9620461963b305cc3e0137cf14a9e3dc88b3576
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 48268547,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "1920.017158 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2020-11-03T00:45:51",
  "trx_id": "b9620461963b305cc3e0137cf14a9e3dc88b3576",
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemdelegated 5.368 SP to @prfrnir
2020/05/09 10:09:51
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares8740.746387 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #43222218/Trx 3aac68933dda6f03c215e22a18c031e2a8b897b0
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 43222218,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "8740.746387 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2020-05-09T10:09:51",
  "trx_id": "3aac68933dda6f03c215e22a18c031e2a8b897b0",
  "trx_in_block": 8,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemdelegated 1.200 SP to @prfrnir
2020/05/08 14:25:57
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares1953.311140 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #43199098/Trx 55d3e3f889e9e300bbd0081a2ac36a45cb8883be
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 43199098,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "1953.311140 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2020-05-08T14:25:57",
  "trx_id": "55d3e3f889e9e300bbd0081a2ac36a45cb8883be",
  "trx_in_block": 21,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/12/18 02:10:03
authorsteemitboard
bodyCongratulations @prfrnir! You received a personal award! <table><tr><td>https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@prfrnir/birthday2.png</td><td>Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years!</td></tr></table> <sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@prfrnir) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=prfrnir)_</sub> ###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes!
json metadata{"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png"]}
parent authorprfrnir
parent permlinkstatistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees
permlinksteemitboard-notify-prfrnir-20191218t021003000z
title
Transaction InfoBlock #39132452/Trx ed883ab672a3a60eb62f56c52f665d3bc52717b9
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 39132452,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "steemitboard",
      "body": "Congratulations @prfrnir! You received a personal award!\n\n<table><tr><td>https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@prfrnir/birthday2.png</td><td>Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years!</td></tr></table>\n\n<sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@prfrnir) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=prfrnir)_</sub>\n\n\n###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes!",
      "json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png\"]}",
      "parent_author": "prfrnir",
      "parent_permlink": "statistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees",
      "permlink": "steemitboard-notify-prfrnir-20191218t021003000z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-12-18T02:10:03",
  "trx_id": "ed883ab672a3a60eb62f56c52f665d3bc52717b9",
  "trx_in_block": 7,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemdelegated 5.445 SP to @prfrnir
2019/09/29 20:44:57
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares8866.364249 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #36855170/Trx 4b346b78bacef75cf01952c910c6d7715009e732
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 36855170,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "8866.364249 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-09-29T20:44:57",
  "trx_id": "4b346b78bacef75cf01952c910c6d7715009e732",
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
steemdelegated 17.934 SP to @prfrnir
2019/09/06 16:06:33
delegateeprfrnir
delegatorsteem
vesting shares29204.402249 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #36188954/Trx 0abf28bf0a15b3a2b783e7a269b55bd1d7c00d3b
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 36188954,
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegatee": "prfrnir",
      "delegator": "steem",
      "vesting_shares": "29204.402249 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-09-06T16:06:33",
  "trx_id": "0abf28bf0a15b3a2b783e7a269b55bd1d7c00d3b",
  "trx_in_block": 11,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/07/01 13:48:57
authorprfrnir
bodyNow that the NBA draft is over, fans and analysts are pouring over team selections. Lotto teams are thinking they have their next star. Contenders are thinking they have the next complementary pieces to boost their team. But it won't be a few years until we know the next busts and steals of this draft. In the meantime, I wanted to do some quick analysis on the draft and the players in the NBA. There are only 23 players drafted since 2006 (the 1st draft that restricted the drafting of players who just graduated from high school) who have been selected to more than 1 All-NBA team. To put that into perspective, 840 players have been drafted since (although 60 would have been from the most recent draft). So fewer than 3% of all players drafted since 2006 are multiple time All-NBA selections (fewer than 2 per draft). The following are the list of All-NBA players to turn the numbers into basketball terms. <center>![Untitled.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png)</center> As you can see, there are a few 1st time selections that the majority of NBA fans would never include as stars and who might be better categorized as role players. In addition, all players with more than 1 selection have been offered max contracts, while that's not necessarily the case for 1 time selections. Of course, these are not necessarily the most perfect definitions of what constitutes a star, but I wanted something quantitative and this'll do for now. But how does one identify a potential star during draft time? Obviously play is a big deal. But I was wondering if the NCAAB All-NBA equivalent would be a good indicator. And it turns out, it's not. Of the 20 multi-time All-NBA players who played in college (3 did not - Marc Gasol, Giannis Antetokounmpo, and Rudy Gobert), only 11 were All-America selections in college. <center>![1.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png)</center> What's interesting is that the majority of the 9 players who were never All-Americas in college is that they all played for major programs. And even Stephen Curry (Davidson), Kawhi Leonard (San Diego St), and Damian Lillard (Weber St) were noticed by the All-Americas selection committee. But what about All-America selections who never turned out to be stars? Well rather than divide players solely into 2 categories of stars and non-stars, I created 4 other categories: <ol> <li>Solid Contributor: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 BPM, >0 VORP</li> <li>Rotation Player: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 VORP</li> <li>NBA Washout: everyone else with >0 G</li> <li>Never Played in NBA: everyone with G=0</li></ol> Excluding the most recent draftees, there were 152 college All-Americas players. Eleven (7%) became NBA stars. 35 (23%) became solid contributors, 37 (24%) became rotation players, 64 (42%) became NBA washouts, and 5 (3%) never played in the NBA. Nearly half of all college All-Americas players become nobodies after college. I took it a step further and checked how many NBA stars were high school All-Americans (either McDonald's or Parade) and the percentages were actually the same. Only 11 of the 20 "stars" were selected for any All-American high school honors. <center>![2.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png)</center> And what about the other players that were high school All-Americans? Excluding the most recent draftees, 243 were high school All-Americans. Eleven (5%) became NBA stars, 51 (21%) became solid contributors, 54 (22%) became rotation players, 117 (48%) became NBA washouts, and 10 (4%) never played in the NBA despite being drafted. Overall, high school All-American awards seem just as predictive as college All-America awards. But what if we applied combinations of college and high school all-American selections? And to provide some sense of comparison, I also calculated how draftees split in general. <center>![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png)</center> <center>![3.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png)</center> <center>![4.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png)</center> Based on this analysis, it does seem sensible that the greatest percentage of NBA stars come from the draftees that contains both high school and college stars (10% vs 2%/5%/2%). What's interesting is that between draftees that had only 1 of either college or high school All-American awards, you're more likely to find either NBA stars and solid contributors from the draftees of only high school All-Americans (42% vs 12%). And even more damning against college basketball success is that a greater percentage of draftees who had no awards in either college or high school become NBA stars or solid contributors when compared to the percentage of draftees who had just college All-American status (15% vs 12%). Overall, this seems to indicate: - A draftee's college All-American status is a positive sign for NBA teams only if he was a high school All-American as well as that draftee pool has the greatest percentage of stars. - If the prospect was a college All-American but not a high school one, then that might actually be a negative sign for NBA teams as the draftee pool of non-college All-Americans as a whole (high school All-Americans + non-All-Americans) has a better chance of finding solid contributors or better (20% vs 12%). For this year's draft, that would be great news for Zion Williamson, R.J. Barrett, and Kyle Guy. All 3 were both All-Americans in high school and college. Darius Garland, Coby White, Cam Reddish, Romeo Langford, Darius Bazley, Nassir Little, Keldon Johnson, Bol Bol, and Jaylen Hands were all high school All-Americans, but not college ones. They might fare better in the pros than Ja Morant, Jarrett Culver, Rui Hachimura, Brandon Clarke, Grant Williams, and Carsen Edwards - all of whom where college All-Americans but not high school ones. This raises a few questions: <ol> <li>Why does college All-American status without high school All-American status seem to have a negative impact on NBA contribution? One would think that if a player played well in college, even if he were not a star in high school, that would be at minimum equal to if not a better indicator than players who were never stars at all or only high school stars!</li> <li>Is it possible that NBA basketball is more similar to high school basketball, with more emphasis on athleticism, natural talent, and/or unequal teams?</li> <li>Are college basketball programs or coaches just able to overperform with their players? If so, why? Is it because they are managing their players more as opposed to NBA teams who provide more freedom?</li> <li>Does the fact that NBA money come into play make college stars perform worse (or non-college stars better)?</li> --- Regardless, in order to tie this back to the NBA draft, I wanted to consider draft position: how well do higher draft picks correlate with future NBA contributions? <center>![6.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png)</center> <center>![9.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png)</center> Overall, pretty good I'd say. Your chance of finding stars and solid contributors drops the later you pick (dramatically), so much so that it seems picks 56–60 are pretty much worthless. But what's interesting about this chart is that is seems draft position (and consequently scouting and GM decisions) is quite good and may be an even better predictor of future contributions. So I tried to see the draft positions of our college and high school stars. <center>![7.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png)</center> And despite there being an overwhelming number of NCAA stars, they never once outnumber by percentage the number of high school stars selected in the same draft positions. <center>![8.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png)</center> Unsurprisingly, the 1st pick is almost always a NCAA + HS star and >50% of all NCAA + HS stars were selected by the 11th pick. What's interesting though is that this chart looks strikingly similar to that of the NBA stars draft percentage chart. Overall, it would seem that whatever methods teams and GMs use to draft, they are on average pretty accurate (or perhaps it is just easier to draft NBA players than expected). What do you think? Do these numbers surprise you? What other data points would have been interesting to capture?
json metadata{"tags":["nba","nba-draft"],"image":["https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
parent author
parent permlinknba-draft
permlinkstatistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees
titleStatistical Analysis on Potential Stardom of NBA Draftees
Transaction InfoBlock #34282513/Trx 14931ef51267679e7d630169f4191d608fae997c
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 34282513,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "body": "Now that the NBA draft is over, fans and analysts are pouring over team selections. Lotto teams are thinking they have their next star. Contenders are thinking they have the next complementary pieces to boost their team. But it won't be a few years until we know the next busts and steals of this draft.\n\nIn the meantime, I wanted to do some quick analysis on the draft and the players in the NBA.\n\nThere are only 23 players drafted since 2006 (the 1st draft that restricted the drafting of players who just graduated from high school) who have been selected to more than 1 All-NBA team. To put that into perspective, 840 players have been drafted since (although 60 would have been from the most recent draft). So fewer than 3% of all players drafted since 2006 are multiple time All-NBA selections (fewer than 2 per draft).\n\nThe following are the list of All-NBA players to turn the numbers into basketball terms.\n<center>![Untitled.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png)</center>\n\nAs you can see, there are a few 1st time selections that the majority of NBA fans would never include as stars and who might be better categorized as role players. In addition, all players with more than 1 selection have been offered max contracts, while that's not necessarily the case for 1 time selections. Of course, these are not necessarily the most perfect definitions of what constitutes a star, but I wanted something quantitative and this'll do for now.\n\nBut how does one identify a potential star during draft time? Obviously play is a big deal. But I was wondering if the NCAAB All-NBA equivalent would be a good indicator. And it turns out, it's not. Of the 20 multi-time All-NBA players who played in college (3 did not - Marc Gasol, Giannis Antetokounmpo, and Rudy Gobert), only 11 were All-America selections in college.\n<center>![1.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png)</center>\n\nWhat's interesting is that the majority of the 9 players who were never All-Americas in college is that they all played for major programs. And even Stephen Curry (Davidson), Kawhi Leonard (San Diego St), and Damian Lillard (Weber St) were noticed by the All-Americas selection committee.\n\nBut what about All-America selections who never turned out to be stars? Well rather than divide players solely into 2 categories of stars and non-stars, I created 4 other categories:\n<ol>\n<li>Solid Contributor: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 BPM, >0 VORP</li>\n<li>Rotation Player: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 VORP</li>\n<li>NBA Washout: everyone else with >0 G</li>\n<li>Never Played in NBA: everyone with G=0</li></ol>\n\nExcluding the most recent draftees, there were 152 college All-Americas players. Eleven (7%) became NBA stars. 35 (23%) became solid contributors, 37 (24%) became rotation players, 64 (42%) became NBA washouts, and 5 (3%) never played in the NBA. Nearly half of all college All-Americas players become nobodies after college.\n\nI took it a step further and checked how many NBA stars were high school All-Americans (either McDonald's or Parade) and the percentages were actually the same. Only 11 of the 20 \"stars\" were selected for any All-American high school honors.\n<center>![2.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png)</center>\n\nAnd what about the other players that were high school All-Americans? Excluding the most recent draftees, 243 were high school All-Americans. Eleven (5%) became NBA stars, 51 (21%) became solid contributors, 54 (22%) became rotation players, 117 (48%) became NBA washouts, and 10 (4%) never played in the NBA despite being drafted. Overall, high school All-American awards seem just as predictive as college All-America awards.\n\nBut what if we applied combinations of college and high school all-American selections? And to provide some sense of comparison, I also calculated how draftees split in general.\n<center>![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png)</center>\n<center>![3.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png)</center>\n<center>![4.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png)</center>\n\nBased on this analysis, it does seem sensible that the greatest percentage of NBA stars come from the draftees that contains both high school and college stars (10% vs 2%/5%/2%).\n\nWhat's interesting is that between draftees that had only 1 of either college or high school All-American awards, you're more likely to find either NBA stars and solid contributors from the draftees of only high school All-Americans (42% vs 12%). And even more damning against college basketball success is that a greater percentage of draftees who had no awards in either college or high school become NBA stars or solid contributors when compared to the percentage of draftees who had just college All-American status (15% vs 12%).\n\nOverall, this seems to indicate:\n- A draftee's college All-American status is a positive sign for NBA teams only if he was a high school All-American as well as that draftee pool has the greatest percentage of stars.\n- If the prospect was a college All-American but not a high school one, then that might actually be a negative sign for NBA teams as the draftee pool of non-college All-Americans as a whole (high school All-Americans + non-All-Americans) has a better chance of finding solid contributors or better (20% vs 12%).\n\nFor this year's draft, that would be great news for Zion Williamson, R.J. Barrett, and Kyle Guy. All 3 were both All-Americans in high school and college.\n\nDarius Garland, Coby White, Cam Reddish, Romeo Langford, Darius Bazley, Nassir Little, Keldon Johnson, Bol Bol, and Jaylen Hands were all high school All-Americans, but not college ones. They might fare better in the pros than Ja Morant, Jarrett Culver, Rui Hachimura, Brandon Clarke, Grant Williams, and Carsen Edwards - all of whom where college All-Americans but not high school ones.\n\nThis raises a few questions:\n<ol>\n<li>Why does college All-American status without high school All-American status seem to have a negative impact on NBA contribution? One would think that if a player played well in college, even if he were not a star in high school, that would be at minimum equal to if not a better indicator than players who were never stars at all or only high school stars!</li>\n<li>Is it possible that NBA basketball is more similar to high school basketball, with more emphasis on athleticism, natural talent, and/or unequal teams?</li>\n<li>Are college basketball programs or coaches just able to overperform with their players? If so, why? Is it because they are managing their players more as opposed to NBA teams who provide more freedom?</li>\n<li>Does the fact that NBA money come into play make college stars perform worse (or non-college stars better)?</li>\n\n---\n\nRegardless, in order to tie this back to the NBA draft, I wanted to consider draft position: how well do higher draft picks correlate with future NBA contributions?\n<center>![6.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png)</center>\n<center>![9.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png)</center>\n\nOverall, pretty good I'd say. Your chance of finding stars and solid contributors drops the later you pick (dramatically), so much so that it seems picks 56–60 are pretty much worthless.\n\nBut what's interesting about this chart is that is seems draft position (and consequently scouting and GM decisions) is quite good and may be an even better predictor of future contributions.\n\nSo I tried to see the draft positions of our college and high school stars.\n<center>![7.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png)</center>\n\nAnd despite there being an overwhelming number of NCAA stars, they never once outnumber by percentage the number of high school stars selected in the same draft positions.\n\n<center>![8.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png)</center>\nUnsurprisingly, the 1st pick is almost always a NCAA + HS star and >50% of all NCAA + HS stars were selected by the 11th pick.\n\nWhat's interesting though is that this chart looks strikingly similar to that of the NBA stars draft percentage chart.\n\nOverall, it would seem that whatever methods teams and GMs use to draft, they are on average pretty accurate (or perhaps it is just easier to draft NBA players than expected).\n\nWhat do you think? Do these numbers surprise you? What other data points would have been interesting to capture?",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"nba\",\"nba-draft\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "nba-draft",
      "permlink": "statistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees",
      "title": "Statistical Analysis on Potential Stardom of NBA Draftees"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-07-01T13:48:57",
  "trx_id": "14931ef51267679e7d630169f4191d608fae997c",
  "trx_in_block": 9,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/07/01 13:48:39
authorprfrnir
permlinkstatistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees
votermillibot
weight500 (5.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #34282507/Trx c98f5a913cce2fe83c909aa82f2109ae9a4ed4b8
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 34282507,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "statistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees",
      "voter": "millibot",
      "weight": 500
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-07-01T13:48:39",
  "trx_id": "c98f5a913cce2fe83c909aa82f2109ae9a4ed4b8",
  "trx_in_block": 24,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/07/01 13:47:42
authorprfrnir
bodyNow that the NBA draft is over, fans and analysts are pouring over team selections. Lotto teams are thinking they have their next star. Contenders are thinking they have the next complementary pieces to boost their team. But it won't be a few years until we know the next busts and steals of this draft. In the meantime, I wanted to do some quick analysis on the draft and the players in the NBA. There are only 23 players drafted since 2006 (the 1st draft that restricted the drafting of players who just graduated from high school) who have been selected to more than 1 All-NBA team. To put that into perspective, 840 players have been drafted since (although 60 would have been from the most recent draft). So fewer than 3% of all players drafted since 2006 are multiple time All-NBA selections (fewer than 2 per draft). The following are the list of All-NBA players to turn the numbers into basketball terms. <center>![Untitled.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png)</center> As you can see, there are a few 1st time selections that the majority of NBA fans would never include as stars and who might be better categorized as role players. In addition, all players with more than 1 selection have been offered max contracts, while that's not necessarily the case for 1 time selections. Of course, these are not necessarily the most perfect definitions of what constitutes a star, but I wanted something quantitative and this'll do for now. But how does one identify a potential star during draft time? Obviously play is a big deal. But I was wondering if the NCAAB All-NBA equivalent would be a good indicator. And it turns out, it's not. Of the 20 multi-time All-NBA players who played in college (3 did not - Marc Gasol, Giannis Antetokounmpo, and Rudy Gobert), only 11 were All-America selections in college. <center>![1.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png)</center> What's interesting is that the majority of the 9 players who were never All-Americas in college is that they all played for major programs. And even Stephen Curry (Davidson), Kawhi Leonard (San Diego St), and Damian Lillard (Weber St) were noticed by the All-Americas selection committee. But what about All-America selections who never turned out to be stars? Well rather than divide players solely into 2 categories of stars and non-stars, I created 4 other categories: <ol> <li>Solid Contributor: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 BPM, >0 VORP</li> <li>Rotation Player: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 VORP</li> <li>NBA Washout: everyone else with >0 G</li> <li>Never Played in NBA: everyone with G=0</li></ol> Excluding the most recent draftees, there were 152 college All-Americas players. Eleven (7%) became NBA stars. 35 (23%) became solid contributors, 37 (24%) became rotation players, 64 (42%) became NBA washouts, and 5 (3%) never played in the NBA. Nearly half of all college All-Americas players become nobodies after college. I took it a step further and checked how many NBA stars were high school All-Americans (either McDonald's or Parade) and the percentages were actually the same. Only 11 of the 20 "stars" were selected for any All-American high school honors. <center>![2.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png)</center> And what about the other players that were high school All-Americans? Excluding the most recent draftees, 243 were high school All-Americans. Eleven (5%) became NBA stars, 51 (21%) became solid contributors, 54 (22%) became rotation players, 117 (48%) became NBA washouts, and 10 (4%) never played in the NBA despite being drafted. Overall, high school All-American awards seem just as predictive as college All-America awards. But what if we applied combinations of college and high school all-American selections? And to provide some sense of comparison, I also calculated how draftees split in general. <center>![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png)</center> <center>![3.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png)</center> <center>![4.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png)</center> Based on this analysis, it does seem sensible that the greatest percentage of NBA stars come from the draftees that contains both high school and college stars (10% vs 2%/5%/2%). What's interesting is that between draftees that had only 1 of either college or high school All-American awards, you're more likely to find either NBA stars and solid contributors from the draftees of only high school All-Americans (42% vs 12%). And even more damning against college basketball success is that a greater percentage of draftees who had no awards in either college or high school become NBA stars or solid contributors when compared to the percentage of draftees who had just college All-American status (15% vs 12%). Overall, this seems to indicate: - A draftee's college All-American status is a positive sign for NBA teams only if he was a high school All-American as well as that draftee pool has the greatest percentage of stars. - If the prospect was a college All-American but not a high school one, then that might actually be a negative sign for NBA teams as the draftee pool of non-college All-Americans as a whole (high school All-Americans + non-All-Americans) has a better chance of finding solid contributors or better (20% vs 12%). For this year's draft, that would be great news for Zion Williamson, R.J. Barrett, and Kyle Guy. All 3 were both All-Americans in high school and college. Darius Garland, Coby White, Cam Reddish, Romeo Langford, Darius Bazley, Nassir Little, Keldon Johnson, Bol Bol, and Jaylen Hands were all high school All-Americans, but not college ones. They might fare better in the pros than Ja Morant, Jarrett Culver, Rui Hachimura, Brandon Clarke, Grant Williams, and Carsen Edwards - all of whom where college All-Americans but not high school ones. This raises a few questions: <ol> <li>Why does college All-American status without high school All-American status seem to have a negative impact on NBA contribution? One would think that if a player played well in college, even if he were not a star in high school, that would be at minimum equal to if not a better indicator than players who were never stars at all or only high school stars!</li> <li>Is it possible that NBA basketball is more similar to high school basketball, with more emphasis on athleticism, natural talent, and/or unequal teams?</li> <li>Are college basketball programs or coaches just able to overperform with their players? If so, why? Is it because they are managing their players more as opposed to NBA teams who provide more freedom?</li> <li>Does the fact that NBA money come into play make college stars perform worse (or non-college stars better)?</li> --- Regardless, in order to tie this back to the NBA draft, I wanted to consider draft position: how well do higher draft picks correlate with future NBA contributions? <center>![6.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png)</center> <center>![9.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png)</center> Overall, pretty good I'd say. Your chance of finding stars and solid contributors drops the later you pick (dramatically), so much so that it seems picks 56–60 are pretty much worthless. But what's interesting about this chart is that is seems draft position (and consequently scouting and GM decisions) is quite good and may be an even better predictor of future contributions. So I tried to see the draft positions of our college and high school stars. <center>![7.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png)</center> And despite there being an overwhelming number of NCAA stars, they never once outnumber by percentage the number of high school stars selected in the same draft positions. <center>![8.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png)</center> Unsurprisingly, the 1st pick is almost always a NCAA + HS star and >50% of all NCAA + HS stars were selected by the 11th pick. What's interesting though is that this chart looks strikingly similar to that of the NBA stars draft percentage chart. Overall, it would seem that whatever methods teams and GMs use to draft, they are on average pretty accurate (or perhaps it is just easier to draft NBA players than expected). What do you think? Do these numbers surprise you? What other data points would have been interesting to capture?
json metadata{"tags":["nba-draft"],"image":["https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
parent author
parent permlinknba-draft
permlinkstatistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees
titleStatistical Analysis on Potential Stardom of NBA Draftees
Transaction InfoBlock #34282488/Trx 00a311fd811935d766c07cb709107f8c7619b41d
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 34282488,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "body": "Now that the NBA draft is over, fans and analysts are pouring over team selections. Lotto teams are thinking they have their next star. Contenders are thinking they have the next complementary pieces to boost their team. But it won't be a few years until we know the next busts and steals of this draft.\n\nIn the meantime, I wanted to do some quick analysis on the draft and the players in the NBA.\n\nThere are only 23 players drafted since 2006 (the 1st draft that restricted the drafting of players who just graduated from high school) who have been selected to more than 1 All-NBA team. To put that into perspective, 840 players have been drafted since (although 60 would have been from the most recent draft). So fewer than 3% of all players drafted since 2006 are multiple time All-NBA selections (fewer than 2 per draft).\n\nThe following are the list of All-NBA players to turn the numbers into basketball terms.\n<center>![Untitled.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png)</center>\n\nAs you can see, there are a few 1st time selections that the majority of NBA fans would never include as stars and who might be better categorized as role players. In addition, all players with more than 1 selection have been offered max contracts, while that's not necessarily the case for 1 time selections. Of course, these are not necessarily the most perfect definitions of what constitutes a star, but I wanted something quantitative and this'll do for now.\n\nBut how does one identify a potential star during draft time? Obviously play is a big deal. But I was wondering if the NCAAB All-NBA equivalent would be a good indicator. And it turns out, it's not. Of the 20 multi-time All-NBA players who played in college (3 did not - Marc Gasol, Giannis Antetokounmpo, and Rudy Gobert), only 11 were All-America selections in college.\n<center>![1.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png)</center>\n\nWhat's interesting is that the majority of the 9 players who were never All-Americas in college is that they all played for major programs. And even Stephen Curry (Davidson), Kawhi Leonard (San Diego St), and Damian Lillard (Weber St) were noticed by the All-Americas selection committee.\n\nBut what about All-America selections who never turned out to be stars? Well rather than divide players solely into 2 categories of stars and non-stars, I created 4 other categories:\n<ol>\n<li>Solid Contributor: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 BPM, >0 VORP</li>\n<li>Rotation Player: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 VORP</li>\n<li>NBA Washout: everyone else with >0 G</li>\n<li>Never Played in NBA: everyone with G=0</li></ol>\n\nExcluding the most recent draftees, there were 152 college All-Americas players. Eleven (7%) became NBA stars. 35 (23%) became solid contributors, 37 (24%) became rotation players, 64 (42%) became NBA washouts, and 5 (3%) never played in the NBA. Nearly half of all college All-Americas players become nobodies after college.\n\nI took it a step further and checked how many NBA stars were high school All-Americans (either McDonald's or Parade) and the percentages were actually the same. Only 11 of the 20 \"stars\" were selected for any All-American high school honors.\n<center>![2.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png)</center>\n\nAnd what about the other players that were high school All-Americans? Excluding the most recent draftees, 243 were high school All-Americans. Eleven (5%) became NBA stars, 51 (21%) became solid contributors, 54 (22%) became rotation players, 117 (48%) became NBA washouts, and 10 (4%) never played in the NBA despite being drafted. Overall, high school All-American awards seem just as predictive as college All-America awards.\n\nBut what if we applied combinations of college and high school all-American selections? And to provide some sense of comparison, I also calculated how draftees split in general.\n<center>![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png)</center>\n<center>![3.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png)</center>\n<center>![4.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png)</center>\n\nBased on this analysis, it does seem sensible that the greatest percentage of NBA stars come from the draftees that contains both high school and college stars (10% vs 2%/5%/2%).\n\nWhat's interesting is that between draftees that had only 1 of either college or high school All-American awards, you're more likely to find either NBA stars and solid contributors from the draftees of only high school All-Americans (42% vs 12%). And even more damning against college basketball success is that a greater percentage of draftees who had no awards in either college or high school become NBA stars or solid contributors when compared to the percentage of draftees who had just college All-American status (15% vs 12%).\n\nOverall, this seems to indicate:\n- A draftee's college All-American status is a positive sign for NBA teams only if he was a high school All-American as well as that draftee pool has the greatest percentage of stars.\n- If the prospect was a college All-American but not a high school one, then that might actually be a negative sign for NBA teams as the draftee pool of non-college All-Americans as a whole (high school All-Americans + non-All-Americans) has a better chance of finding solid contributors or better (20% vs 12%).\n\nFor this year's draft, that would be great news for Zion Williamson, R.J. Barrett, and Kyle Guy. All 3 were both All-Americans in high school and college.\n\nDarius Garland, Coby White, Cam Reddish, Romeo Langford, Darius Bazley, Nassir Little, Keldon Johnson, Bol Bol, and Jaylen Hands were all high school All-Americans, but not college ones. They might fare better in the pros than Ja Morant, Jarrett Culver, Rui Hachimura, Brandon Clarke, Grant Williams, and Carsen Edwards - all of whom where college All-Americans but not high school ones.\n\nThis raises a few questions:\n<ol>\n<li>Why does college All-American status without high school All-American status seem to have a negative impact on NBA contribution? One would think that if a player played well in college, even if he were not a star in high school, that would be at minimum equal to if not a better indicator than players who were never stars at all or only high school stars!</li>\n<li>Is it possible that NBA basketball is more similar to high school basketball, with more emphasis on athleticism, natural talent, and/or unequal teams?</li>\n<li>Are college basketball programs or coaches just able to overperform with their players? If so, why? Is it because they are managing their players more as opposed to NBA teams who provide more freedom?</li>\n<li>Does the fact that NBA money come into play make college stars perform worse (or non-college stars better)?</li>\n\n---\n\nRegardless, in order to tie this back to the NBA draft, I wanted to consider draft position: how well do higher draft picks correlate with future NBA contributions?\n<center>![6.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png)</center>\n<center>![9.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png)</center>\n\nOverall, pretty good I'd say. Your chance of finding stars and solid contributors drops the later you pick (dramatically), so much so that it seems picks 56–60 are pretty much worthless.\n\nBut what's interesting about this chart is that is seems draft position (and consequently scouting and GM decisions) is quite good and may be an even better predictor of future contributions.\n\nSo I tried to see the draft positions of our college and high school stars.\n<center>![7.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png)</center>\n\nAnd despite there being an overwhelming number of NCAA stars, they never once outnumber by percentage the number of high school stars selected in the same draft positions.\n\n<center>![8.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png)</center>\nUnsurprisingly, the 1st pick is almost always a NCAA + HS star and >50% of all NCAA + HS stars were selected by the 11th pick.\n\nWhat's interesting though is that this chart looks strikingly similar to that of the NBA stars draft percentage chart.\n\nOverall, it would seem that whatever methods teams and GMs use to draft, they are on average pretty accurate (or perhaps it is just easier to draft NBA players than expected).\n\nWhat do you think? Do these numbers surprise you? What other data points would have been interesting to capture?",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"nba-draft\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "nba-draft",
      "permlink": "statistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees",
      "title": "Statistical Analysis on Potential Stardom of NBA Draftees"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-07-01T13:47:42",
  "trx_id": "00a311fd811935d766c07cb709107f8c7619b41d",
  "trx_in_block": 20,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/07/01 13:47:27
authorprfrnir
bodyNow that the NBA draft is over, fans and analysts are pouring over team selections. Lotto teams are thinking they have their next star. Contenders are thinking they have the next complementary pieces to boost their team. But it won't be a few years until we know the next busts and steals of this draft. In the meantime, I wanted to do some quick analysis on the draft and the players in the NBA. There are only 23 players drafted since 2006 (the 1st draft that restricted the drafting of players who just graduated from high school) who have been selected to more than 1 All-NBA team. To put that into perspective, 840 players have been drafted since (although 60 would have been from the most recent draft). So fewer than 3% of all players drafted since 2006 are multiple time All-NBA selections (fewer than 2 per draft). The following are the list of All-NBA players to turn the numbers into basketball terms. <center>![Untitled.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png)</center> As you can see, there are a few 1st time selections that the majority of NBA fans would never include as stars and who might be better categorized as role players. In addition, all players with more than 1 selection have been offered max contracts, while that's not necessarily the case for 1 time selections. Of course, these are not necessarily the most perfect definitions of what constitutes a star, but I wanted something quantitative and this'll do for now. But how does one identify a potential star during draft time? Obviously play is a big deal. But I was wondering if the NCAAB All-NBA equivalent would be a good indicator. And it turns out, it's not. Of the 20 multi-time All-NBA players who played in college (3 did not - Marc Gasol, Giannis Antetokounmpo, and Rudy Gobert), only 11 were All-America selections in college. <center>![1.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png)</center> What's interesting is that the majority of the 9 players who were never All-Americas in college is that they all played for major programs. And even Stephen Curry (Davidson), Kawhi Leonard (San Diego St), and Damian Lillard (Weber St) were noticed by the All-Americas selection committee. But what about All-America selections who never turned out to be stars? Well rather than divide players solely into 2 categories of stars and non-stars, I created 4 other categories: <ol> <li>Solid Contributor: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 BPM, >0 VORP</li> <li>Rotation Player: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 VORP</li> <li>NBA Washout: everyone else with >0 G</li> <li>Never Played in NBA: everyone with G=0</li></ol> Excluding the most recent draftees, there were 152 college All-Americas players. Eleven (7%) became NBA stars. 35 (23%) became solid contributors, 37 (24%) became rotation players, 64 (42%) became NBA washouts, and 5 (3%) never played in the NBA. Nearly half of all college All-Americas players become nobodies after college. I took it a step further and checked how many NBA stars were high school All-Americans (either McDonald's or Parade) and the percentages were actually the same. Only 11 of the 20 "stars" were selected for any All-American high school honors. <center>![2.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png)</center> And what about the other players that were high school All-Americans? Excluding the most recent draftees, 243 were high school All-Americans. Eleven (5%) became NBA stars, 51 (21%) became solid contributors, 54 (22%) became rotation players, 117 (48%) became NBA washouts, and 10 (4%) never played in the NBA despite being drafted. Overall, high school All-American awards seem just as predictive as college All-America awards. But what if we applied combinations of college and high school all-American selections? And to provide some sense of comparison, I also calculated how draftees split in general. <center>![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png)</center> <center>![3.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png)</center> <center>![4.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png)</center> Based on this analysis, it does seem sensible that the greatest percentage of NBA stars come from the draftees that contains both high school and college stars (10% vs 2%/5%/2%). What's interesting is that between draftees that had only 1 of either college or high school All-American awards, you're more likely to find either NBA stars and solid contributors from the draftees of only high school All-Americans (42% vs 12%). And even more damning against college basketball success is that a greater percentage of draftees who had no awards in either college or high school become NBA stars or solid contributors when compared to the percentage of draftees who had just college All-American status (15% vs 12%). Overall, this seems to indicate: - A draftee's college All-American status is a positive sign for NBA teams only if he was a high school All-American as well as that draftee pool has the greatest percentage of stars. - If the prospect was a college All-American but not a high school one, then that might actually be a negative sign for NBA teams as the draftee pool of non-college All-Americans as a whole (high school All-Americans + non-All-Americans) has a better chance of finding solid contributors or better (20% vs 12%). For this year's draft, that would be great news for Zion Williamson, R.J. Barrett, and Kyle Guy. All 3 were both All-Americans in high school and college. Darius Garland, Coby White, Cam Reddish, Romeo Langford, Darius Bazley, Nassir Little, Keldon Johnson, Bol Bol, and Jaylen Hands were all high school All-Americans, but not college ones. They might fare better in the pros than Ja Morant, Jarrett Culver, Rui Hachimura, Brandon Clarke, Grant Williams, and Carsen Edwards - all of whom where college All-Americans but not high school ones. This raises a few questions: <ol> <li>Why does college All-American status without high school All-American status seem to have a negative impact on NBA contribution? One would think that if a player played well in college, even if he were not a star in high school, that would be at minimum equal to if not a better indicator than players who were never stars at all or only high school stars!</li> <li>Is it possible that NBA basketball is more similar to high school basketball, with more emphasis on athleticism, natural talent, and/or unequal teams?</li> <li>Are college basketball programs or coaches just able to overperform with their players? If so, why? Is it because they are managing their players more as opposed to NBA teams who provide more freedom?</li> <li>Does the fact that NBA money come into play make college stars perform worse (or non-college stars better)?</li> --- Regardless, in order to tie this back to the NBA draft, I wanted to consider draft position: how well do higher draft picks correlate with future NBA contributions? <center>![6.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png)</center> <center>![9.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png)</center> Overall, pretty good I'd say. Your chance of finding stars and solid contributors drops the later you pick (dramatically), so much so that it seems picks 56–60 are pretty much worthless. But what's interesting about this chart is that is seems draft position (and consequently scouting and GM decisions) is quite good and may be an even better predictor of future contributions. So I tried to see the draft positions of our college and high school stars. <center>![7.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png)</center> And despite there being an overwhelming number of NCAA stars, they never once outnumber by percentage the number of high school stars selected in the same draft positions. <center>![8.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png)</center> Unsurprisingly, the 1st pick is almost always a NCAA + HS star and >50% of all NCAA + HS stars were selected by the 11th pick. What's interesting though is that this chart looks strikingly similar to that of the NBA stars draft percentage chart. Overall, it would seem that whatever methods teams and GMs use to draft, they are on average pretty accurate (or perhaps it is just easier to draft NBA players than expected). What do you think? Do these numbers surprise you? What other data points would have been interesting to capture?
json metadata{"tags":["nba","nba-draft","draft","basketball","statistics"],"image":["https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
parent author
parent permlinknba-draft
permlinkstatistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees
titleStatistical Analysis on Potential Stardom of NBA Draftees
Transaction InfoBlock #34282483/Trx aa4422cc4c4d21fe7c4a6d0556c0e8dc5eba05dd
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 34282483,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "body": "Now that the NBA draft is over, fans and analysts are pouring over team selections. Lotto teams are thinking they have their next star. Contenders are thinking they have the next complementary pieces to boost their team. But it won't be a few years until we know the next busts and steals of this draft.\n\nIn the meantime, I wanted to do some quick analysis on the draft and the players in the NBA.\n\nThere are only 23 players drafted since 2006 (the 1st draft that restricted the drafting of players who just graduated from high school) who have been selected to more than 1 All-NBA team. To put that into perspective, 840 players have been drafted since (although 60 would have been from the most recent draft). So fewer than 3% of all players drafted since 2006 are multiple time All-NBA selections (fewer than 2 per draft).\n\nThe following are the list of All-NBA players to turn the numbers into basketball terms.\n<center>![Untitled.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png)</center>\n\nAs you can see, there are a few 1st time selections that the majority of NBA fans would never include as stars and who might be better categorized as role players. In addition, all players with more than 1 selection have been offered max contracts, while that's not necessarily the case for 1 time selections. Of course, these are not necessarily the most perfect definitions of what constitutes a star, but I wanted something quantitative and this'll do for now.\n\nBut how does one identify a potential star during draft time? Obviously play is a big deal. But I was wondering if the NCAAB All-NBA equivalent would be a good indicator. And it turns out, it's not. Of the 20 multi-time All-NBA players who played in college (3 did not - Marc Gasol, Giannis Antetokounmpo, and Rudy Gobert), only 11 were All-America selections in college.\n<center>![1.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png)</center>\n\nWhat's interesting is that the majority of the 9 players who were never All-Americas in college is that they all played for major programs. And even Stephen Curry (Davidson), Kawhi Leonard (San Diego St), and Damian Lillard (Weber St) were noticed by the All-Americas selection committee.\n\nBut what about All-America selections who never turned out to be stars? Well rather than divide players solely into 2 categories of stars and non-stars, I created 4 other categories:\n<ol>\n<li>Solid Contributor: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 BPM, >0 VORP</li>\n<li>Rotation Player: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 VORP</li>\n<li>NBA Washout: everyone else with >0 G</li>\n<li>Never Played in NBA: everyone with G=0</li></ol>\n\nExcluding the most recent draftees, there were 152 college All-Americas players. Eleven (7%) became NBA stars. 35 (23%) became solid contributors, 37 (24%) became rotation players, 64 (42%) became NBA washouts, and 5 (3%) never played in the NBA. Nearly half of all college All-Americas players become nobodies after college.\n\nI took it a step further and checked how many NBA stars were high school All-Americans (either McDonald's or Parade) and the percentages were actually the same. Only 11 of the 20 \"stars\" were selected for any All-American high school honors.\n<center>![2.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png)</center>\n\nAnd what about the other players that were high school All-Americans? Excluding the most recent draftees, 243 were high school All-Americans. Eleven (5%) became NBA stars, 51 (21%) became solid contributors, 54 (22%) became rotation players, 117 (48%) became NBA washouts, and 10 (4%) never played in the NBA despite being drafted. Overall, high school All-American awards seem just as predictive as college All-America awards.\n\nBut what if we applied combinations of college and high school all-American selections? And to provide some sense of comparison, I also calculated how draftees split in general.\n<center>![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png)</center>\n<center>![3.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png)</center>\n<center>![4.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png)</center>\n\nBased on this analysis, it does seem sensible that the greatest percentage of NBA stars come from the draftees that contains both high school and college stars (10% vs 2%/5%/2%).\n\nWhat's interesting is that between draftees that had only 1 of either college or high school All-American awards, you're more likely to find either NBA stars and solid contributors from the draftees of only high school All-Americans (42% vs 12%). And even more damning against college basketball success is that a greater percentage of draftees who had no awards in either college or high school become NBA stars or solid contributors when compared to the percentage of draftees who had just college All-American status (15% vs 12%).\n\nOverall, this seems to indicate:\n- A draftee's college All-American status is a positive sign for NBA teams only if he was a high school All-American as well as that draftee pool has the greatest percentage of stars.\n- If the prospect was a college All-American but not a high school one, then that might actually be a negative sign for NBA teams as the draftee pool of non-college All-Americans as a whole (high school All-Americans + non-All-Americans) has a better chance of finding solid contributors or better (20% vs 12%).\n\nFor this year's draft, that would be great news for Zion Williamson, R.J. Barrett, and Kyle Guy. All 3 were both All-Americans in high school and college.\n\nDarius Garland, Coby White, Cam Reddish, Romeo Langford, Darius Bazley, Nassir Little, Keldon Johnson, Bol Bol, and Jaylen Hands were all high school All-Americans, but not college ones. They might fare better in the pros than Ja Morant, Jarrett Culver, Rui Hachimura, Brandon Clarke, Grant Williams, and Carsen Edwards - all of whom where college All-Americans but not high school ones.\n\nThis raises a few questions:\n<ol>\n<li>Why does college All-American status without high school All-American status seem to have a negative impact on NBA contribution? One would think that if a player played well in college, even if he were not a star in high school, that would be at minimum equal to if not a better indicator than players who were never stars at all or only high school stars!</li>\n<li>Is it possible that NBA basketball is more similar to high school basketball, with more emphasis on athleticism, natural talent, and/or unequal teams?</li>\n<li>Are college basketball programs or coaches just able to overperform with their players? If so, why? Is it because they are managing their players more as opposed to NBA teams who provide more freedom?</li>\n<li>Does the fact that NBA money come into play make college stars perform worse (or non-college stars better)?</li>\n\n---\n\nRegardless, in order to tie this back to the NBA draft, I wanted to consider draft position: how well do higher draft picks correlate with future NBA contributions?\n<center>![6.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png)</center>\n<center>![9.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png)</center>\n\nOverall, pretty good I'd say. Your chance of finding stars and solid contributors drops the later you pick (dramatically), so much so that it seems picks 56–60 are pretty much worthless.\n\nBut what's interesting about this chart is that is seems draft position (and consequently scouting and GM decisions) is quite good and may be an even better predictor of future contributions.\n\nSo I tried to see the draft positions of our college and high school stars.\n<center>![7.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png)</center>\n\nAnd despite there being an overwhelming number of NCAA stars, they never once outnumber by percentage the number of high school stars selected in the same draft positions.\n\n<center>![8.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png)</center>\nUnsurprisingly, the 1st pick is almost always a NCAA + HS star and >50% of all NCAA + HS stars were selected by the 11th pick.\n\nWhat's interesting though is that this chart looks strikingly similar to that of the NBA stars draft percentage chart.\n\nOverall, it would seem that whatever methods teams and GMs use to draft, they are on average pretty accurate (or perhaps it is just easier to draft NBA players than expected).\n\nWhat do you think? Do these numbers surprise you? What other data points would have been interesting to capture?",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"nba\",\"nba-draft\",\"draft\",\"basketball\",\"statistics\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "nba-draft",
      "permlink": "statistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees",
      "title": "Statistical Analysis on Potential Stardom of NBA Draftees"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-07-01T13:47:27",
  "trx_id": "aa4422cc4c4d21fe7c4a6d0556c0e8dc5eba05dd",
  "trx_in_block": 45,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/07/01 02:22:24
authorprfrnir
bodyNow that the NBA draft is over, fans and analysts are pouring over team selections. Lotto teams are thinking they have their next star. Contenders are thinking they have the next complementary pieces to boost their team. But it won't be a few years until we know the next busts and steals of this draft. In the meantime, I wanted to do some quick analysis on the draft and the players in the NBA. There are only 23 players drafted since 2006 (the 1st draft that restricted the drafting of players who just graduated from high school) who have been selected to more than 1 All-NBA team. To put that into perspective, 840 players have been drafted since (although 60 would have been from the most recent draft). So fewer than 3% of all players drafted since 2006 are multiple time All-NBA selections (fewer than 2 per draft). The following are the list of All-NBA players to turn the numbers into basketball terms. <center>![Untitled.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png)</center> As you can see, there are a few 1st time selections that the majority of NBA fans would never include as stars and who might be better categorized as role players. In addition, all players with more than 1 selection have been offered max contracts, while that's not necessarily the case for 1 time selections. Of course, these are not necessarily the most perfect definitions of what constitutes a star, but I wanted something quantitative and this'll do for now. But how does one identify a potential star during draft time? Obviously play is a big deal. But I was wondering if the NCAAB All-NBA equivalent would be a good indicator. And it turns out, it's not. Of the 20 multi-time All-NBA players who played in college (3 did not - Marc Gasol, Giannis Antetokounmpo, and Rudy Gobert), only 11 were All-America selections in college. <center>![1.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png)</center> What's interesting is that the majority of the 9 players who were never All-Americas in college is that they all played for major programs. And even Stephen Curry (Davidson), Kawhi Leonard (San Diego St), and Damian Lillard (Weber St) were noticed by the All-Americas selection committee. But what about All-America selections who never turned out to be stars? Well rather than divide players solely into 2 categories of stars and non-stars, I created 4 other categories: <ol> <li>Solid Contributor: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 BPM, >0 VORP</li> <li>Rotation Player: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 VORP</li> <li>NBA Washout: everyone else with >0 G</li> <li>Never Played in NBA: everyone with G=0</li></ol> Excluding the most recent draftees, there were 152 college All-Americas players. Eleven (7%) became NBA stars. 35 (23%) became solid contributors, 37 (24%) became rotation players, 64 (42%) became NBA washouts, and 5 (3%) never played in the NBA. Nearly half of all college All-Americas players become nobodies after college. I took it a step further and checked how many NBA stars were high school All-Americans (either McDonald's or Parade) and the percentages were actually the same. Only 11 of the 20 "stars" were selected for any All-American high school honors. <center>![2.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png)</center> And what about the other players that were high school All-Americans? Excluding the most recent draftees, 243 were high school All-Americans. Eleven (5%) became NBA stars, 51 (21%) became solid contributors, 54 (22%) became rotation players, 117 (48%) became NBA washouts, and 10 (4%) never played in the NBA despite being drafted. Overall, high school All-American awards seem just as predictive as college All-America awards. But what if we applied combinations of college and high school all-American selections? And to provide some sense of comparison, I also calculated how draftees split in general. <center>![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png)</center> <center>![3.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png)</center> <center>![4.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png)</center> Based on this analysis, it does seem sensible that the greatest percentage of NBA stars come from the draftees that contains both high school and college stars (10% vs 2%/5%/2%). What's interesting is that between draftees that had only 1 of either college or high school All-American awards, you're more likely to find either NBA stars and solid contributors from the draftees of only high school All-Americans (42% vs 12%). And even more damning against college basketball success is that a greater percentage of draftees who had no awards in either college or high school become NBA stars or solid contributors when compared to the percentage of draftees who had just college All-American status (15% vs 12%). Overall, this seems to indicate: - A draftee's college All-American status is a positive sign for NBA teams only if he was a high school All-American as well as that draftee pool has the greatest percentage of stars. - If the prospect was a college All-American but not a high school one, then that might actually be a negative sign for NBA teams as the draftee pool of non-college All-Americans as a whole (high school All-Americans + non-All-Americans) has a better chance of finding solid contributors or better (20% vs 12%). For this year's draft, that would be great news for Zion Williamson, R.J. Barrett, and Kyle Guy. All 3 were both All-Americans in high school and college. Darius Garland, Coby White, Cam Reddish, Romeo Langford, Darius Bazley, Nassir Little, Keldon Johnson, Bol Bol, and Jaylen Hands were all high school All-Americans, but not college ones. They might fare better in the pros than Ja Morant, Jarrett Culver, Rui Hachimura, Brandon Clarke, Grant Williams, and Carsen Edwards - all of whom where college All-Americans but not high school ones. This raises a few questions: <ol> <li>Why does college All-American status without high school All-American status seem to have a negative impact on NBA contribution? One would think that if a player played well in college, even if he were not a star in high school, that would be at minimum equal to if not a better indicator than players who were never stars at all or only high school stars!</li> <li>Is it possible that NBA basketball is more similar to high school basketball, with more emphasis on athleticism, natural talent, and/or unequal teams?</li> <li>Are college basketball programs or coaches just able to overperform with their players? If so, why? Is it because they are managing their players more as opposed to NBA teams who provide more freedom?</li> <li>Does the fact that NBA money come into play make college stars perform worse (or non-college stars better)?</li> --- Regardless, in order to tie this back to the NBA draft, I wanted to consider draft position: how well do higher draft picks correlate with future NBA contributions? <center>![6.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png)</center> <center>![9.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png)</center> Overall, pretty good I'd say. Your chance of finding stars and solid contributors drops the later you pick (dramatically), so much so that it seems picks 56–60 are pretty much worthless. But what's interesting about this chart is that is seems draft position (and consequently scouting and GM decisions) is quite good and may be an even better predictor of future contributions. So I tried to see the draft positions of our college and high school stars. <center>![7.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png)</center> And despite there being an overwhelming number of NCAA stars, they never once outnumber by percentage the number of high school stars selected in the same draft positions. <center>![8.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png)</center> Unsurprisingly, the 1st pick is almost always a NCAA + HS star and >50% of all NCAA + HS stars were selected by the 11th pick. What's interesting though is that this chart looks strikingly similar to that of the NBA stars draft percentage chart. Overall, it would seem that whatever methods teams and GMs use to draft, they are on average pretty accurate (or perhaps it is just easier to draft NBA players than expected). What do you think? Do these numbers surprise you? What other data points would have been interesting to capture?
json metadata{"tags":["nba","nba-draft","draft","basketball","statistics"],"image":["https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
parent author
parent permlinknba-draft
permlinkstatistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees
titleStatistical Analysis on Potential Stardom of NBA Draftees
Transaction InfoBlock #34268792/Trx e0d748eea5d342c48a1420e617437751cae41538
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 34268792,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "body": "Now that the NBA draft is over, fans and analysts are pouring over team selections. Lotto teams are thinking they have their next star. Contenders are thinking they have the next complementary pieces to boost their team. But it won't be a few years until we know the next busts and steals of this draft.\n\nIn the meantime, I wanted to do some quick analysis on the draft and the players in the NBA.\n\nThere are only 23 players drafted since 2006 (the 1st draft that restricted the drafting of players who just graduated from high school) who have been selected to more than 1 All-NBA team. To put that into perspective, 840 players have been drafted since (although 60 would have been from the most recent draft). So fewer than 3% of all players drafted since 2006 are multiple time All-NBA selections (fewer than 2 per draft).\n\nThe following are the list of All-NBA players to turn the numbers into basketball terms.\n<center>![Untitled.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png)</center>\n\nAs you can see, there are a few 1st time selections that the majority of NBA fans would never include as stars and who might be better categorized as role players. In addition, all players with more than 1 selection have been offered max contracts, while that's not necessarily the case for 1 time selections. Of course, these are not necessarily the most perfect definitions of what constitutes a star, but I wanted something quantitative and this'll do for now.\n\nBut how does one identify a potential star during draft time? Obviously play is a big deal. But I was wondering if the NCAAB All-NBA equivalent would be a good indicator. And it turns out, it's not. Of the 20 multi-time All-NBA players who played in college (3 did not - Marc Gasol, Giannis Antetokounmpo, and Rudy Gobert), only 11 were All-America selections in college.\n<center>![1.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png)</center>\n\nWhat's interesting is that the majority of the 9 players who were never All-Americas in college is that they all played for major programs. And even Stephen Curry (Davidson), Kawhi Leonard (San Diego St), and Damian Lillard (Weber St) were noticed by the All-Americas selection committee.\n\nBut what about All-America selections who never turned out to be stars? Well rather than divide players solely into 2 categories of stars and non-stars, I created 4 other categories:\n<ol>\n<li>Solid Contributor: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 BPM, >0 VORP</li>\n<li>Rotation Player: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 VORP</li>\n<li>NBA Washout: everyone else with >0 G</li>\n<li>Never Played in NBA: everyone with G=0</li></ol>\n\nExcluding the most recent draftees, there were 152 college All-Americas players. Eleven (7%) became NBA stars. 35 (23%) became solid contributors, 37 (24%) became rotation players, 64 (42%) became NBA washouts, and 5 (3%) never played in the NBA. Nearly half of all college All-Americas players become nobodies after college.\n\nI took it a step further and checked how many NBA stars were high school All-Americans (either McDonald's or Parade) and the percentages were actually the same. Only 11 of the 20 \"stars\" were selected for any All-American high school honors.\n<center>![2.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png)</center>\n\nAnd what about the other players that were high school All-Americans? Excluding the most recent draftees, 243 were high school All-Americans. Eleven (5%) became NBA stars, 51 (21%) became solid contributors, 54 (22%) became rotation players, 117 (48%) became NBA washouts, and 10 (4%) never played in the NBA despite being drafted. Overall, high school All-American awards seem just as predictive as college All-America awards.\n\nBut what if we applied combinations of college and high school all-American selections? And to provide some sense of comparison, I also calculated how draftees split in general.\n<center>![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png)</center>\n<center>![3.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png)</center>\n<center>![4.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png)</center>\n\nBased on this analysis, it does seem sensible that the greatest percentage of NBA stars come from the draftees that contains both high school and college stars (10% vs 2%/5%/2%).\n\nWhat's interesting is that between draftees that had only 1 of either college or high school All-American awards, you're more likely to find either NBA stars and solid contributors from the draftees of only high school All-Americans (42% vs 12%). And even more damning against college basketball success is that a greater percentage of draftees who had no awards in either college or high school become NBA stars or solid contributors when compared to the percentage of draftees who had just college All-American status (15% vs 12%).\n\nOverall, this seems to indicate:\n- A draftee's college All-American status is a positive sign for NBA teams only if he was a high school All-American as well as that draftee pool has the greatest percentage of stars.\n- If the prospect was a college All-American but not a high school one, then that might actually be a negative sign for NBA teams as the draftee pool of non-college All-Americans as a whole (high school All-Americans + non-All-Americans) has a better chance of finding solid contributors or better (20% vs 12%).\n\nFor this year's draft, that would be great news for Zion Williamson, R.J. Barrett, and Kyle Guy. All 3 were both All-Americans in high school and college.\n\nDarius Garland, Coby White, Cam Reddish, Romeo Langford, Darius Bazley, Nassir Little, Keldon Johnson, Bol Bol, and Jaylen Hands were all high school All-Americans, but not college ones. They might fare better in the pros than Ja Morant, Jarrett Culver, Rui Hachimura, Brandon Clarke, Grant Williams, and Carsen Edwards - all of whom where college All-Americans but not high school ones.\n\nThis raises a few questions:\n<ol>\n<li>Why does college All-American status without high school All-American status seem to have a negative impact on NBA contribution? One would think that if a player played well in college, even if he were not a star in high school, that would be at minimum equal to if not a better indicator than players who were never stars at all or only high school stars!</li>\n<li>Is it possible that NBA basketball is more similar to high school basketball, with more emphasis on athleticism, natural talent, and/or unequal teams?</li>\n<li>Are college basketball programs or coaches just able to overperform with their players? If so, why? Is it because they are managing their players more as opposed to NBA teams who provide more freedom?</li>\n<li>Does the fact that NBA money come into play make college stars perform worse (or non-college stars better)?</li>\n\n---\n\nRegardless, in order to tie this back to the NBA draft, I wanted to consider draft position: how well do higher draft picks correlate with future NBA contributions?\n<center>![6.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png)</center>\n<center>![9.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png)</center>\n\nOverall, pretty good I'd say. Your chance of finding stars and solid contributors drops the later you pick (dramatically), so much so that it seems picks 56–60 are pretty much worthless.\n\nBut what's interesting about this chart is that is seems draft position (and consequently scouting and GM decisions) is quite good and may be an even better predictor of future contributions.\n\nSo I tried to see the draft positions of our college and high school stars.\n<center>![7.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png)</center>\n\nAnd despite there being an overwhelming number of NCAA stars, they never once outnumber by percentage the number of high school stars selected in the same draft positions.\n\n<center>![8.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png)</center>\nUnsurprisingly, the 1st pick is almost always a NCAA + HS star and >50% of all NCAA + HS stars were selected by the 11th pick.\n\nWhat's interesting though is that this chart looks strikingly similar to that of the NBA stars draft percentage chart.\n\nOverall, it would seem that whatever methods teams and GMs use to draft, they are on average pretty accurate (or perhaps it is just easier to draft NBA players than expected).\n\nWhat do you think? Do these numbers surprise you? What other data points would have been interesting to capture?",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"nba\",\"nba-draft\",\"draft\",\"basketball\",\"statistics\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "nba-draft",
      "permlink": "statistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees",
      "title": "Statistical Analysis on Potential Stardom of NBA Draftees"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-07-01T02:22:24",
  "trx_id": "e0d748eea5d342c48a1420e617437751cae41538",
  "trx_in_block": 21,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/30 19:51:27
authorprfrnir
body@@ -3996,21 +3996,16 @@ enter%3E!%5B -5.png %5D(https: @@ -4035,54 +4035,58 @@ /DQm -dG8QGBSbn2hAWAvQuNpCJKsKF6bfb3CNuW7USJ6jCxzH/5 +RbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image .png
json metadata{"tags":["nba-draft","nba","draft","basketball","statistics"],"image":["https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
parent author
parent permlinknba-draft
permlinkstatistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees
titleStatistical Analysis on Potential Stardom of NBA Draftees
Transaction InfoBlock #34260980/Trx a7aa059ed9e15b570ce153d4d1dc94744ce9d592
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 34260980,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "body": "@@ -3996,21 +3996,16 @@\n enter%3E!%5B\n-5.png\n %5D(https:\n@@ -4035,54 +4035,58 @@\n /DQm\n-dG8QGBSbn2hAWAvQuNpCJKsKF6bfb3CNuW7USJ6jCxzH/5\n+RbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image\n .png\n",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"nba-draft\",\"nba\",\"draft\",\"basketball\",\"statistics\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRbBZcr44BH9YcdKTEMCo6DHpFWCSGXrHgVyz58yh83D2/image.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "nba-draft",
      "permlink": "statistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees",
      "title": "Statistical Analysis on Potential Stardom of NBA Draftees"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-30T19:51:27",
  "trx_id": "a7aa059ed9e15b570ce153d4d1dc94744ce9d592",
  "trx_in_block": 24,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/30 19:42:42
authorprfrnir
permlinkstatistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees
votergamezine
weight280 (2.80%)
Transaction InfoBlock #34260805/Trx ab1d453346c448ecf26ebf41a65c6ada61b43519
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 34260805,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "statistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees",
      "voter": "gamezine",
      "weight": 280
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-30T19:42:42",
  "trx_id": "ab1d453346c448ecf26ebf41a65c6ada61b43519",
  "trx_in_block": 7,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/30 19:42:39
authorprfrnir
permlinkstatistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees
votermap10k
weight38 (0.38%)
Transaction InfoBlock #34260804/Trx 9b6ec7be1d129bd51ed76dd6d3a2161228fc59bb
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 34260804,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "statistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees",
      "voter": "map10k",
      "weight": 38
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-30T19:42:39",
  "trx_id": "9b6ec7be1d129bd51ed76dd6d3a2161228fc59bb",
  "trx_in_block": 38,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/30 19:41:33
authorprfrnir
permlinkstatistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees
voteraccelerator
weight33 (0.33%)
Transaction InfoBlock #34260782/Trx 5f04429f86020f2dceec6cc5981c666c19990be8
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 34260782,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "statistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees",
      "voter": "accelerator",
      "weight": 33
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-30T19:41:33",
  "trx_id": "5f04429f86020f2dceec6cc5981c666c19990be8",
  "trx_in_block": 29,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/30 19:40:51
authorprfrnir
permlinkstatistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees
voterpc-tip
weight300 (3.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #34260768/Trx b76b2228eb517f1d23e762b0d42df022491ef778
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 34260768,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "statistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees",
      "voter": "pc-tip",
      "weight": 300
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-30T19:40:51",
  "trx_id": "b76b2228eb517f1d23e762b0d42df022491ef778",
  "trx_in_block": 12,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/30 19:40:51
authorprfrnir
permlinkstatistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees
voterdlikeguy
weight300 (3.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #34260768/Trx 915ca601a7a302537031b13c92a1fc75a5277119
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 34260768,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "statistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees",
      "voter": "dlikeguy",
      "weight": 300
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-30T19:40:51",
  "trx_id": "915ca601a7a302537031b13c92a1fc75a5277119",
  "trx_in_block": 7,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/30 19:40:45
authorprfrnir
permlinkstatistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees
voterezravandi
weight210 (2.10%)
Transaction InfoBlock #34260766/Trx d469653eafe1207879215056a0c806002583e489
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 34260766,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "statistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees",
      "voter": "ezravandi",
      "weight": 210
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-30T19:40:45",
  "trx_id": "d469653eafe1207879215056a0c806002583e489",
  "trx_in_block": 15,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/30 19:27:48
authorprfrnir
bodyNow that the NBA draft is over, fans and analysts are pouring over team selections. Lotto teams are thinking they have their next star. Contenders are thinking they have the next complementary pieces to boost their team. But it won't be a few years until we know the next busts and steals of this draft. In the meantime, I wanted to do some quick analysis on the draft and the players in the NBA. There are only 23 players drafted since 2006 (the 1st draft that restricted the drafting of players who just graduated from high school) who have been selected to more than 1 All-NBA team. To put that into perspective, 840 players have been drafted since (although 60 would have been from the most recent draft). So fewer than 3% of all players drafted since 2006 are multiple time All-NBA selections (fewer than 2 per draft). The following are the list of All-NBA players to turn the numbers into basketball terms. <center>![Untitled.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png)</center> As you can see, there are a few 1st time selections that the majority of NBA fans would never include as stars and who might be better categorized as role players. In addition, all players with more than 1 selection have been offered max contracts, while that's not necessarily the case for 1 time selections. Of course, these are not necessarily the most perfect definitions of what constitutes a star, but I wanted something quantitative and this'll do for now. But how does one identify a potential star during draft time? Obviously play is a big deal. But I was wondering if the NCAAB All-NBA equivalent would be a good indicator. And it turns out, it's not. Of the 20 multi-time All-NBA players who played in college (3 did not - Marc Gasol, Giannis Antetokounmpo, and Rudy Gobert), only 11 were All-America selections in college. <center>![1.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png)</center> What's interesting is that the majority of the 9 players who were never All-Americas in college is that they all played for major programs. And even Stephen Curry (Davidson), Kawhi Leonard (San Diego St), and Damian Lillard (Weber St) were noticed by the All-Americas selection committee. But what about All-America selections who never turned out to be stars? Well rather than divide players solely into 2 categories of stars and non-stars, I created 4 other categories: <ol> <li>Solid Contributor: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 BPM, >0 VORP</li> <li>Rotation Player: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 VORP</li> <li>NBA Washout: everyone else with >0 G</li> <li>Never Played in NBA: everyone with G=0</li></ol> Excluding the most recent draftees, there were 152 college All-Americas players. Eleven (7%) became NBA stars. 35 (23%) became solid contributors, 37 (24%) became rotation players, 64 (42%) became NBA washouts, and 5 (3%) never played in the NBA. Nearly half of all college All-Americas players become nobodies after college. I took it a step further and checked how many NBA stars were high school All-Americans (either McDonald's or Parade) and the percentages were actually the same. Only 11 of the 20 "stars" were selected for any All-American high school honors. <center>![2.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png)</center> And what about the other players that were high school All-Americans? Excluding the most recent draftees, 243 were high school All-Americans. Eleven (5%) became NBA stars, 51 (21%) became solid contributors, 54 (22%) became rotation players, 117 (48%) became NBA washouts, and 10 (4%) never played in the NBA despite being drafted. Overall, high school All-American awards seem just as predictive as college All-America awards. But what if we applied combinations of college and high school all-American selections? And to provide some sense of comparison, I also calculated how draftees split in general. <center>![5.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdG8QGBSbn2hAWAvQuNpCJKsKF6bfb3CNuW7USJ6jCxzH/5.png)</center> <center>![3.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png)</center> <center>![4.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png)</center> Based on this analysis, it does seem sensible that the greatest percentage of NBA stars come from the draftees that contains both high school and college stars (10% vs 2%/5%/2%). What's interesting is that between draftees that had only 1 of either college or high school All-American awards, you're more likely to find either NBA stars and solid contributors from the draftees of only high school All-Americans (42% vs 12%). And even more damning against college basketball success is that a greater percentage of draftees who had no awards in either college or high school become NBA stars or solid contributors when compared to the percentage of draftees who had just college All-American status (15% vs 12%). Overall, this seems to indicate: - A draftee's college All-American status is a positive sign for NBA teams only if he was a high school All-American as well as that draftee pool has the greatest percentage of stars. - If the prospect was a college All-American but not a high school one, then that might actually be a negative sign for NBA teams as the draftee pool of non-college All-Americans as a whole (high school All-Americans + non-All-Americans) has a better chance of finding solid contributors or better (20% vs 12%). For this year's draft, that would be great news for Zion Williamson, R.J. Barrett, and Kyle Guy. All 3 were both All-Americans in high school and college. Darius Garland, Coby White, Cam Reddish, Romeo Langford, Darius Bazley, Nassir Little, Keldon Johnson, Bol Bol, and Jaylen Hands were all high school All-Americans, but not college ones. They might fare better in the pros than Ja Morant, Jarrett Culver, Rui Hachimura, Brandon Clarke, Grant Williams, and Carsen Edwards - all of whom where college All-Americans but not high school ones. This raises a few questions: <ol> <li>Why does college All-American status without high school All-American status seem to have a negative impact on NBA contribution? One would think that if a player played well in college, even if he were not a star in high school, that would be at minimum equal to if not a better indicator than players who were never stars at all or only high school stars!</li> <li>Is it possible that NBA basketball is more similar to high school basketball, with more emphasis on athleticism, natural talent, and/or unequal teams?</li> <li>Are college basketball programs or coaches just able to overperform with their players? If so, why? Is it because they are managing their players more as opposed to NBA teams who provide more freedom?</li> <li>Does the fact that NBA money come into play make college stars perform worse (or non-college stars better)?</li> --- Regardless, in order to tie this back to the NBA draft, I wanted to consider draft position: how well do higher draft picks correlate with future NBA contributions? <center>![6.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png)</center> <center>![9.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png)</center> Overall, pretty good I'd say. Your chance of finding stars and solid contributors drops the later you pick (dramatically), so much so that it seems picks 56–60 are pretty much worthless. But what's interesting about this chart is that is seems draft position (and consequently scouting and GM decisions) is quite good and may be an even better predictor of future contributions. So I tried to see the draft positions of our college and high school stars. <center>![7.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png)</center> And despite there being an overwhelming number of NCAA stars, they never once outnumber by percentage the number of high school stars selected in the same draft positions. <center>![8.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png)</center> Unsurprisingly, the 1st pick is almost always a NCAA + HS star and >50% of all NCAA + HS stars were selected by the 11th pick. What's interesting though is that this chart looks strikingly similar to that of the NBA stars draft percentage chart. Overall, it would seem that whatever methods teams and GMs use to draft, they are on average pretty accurate (or perhaps it is just easier to draft NBA players than expected). What do you think? Do these numbers surprise you? What other data points would have been interesting to capture?
json metadata{"tags":["nba-draft","nba","draft","basketball","statistics"],"image":["https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdG8QGBSbn2hAWAvQuNpCJKsKF6bfb3CNuW7USJ6jCxzH/5.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
parent author
parent permlinknba-draft
permlinkstatistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees
titleStatistical Analysis on Potential Stardom of NBA Draftees
Transaction InfoBlock #34260507/Trx 61b640f70b039b2cc731b83a264f66b43110551f
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 34260507,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "body": "Now that the NBA draft is over, fans and analysts are pouring over team selections. Lotto teams are thinking they have their next star. Contenders are thinking they have the next complementary pieces to boost their team. But it won't be a few years until we know the next busts and steals of this draft.\n\nIn the meantime, I wanted to do some quick analysis on the draft and the players in the NBA.\n\nThere are only 23 players drafted since 2006 (the 1st draft that restricted the drafting of players who just graduated from high school) who have been selected to more than 1 All-NBA team. To put that into perspective, 840 players have been drafted since (although 60 would have been from the most recent draft). So fewer than 3% of all players drafted since 2006 are multiple time All-NBA selections (fewer than 2 per draft).\n\nThe following are the list of All-NBA players to turn the numbers into basketball terms.\n<center>![Untitled.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png)</center>\n\nAs you can see, there are a few 1st time selections that the majority of NBA fans would never include as stars and who might be better categorized as role players. In addition, all players with more than 1 selection have been offered max contracts, while that's not necessarily the case for 1 time selections. Of course, these are not necessarily the most perfect definitions of what constitutes a star, but I wanted something quantitative and this'll do for now.\n\nBut how does one identify a potential star during draft time? Obviously play is a big deal. But I was wondering if the NCAAB All-NBA equivalent would be a good indicator. And it turns out, it's not. Of the 20 multi-time All-NBA players who played in college (3 did not - Marc Gasol, Giannis Antetokounmpo, and Rudy Gobert), only 11 were All-America selections in college.\n<center>![1.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png)</center>\n\nWhat's interesting is that the majority of the 9 players who were never All-Americas in college is that they all played for major programs. And even Stephen Curry (Davidson), Kawhi Leonard (San Diego St), and Damian Lillard (Weber St) were noticed by the All-Americas selection committee.\n\nBut what about All-America selections who never turned out to be stars? Well rather than divide players solely into 2 categories of stars and non-stars, I created 4 other categories:\n<ol>\n<li>Solid Contributor: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 BPM, >0 VORP</li>\n<li>Rotation Player: career average of >= 10 MPG, >0 VORP</li>\n<li>NBA Washout: everyone else with >0 G</li>\n<li>Never Played in NBA: everyone with G=0</li></ol>\n\nExcluding the most recent draftees, there were 152 college All-Americas players. Eleven (7%) became NBA stars. 35 (23%) became solid contributors, 37 (24%) became rotation players, 64 (42%) became NBA washouts, and 5 (3%) never played in the NBA. Nearly half of all college All-Americas players become nobodies after college.\n\nI took it a step further and checked how many NBA stars were high school All-Americans (either McDonald's or Parade) and the percentages were actually the same. Only 11 of the 20 \"stars\" were selected for any All-American high school honors.\n<center>![2.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png)</center>\n\nAnd what about the other players that were high school All-Americans? Excluding the most recent draftees, 243 were high school All-Americans. Eleven (5%) became NBA stars, 51 (21%) became solid contributors, 54 (22%) became rotation players, 117 (48%) became NBA washouts, and 10 (4%) never played in the NBA despite being drafted. Overall, high school All-American awards seem just as predictive as college All-America awards.\n\nBut what if we applied combinations of college and high school all-American selections? And to provide some sense of comparison, I also calculated how draftees split in general.\n<center>![5.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdG8QGBSbn2hAWAvQuNpCJKsKF6bfb3CNuW7USJ6jCxzH/5.png)</center>\n<center>![3.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png)</center>\n<center>![4.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png)</center>\n\nBased on this analysis, it does seem sensible that the greatest percentage of NBA stars come from the draftees that contains both high school and college stars (10% vs 2%/5%/2%).\n\nWhat's interesting is that between draftees that had only 1 of either college or high school All-American awards, you're more likely to find either NBA stars and solid contributors from the draftees of only high school All-Americans (42% vs 12%). And even more damning against college basketball success is that a greater percentage of draftees who had no awards in either college or high school become NBA stars or solid contributors when compared to the percentage of draftees who had just college All-American status (15% vs 12%).\n\nOverall, this seems to indicate:\n- A draftee's college All-American status is a positive sign for NBA teams only if he was a high school All-American as well as that draftee pool has the greatest percentage of stars.\n- If the prospect was a college All-American but not a high school one, then that might actually be a negative sign for NBA teams as the draftee pool of non-college All-Americans as a whole (high school All-Americans + non-All-Americans) has a better chance of finding solid contributors or better (20% vs 12%).\n\nFor this year's draft, that would be great news for Zion Williamson, R.J. Barrett, and Kyle Guy. All 3 were both All-Americans in high school and college.\n\nDarius Garland, Coby White, Cam Reddish, Romeo Langford, Darius Bazley, Nassir Little, Keldon Johnson, Bol Bol, and Jaylen Hands were all high school All-Americans, but not college ones. They might fare better in the pros than Ja Morant, Jarrett Culver, Rui Hachimura, Brandon Clarke, Grant Williams, and Carsen Edwards - all of whom where college All-Americans but not high school ones.\n\nThis raises a few questions:\n<ol>\n<li>Why does college All-American status without high school All-American status seem to have a negative impact on NBA contribution? One would think that if a player played well in college, even if he were not a star in high school, that would be at minimum equal to if not a better indicator than players who were never stars at all or only high school stars!</li>\n<li>Is it possible that NBA basketball is more similar to high school basketball, with more emphasis on athleticism, natural talent, and/or unequal teams?</li>\n<li>Are college basketball programs or coaches just able to overperform with their players? If so, why? Is it because they are managing their players more as opposed to NBA teams who provide more freedom?</li>\n<li>Does the fact that NBA money come into play make college stars perform worse (or non-college stars better)?</li>\n\n---\n\nRegardless, in order to tie this back to the NBA draft, I wanted to consider draft position: how well do higher draft picks correlate with future NBA contributions?\n<center>![6.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png)</center>\n<center>![9.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png)</center>\n\nOverall, pretty good I'd say. Your chance of finding stars and solid contributors drops the later you pick (dramatically), so much so that it seems picks 56–60 are pretty much worthless.\n\nBut what's interesting about this chart is that is seems draft position (and consequently scouting and GM decisions) is quite good and may be an even better predictor of future contributions.\n\nSo I tried to see the draft positions of our college and high school stars.\n<center>![7.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png)</center>\n\nAnd despite there being an overwhelming number of NCAA stars, they never once outnumber by percentage the number of high school stars selected in the same draft positions.\n\n<center>![8.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png)</center>\nUnsurprisingly, the 1st pick is almost always a NCAA + HS star and >50% of all NCAA + HS stars were selected by the 11th pick.\n\nWhat's interesting though is that this chart looks strikingly similar to that of the NBA stars draft percentage chart.\n\nOverall, it would seem that whatever methods teams and GMs use to draft, they are on average pretty accurate (or perhaps it is just easier to draft NBA players than expected).\n\nWhat do you think? Do these numbers surprise you? What other data points would have been interesting to capture?",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"nba-draft\",\"nba\",\"draft\",\"basketball\",\"statistics\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQje6H8sN7opYZA7V28En7J5QzDuDJXqtuYNgX4gRNmMg/Untitled.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNzUbqLo2SyEWEvhx8PPMTuMahVJvHd4ximpv21SCvRKV/1.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaQiG7z5Z4VgFA3eThu9AGSC5RuxAnPrRu28DAiExKXg3/2.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdG8QGBSbn2hAWAvQuNpCJKsKF6bfb3CNuW7USJ6jCxzH/5.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNW1EMdaPpmuz96Uz6HPU3UKZdoh74oJ9JCTrAY2zc6Ek/3.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTVuSpyH6VxFAez8zGj8fBT5CYfMbzbtbHGc1KpYT8AEn/4.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUGBBCky7ZYnW8oCkT6BgsSriTv74YYrAmaYDC9GjVQWr/6.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmYx2KBRjmBGuP7Cuv1p74F7rSqktCivm3CCAvLqcwMvBD/9.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbKZY9ooJkNjgsD2Fk1juRP78Hg56XVCRQeuYips473jf/7.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcXWNm6TpJ69RXkAMgzb6ENbfEvRbUMHjJQSFvBpA2L4w/8.png\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "nba-draft",
      "permlink": "statistical-analysis-on-potential-stardom-of-nba-draftees",
      "title": "Statistical Analysis on Potential Stardom of NBA Draftees"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-30T19:27:48",
  "trx_id": "61b640f70b039b2cc731b83a264f66b43110551f",
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
crypto.piotrsent 0.003 STEEM to @prfrnir- "Dear @prfrnir, I'm not a bot. I'm actually human and also I hope you don't mind this little memo. If you do then please let me know and I won't bother you again in the future. I'm writting to you simp..."
2019/06/26 08:28:15
amount0.003 STEEM
fromcrypto.piotr
memoDear @prfrnir, I'm not a bot. I'm actually human and also I hope you don't mind this little memo. If you do then please let me know and I won't bother you again in the future. I'm writting to you simply because I'm trying to help @machnbirdsparo to promote his latest post (he is a good friend of mine and very supportive Steemit user). In his latest publication "GAMING and CREATIVE MINDS APPLY" he is presenting new social media platform SPRTSHUB, which seem to be focusing in interesting niche: community sharing passion to SPORTS. Hope you will find this post worth your time. I read and upvote all valuable comments. Yours, Piotr // LINK: https://steemit.com/contest/@machnbirdsparo/gaming-and-creative-minds-apply
toprfrnir
Transaction InfoBlock #34132249/Trx a57d27f7aa21eb2136e932b476688dfa4cae2107
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 34132249,
  "op": [
    "transfer",
    {
      "amount": "0.003 STEEM",
      "from": "crypto.piotr",
      "memo": "Dear @prfrnir, I'm not a bot. I'm actually human and also I hope you don't mind this little memo. If you do then please let me know and I won't bother you again in the future. I'm writting to you simply because I'm trying to help @machnbirdsparo to promote his latest post (he is a good friend of mine and very supportive Steemit user). In his latest publication \"GAMING and CREATIVE MINDS APPLY\" he is presenting new social media platform SPRTSHUB, which seem to be focusing in interesting niche: community sharing passion to SPORTS. Hope you will find this post worth your time. I read and upvote all valuable comments. Yours, Piotr // LINK: https://steemit.com/contest/@machnbirdsparo/gaming-and-creative-minds-apply",
      "to": "prfrnir"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-26T08:28:15",
  "trx_id": "a57d27f7aa21eb2136e932b476688dfa4cae2107",
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
prfrnirreceived 0.090 SBD, 0.280 SP author reward for @prfrnir / how-to-buy-pants
2019/06/23 12:51:21
authorprfrnir
permlinkhow-to-buy-pants
sbd payout0.090 SBD
steem payout0.000 STEEM
vesting payout455.734374 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #34051214/Virtual Operation #5
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 34051214,
  "op": [
    "author_reward",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "how-to-buy-pants",
      "sbd_payout": "0.090 SBD",
      "steem_payout": "0.000 STEEM",
      "vesting_payout": "455.734374 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-23T12:51:21",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 5
}
2019/06/16 17:15:33
authorprfrnir
permlinkhow-to-buy-pants
voterlaissez-faire
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33855329/Trx 9f23248bbf8ed3a508ccc05cc8d0c9c1c0f0b25e
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33855329,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "how-to-buy-pants",
      "voter": "laissez-faire",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-16T17:15:33",
  "trx_id": "9f23248bbf8ed3a508ccc05cc8d0c9c1c0f0b25e",
  "trx_in_block": 26,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/16 17:10:21
authorprfrnir
permlinkhow-to-buy-pants
votersteemitboard
weight100 (1.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33855225/Trx 0e6040bebaa6108da89b42d227ab16c4006686a3
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33855225,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "how-to-buy-pants",
      "voter": "steemitboard",
      "weight": 100
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-16T17:10:21",
  "trx_id": "0e6040bebaa6108da89b42d227ab16c4006686a3",
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/16 17:10:18
authorsteemitboard
bodyCongratulations @prfrnir! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) : <table><tr><td><img src="https://steemitimages.com/60x70/http://steemitboard.com/@prfrnir/payout.png?201906161516"></td><td>You received more than 10 as payout for your posts. Your next target is to reach a total payout of 50</td></tr> </table> <sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@prfrnir) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=prfrnir)_</sub> <sub>_If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word_ `STOP`</sub> To support your work, I also upvoted your post! ###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes!
json metadata{"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png"]}
parent authorprfrnir
parent permlinkhow-to-buy-pants
permlinksteemitboard-notify-prfrnir-20190616t171020000z
title
Transaction InfoBlock #33855224/Trx c2abaae52282a101774515f16a0b086adbe4211d
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33855224,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "steemitboard",
      "body": "Congratulations @prfrnir! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :\n\n<table><tr><td><img src=\"https://steemitimages.com/60x70/http://steemitboard.com/@prfrnir/payout.png?201906161516\"></td><td>You received more than 10 as payout for your posts. Your next target is to reach a total payout of 50</td></tr>\n</table>\n\n<sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@prfrnir) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=prfrnir)_</sub>\n<sub>_If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word_ `STOP`</sub>\n\n\nTo support your work, I also upvoted your post!\n\n\n###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes!",
      "json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png\"]}",
      "parent_author": "prfrnir",
      "parent_permlink": "how-to-buy-pants",
      "permlink": "steemitboard-notify-prfrnir-20190616t171020000z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-16T17:10:18",
  "trx_id": "c2abaae52282a101774515f16a0b086adbe4211d",
  "trx_in_block": 35,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/16 13:31:27
authorprfrnir
permlinkhow-to-buy-pants
voterfilipino
weight1000 (10.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33850855/Trx 84b8b35891c00ec5725664dd03c4fab652dcebc3
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33850855,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "how-to-buy-pants",
      "voter": "filipino",
      "weight": 1000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-16T13:31:27",
  "trx_id": "84b8b35891c00ec5725664dd03c4fab652dcebc3",
  "trx_in_block": 21,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/16 13:20:30
authorprfrnir
permlinkhow-to-buy-pants
votermatildapurse
weight2500 (25.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33850636/Trx 59d3dbef2e704be372bd131afb8f72e94bfd288f
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33850636,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "how-to-buy-pants",
      "voter": "matildapurse",
      "weight": 2500
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-16T13:20:30",
  "trx_id": "59d3dbef2e704be372bd131afb8f72e94bfd288f",
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
aicuupvoted (73.14%) @prfrnir / how-to-buy-pants
2019/06/16 13:04:39
authorprfrnir
permlinkhow-to-buy-pants
voteraicu
weight7314 (73.14%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33850319/Trx 4fa8447718480f5384aa28652515bae6be10cd8b
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33850319,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "how-to-buy-pants",
      "voter": "aicu",
      "weight": 7314
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-16T13:04:39",
  "trx_id": "4fa8447718480f5384aa28652515bae6be10cd8b",
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
prfrnirpublished a new post: how-to-buy-pants
2019/06/16 12:51:21
authorprfrnir
body*Note: This article was originally published on my blog https://thedesignersmust.wordpress.com/, hence some of the links to other articles listed there.* Pants are everywhere and yet misunderstood. They are seen as an obstacle to comfort and nuisance to care. And if anyone looks or feels ridiculous, the blame is going to be directed at poorly fitting pants. But as much as pants are difficult to wear or maintain, they are the foundation for our appearance. If you want to look smart or thinner, a good pair of pants goes a long way. And if you want to save money on clothes, a good pair of paints is key to building multiple outfits without seeming like you’re wearing the same one. They blend your shoes to the rest of your body and the frame your shirt and jacket. A great pair of pants balances one’s appearance and makes each individual piece appear better fitting. A poor pair of pants does the opposite and makes each appear worse. But how does one look for pants? There are thousands of brands, multiple fits or styles within each brand, and multiple colors available for each of those. Unfortunately, I have no easy answer to this. But I do believe knowledge of and understanding pants is the first step to being able to make better decisions in buying and wearing pants. With that said, I’ll start from the most basic concepts. The purpose of your pants is perhaps the best and easier way to start narrowing down what you want to buy and to streamline decision making. The overwhelming reason I hear for buying pants is for work. Once upon a time, every man was expected to wear a suit: at work, on the weekend, on vacation, anywhere. It was the default attire of everyday life. More formal occasions required more formal wear: black tie (tuxedo), white tie, and a few other special occasion outfits. These special occasion outfits, decades prior, were the suits of their day. And in their day, the suit was the informal attire one might find outdoors in the country. ![dress_chart_fashion_19021.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTuhoE3iVAm3fhY3SE4gLMe96fMqkeni8DxDYXDpouQN1/dress_chart_fashion_19021.jpg) What situations are formal and informal and what is expected has changed with time. These days, the suit is maybe the most formal outfit anyone will own. And the suit for many jobs is no longer required. So please keep in mind that there are no “rules” that are always true. Literally every assumption or constant of dress has changed over time and place. These are more as guidelines that help with decision making. While understanding guidelines and purpose is more complex than “if X, always wear Y”, I think it helps to provide additional knowledge should your conditions be slightly different. On the plus side, given that this is a post about pants only, we’ll save time by not covering other items. ## Work Pants Looking for clothes by color and fabric is the quickest way to pare down your options. So for those of you looking for the simple answer: **mid to light gray wool.** Now if you need pants for work (and yet do NOT require a suit), I think mid to light gray is the most conservative and flexible choice of all colors as they **pair well with practically all shirt, jacket, shoe, and skin colors**. And don’t think that the color palette limits you at all; wool comes in tens of weaves from flannel to twill and weights and from worsted to woolen. There are **tens of choices** of mid to light gray wools given the number of attribute combinations. The next best option (given the tens of combinations, this might be more the nth+1 option) would be tan wool. It is less conservative than gray (although if there is no expectation of wearing a suit it doesn’t matter) and requires checking if the shade in question works with your skin tone, but it offers **more flexibility** with other color shirts and socks meaning it’ll probably also be more suitable for wear outside work as well. Now you might be wondering how I feel about **navy blue or black**. Again, since we’re not talking about suits **I would avoid both**. The reason is that both colors are too severe and inflexible to wear properly without the matching jacket (without which the outfit appears half finished because of the light colored tops) and they are difficult to pair. Both only pair with black shoes and dark socks, unlike gray and tan which pair much more easily with other colors. And while I am completely aware navy blue pants and/or suits are being worn with brown shoes these days, I have never seen the combination work. The dissonance in color draws too much focus towards the shoes, which in turn draws attention away from where you want it. I would avoid it considering you can probably find 1000 better and easier to wear combinations (if we’re including shoes, socks, shirts, and jackets) with gray and tan wool pants than with navy and black. I cannot highlight enough the flexibility of grays and tans — even in the most casual workplace these will work. But wear black or navy in an office with bright green polos, jeans, and floral dresses, and you will feel out of place. Now why wool? The simple answer is that **wool exudes professionalism, efficiency, cleanliness, and simplicity**. Cotton creases and wrinkles and flops and shows its wear and tear. Cotton has a stiff, almost thin cardboard-like look. It’s fine for the outdoors, but inside a modern office it doesn’t look nearly as right as wool. Wool pants will also appear ironed and pressed as long as it’s been stored properly, folded or hung along the crease. In comparison, cotton pants need to be ironed prior to use like shirts (and after a few minutes they start losing their shape). But please avoid wrinkly wools! I like to squeeze and bunch up the fabric, and if it doesn’t spring back to shape without creases **AVOID IT**. These are the wools that give the appearance of a cheap, wrinkled uniform and create the same issues as cotton. ![1560187559809.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPDCgcxWXhoYSoiY86VPEvv7mrVax8WfS9uSWUJKWowZW/1560187559809.png) ![1560187729552.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPmmNwrWhAD7wDiuhKFdJxQaMvZehECiygVdwLoCGaA41/1560187729552.png) Worsted or woolen? You might find certain wools will have one of the two descriptors in their name. The names describe how the wool was woven into fabric, and the simple explanation is that worsted will appear to have a smoother texture and woolen a bit of a brushed or fluffy texture. As we’re talking about stand alone pants, I’d lean towards **woolen in grays and either for tan**. The reason is that a very smooth, shiny pair of gray pants may appear to be part of a suit (depending on the weave) and may look out of place without the jacket (similar to the issue of navy and black pants). ## Casual Pants If you read the brief history of suits earlier, it might have occurred to you that wearing work pants sans coat is quite informal in the context of the past 100 or so years. And I would absolutely agree. And for that reason, I personally have a **lot of overlap between my work and casual pants** because they are essentially the same. By avoiding shiny worsteds and severe colors for work, they are just as flexible outside work. But that’s by greedy personality of wanting everything to be versatile and usable in as many situations as possible shining through. Therefore, I find your dress outside work is your chance to express yourself! And as a guide, I’d like to cover the basics (the minutiae once you delve beneath the basics will be for another time) of fabric and colors. ### Fabrics I’ll quickly summarize the 3 main fabrics available: **cotton, wool, and polyester**. Again there are more, but I suspect 95% of people will wear one of the above 3. Depending on the retailer, they might not say much more than the fabric content above. If that’s your price range, then the general differences between the three would be that: * wool cannot be machine washed but will retain its shape, * cotton can be machine washed but will easily wrinkle and lose its shape, and * polyester (imitating wool) can be machine washed and keep its shape and avoid wrinkles, but is likely going to wear hot and feel synthetic. Now some retailers will have additional descriptors often describing a combination of characteristics, not just the fabric and/or weave. Rather than categorize all of them, I’ll quickly cover a few of the most common ones. * **Denim:** the vast majority of jeans are made from blue cotton denim fabric. It has alternating blue and white diagonal ribs that provide a distinctive look. It wears hard, but will lose shape over time and can leave fade marks. ![robert_redford_santa_barbara_-_p_-_2014-e1560642656176.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmVbEFrsgpzPPzDvdnTbzV2uw4DHtopac2xpJwAuEw8RfW/robert_redford_santa_barbara_-_p_-_2014-e1560642656176.jpg) * **Khakis/Chinos:** probably your most common cotton pants descriptor (as jeans are often separated into a separate category). They are similar to denim in that they often have diagonal ribs, but come in a variety of colors, will appear solid (as opposed to the alternating colors in denim) and are generally finer in both weight and weave (notice how the diagonal lines on denim are usually more prominent than the ones on these). They usually don’t wear as hard as denim, but also tend to lose shape over time and can leave fade marks. ![1_l_4rl3cqrq3rty_cuxrnma.jpeg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmX2ye1RYFUKxyoidQcWTAFEHS5moWDEyU8HGGUSbaf9Cy/1_l_4rl3cqrq3rty_cuxrnma.jpeg) * **Corduroy:** fabric traditionally associated with the English countryside and can come in multiple fabrics, although most commonly made from cotton. The fabric is made so there are sets of vertical ‘ridges’ called wales. Different fabrics with have different width of wales. I would avoid low wale counts as they appear very prominent and can look costume-like (as they will appear velvet like). ![paul-newman-cat-on-a-hot-tin-roof.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaep8EGr54NufrVZd6APJZNcqVaj9nf4LPMX35sZcHEb4/paul-newman-cat-on-a-hot-tin-roof.png) * **Tropical Wool:** a very common wool fabric, marketed I suspect because many consumers wear mostly cotton and believe wool is heavy and wears too hot. However, I disagree and find wool for the most part is very comfortable. Nevertheless, tropical wool is very light wool and tends to be a shiny. Its levity it can make it appear flimsy and wrinkled and its shine makes it appear as part of a s uit. That is not to say all tropical wools are so, but I find it easier to avoid them altogether. ![gettyimages-50316849.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRUKZ7tvVVapueanurUfubuYtYDZtbcLBzyNuxUuBR584/gettyimages-50316849.jpg) * **Flannel:** soft, casual fabric, often made of wool (in the context of pants at least). The fabric is usually quite airy so I’ve found it quite good for most weather. Often has a nice textured appearance which works well with conservative colors. One issue is that despite being made of wool, I find the crease on flannel becomes very faint over wear compared to other fabrics so it loses its shape relatively more than most wool fabrics. ![060-cary-grant-theredlist1.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQhVzxeD65eBVbujLAxiKrtFqvftkiV7Zja33pBGKKeQj/060-cary-grant-theredlist1.jpg) * **Twill:** this is a common weave that encompasses denim, khaki/chino, gabardine, and more. However, I’d like to point out wool can be woven in twill as well. Cavalry twill in particular is like the denim of wools. It can have similar alternating colors in the ribs, has heft, wears hard and maintains its shape very well. ![55445_kyeri-grant_or_cary-grant_1600x1200_www_gdefon_ru.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmc6Pp7CGGFeDMmKv9tpeDLacQiT5LjfQHCeP1h8qpkP8H/55445_kyeri-grant_or_cary-grant_1600x1200_www_gdefon_ru.jpg) Again these are not the only types of cotton and wool pants. They are the most common ones I’ve seen. But perhaps equally important for selecting pants is the **weight of the fabric** (which might be more difficult to know if not listed). Again, I personally avoid very light (9 oz or less) fabrics as they tend to wrinkle and look thin. And I’ve found as I’ve purchased **nicer fabrics**, ‘breathability’ of fabrics is no longer much of an issue as even medium weight fabrics are fine in moderate summer temperatures (~80 degrees Fahrenheit here). ### Colors You probably don’t feel colors are a limiting factor. But with all the choices available, you might want to consider it to ease your decision making. Again, the most versatile colors I find are **shades of gray and tan** here as well (I actually like wearing the same pairs for work and pleasure because they are so flexible). **Jeans**, which practically match with anything very casual these days and **white or off white colors**, while tough to pull off but great when done correctly, are tied for my distant third option. Again, darker colors such as blue and black I would avoid as they’re just less versatile. However, it’s possible there are a few nicely textured or non-solid navy or black fabrics out there that make the them easier to pair. Now what about unusual colors, such as red, purple, yellow, and practically anything other than what I listed above? Do it if that’s your personality! But to me, these colors are also less versatile, working with fewer combinations of colors and textures. And they stick out. And if they **don’t fit** you right, you will receive a lot of attention for maybe less than flattering reasons. Which is a great segue to our next topic. ## Fit Perhaps the most difficult part of findings pants is the fit. This is something that can’t necessarily be seen through images like fabric or color. And I cannot find any substitute to trying on the pants. Now that doesn’t mean you need a physical store; many online stores allow for returns which means you can try on clothes in the comfort of your home. But this doesn’t mean it’s easy, especially if you’re picky (and maybe you are if you are reading this article). Unlike other goods, pants are **not standardized across stores or brands**. While something like specs of electronics can be compared across similar items (e.g. cameras), no such comparison can really be performed for the fit. ### Sizing While the same attributes may exist across brands, they are not necessarily comparable. Just because something is ‘regular fit’ in one brand does not make it comparable to a ‘regular fit’ in another brand. Same for waist sizes. A 34 in one brand may not fit similarly to a 34 in another brand. In fact, they might not even fit similarly in the same brand if the brand has many fits. Or they might even fit differently in the same fit for the same brand over time as the brand has changed the fit over time. One way brands have tried to combat this is by posting measurements of their pants. This can include the width of key areas such as the waist, seat, thigh, and leg opening. While this is more useful than only providing the size, [it can be difficult to truly compare pants from these measurements alone.](https://thedesignersmust.wordpress.com/2018/12/21/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/) ### Measurements Alone Do NOT Describe Shape Imagine two ellipses, one rotated 90 degrees from the other. Both have the same circumference, but appear to be completely different shapes. For that reason, the circumference of measurements alone may not illustrate how the pants fit because it does not describe the shape of the intended wearer. Now all the above measurements are only horizontal measurements. One of the most crucial aspects of pants is the rise, or the vertical length of the pants above the crotch. (Confusingly, the rise is measured in 2 different methods: a tailor will measure the true rise as the vertical length of the rise and less technical folks, often those writing clothing measurements, often measure the rise as the total length. These mean different things and yet are sometimes not distinguished on measurement charts.) The rise provides only the length with complete disregard of the curvature. Imagine 2 different parabolic curves. They could have the same length (total or vertical) of curve, but be two completely different curves! The discussion of curves and lengths I have described above is all related to pattern making. Pattern making details how to cut the cloth that’s sewn together for your clothes. And it’s at that stage in the manufacturing process where the fit is already determined. Because each brand has its own patterns, each brand fits differently. Because clothes from different time periods have different patterns, clothes from different decades look different (outside the colors and patterns). Because people have different body shapes and sizes, a tailor will create different patterns for different people to achieve the same fit. ![img_1539-e1531060745415.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmapcGdqczh1fPsutPbNBpSTyLPGt9aQHDEHZFySfZvzGw/img_1539-e1531060745415.jpg) Now I won’t go into how this is all done because that’s another story. But because achieving a perfect fit is entirely dependent on the pattern used, there is little room to maneuver on the finished ready-to-wear product. While alterations are certainly possible, most glaring issues cannot be fixed as most fixes require displacing cloth from one area and adding cloth in another. As ready-to-wear clothing often does not provide generous amounts of excess cloth at the seams, there is generally no extra cloth in the area that’s required for the alteration. ![Remedies and Defects_1.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmVyFrWKCMv4k4kfppu4kaLT9rCSAxuZdfb7187p71puoE/Remedies%20and%20Defects_1.png) ![Remedies and Defects_2.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmV5pRA7TYaE2S4rMVfSbBfQ15MYCzbk7sL6zXXt3ypSe6/Remedies%20and%20Defects_2.png) Therefore when you buy pants do not believe that a glaring issue can be resolved, despite what the salesman says. (I’m willing to bet most salesman do not know how pattern making or pattern changes work!) As a result, **when you buy pants, what you see is going to be very close to what you’re going to get**, minus some common, easy alterations that are built into the construction of pants. These are: * Taking in or letting out the waist at the center back of the waistband and into the center back seat seam. This however is really only performed on pants with a split waistband (anything above the cheapest type of pants will usually have this). * Taking in or letting out (depends on how much excess the pants have) the legs. Looking at the above, you may notice that the width of the waist and legs can be altered. But don’t be fooled. These alterations do not fix issues of balance (which is what the majority of true issues in ready-to-wear pants are). If the pants fit cleanly before, they will still fit cleanly after these changes. And if they didn’t fit cleanly before, they still won’t fit cleanly after these changes. However, you may have noticed the seat is one alteration I have not listed. Because that is the most static area of any ready-to-wear pants, I would use that to help find your size for the brand and fit. For example, if the seat does not fit in a regular fit size 34, continue checking other sizes rather than give up on the fit and brand. If the seat on the new size fits (feels neither tight nor loose) and the rest of the pants don’t, then chances are the fit and brand will not work for you at all. ### Identify your desired attributes But what are you looking for? This is where everyone has their own opinion ([one person’s “style” could be another person’s “defect”](https://thedesignersmust.wordpress.com/2019/06/13/defect-or-style/)). I like clean lines that don’t attract attention downwards and keep eyes focused on the body as a whole. ![anthony-sinclair-man-about-town-1954-suit.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmatbeqwqeDCPr8GJZFP9M5QgMfUhH1rkD7txW1T1CMXc8/anthony-sinclair-man-about-town-1954-suit.jpg) I also like the waistband to sit a bit higher, close to the natural waist to ensure the torso doesn’t appear too long and appears natural and balanced, frame the waist, and to slim down any belly fat. ![frwl6-pants1-1.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmX5vFwKGx4XEXGvYTrDsFQFVEFSxEYxsHzEuxLs71FJ5V/frwl6-pants1-1.jpg) ![annex-gable-clark_nrfpt_22.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTdwDtXaJmjq42ffWVwtogjRFGJWtS3Gb9p13yg6NGSsk/annex-gable-clark_nrfpt_22.jpg) ![8f823ef48ae8f297fde9934ed050b5b6.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRYDGndJ1nnt5mjbiHRWPVzKNMUz5HzT9YPLvgZmSmAJW/8f823ef48ae8f297fde9934ed050b5b6.jpg) Are these attributes very particular? Yes. Will they be difficult to find on ready-to-wear pants? Yes. Having a vision and trying to find it in already finished products is like finding a needle in a haystack. And that vision or fit is important, because it expresses you. I can guarantee that if you don’t like what you’re wearing, you won’t wear it. Maybe not in the 1st week or 1st month. But definitely at some point it will be lingering on your shelf unworn because you don’t enjoy wearing it. So there’s no need to be buying things just because everyone else is buying that. This is the **downside of ready-to-wear**; if you have a particular vision, you need to find that particular brand or fit that has the same vision. This means a lot of digging on websites and other media and trying on clothes to find what you want. For this reason if you stick with ready-to-wear, I would be **open minded** about some details that normally hold people up from making purchases but have zero effect on the fit or shape of pants (e.g. brands, fit names, sometimes even pleats as you might have a shape that ready-to-wear retailers mostly cut for using pleats). There is no simple answer for this. There’s hundreds of different pants out there and it would be amiss for me to create a single formula for everyone. Think about this positively; **there are a bunch of ideas designers have already put out there on pants just waiting for someone like you to try!** Imagine never trying new foods or visiting new places or meeting new people. Ridiculous, right? Trying clothes can be the same experience! It can be fun trying something different. And best of all, most of places allow free returns. So why not? That being said, it would mean you have to making shopping for clothes not a chore to do just when you have a new event coming up with that burden of a deadline. That pressure of doing something for someone else can put a damper on even the most fun tasks. **Try shopping or fitting clothes when there’s no pressure to have new clothes**. Because if you’re shopping for clothes, it should be for you. Because that’s the wonderful thing about pants. You’ll always have them everywhere you go. And rather than a nuisance, it should be a pleasure knowing you have something that you want.
json metadata{"tags":["pants","retail","fashion","shopping","apparel"],"image":["https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTuhoE3iVAm3fhY3SE4gLMe96fMqkeni8DxDYXDpouQN1/dress_chart_fashion_19021.jpg","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPDCgcxWXhoYSoiY86VPEvv7mrVax8WfS9uSWUJKWowZW/1560187559809.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPmmNwrWhAD7wDiuhKFdJxQaMvZehECiygVdwLoCGaA41/1560187729552.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmVbEFrsgpzPPzDvdnTbzV2uw4DHtopac2xpJwAuEw8RfW/robert_redford_santa_barbara_-_p_-_2014-e1560642656176.jpg","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmX2ye1RYFUKxyoidQcWTAFEHS5moWDEyU8HGGUSbaf9Cy/1_l_4rl3cqrq3rty_cuxrnma.jpeg","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaep8EGr54NufrVZd6APJZNcqVaj9nf4LPMX35sZcHEb4/paul-newman-cat-on-a-hot-tin-roof.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRUKZ7tvVVapueanurUfubuYtYDZtbcLBzyNuxUuBR584/gettyimages-50316849.jpg","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQhVzxeD65eBVbujLAxiKrtFqvftkiV7Zja33pBGKKeQj/060-cary-grant-theredlist1.jpg","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmc6Pp7CGGFeDMmKv9tpeDLacQiT5LjfQHCeP1h8qpkP8H/55445_kyeri-grant_or_cary-grant_1600x1200_www_gdefon_ru.jpg","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmapcGdqczh1fPsutPbNBpSTyLPGt9aQHDEHZFySfZvzGw/img_1539-e1531060745415.jpg","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmVyFrWKCMv4k4kfppu4kaLT9rCSAxuZdfb7187p71puoE/Remedies%20and%20Defects_1.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmV5pRA7TYaE2S4rMVfSbBfQ15MYCzbk7sL6zXXt3ypSe6/Remedies%20and%20Defects_2.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmatbeqwqeDCPr8GJZFP9M5QgMfUhH1rkD7txW1T1CMXc8/anthony-sinclair-man-about-town-1954-suit.jpg","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmX5vFwKGx4XEXGvYTrDsFQFVEFSxEYxsHzEuxLs71FJ5V/frwl6-pants1-1.jpg","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTdwDtXaJmjq42ffWVwtogjRFGJWtS3Gb9p13yg6NGSsk/annex-gable-clark_nrfpt_22.jpg","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRYDGndJ1nnt5mjbiHRWPVzKNMUz5HzT9YPLvgZmSmAJW/8f823ef48ae8f297fde9934ed050b5b6.jpg"],"links":["https://thedesignersmust.wordpress.com/","https://thedesignersmust.wordpress.com/2018/12/21/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/","https://thedesignersmust.wordpress.com/2019/06/13/defect-or-style/"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
parent author
parent permlinkpants
permlinkhow-to-buy-pants
titleHow to Buy Pants
Transaction InfoBlock #33850053/Trx 5ecc98d6030c1e6fabef175294efbf7bca69eadb
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33850053,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "body": "*Note: This article was originally published on my blog https://thedesignersmust.wordpress.com/, hence some of the links to other articles listed there.*\n\nPants are everywhere and yet misunderstood. They are seen as an obstacle to comfort and nuisance to care. And if anyone looks or feels ridiculous, the blame is going to be directed at poorly fitting pants.\n\nBut as much as pants are difficult to wear or maintain, they are the foundation for our appearance. If you want to look smart or thinner, a good pair of pants goes a long way. And if you want to save money on clothes, a good pair of paints is key to building multiple outfits without seeming like you’re wearing the same one. They blend your shoes to the rest of your body and the frame your shirt and jacket.\n\nA great pair of pants balances one’s appearance and makes each individual piece appear better fitting. A poor pair of pants does the opposite and makes each appear worse.\n\nBut how does one look for pants? There are thousands of brands, multiple fits or styles within each brand, and multiple colors available for each of those. Unfortunately, I have no easy answer to this. But I do believe knowledge of and understanding pants is the first step to being able to make better decisions in buying and wearing pants. With that said, I’ll start from the most basic concepts.\n\nThe purpose of your pants is perhaps the best and easier way to start narrowing down what you want to buy and to streamline decision making. The overwhelming reason I hear for buying pants is for work.\n\nOnce upon a time, every man was expected to wear a suit: at work, on the weekend, on vacation, anywhere. It was the default attire of everyday life. More formal occasions required more formal wear: black tie (tuxedo), white tie, and a few other special occasion outfits. These special occasion outfits, decades prior, were the suits of their day. And in their day, the suit was the informal attire one might find outdoors in the country.\n\n![dress_chart_fashion_19021.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTuhoE3iVAm3fhY3SE4gLMe96fMqkeni8DxDYXDpouQN1/dress_chart_fashion_19021.jpg)\n\nWhat situations are formal and informal and what is expected has changed with time. These days, the suit is maybe the most formal outfit anyone will own. And the suit for many jobs is no longer required. So please keep in mind that there are no “rules” that are always true. Literally every assumption or constant of dress has changed over time and place. These are more as guidelines that help with decision making. While understanding guidelines and purpose is more complex than “if X, always wear Y”, I think it helps to provide additional knowledge should your conditions be slightly different. On the plus side, given that this is a post about pants only, we’ll save time by not covering other items.\n\n## Work Pants\nLooking for clothes by color and fabric is the quickest way to pare down your options. So for those of you looking for the simple answer: **mid to light gray wool.**\n\nNow if you need pants for work (and yet do NOT require a suit), I think mid to light gray is the most conservative and flexible choice of all colors as they **pair well with practically all shirt, jacket, shoe, and skin colors**. And don’t think that the color palette limits you at all; wool comes in tens of weaves from flannel to twill and weights and from worsted to woolen. There are **tens of choices** of mid to light gray wools given the number of attribute combinations.\n\nThe next best option (given the tens of combinations, this might be more the nth+1 option) would be tan wool.\n\nIt is less conservative than gray (although if there is no expectation of wearing a suit it doesn’t matter) and requires checking if the shade in question works with your skin tone, but it offers **more flexibility** with other color shirts and socks meaning it’ll probably also be more suitable for wear outside work as well.\n\nNow you might be wondering how I feel about **navy blue or black**. Again, since we’re not talking about suits **I would avoid both**. The reason is that both colors are too severe and inflexible to wear properly without the matching jacket (without which the outfit appears half finished because of the light colored tops) and they are difficult to pair. Both only pair with black shoes and dark socks, unlike gray and tan which pair much more easily with other colors. And while I am completely aware navy blue pants and/or suits are being worn with brown shoes these days, I have never seen the combination work.\n\nThe dissonance in color draws too much focus towards the shoes, which in turn draws attention away from where you want it. I would avoid it considering you can probably find 1000 better and easier to wear combinations (if we’re including shoes, socks, shirts, and jackets) with gray and tan wool pants than with navy and black. I cannot highlight enough the flexibility of grays and tans — even in the most casual workplace these will work. But wear black or navy in an office with bright green polos, jeans, and floral dresses, and you will feel out of place.\n\nNow why wool? The simple answer is that **wool exudes professionalism, efficiency, cleanliness, and simplicity**. Cotton creases and wrinkles and flops and shows its wear and tear. Cotton has a stiff, almost thin cardboard-like look. It’s fine for the outdoors, but inside a modern office it doesn’t look nearly as right as wool. Wool pants will also appear ironed and pressed as long as it’s been stored properly, folded or hung along the crease. In comparison, cotton pants need to be ironed prior to use like shirts (and after a few minutes they start losing their shape).\n\nBut please avoid wrinkly wools! I like to squeeze and bunch up the fabric, and if it doesn’t spring back to shape without creases **AVOID IT**. These are the wools that give the appearance of a cheap, wrinkled uniform and create the same issues as cotton.\n\n![1560187559809.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPDCgcxWXhoYSoiY86VPEvv7mrVax8WfS9uSWUJKWowZW/1560187559809.png)\n![1560187729552.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPmmNwrWhAD7wDiuhKFdJxQaMvZehECiygVdwLoCGaA41/1560187729552.png)\n\nWorsted or woolen? You might find certain wools will have one of the two descriptors in their name. The names describe how the wool was woven into fabric, and the simple explanation is that worsted will appear to have a smoother texture and woolen a bit of a brushed or fluffy texture. As we’re talking about stand alone pants, I’d lean towards **woolen in grays and either for tan**. The reason is that a very smooth, shiny pair of gray pants may appear to be part of a suit (depending on the weave) and may look out of place without the jacket (similar to the issue of navy and black pants).\n\n## Casual Pants\nIf you read the brief history of suits earlier, it might have occurred to you that wearing work pants sans coat is quite informal in the context of the past 100 or so years. And I would absolutely agree. And for that reason, I personally have a **lot of overlap between my work and casual pants** because they are essentially the same. By avoiding shiny worsteds and severe colors for work, they are just as flexible outside work. But that’s by greedy personality of wanting everything to be versatile and usable in as many situations as possible shining through.\n\nTherefore, I find your dress outside work is your chance to express yourself! And as a guide, I’d like to cover the basics (the minutiae once you delve beneath the basics will be for another time) of fabric and colors.\n\n### Fabrics\nI’ll quickly summarize the 3 main fabrics available: **cotton, wool, and polyester**. Again there are more, but I suspect 95% of people will wear one of the above 3.\n\nDepending on the retailer, they might not say much more than the fabric content above. If that’s your price range, then the general differences between the three would be that:\n\n* wool cannot be machine washed but will retain its shape,\n* cotton can be machine washed but will easily wrinkle and lose its shape, and\n* polyester (imitating wool) can be machine washed and keep its shape and avoid wrinkles, but is likely going to wear hot and feel synthetic.\n\nNow some retailers will have additional descriptors often describing a combination of characteristics, not just the fabric and/or weave. Rather than categorize all of them, I’ll quickly cover a few of the most common ones.\n\n* **Denim:** the vast majority of jeans are made from blue cotton denim fabric. It has alternating blue and white diagonal ribs that provide a distinctive look. It wears hard, but will lose shape over time and can leave fade marks.\n![robert_redford_santa_barbara_-_p_-_2014-e1560642656176.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmVbEFrsgpzPPzDvdnTbzV2uw4DHtopac2xpJwAuEw8RfW/robert_redford_santa_barbara_-_p_-_2014-e1560642656176.jpg)\n* **Khakis/Chinos:** probably your most common cotton pants descriptor (as jeans are often separated into a separate category). They are similar to denim in that they often have diagonal ribs, but come in a variety of colors, will appear solid (as opposed to the alternating colors in denim) and are generally finer in both weight and weave (notice how the diagonal lines on denim are usually more prominent than the ones on these). They usually don’t wear as hard as denim, but also tend to lose shape over time and can leave fade marks.\n![1_l_4rl3cqrq3rty_cuxrnma.jpeg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmX2ye1RYFUKxyoidQcWTAFEHS5moWDEyU8HGGUSbaf9Cy/1_l_4rl3cqrq3rty_cuxrnma.jpeg)\n* **Corduroy:** fabric traditionally associated with the English countryside and can come in multiple fabrics, although most commonly made from cotton. The fabric is made so there are sets of vertical ‘ridges’ called wales. Different fabrics with have different width of wales. I would avoid low wale counts as they appear very prominent and can look costume-like (as they will appear velvet like).\n![paul-newman-cat-on-a-hot-tin-roof.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaep8EGr54NufrVZd6APJZNcqVaj9nf4LPMX35sZcHEb4/paul-newman-cat-on-a-hot-tin-roof.png)\n* **Tropical Wool:** a very common wool fabric, marketed I suspect because many consumers wear mostly cotton and believe wool is heavy and wears too hot. However, I disagree and find wool for the most part is very comfortable. Nevertheless, tropical wool is very light wool and tends to be a shiny. Its levity it can make it appear flimsy and wrinkled and its shine makes it appear as part of a s uit. That is not to say all tropical wools are so, but I find it easier to avoid them altogether.\n![gettyimages-50316849.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRUKZ7tvVVapueanurUfubuYtYDZtbcLBzyNuxUuBR584/gettyimages-50316849.jpg)\n* **Flannel:** soft, casual fabric, often made of wool (in the context of pants at least). The fabric is usually quite airy so I’ve found it quite good for most weather. Often has a nice textured appearance which works well with conservative colors. One issue is that despite being made of wool, I find the crease on flannel becomes very faint over wear compared to other fabrics so it loses its shape relatively more than most wool fabrics.\n![060-cary-grant-theredlist1.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQhVzxeD65eBVbujLAxiKrtFqvftkiV7Zja33pBGKKeQj/060-cary-grant-theredlist1.jpg)\n* **Twill:** this is a common weave that encompasses denim, khaki/chino, gabardine, and more. However, I’d like to point out wool can be woven in twill as well. Cavalry twill in particular is like the denim of wools. It can have similar alternating colors in the ribs, has heft, wears hard and maintains its shape very well.\n![55445_kyeri-grant_or_cary-grant_1600x1200_www_gdefon_ru.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmc6Pp7CGGFeDMmKv9tpeDLacQiT5LjfQHCeP1h8qpkP8H/55445_kyeri-grant_or_cary-grant_1600x1200_www_gdefon_ru.jpg)\n\nAgain these are not the only types of cotton and wool pants. They are the most common ones I’ve seen. But perhaps equally important for selecting pants is the **weight of the fabric** (which might be more difficult to know if not listed). Again, I personally avoid very light (9 oz or less) fabrics as they tend to wrinkle and look thin. And I’ve found as I’ve purchased **nicer fabrics**, ‘breathability’ of fabrics is no longer much of an issue as even medium weight fabrics are fine in moderate summer temperatures (~80 degrees Fahrenheit here).\n\n### Colors\nYou probably don’t feel colors are a limiting factor. But with all the choices available, you might want to consider it to ease your decision making.\n\nAgain, the most versatile colors I find are **shades of gray and tan** here as well (I actually like wearing the same pairs for work and pleasure because they are so flexible). **Jeans**, which practically match with anything very casual these days and **white or off white colors**, while tough to pull off but great when done correctly, are tied for my distant third option.\n\nAgain, darker colors such as blue and black I would avoid as they’re just less versatile. However, it’s possible there are a few nicely textured or non-solid navy or black fabrics out there that make the them easier to pair.\n\nNow what about unusual colors, such as red, purple, yellow, and practically anything other than what I listed above? Do it if that’s your personality! But to me, these colors are also less versatile, working with fewer combinations of colors and textures. And they stick out. And if they **don’t fit** you right, you will receive a lot of attention for maybe less than flattering reasons. Which is a great segue to our next topic.\n\n## Fit\nPerhaps the most difficult part of findings pants is the fit. This is something that can’t necessarily be seen through images like fabric or color. And I cannot find any substitute to trying on the pants. Now that doesn’t mean you need a physical store; many online stores allow for returns which means you can try on clothes in the comfort of your home. But this doesn’t mean it’s easy, especially if you’re picky (and maybe you are if you are reading this article).\n\nUnlike other goods, pants are **not standardized across stores or brands**. While something like specs of electronics can be compared across similar items (e.g. cameras), no such comparison can really be performed for the fit.\n\n### Sizing\nWhile the same attributes may exist across brands, they are not necessarily comparable. Just because something is ‘regular fit’ in one brand does not make it comparable to a ‘regular fit’ in another brand. Same for waist sizes. A 34 in one brand may not fit similarly to a 34 in another brand. In fact, they might not even fit similarly in the same brand if the brand has many fits. Or they might even fit differently in the same fit for the same brand over time as the brand has changed the fit over time.\n\nOne way brands have tried to combat this is by posting measurements of their pants. This can include the width of key areas such as the waist, seat, thigh, and leg opening. While this is more useful than only providing the size, [it can be difficult to truly compare pants from these measurements alone.](https://thedesignersmust.wordpress.com/2018/12/21/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/)\n\n### Measurements Alone Do NOT Describe Shape\nImagine two ellipses, one rotated 90 degrees from the other. Both have the same circumference, but appear to be completely different shapes. For that reason, the circumference of measurements alone may not illustrate how the pants fit because it does not describe the shape of the intended wearer.\n\nNow all the above measurements are only horizontal measurements. One of the most crucial aspects of pants is the rise, or the vertical length of the pants above the crotch. (Confusingly, the rise is measured in 2 different methods: a tailor will measure the true rise as the vertical length of the rise and less technical folks, often those writing clothing measurements, often measure the rise as the total length. These mean different things and yet are sometimes not distinguished on measurement charts.) The rise provides only the length with complete disregard of the curvature. Imagine 2 different parabolic curves. They could have the same length (total or vertical) of curve, but be two completely different curves!\n\nThe discussion of curves and lengths I have described above is all related to pattern making. Pattern making details how to cut the cloth that’s sewn together for your clothes. And it’s at that stage in the manufacturing process where the fit is already determined. Because each brand has its own patterns, each brand fits differently. Because clothes from different time periods have different patterns, clothes from different decades look different (outside the colors and patterns). Because people have different body shapes and sizes, a tailor will create different patterns for different people to achieve the same fit.\n![img_1539-e1531060745415.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmapcGdqczh1fPsutPbNBpSTyLPGt9aQHDEHZFySfZvzGw/img_1539-e1531060745415.jpg)\nNow I won’t go into how this is all done because that’s another story. But because achieving a perfect fit is entirely dependent on the pattern used, there is little room to maneuver on the finished ready-to-wear product.\n\nWhile alterations are certainly possible, most glaring issues cannot be fixed as most fixes require displacing cloth from one area and adding cloth in another. As ready-to-wear clothing often does not provide generous amounts of excess cloth at the seams, there is generally no extra cloth in the area that’s required for the alteration.\n![Remedies and Defects_1.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmVyFrWKCMv4k4kfppu4kaLT9rCSAxuZdfb7187p71puoE/Remedies%20and%20Defects_1.png)\n![Remedies and Defects_2.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmV5pRA7TYaE2S4rMVfSbBfQ15MYCzbk7sL6zXXt3ypSe6/Remedies%20and%20Defects_2.png)\n\nTherefore when you buy pants do not believe that a glaring issue can be resolved, despite what the salesman says. (I’m willing to bet most salesman do not know how pattern making or pattern changes work!) As a result, **when you buy pants, what you see is going to be very close to what you’re going to get**, minus some common, easy alterations that are built into the construction of pants. These are:\n\n* Taking in or letting out the waist at the center back of the waistband and into the center back seat seam. This however is really only performed on pants with a split waistband (anything above the cheapest type of pants will usually have this).\n* Taking in or letting out (depends on how much excess the pants have) the legs.\nLooking at the above, you may notice that the width of the waist and legs can be altered. But don’t be fooled. These alterations do not fix issues of balance (which is what the majority of true issues in ready-to-wear pants are). If the pants fit cleanly before, they will still fit cleanly after these changes. And if they didn’t fit cleanly before, they still won’t fit cleanly after these changes.\n\nHowever, you may have noticed the seat is one alteration I have not listed. Because that is the most static area of any ready-to-wear pants, I would use that to help find your size for the brand and fit. For example, if the seat does not fit in a regular fit size 34, continue checking other sizes rather than give up on the fit and brand. If the seat on the new size fits (feels neither tight nor loose) and the rest of the pants don’t, then chances are the fit and brand will not work for you at all.\n\n### Identify your desired attributes\nBut what are you looking for? This is where everyone has their own opinion ([one person’s “style” could be another person’s “defect”](https://thedesignersmust.wordpress.com/2019/06/13/defect-or-style/)).\n\nI like clean lines that don’t attract attention downwards and keep eyes focused on the body as a whole.\n![anthony-sinclair-man-about-town-1954-suit.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmatbeqwqeDCPr8GJZFP9M5QgMfUhH1rkD7txW1T1CMXc8/anthony-sinclair-man-about-town-1954-suit.jpg)\n\nI also like the waistband to sit a bit higher, close to the natural waist to ensure the torso doesn’t appear too long and appears natural and balanced, frame the waist, and to slim down any belly fat.\n![frwl6-pants1-1.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmX5vFwKGx4XEXGvYTrDsFQFVEFSxEYxsHzEuxLs71FJ5V/frwl6-pants1-1.jpg)\n![annex-gable-clark_nrfpt_22.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTdwDtXaJmjq42ffWVwtogjRFGJWtS3Gb9p13yg6NGSsk/annex-gable-clark_nrfpt_22.jpg)\n![8f823ef48ae8f297fde9934ed050b5b6.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRYDGndJ1nnt5mjbiHRWPVzKNMUz5HzT9YPLvgZmSmAJW/8f823ef48ae8f297fde9934ed050b5b6.jpg)\n\nAre these attributes very particular? Yes. Will they be difficult to find on ready-to-wear pants? Yes. Having a vision and trying to find it in already finished products is like finding a needle in a haystack. And that vision or fit is important, because it expresses you. I can guarantee that if you don’t like what you’re wearing, you won’t wear it. Maybe not in the 1st week or 1st month. But definitely at some point it will be lingering on your shelf unworn because you don’t enjoy wearing it. So there’s no need to be buying things just because everyone else is buying that.\n\nThis is the **downside of ready-to-wear**; if you have a particular vision, you need to find that particular brand or fit that has the same vision. This means a lot of digging on websites and other media and trying on clothes to find what you want.\n\nFor this reason if you stick with ready-to-wear, I would be **open minded** about some details that normally hold people up from making purchases but have zero effect on the fit or shape of pants (e.g. brands, fit names, sometimes even pleats as you might have a shape that ready-to-wear retailers mostly cut for using pleats).\n\nThere is no simple answer for this. There’s hundreds of different pants out there and it would be amiss for me to create a single formula for everyone. Think about this positively; **there are a bunch of ideas designers have already put out there on pants just waiting for someone like you to try!**\n\nImagine never trying new foods or visiting new places or meeting new people. Ridiculous, right? Trying clothes can be the same experience! It can be fun trying something different. And best of all, most of places allow free returns. So why not?\n\nThat being said, it would mean you have to making shopping for clothes not a chore to do just when you have a new event coming up with that burden of a deadline. That pressure of doing something for someone else can put a damper on even the most fun tasks. **Try shopping or fitting clothes when there’s no pressure to have new clothes**. Because if you’re shopping for clothes, it should be for you.\n\nBecause that’s the wonderful thing about pants. You’ll always have them everywhere you go. And rather than a nuisance, it should be a pleasure knowing you have something that you want.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"pants\",\"retail\",\"fashion\",\"shopping\",\"apparel\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTuhoE3iVAm3fhY3SE4gLMe96fMqkeni8DxDYXDpouQN1/dress_chart_fashion_19021.jpg\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPDCgcxWXhoYSoiY86VPEvv7mrVax8WfS9uSWUJKWowZW/1560187559809.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPmmNwrWhAD7wDiuhKFdJxQaMvZehECiygVdwLoCGaA41/1560187729552.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmVbEFrsgpzPPzDvdnTbzV2uw4DHtopac2xpJwAuEw8RfW/robert_redford_santa_barbara_-_p_-_2014-e1560642656176.jpg\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmX2ye1RYFUKxyoidQcWTAFEHS5moWDEyU8HGGUSbaf9Cy/1_l_4rl3cqrq3rty_cuxrnma.jpeg\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaep8EGr54NufrVZd6APJZNcqVaj9nf4LPMX35sZcHEb4/paul-newman-cat-on-a-hot-tin-roof.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRUKZ7tvVVapueanurUfubuYtYDZtbcLBzyNuxUuBR584/gettyimages-50316849.jpg\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmQhVzxeD65eBVbujLAxiKrtFqvftkiV7Zja33pBGKKeQj/060-cary-grant-theredlist1.jpg\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmc6Pp7CGGFeDMmKv9tpeDLacQiT5LjfQHCeP1h8qpkP8H/55445_kyeri-grant_or_cary-grant_1600x1200_www_gdefon_ru.jpg\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmapcGdqczh1fPsutPbNBpSTyLPGt9aQHDEHZFySfZvzGw/img_1539-e1531060745415.jpg\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmVyFrWKCMv4k4kfppu4kaLT9rCSAxuZdfb7187p71puoE/Remedies%20and%20Defects_1.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmV5pRA7TYaE2S4rMVfSbBfQ15MYCzbk7sL6zXXt3ypSe6/Remedies%20and%20Defects_2.png\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmatbeqwqeDCPr8GJZFP9M5QgMfUhH1rkD7txW1T1CMXc8/anthony-sinclair-man-about-town-1954-suit.jpg\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmX5vFwKGx4XEXGvYTrDsFQFVEFSxEYxsHzEuxLs71FJ5V/frwl6-pants1-1.jpg\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTdwDtXaJmjq42ffWVwtogjRFGJWtS3Gb9p13yg6NGSsk/annex-gable-clark_nrfpt_22.jpg\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRYDGndJ1nnt5mjbiHRWPVzKNMUz5HzT9YPLvgZmSmAJW/8f823ef48ae8f297fde9934ed050b5b6.jpg\"],\"links\":[\"https://thedesignersmust.wordpress.com/\",\"https://thedesignersmust.wordpress.com/2018/12/21/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/\",\"https://thedesignersmust.wordpress.com/2019/06/13/defect-or-style/\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}",
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "pants",
      "permlink": "how-to-buy-pants",
      "title": "How to Buy Pants"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-16T12:51:21",
  "trx_id": "5ecc98d6030c1e6fabef175294efbf7bca69eadb",
  "trx_in_block": 26,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
prfrnirreceived 5.728 SBD, 16.798 SP author reward for @prfrnir / a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
2019/06/14 17:56:51
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
sbd payout5.728 SBD
steem payout0.000 STEEM
vesting payout27353.999339 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #33798614/Virtual Operation #63
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33798614,
  "op": [
    "author_reward",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "sbd_payout": "5.728 SBD",
      "steem_payout": "0.000 STEEM",
      "vesting_payout": "27353.999339 VESTS"
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-14T17:56:51",
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "virtual_op": 63
}
2019/06/12 12:51:33
authorerikah
bodyUnlike you, who seem to know a lot about this, I know nothing, this is all new (and Chinese) to me 😁 However, looking at the teams, I'm proud to say I know a couple of names like Chicago Bulls and Los Angeles Lakers, so I'm not totally lost. I know NBA is a big deal in the uS and maybe outside US as well. Anyway, nice review, full of details. Well done!
json metadata{"tags":["nba","nba-draft","nba-lottery","tanking","statistics"],"app":"esteem/2.1.0-surfer","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem.app"}
parent authorprfrnir
parent permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
permlinkre-prfrnir-2019612t155130750z
title
Transaction InfoBlock #33734982/Trx db4bd87ba1c6231192a03d706333a24675de48c7
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33734982,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "erikah",
      "body": "Unlike you, who seem to know a lot about this, I know nothing, this is all new (and Chinese) to me 😁 However, looking at the teams, I'm proud to say I know a couple of names like Chicago Bulls and Los Angeles Lakers, so I'm not totally lost. I know NBA is a big deal in the uS and maybe outside US as well. Anyway, nice review, full of details. Well done!",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"nba\",\"nba-draft\",\"nba-lottery\",\"tanking\",\"statistics\"],\"app\":\"esteem/2.1.0-surfer\",\"format\":\"markdown+html\",\"community\":\"esteem.app\"}",
      "parent_author": "prfrnir",
      "parent_permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "permlink": "re-prfrnir-2019612t155130750z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-12T12:51:33",
  "trx_id": "db4bd87ba1c6231192a03d706333a24675de48c7",
  "trx_in_block": 13,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 16:24:15
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voterraphaelle
weight1000 (10.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33624203/Trx ef03b6516e305fccc0187523684c1e807a2d9d9a
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33624203,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "raphaelle",
      "weight": 1000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T16:24:15",
  "trx_id": "ef03b6516e305fccc0187523684c1e807a2d9d9a",
  "trx_in_block": 9,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 16:23:30
authorarcange
bodyCongratulations @prfrnir! Your post was mentioned in the [Steem Hit Parade for newcomers](/hit-parade/@arcange/daily-hit-parade-for-newcomers-20190607) in the following categories: * Upvotes - Ranked 2 with 1004 upvotes * Pending payout - Ranked 2 with $ 13,22 I also upvoted your post to increase its reward If you like my work to promote newcomers and give them more visibility on the Steem blockchain, consider to [vote for my witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=arcange&approve=1)!
json metadata
parent authorprfrnir
parent permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
permlinkre-a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds-20190607t182250000z
title
Transaction InfoBlock #33624188/Trx eb52afaf59139bd40dbe86ac116633f33905bbf5
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33624188,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "arcange",
      "body": "Congratulations @prfrnir!\nYour post was mentioned in the [Steem Hit Parade for newcomers](/hit-parade/@arcange/daily-hit-parade-for-newcomers-20190607) in the following categories:\n\n* Upvotes - Ranked 2 with 1004 upvotes\n* Pending payout - Ranked 2 with $ 13,22\n\nI also upvoted your post to increase its reward\nIf you like my work to promote newcomers and give them more visibility on the Steem blockchain, consider to [vote for my witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=arcange&approve=1)!",
      "json_metadata": "",
      "parent_author": "prfrnir",
      "parent_permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "permlink": "re-a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds-20190607t182250000z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T16:23:30",
  "trx_id": "eb52afaf59139bd40dbe86ac116633f33905bbf5",
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 16:22:51
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voterarcange
weight1000 (10.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33624175/Trx a1fa4ce1b628733e900978ed6563f19dfca6903b
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33624175,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "arcange",
      "weight": 1000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T16:22:51",
  "trx_id": "a1fa4ce1b628733e900978ed6563f19dfca6903b",
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 09:54:12
authorsteemitboard
bodyCongratulations @prfrnir! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) : <table><tr><td><img src="https://steemitimages.com/60x70/https://steemitboard.com/@prfrnir/voted.png?201906080903"></td><td>You received more than 1000 upvotes. Your next target is to reach 2000 upvotes.</td></tr> </table> <sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@prfrnir) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=prfrnir)_</sub> <sub>_If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word_ `STOP`</sub> ###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes!
json metadata{"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png"]}
parent authorprfrnir
parent permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
permlinksteemitboard-notify-prfrnir-20190608t095414000z
title
Transaction InfoBlock #33616411/Trx fcc117a8c3afdc70ac319472c256565688974a84
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33616411,
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "author": "steemitboard",
      "body": "Congratulations @prfrnir! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :\n\n<table><tr><td><img src=\"https://steemitimages.com/60x70/https://steemitboard.com/@prfrnir/voted.png?201906080903\"></td><td>You received more than 1000 upvotes. Your next target is to reach 2000 upvotes.</td></tr>\n</table>\n\n<sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@prfrnir) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=prfrnir)_</sub>\n<sub>_If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word_ `STOP`</sub>\n\n\n\n###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes!",
      "json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png\"]}",
      "parent_author": "prfrnir",
      "parent_permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "permlink": "steemitboard-notify-prfrnir-20190608t095414000z",
      "title": ""
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T09:54:12",
  "trx_id": "fcc117a8c3afdc70ac319472c256565688974a84",
  "trx_in_block": 13,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 08:17:27
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voteredprivat
weight15 (0.15%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33614481/Trx 06b59d73f7e73e1bd3a5d1bde309e1e1b1b3c7a1
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33614481,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "edprivat",
      "weight": 15
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T08:17:27",
  "trx_id": "06b59d73f7e73e1bd3a5d1bde309e1e1b1b3c7a1",
  "trx_in_block": 29,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 08:02:39
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voterandohyara
weight500 (5.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33614185/Trx 33f119e5201d02fe9e959cf13c5b0106cab9eebd
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33614185,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "andohyara",
      "weight": 500
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T08:02:39",
  "trx_id": "33f119e5201d02fe9e959cf13c5b0106cab9eebd",
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 08:02:36
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voterlillywilton
weight2000 (20.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33614184/Trx 649c7f47d0d91897f9ec3a3954af3ffc4c1cc048
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33614184,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "lillywilton",
      "weight": 2000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T08:02:36",
  "trx_id": "649c7f47d0d91897f9ec3a3954af3ffc4c1cc048",
  "trx_in_block": 20,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 08:02:36
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voteremsteemians
weight1000 (10.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33614184/Trx 9318327ab2831b11b5864a41318dc23cfae26118
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33614184,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "emsteemians",
      "weight": 1000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T08:02:36",
  "trx_id": "9318327ab2831b11b5864a41318dc23cfae26118",
  "trx_in_block": 17,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 08:02:36
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
votera0i
weight100 (1.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33614184/Trx a087ba796c99aa929655d1b2f04d6cbd635274b2
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33614184,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "a0i",
      "weight": 100
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T08:02:36",
  "trx_id": "a087ba796c99aa929655d1b2f04d6cbd635274b2",
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 08:02:36
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voterarchaimusic
weight1000 (10.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33614184/Trx 8dc835d5ddf652ab217b4682548ec09b599060d0
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33614184,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "archaimusic",
      "weight": 1000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T08:02:36",
  "trx_id": "8dc835d5ddf652ab217b4682548ec09b599060d0",
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 08:02:33
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voterrecordpool
weight500 (5.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33614183/Trx c8b33f9128c3cc8d0b5cbb9f117ba93a943f6a08
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33614183,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "recordpool",
      "weight": 500
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T08:02:33",
  "trx_id": "c8b33f9128c3cc8d0b5cbb9f117ba93a943f6a08",
  "trx_in_block": 22,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 08:02:33
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
votermoshitunes
weight500 (5.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33614183/Trx f3aec622039ba0b24cb691aa3a6fb0d1214dbc7e
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33614183,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "moshitunes",
      "weight": 500
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T08:02:33",
  "trx_id": "f3aec622039ba0b24cb691aa3a6fb0d1214dbc7e",
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 08:02:18
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voterjonmagnusson
weight1300 (13.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33614178/Trx 371ab43530bc0e3904424c43c6bbd70c54adb644
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33614178,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "jonmagnusson",
      "weight": 1300
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T08:02:18",
  "trx_id": "371ab43530bc0e3904424c43c6bbd70c54adb644",
  "trx_in_block": 20,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 08:02:18
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
votermusicvoter
weight100 (1.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33614178/Trx 7376a028544b6c1322b5c9c169fed4e792f0d830
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33614178,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "musicvoter",
      "weight": 100
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T08:02:18",
  "trx_id": "7376a028544b6c1322b5c9c169fed4e792f0d830",
  "trx_in_block": 17,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:18
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
votercesarisaad
weight2600 (26.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613979/Trx b019dc0dc35b25ebd6b06749f96d8337ff765b17
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613979,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "cesarisaad",
      "weight": 2600
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:18",
  "trx_id": "b019dc0dc35b25ebd6b06749f96d8337ff765b17",
  "trx_in_block": 12,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:18
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voterichki
weight2600 (26.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613979/Trx 8a46ff71e7f4761674a8273004832a8b37d94183
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613979,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "ichki",
      "weight": 2600
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:18",
  "trx_id": "8a46ff71e7f4761674a8273004832a8b37d94183",
  "trx_in_block": 10,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:15
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voterekayanti
weight1300 (13.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613978/Trx af2538064a784a6d5375bf59b663499d45520da5
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613978,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "ekayanti",
      "weight": 1300
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:15",
  "trx_id": "af2538064a784a6d5375bf59b663499d45520da5",
  "trx_in_block": 23,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:15
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voterflatman
weight5200 (52.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613978/Trx 1ea11c37ac535dcb1d21d33e5496c6814c8f43b2
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613978,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "flatman",
      "weight": 5200
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:15",
  "trx_id": "1ea11c37ac535dcb1d21d33e5496c6814c8f43b2",
  "trx_in_block": 21,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:15
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voterdentalsteem
weight520 (5.20%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613978/Trx 6a7041ed36c582b54e85bcef0455a2a31b8a3309
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613978,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "dentalsteem",
      "weight": 520
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:15",
  "trx_id": "6a7041ed36c582b54e85bcef0455a2a31b8a3309",
  "trx_in_block": 20,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:15
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
votermarehalm
weight5200 (52.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613978/Trx 33abd404ffeb1ae8a6c31c8278af53d5dce55ff3
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613978,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "marehalm",
      "weight": 5200
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:15",
  "trx_id": "33abd404ffeb1ae8a6c31c8278af53d5dce55ff3",
  "trx_in_block": 19,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:15
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
votergosmire78
weight5200 (52.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613978/Trx 2148d58eb3af4f5e4eaa095f7dabd7521f0ce43b
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613978,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "gosmire78",
      "weight": 5200
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:15",
  "trx_id": "2148d58eb3af4f5e4eaa095f7dabd7521f0ce43b",
  "trx_in_block": 17,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:15
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voterpuggle
weight1560 (15.60%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613978/Trx cfe5c75c61979331b696854834b87eb020be8030
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613978,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "puggle",
      "weight": 1560
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:15",
  "trx_id": "cfe5c75c61979331b696854834b87eb020be8030",
  "trx_in_block": 15,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:15
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voteroclinton
weight2600 (26.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613978/Trx c78b3a9e96ce8cdc52123f570972c07aa1089159
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613978,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "oclinton",
      "weight": 2600
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:15",
  "trx_id": "c78b3a9e96ce8cdc52123f570972c07aa1089159",
  "trx_in_block": 14,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:15
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
votersenorcoconut
weight260 (2.60%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613978/Trx 905bc4e20c2506a72dd3785e39ee027980503ffa
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613978,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "senorcoconut",
      "weight": 260
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:15",
  "trx_id": "905bc4e20c2506a72dd3785e39ee027980503ffa",
  "trx_in_block": 12,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:15
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voterstevenwood
weight520 (5.20%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613978/Trx c74b353d595bb55c680ff2c4d5819dc4d36f316d
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613978,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "stevenwood",
      "weight": 520
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:15",
  "trx_id": "c74b353d595bb55c680ff2c4d5819dc4d36f316d",
  "trx_in_block": 11,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:15
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
votercarmesi
weight2600 (26.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613978/Trx db9926dfdc5c7c738eafdfb04b7c95a3da18c8e1
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613978,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "carmesi",
      "weight": 2600
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:15",
  "trx_id": "db9926dfdc5c7c738eafdfb04b7c95a3da18c8e1",
  "trx_in_block": 7,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:15
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
votermohadaslam
weight2600 (26.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613978/Trx d7b5ce07d6d9c9768fb1e765614ea88012d747c9
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613978,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "mohadaslam",
      "weight": 2600
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:15",
  "trx_id": "d7b5ce07d6d9c9768fb1e765614ea88012d747c9",
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:15
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voteroghie
weight5000 (50.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613978/Trx 2e083ddbbf80edd1f0e1a04d9861237f61e782f3
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613978,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "oghie",
      "weight": 5000
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:15",
  "trx_id": "2e083ddbbf80edd1f0e1a04d9861237f61e782f3",
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:12
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voterdanlipert
weight2600 (26.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613977/Trx fdb8424990eeef938180b3232049a176e7f6911d
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613977,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "danlipert",
      "weight": 2600
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:12",
  "trx_id": "fdb8424990eeef938180b3232049a176e7f6911d",
  "trx_in_block": 37,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:12
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voterleftyobradovich
weight5200 (52.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613977/Trx e01e2085813013358f8f1163ce4a93e66a51b50b
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613977,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "leftyobradovich",
      "weight": 5200
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:12",
  "trx_id": "e01e2085813013358f8f1163ce4a93e66a51b50b",
  "trx_in_block": 36,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:12
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voteralexhuang
weight2600 (26.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613977/Trx 65a9e3d8a24df86fb832ecc14c29fdb72415d825
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613977,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "alexhuang",
      "weight": 2600
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:12",
  "trx_id": "65a9e3d8a24df86fb832ecc14c29fdb72415d825",
  "trx_in_block": 34,
  "virtual_op": 0
}
2019/06/08 07:52:12
authorprfrnir
permlinka-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds
voteraejackson
weight104 (1.04%)
Transaction InfoBlock #33613977/Trx e07f098e7b235a3e6eab39098e09af94d9b6d2a4
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "block": 33613977,
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "author": "prfrnir",
      "permlink": "a-different-way-to-generate-nba-lottery-odds",
      "voter": "aejackson",
      "weight": 104
    }
  ],
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-06-08T07:52:12",
  "trx_id": "e07f098e7b235a3e6eab39098e09af94d9b6d2a4",
  "trx_in_block": 33,
  "virtual_op": 0
}

Account Metadata

POSTING JSON METADATA
None
JSON METADATA
None
{
  "posting_json_metadata": {},
  "json_metadata": {}
}

Auth Keys

Owner
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM65ZTpdennXMT4Y57EmFXNCsVKdtavof5FmTC93ZRTCfXNCKggr1/1
Active
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM64HgZB9XxtXEX1H6S13AB95cau3DS7CgiXQw98SpHCZu39ggYG1/1
Posting
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM6kaGxryXKW4YFXQqNTcmxog4Rm2rV1oxxy8s5Gz5Jdbzy5JHBB1/1
Memo
STM6FEBkyN3DBcRqVHn1f4y9djXMQwhPvTQsF9k4NjXCa7ysa5dom
{
  "owner": {
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM65ZTpdennXMT4Y57EmFXNCsVKdtavof5FmTC93ZRTCfXNCKggr",
        1
      ]
    ],
    "weight_threshold": 1
  },
  "active": {
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM64HgZB9XxtXEX1H6S13AB95cau3DS7CgiXQw98SpHCZu39ggYG",
        1
      ]
    ],
    "weight_threshold": 1
  },
  "posting": {
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM6kaGxryXKW4YFXQqNTcmxog4Rm2rV1oxxy8s5Gz5Jdbzy5JHBB",
        1
      ]
    ],
    "weight_threshold": 1
  },
  "memo": "STM6FEBkyN3DBcRqVHn1f4y9djXMQwhPvTQsF9k4NjXCa7ysa5dom"
}

Witness Votes

0 / 30
No active witness votes.
[]