@platosophia
25Bachelors in Science in Computer Science. Masters of Arts in Philosophy. Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/jairohtuada
steemit.com/@platosophiaVOTING POWER100.00%
DOWNVOTE POWER100.00%
RESOURCE CREDITS100.00%
REPUTATION PROGRESS0.00%
Net Worth
0.037USD
STEEM
0.000STEEM
SBD
0.000SBD
Effective Power
5.007SP
├── Own SP
0.635SP
└── Incoming DelegationsDeleg
+4.372SP
Detailed Balance
| STEEM | ||
| balance | 0.000STEEM | STEEM |
| market_balance | 0.000STEEM | STEEM |
| savings_balance | 0.000STEEM | STEEM |
| reward_steem_balance | 0.000STEEM | STEEM |
| STEEM POWER | ||
| Own SP | 0.635SP | SP |
| Delegated Out | 0.000SP | SP |
| Delegation In | 4.372SP | SP |
| Effective Power | 5.007SP | SP |
| Reward SP (pending) | 0.000SP | SP |
| SBD | ||
| sbd_balance | 0.000SBD | SBD |
| sbd_conversions | 0.000SBD | SBD |
| sbd_market_balance | 0.000SBD | SBD |
| savings_sbd_balance | 0.000SBD | SBD |
| reward_sbd_balance | 0.000SBD | SBD |
{
"balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"savings_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"reward_steem_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"vesting_shares": "1032.085493 VESTS",
"delegated_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
"received_vesting_shares": "7111.574313 VESTS",
"sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"savings_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"reward_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"conversions": []
}Account Info
| name | platosophia |
| id | 310032 |
| rank | 1,348,743 |
| reputation | 81498894 |
| created | 2017-08-12T12:52:48 |
| recovery_account | steem |
| proxy | None |
| post_count | 4 |
| comment_count | 0 |
| lifetime_vote_count | 0 |
| witnesses_voted_for | 0 |
| last_post | 2017-08-15T08:38:18 |
| last_root_post | 2017-08-14T14:38:54 |
| last_vote_time | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
| proxied_vsf_votes | 0, 0, 0, 0 |
| can_vote | 1 |
| voting_power | 0 |
| delayed_votes | 0 |
| balance | 0.000 STEEM |
| savings_balance | 0.000 STEEM |
| sbd_balance | 0.000 SBD |
| savings_sbd_balance | 0.000 SBD |
| vesting_shares | 1032.085493 VESTS |
| delegated_vesting_shares | 0.000000 VESTS |
| received_vesting_shares | 7111.574313 VESTS |
| reward_vesting_balance | 0.000000 VESTS |
| vesting_balance | 0.000 STEEM |
| vesting_withdraw_rate | 0.000000 VESTS |
| next_vesting_withdrawal | 1969-12-31T23:59:59 |
| withdrawn | 0 |
| to_withdraw | 0 |
| withdraw_routes | 0 |
| savings_withdraw_requests | 0 |
| last_account_recovery | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
| reset_account | null |
| last_owner_update | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
| last_account_update | 2017-08-14T15:02:06 |
| mined | No |
| sbd_seconds | 0 |
| sbd_last_interest_payment | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
| savings_sbd_last_interest_payment | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
{
"id": 310032,
"name": "platosophia",
"owner": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM7P1qeyyf8mWLCP393qGEqi8o9gZLPwr6yPWKG15FmuPEmA3H4P",
1
]
]
},
"active": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM5uZ41LLp52QTwfcCrapw7bKVETdQHQTAPUB6hW4qDzKWqNCP2y",
1
]
]
},
"posting": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM6xmfedSHCtD2pbeyGJsa8bg8xqBc4pHnaUyq5KyScfW9kGWQXc",
1
]
]
},
"memo_key": "STM63SdEzxVvnJ8m8Aok98DxhYbmUB3bz3upzQgb8RANxs4CcPqSV",
"json_metadata": "{\"profile\":{\"profile_image\":\"https://s12.postimg.org/cpr1wsynx/i_KIXzkh7_400x400.jpg\",\"about\":\"Bachelors in Science in Computer Science. Masters of Arts in Philosophy. Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/jairohtuada\",\"website\":\"https://whoneedstruth.wordpress.com\"}}",
"posting_json_metadata": "{\"profile\":{\"profile_image\":\"https://s12.postimg.org/cpr1wsynx/i_KIXzkh7_400x400.jpg\",\"about\":\"Bachelors in Science in Computer Science. Masters of Arts in Philosophy. Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/jairohtuada\",\"website\":\"https://whoneedstruth.wordpress.com\"}}",
"proxy": "",
"last_owner_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"last_account_update": "2017-08-14T15:02:06",
"created": "2017-08-12T12:52:48",
"mined": false,
"recovery_account": "steem",
"last_account_recovery": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"reset_account": "null",
"comment_count": 0,
"lifetime_vote_count": 0,
"post_count": 4,
"can_vote": true,
"voting_manabar": {
"current_mana": "8143659806",
"last_update_time": 1779080943
},
"downvote_manabar": {
"current_mana": 2035914951,
"last_update_time": 1779080943
},
"voting_power": 0,
"balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"savings_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"sbd_seconds": "0",
"sbd_seconds_last_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"sbd_last_interest_payment": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"savings_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"savings_sbd_seconds": "0",
"savings_sbd_seconds_last_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"savings_sbd_last_interest_payment": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"savings_withdraw_requests": 0,
"reward_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"reward_steem_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"reward_vesting_balance": "0.000000 VESTS",
"reward_vesting_steem": "0.000 STEEM",
"vesting_shares": "1032.085493 VESTS",
"delegated_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
"received_vesting_shares": "7111.574313 VESTS",
"vesting_withdraw_rate": "0.000000 VESTS",
"next_vesting_withdrawal": "1969-12-31T23:59:59",
"withdrawn": 0,
"to_withdraw": 0,
"withdraw_routes": 0,
"curation_rewards": 0,
"posting_rewards": 0,
"proxied_vsf_votes": [
0,
0,
0,
0
],
"witnesses_voted_for": 0,
"last_post": "2017-08-15T08:38:18",
"last_root_post": "2017-08-14T14:38:54",
"last_vote_time": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"post_bandwidth": 0,
"pending_claimed_accounts": 0,
"vesting_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"reputation": 81498894,
"transfer_history": [],
"market_history": [],
"post_history": [],
"vote_history": [],
"other_history": [],
"witness_votes": [],
"tags_usage": [],
"guest_bloggers": [],
"rank": 1348743
}Withdraw Routes
| Incoming | Outgoing |
|---|---|
Empty | Empty |
{
"incoming": [],
"outgoing": []
}From Date
To Date
steemdelegated 4.372 SP to @platosophia2026/05/18 05:09:03
steemdelegated 4.372 SP to @platosophia
2026/05/18 05:09:03
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 7111.574313 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #106149299/Trx 72d5d89a71d59c2744cdace7c3b98ef4b094ccb5 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "72d5d89a71d59c2744cdace7c3b98ef4b094ccb5",
"block": 106149299,
"trx_in_block": 0,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2026-05-18T05:09:03",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "7111.574313 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 2.705 SP to @platosophia2026/05/12 23:41:42
steemdelegated 2.705 SP to @platosophia
2026/05/12 23:41:42
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 4399.363908 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #105999484/Trx 1cb5d4f827ff13206045fa68e1d60877db0e11fd |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "1cb5d4f827ff13206045fa68e1d60877db0e11fd",
"block": 105999484,
"trx_in_block": 1,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2026-05-12T23:41:42",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "4399.363908 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 4.380 SP to @platosophia2026/04/26 04:22:33
steemdelegated 4.380 SP to @platosophia
2026/04/26 04:22:33
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 7124.090069 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #105516816/Trx decae876f61c5143ea9719bd612618e92c75dd02 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "decae876f61c5143ea9719bd612618e92c75dd02",
"block": 105516816,
"trx_in_block": 0,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2026-04-26T04:22:33",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "7124.090069 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 2.730 SP to @platosophia2026/01/23 20:57:18
steemdelegated 2.730 SP to @platosophia
2026/01/23 20:57:18
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 4440.910727 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #102867568/Trx 7025764bf81c7a67036dc8cab32c98d0d76399cb |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "7025764bf81c7a67036dc8cab32c98d0d76399cb",
"block": 102867568,
"trx_in_block": 2,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2026-01-23T20:57:18",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "4440.910727 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 2.831 SP to @platosophia2024/12/17 16:08:12
steemdelegated 2.831 SP to @platosophia
2024/12/17 16:08:12
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 4605.129924 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #91313799/Trx 8c682b92411b52217ee34222919384c9fd6f067c |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "8c682b92411b52217ee34222919384c9fd6f067c",
"block": 91313799,
"trx_in_block": 3,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2024-12-17T16:08:12",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "4605.129924 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 2.935 SP to @platosophia2023/11/14 07:49:33
steemdelegated 2.935 SP to @platosophia
2023/11/14 07:49:33
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 4774.263456 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #79867958/Trx cd045828f90a83f4a075791a9f6677e840038a14 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "cd045828f90a83f4a075791a9f6677e840038a14",
"block": 79867958,
"trx_in_block": 5,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2023-11-14T07:49:33",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "4774.263456 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 4.741 SP to @platosophia2023/09/22 09:02:06
steemdelegated 4.741 SP to @platosophia
2023/09/22 09:02:06
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 7711.172242 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #78361243/Trx d8954ec23c8e187650e2125c82f2a45cf890f264 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "d8954ec23c8e187650e2125c82f2a45cf890f264",
"block": 78361243,
"trx_in_block": 0,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2023-09-22T09:02:06",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "7711.172242 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 4.877 SP to @platosophia2022/11/03 16:40:33
steemdelegated 4.877 SP to @platosophia
2022/11/03 16:40:33
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 7933.223680 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #69119201/Trx 8283f355018bdc0ad054547e32576a9687d3d7d3 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "8283f355018bdc0ad054547e32576a9687d3d7d3",
"block": 69119201,
"trx_in_block": 5,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2022-11-03T16:40:33",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "7933.223680 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 5.013 SP to @platosophia2022/01/17 21:59:45
steemdelegated 5.013 SP to @platosophia
2022/01/17 21:59:45
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 8153.331281 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #60822592/Trx 01284aaf620845dfe98fc7fc2b0ebd118c9b0d2e |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "01284aaf620845dfe98fc7fc2b0ebd118c9b0d2e",
"block": 60822592,
"trx_in_block": 4,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2022-01-17T21:59:45",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "8153.331281 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 5.126 SP to @platosophia2021/06/14 05:13:30
steemdelegated 5.126 SP to @platosophia
2021/06/14 05:13:30
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 8337.525569 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #54612979/Trx b9e3de9329ca0ac4f46fd4c61e0f26086cfce6ef |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "b9e3de9329ca0ac4f46fd4c61e0f26086cfce6ef",
"block": 54612979,
"trx_in_block": 4,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2021-06-14T05:13:30",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "8337.525569 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 5.241 SP to @platosophia2020/12/11 15:26:42
steemdelegated 5.241 SP to @platosophia
2020/12/11 15:26:42
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 8524.947543 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #49360274/Trx bfde4b701dc945ffe550140412f391a003cabadf |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "bfde4b701dc945ffe550140412f391a003cabadf",
"block": 49360274,
"trx_in_block": 0,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-12-11T15:26:42",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "8524.947543 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 1.176 SP to @platosophia2020/12/06 09:02:51
steemdelegated 1.176 SP to @platosophia
2020/12/06 09:02:51
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 1912.543513 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #49211804/Trx 50224fb13ba5575ec887e89a1cbaaff45688d531 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "50224fb13ba5575ec887e89a1cbaaff45688d531",
"block": 49211804,
"trx_in_block": 1,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-12-06T09:02:51",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "1912.543513 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 5.245 SP to @platosophia2020/12/05 19:04:33
steemdelegated 5.245 SP to @platosophia
2020/12/05 19:04:33
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 8531.155397 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #49195356/Trx c995121bcbd388fc4126221caafe87149e130624 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "c995121bcbd388fc4126221caafe87149e130624",
"block": 49195356,
"trx_in_block": 0,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-12-05T19:04:33",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "8531.155397 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 1.180 SP to @platosophia2020/11/03 00:35:30
steemdelegated 1.180 SP to @platosophia
2020/11/03 00:35:30
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 1920.017158 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #48268341/Trx 66c46b008c4202f02396574a73b988cb0f41a870 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "66c46b008c4202f02396574a73b988cb0f41a870",
"block": 48268341,
"trx_in_block": 2,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-11-03T00:35:30",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "1920.017158 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 5.370 SP to @platosophia2020/05/09 10:04:45
steemdelegated 5.370 SP to @platosophia
2020/05/09 10:04:45
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 8733.960756 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #43222118/Trx c865e60a3e5b6eabd25b38d29b45b4bf612b2c3d |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "c865e60a3e5b6eabd25b38d29b45b4bf612b2c3d",
"block": 43222118,
"trx_in_block": 0,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-05-09T10:04:45",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "8733.960756 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 1.201 SP to @platosophia2020/05/08 14:20:03
steemdelegated 1.201 SP to @platosophia
2020/05/08 14:20:03
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 1953.311140 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #43198984/Trx ad17d159129e5decf5a061c9e4a2dcd1f321b32d |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "ad17d159129e5decf5a061c9e4a2dcd1f321b32d",
"block": 43198984,
"trx_in_block": 17,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-05-08T14:20:03",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "1953.311140 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 5.378 SP to @platosophia2020/04/16 02:38:42
steemdelegated 5.378 SP to @platosophia
2020/04/16 02:38:42
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 8746.848204 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #42568396/Trx be6407ea8f9199998e5bd6e3aca87da5c972f7b2 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "be6407ea8f9199998e5bd6e3aca87da5c972f7b2",
"block": 42568396,
"trx_in_block": 2,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-04-16T02:38:42",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "8746.848204 VESTS"
}
]
}2019/08/12 14:33:33
2019/08/12 14:33:33
| parent author | platosophia |
| parent permlink | has-the-gardener-showed-up |
| author | steemitboard |
| permlink | steemitboard-notify-platosophia-20190812t143332000z |
| title | |
| body | Congratulations @platosophia! You received a personal award! <table><tr><td>https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@platosophia/birthday2.png</td><td>Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years!</td></tr></table> <sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@platosophia) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=platosophia)_</sub> ###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes! |
| json metadata | {"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png"]} |
| Transaction Info | Block #35489977/Trx 5a745342861711e2fec52cae08a17dfe2eea81e4 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "5a745342861711e2fec52cae08a17dfe2eea81e4",
"block": 35489977,
"trx_in_block": 5,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2019-08-12T14:33:33",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "platosophia",
"parent_permlink": "has-the-gardener-showed-up",
"author": "steemitboard",
"permlink": "steemitboard-notify-platosophia-20190812t143332000z",
"title": "",
"body": "Congratulations @platosophia! You received a personal award!\n\n<table><tr><td>https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@platosophia/birthday2.png</td><td>Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years!</td></tr></table>\n\n<sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@platosophia) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=platosophia)_</sub>\n\n\n###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes!",
"json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png\"]}"
}
]
}steemdelegated 5.498 SP to @platosophia2019/05/12 19:45:42
steemdelegated 5.498 SP to @platosophia
2019/05/12 19:45:42
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 8942.465017 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #32851315/Trx 13f690b52052fd2b96e351fca8b07fb86e0f7423 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "13f690b52052fd2b96e351fca8b07fb86e0f7423",
"block": 32851315,
"trx_in_block": 20,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2019-05-12T19:45:42",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "8942.465017 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 5.621 SP to @platosophia2018/05/16 23:42:24
steemdelegated 5.621 SP to @platosophia
2018/05/16 23:42:24
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 9142.075885 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #22493949/Trx 4bbb691456258f3f6a0f1df4f8125b5e48ed9209 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "4bbb691456258f3f6a0f1df4f8125b5e48ed9209",
"block": 22493949,
"trx_in_block": 1,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2018-05-16T23:42:24",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "9142.075885 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 18.213 SP to @platosophia2018/02/22 12:27:45
steemdelegated 18.213 SP to @platosophia
2018/02/22 12:27:45
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 29624.038416 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #20092583/Trx a5470737b8148409ee79268bc0b58d6d16d171ff |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "a5470737b8148409ee79268bc0b58d6d16d171ff",
"block": 20092583,
"trx_in_block": 15,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2018-02-22T12:27:45",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "29624.038416 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 18.339 SP to @platosophia2017/10/13 16:19:21
steemdelegated 18.339 SP to @platosophia
2017/10/13 16:19:21
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | platosophia |
| vesting shares | 29828.914507 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #16298569/Trx 202a07a44eb46ab77f6da647f305b897a28f0f4f |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "202a07a44eb46ab77f6da647f305b897a28f0f4f",
"block": 16298569,
"trx_in_block": 3,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-10-13T16:19:21",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "platosophia",
"vesting_shares": "29828.914507 VESTS"
}
]
}2017/08/15 13:27:03
2017/08/15 13:27:03
| voter | discernente |
| author | platosophia |
| permlink | re-discernente-re-platosophia-re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t233606639z |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #14596886/Trx 8a0087efaa7dc53b514eb9bbc5dc1880de2a1b77 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "8a0087efaa7dc53b514eb9bbc5dc1880de2a1b77",
"block": 14596886,
"trx_in_block": 18,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-15T13:27:03",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "discernente",
"author": "platosophia",
"permlink": "re-discernente-re-platosophia-re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t233606639z",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}2017/08/15 13:26:39
2017/08/15 13:26:39
| parent author | platosophia |
| parent permlink | re-discernente-re-platosophia-re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t233606639z |
| author | discernente |
| permlink | re-platosophia-re-discernente-re-platosophia-re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t132636574z |
| title | |
| body | >Oh no. This is not our rational standard. This is not even rational. Rather, this is an informal fallacy in logic called argumentum ad ignorantiam that says a proposition is true because it has not proven to be false (or vice versa). For instance, we didn’t have any evidences for the existence of electrons not until Thomson discovered it in 1897. Does that mean that electrons didn’t exist back then? Of course not. That is why I said that things without evidence do not exist **until proven otherwise**, ie, they are hypotesys by default. If you argue that they are not mere hypotesys, you have the burden of the proof. >For instance, the laws of arithmetic or logic. We can’t prove them (w/o reasoning in circle), rather we only presuppose and utilize them to prove other things. Math is not true or false, it is only an instrument of reason. But even reason itself isn't onthologicaly true or false. It is true in some situations and absolutely useless in another ones. >I don't where you get that number. For each one thing that you show me to exist, I can imagine and describe to you 10 things that you won't believe to exist. > However, I see no reason to deny that agnoticism is not compatible with dobut and the demand for some evidence. Perhaps you want to show your evidence for this too? >May know where you get this general rule you affirm? (And by the way, you need to show your proof for this too!) Are you agnostic regarding leprechauns? Are you agnostic regarding ETs? Or you don't believe them **until proven otherwise**? >And lastly, please upvote this if you think the conversation is fruitful. Thank you for engaging my first post! :) Done. |
| json metadata | {"tags":["religion"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14596878/Trx 0f7039a84d11fa283e38cfc2ce07f18957f38980 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "0f7039a84d11fa283e38cfc2ce07f18957f38980",
"block": 14596878,
"trx_in_block": 0,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-15T13:26:39",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "platosophia",
"parent_permlink": "re-discernente-re-platosophia-re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t233606639z",
"author": "discernente",
"permlink": "re-platosophia-re-discernente-re-platosophia-re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t132636574z",
"title": "",
"body": ">Oh no. This is not our rational standard. This is not even rational. Rather, this is an informal fallacy in logic called argumentum ad ignorantiam that says a proposition is true because it has not proven to be false (or vice versa). For instance, we didn’t have any evidences for the existence of electrons not until Thomson discovered it in 1897. Does that mean that electrons didn’t exist back then? Of course not.\n\nThat is why I said that things without evidence do not exist **until proven otherwise**, ie, they are hypotesys by default. If you argue that they are not mere hypotesys, you have the burden of the proof.\n\n>For instance, the laws of arithmetic or logic. We can’t prove them (w/o reasoning in circle), rather we only presuppose and utilize them to prove other things.\n\nMath is not true or false, it is only an instrument of reason. But even reason itself isn't onthologicaly true or false. It is true in some situations and absolutely useless in another ones.\n\n>I don't where you get that number.\n\nFor each one thing that you show me to exist, I can imagine and describe to you 10 things that you won't believe to exist.\n\n> However, I see no reason to deny that agnoticism is not compatible with dobut and the demand for some evidence. Perhaps you want to show your evidence for this too?\n>May know where you get this general rule you affirm? (And by the way, you need to show your proof for this too!)\n\nAre you agnostic regarding leprechauns? Are you agnostic regarding ETs? Or you don't believe them **until proven otherwise**?\n\n>And lastly, please upvote this if you think the conversation is fruitful. Thank you for engaging my first post! :)\n\nDone.",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"religion\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}"
}
]
}2017/08/15 08:38:18
2017/08/15 08:38:18
| parent author | discernente |
| parent permlink | re-platosophia-re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t001102024z |
| author | platosophia |
| permlink | re-discernente-re-platosophia-re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t233606639z |
| title | |
| body | Hello @discernente, thank you for responding. Let me respond to your claims also. >In reality we never have absolute certainties in this life. By the way, does absolute certainty even exist? Yes, concerning absolute or rational certainty, I agree with you with the majority of the philosophers. That bar is too high for knowledge (i.e., human knowledge). This was the mistake for the rationalists (esp. Descartes) for their epistemology (which resulted in dogmatism). So anyone who claims to have an absolute certainty of knowledge, the best response would be suspicion. Let's catch that person and study him! >But regardless, what I meant is that our rational standard is that things without evidence do not exist until proven otherwise. Oh no. This is not our rational standard. This is not even rational. Rather, this is an informal fallacy in logic called *argumentum ad ignorantiam* that says a proposition is true because it has not proven to be false (or vice versa). For instance, we didn't have any evidences for the existence of electrons not until Thomson discovered it in 1897. Does that mean that electrons didn't exist back then? Of course not. >It is more rational not to believe in the existence of things without any evidence, than to simply believe and even propagate this belief without proving anything of what is being affirmed. That sounds even slightly arrogant and dishonest intellectually. Yes. I couldn't agree any better with this. >Well IMHO I think that the context matters little, since the question is objective. What matters is the affirmation itself, of the objective existence in the real world of something without having to prove it. The human mind is prodigal in imagining things, but not even 1% of the things we imagine exist in the factual reality outside our imagination. Yes. I also (a lot of times) imagine things that don't exist in factual reality. Especially before sleep. But may I know where you get that number from? >Thus, regardless of context, whenever the claim is that there is something without any evidence, the first natural reaction of any rational person should be the doubt and the demand for some evidence. I agree with the latter part, but I think where you err here is when you start it with "regardless of context". Philosophers actually recognize *a priori* truths (i.e., truths that are true by their own nature.) For instance, the laws of arithmetic or logic. We can't prove them (w/o reasoning in circle), rather we only presuppose and utilize them to prove other things. On the other hand, where you view is compatible is in *the belief of the non-occurence of events without any evidence for it*. Irving Copi, in his his helpful book *Introduction to Logic*: _In some circumstances it can be safely assumed that if a certain event had occurred, evidence of it could be discovered by qualified investigators. In such circumstances it is perfectly reasonable to take the absence of proof of its occurrence as positive proof of its non-occurrence (1953, p. 95)_ That is, *occurence* is not identical with *existence*. And my post is about the latter (and so are your objections). >Therefore, I think that the most rational position for 99% of the claims of existence without evidence is first and foremost the doubt, the demand for some evidence, and not simply agnosticism. Adopting agnosticism just because you can not prove otherwise would be almost like a reversal of the burden of proof. I don't where you get that number. However, I see no reason to deny that agnoticism is not compatible with dobut and the demand for some evidence. Perhaps you want to show your evidence for this too? >What is affirmed without proof can be rejected without proof, that is the general rule. May know where you get this general rule you affirm? (And by the way, you need to show your proof for this too!) And lastly, please upvote this if you think the conversation is fruitful. Thank you for engaging my first post! :) |
| json metadata | {"tags":["religion"],"users":["discernente"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14591113/Trx bec94b95724d8e4396988c3b47e5c43da214d7ba |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "bec94b95724d8e4396988c3b47e5c43da214d7ba",
"block": 14591113,
"trx_in_block": 3,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-15T08:38:18",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "discernente",
"parent_permlink": "re-platosophia-re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t001102024z",
"author": "platosophia",
"permlink": "re-discernente-re-platosophia-re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t233606639z",
"title": "",
"body": "Hello @discernente, thank you for responding. Let me respond to your claims also. \n\n>In reality we never have absolute certainties in this life. By the way, does absolute certainty even exist? \n\nYes, concerning absolute or rational certainty, I agree with you with the majority of the philosophers. That bar is too high for knowledge (i.e., human knowledge). This was the mistake for the rationalists (esp. Descartes) for their epistemology (which resulted in dogmatism). So anyone who claims to have an absolute certainty of knowledge, the best response would be suspicion. Let's catch that person and study him!\n\n>But regardless, what I meant is that our rational standard is that things without evidence do not exist until proven otherwise. \n\nOh no. This is not our rational standard. This is not even rational. Rather, this is an informal fallacy in logic called *argumentum ad ignorantiam* that says a proposition is true because it has not proven to be false (or vice versa). For instance, we didn't have any evidences for the existence of electrons not until Thomson discovered it in 1897. Does that mean that electrons didn't exist back then? Of course not. \n\n>It is more rational not to believe in the existence of things without any evidence, than to simply believe and even propagate this belief without proving anything of what is being affirmed. That sounds even slightly arrogant and dishonest intellectually.\n\nYes. I couldn't agree any better with this.\n\n>Well IMHO I think that the context matters little, since the question is objective. What matters is the affirmation itself, of the objective existence in the real world of something without having to prove it. The human mind is prodigal in imagining things, but not even 1% of the things we imagine exist in the factual reality outside our imagination.\n\nYes. I also (a lot of times) imagine things that don't exist in factual reality. Especially before sleep. But may I know where you get that number from?\n\n>Thus, regardless of context, whenever the claim is that there is something without any evidence, the first natural reaction of any rational person should be the doubt and the demand for some evidence.\n\nI agree with the latter part, but I think where you err here is when you start it with \"regardless of context\". Philosophers actually recognize *a priori* truths (i.e., truths that are true by their own nature.) For instance, the laws of arithmetic or logic. We can't prove them (w/o reasoning in circle), rather we only presuppose and utilize them to prove other things.\n\nOn the other hand, where you view is compatible is in *the belief of the non-occurence of events without any evidence for it*. Irving Copi, in his his helpful book *Introduction to Logic*:\n\n _In some circumstances it can be safely assumed that if a certain event had occurred, evidence of it could be discovered by qualified investigators. In such circumstances it is perfectly reasonable to take the absence of proof of its occurrence as positive proof of its non-occurrence (1953, p. 95)_ \n\nThat is, *occurence* is not identical with *existence*. And my post is about the latter (and so are your objections).\n\n>Therefore, I think that the most rational position for 99% of the claims of existence without evidence is first and foremost the doubt, the demand for some evidence, and not simply agnosticism. Adopting agnosticism just because you can not prove otherwise would be almost like a reversal of the burden of proof.\n\nI don't where you get that number. However, I see no reason to deny that agnoticism is not compatible with dobut and the demand for some evidence. Perhaps you want to show your evidence for this too? \n\n>What is affirmed without proof can be rejected without proof, that is the general rule.\n\nMay know where you get this general rule you affirm? (And by the way, you need to show your proof for this too!)\n\nAnd lastly, please upvote this if you think the conversation is fruitful. Thank you for engaging my first post! :)",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"religion\"],\"users\":[\"discernente\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}"
}
]
}2017/08/15 08:30:09
2017/08/15 08:30:09
| parent author | platosophia |
| parent permlink | has-the-gardener-showed-up |
| author | steemitboard |
| permlink | steemitboard-notify-platosophia-20170815t083011000z |
| title | |
| body | Congratulations @platosophia! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) : [](http://steemitboard.com/@platosophia) You got a First Vote [](http://steemitboard.com/@platosophia) You got a First Reply Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard. For more information about SteemitBoard, click [here](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard) If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word `STOP` > By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how [here](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/http-i-cubeupload-com-7ciqeo-png)! |
| json metadata | {"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notifications.png"]} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14590950/Trx d443d7d54cf83ad914c6604b6db7c954b8c0c237 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "d443d7d54cf83ad914c6604b6db7c954b8c0c237",
"block": 14590950,
"trx_in_block": 17,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-15T08:30:09",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "platosophia",
"parent_permlink": "has-the-gardener-showed-up",
"author": "steemitboard",
"permlink": "steemitboard-notify-platosophia-20170815t083011000z",
"title": "",
"body": "Congratulations @platosophia! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :\n\n[](http://steemitboard.com/@platosophia) You got a First Vote\n[](http://steemitboard.com/@platosophia) You got a First Reply\n\nClick on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.\nFor more information about SteemitBoard, click [here](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard)\n\nIf you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word `STOP`\n\n> By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how [here](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/http-i-cubeupload-com-7ciqeo-png)!",
"json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notifications.png\"]}"
}
]
}2017/08/15 03:26:09
2017/08/15 03:26:09
| voter | jrubes |
| author | platosophia |
| permlink | re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t142707560z |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #14584870/Trx c604d2f89f9c0403a22489d5a2a0b6acef426097 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "c604d2f89f9c0403a22489d5a2a0b6acef426097",
"block": 14584870,
"trx_in_block": 12,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-15T03:26:09",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "jrubes",
"author": "platosophia",
"permlink": "re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t142707560z",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}2017/08/15 00:17:27
2017/08/15 00:17:27
| parent author | platosophia |
| parent permlink | re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t142707560z |
| author | discernente |
| permlink | re-platosophia-re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t001102024z |
| title | |
| body | @@ -549,16 +549,21 @@ the way, + does absolut @@ -584,17 +584,16 @@ en exist -s ? But re |
| json metadata | {"tags":["religion"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14581096/Trx 972c0365eb5b596bc038e2e0a2c1378cb576e71b |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "972c0365eb5b596bc038e2e0a2c1378cb576e71b",
"block": 14581096,
"trx_in_block": 8,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-15T00:17:27",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "platosophia",
"parent_permlink": "re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t142707560z",
"author": "discernente",
"permlink": "re-platosophia-re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t001102024z",
"title": "",
"body": "@@ -549,16 +549,21 @@\n the way,\n+ does\n absolut\n@@ -584,17 +584,16 @@\n en exist\n-s\n ? But re\n",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"religion\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}"
}
]
}2017/08/15 00:11:00
2017/08/15 00:11:00
| parent author | platosophia |
| parent permlink | re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t142707560z |
| author | discernente |
| permlink | re-platosophia-re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t001102024z |
| title | |
| body | >Good point. Yes, if I understand where you are coming from, you are claiming that there are some things we don't believe to exist because we have no evidence for it. You are correct. For instance, a flying crocodile or a unicorn. We are perfectly rational to hold the belief that both don't exist with the absence of any evidence. But that doesn't mean it's logically impossible that both of them don't exist. Although experience tells us that it's highly plausible that they don't. In reality we never have absolute certainties in this life. By the way, absolute certainty even exists? But regardless, what I meant is that our rational standard is that things without evidence do not exist until proven otherwise. It is more rational not to believe in the existence of things without any evidence, than to simply believe and even propagate this belief without proving anything of what is being affirmed. That sounds even slightly arrogant and dishonest intellectually. >However, when we say "absence of evidence does not mean the evidence of absence," we need to understand this in a context of a debate where two sides are claiming to have opposing view points. For instance, suppose that two people (i.e., John and James) are discussing whether Batanes Island exists. Now for John, since he went there for summer and took a photo of him in its beach, he is perfectly rational to hold the belief that that island exists. But for James, who just heard the island for the first time, he cannot claim that Batanes island doesn't exist (although he can believe that it doesn't) because he simply doesn't have any evidence for it, because John is claiming the opposite and showing some evidences. Thus, the best position for James would be agnosticism. (Of course, that doesn't mean that James can no longer believe that that island doesn't exit. But that's not equal to saying that the island doesn't exist. For one reason that the first one is a belief about how the world is, and the second one is how the world really is). Well IMHO I think that the context matters little, since the question is objective. What matters is the affirmation itself, of the objective existence in the real world of something without having to prove it. The human mind is prodigal in imagining things, but not even 1% of the things we imagine exist in the factual reality outside our imagination. Thus, regardless of context, whenever the claim is that there is something without any evidence, the first natural reaction of any rational person should be the doubt and the demand for some evidence. Therefore, I think that the most rational position for 99% of the claims of existence without evidence is first and foremost the doubt, the demand for some evidence, and not simply agnosticism. Adopting agnosticism just because you can not prove otherwise would be almost like a reversal of the burden of proof. What is affirmed without proof can be rejected without proof, that is the general rule. |
| json metadata | {"tags":["religion"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14580967/Trx 4b80bb2377a12faf9b99af0184cd6bc227144c8f |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "4b80bb2377a12faf9b99af0184cd6bc227144c8f",
"block": 14580967,
"trx_in_block": 8,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-15T00:11:00",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "platosophia",
"parent_permlink": "re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t142707560z",
"author": "discernente",
"permlink": "re-platosophia-re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t001102024z",
"title": "",
"body": ">Good point. Yes, if I understand where you are coming from, you are claiming that there are some things we don't believe to exist because we have no evidence for it. You are correct. For instance, a flying crocodile or a unicorn. We are perfectly rational to hold the belief that both don't exist with the absence of any evidence. But that doesn't mean it's logically impossible that both of them don't exist. Although experience tells us that it's highly plausible that they don't.\n\nIn reality we never have absolute certainties in this life. By the way, absolute certainty even exists? But regardless, what I meant is that our rational standard is that things without evidence do not exist until proven otherwise. It is more rational not to believe in the existence of things without any evidence, than to simply believe and even propagate this belief without proving anything of what is being affirmed. That sounds even slightly arrogant and dishonest intellectually.\n\n>However, when we say \"absence of evidence does not mean the evidence of absence,\" we need to understand this in a context of a debate where two sides are claiming to have opposing view points. For instance, suppose that two people (i.e., John and James) are discussing whether Batanes Island exists. Now for John, since he went there for summer and took a photo of him in its beach, he is perfectly rational to hold the belief that that island exists. But for James, who just heard the island for the first time, he cannot claim that Batanes island doesn't exist (although he can believe that it doesn't) because he simply doesn't have any evidence for it, because John is claiming the opposite and showing some evidences. Thus, the best position for James would be agnosticism. (Of course, that doesn't mean that James can no longer believe that that island doesn't exit. But that's not equal to saying that the island doesn't exist. For one reason that the first one is a belief about how the world is, and the second one is how the world really is).\n\nWell IMHO I think that the context matters little, since the question is objective. What matters is the affirmation itself, of the objective existence in the real world of something without having to prove it. The human mind is prodigal in imagining things, but not even 1% of the things we imagine exist in the factual reality outside our imagination. \n\nThus, regardless of context, whenever the claim is that there is something without any evidence, the first natural reaction of any rational person should be the doubt and the demand for some evidence. \n\nTherefore, I think that the most rational position for 99% of the claims of existence without evidence is first and foremost the doubt, the demand for some evidence, and not simply agnosticism. Adopting agnosticism just because you can not prove otherwise would be almost like a reversal of the burden of proof.\n\nWhat is affirmed without proof can be rejected without proof, that is the general rule.",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"religion\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}"
}
]
}2017/08/14 23:29:18
2017/08/14 23:29:18
| parent author | discernente |
| parent permlink | re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170814t205221682z |
| author | platosophia |
| permlink | re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t142707560z |
| title | |
| body | Good point. Yes, if I understand where you are coming from, you are claiming that *there are some things we don't believe to exist because we have no evidence for it.* You are correct. For instance, a flying crocodile or a unicorn. We are perfectly rational to hold the belief that both don't exist with the absence of any evidence. But that doesn't mean it's *logically impossible* that both of them don't exist. Although experience tells us that it's highly plausible that they don't. However, when we say "absence of evidence does not mean the evidence of absence," we need to understand this in a context of a debate where two sides are claiming to have opposing view points. For instance, suppose that two people (i.e., John and James) are discussing whether Batanes Island exists. Now for John, since he went there for summer and took a photo of him in its beach, he is perfectly rational to hold the belief that that island exists. But for James, who just heard the island for the first time, he cannot claim that *Batanes island doesn't exist* (although he can *believe* that it doesn't) because he simply doesn't have any evidence for it, because John is claiming the opposite and showing some evidences. Thus, the best position for James would be agnosticism. (Of course, that doesn't mean that James can no longer *believe* that that island doesn't exit. But that's not equal to saying that the island doesn't exist. For one reason that the first one is a belief about how the world is, and the second one is how the world really is). |
| json metadata | {"tags":["religion"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14580133/Trx 46dc641dfefab068e8727744123ffb7ef11e9093 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "46dc641dfefab068e8727744123ffb7ef11e9093",
"block": 14580133,
"trx_in_block": 1,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-14T23:29:18",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "discernente",
"parent_permlink": "re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170814t205221682z",
"author": "platosophia",
"permlink": "re-discernente-re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170815t142707560z",
"title": "",
"body": "Good point. Yes, if I understand where you are coming from, you are claiming that *there are some things we don't believe to exist because we have no evidence for it.* You are correct. For instance, a flying crocodile or a unicorn. We are perfectly rational to hold the belief that both don't exist with the absence of any evidence. But that doesn't mean it's *logically impossible* that both of them don't exist. Although experience tells us that it's highly plausible that they don't.\n\nHowever, when we say \"absence of evidence does not mean the evidence of absence,\" we need to understand this in a context of a debate where two sides are claiming to have opposing view points. For instance, suppose that two people (i.e., John and James) are discussing whether Batanes Island exists. Now for John, since he went there for summer and took a photo of him in its beach, he is perfectly rational to hold the belief that that island exists. But for James, who just heard the island for the first time, he cannot claim that *Batanes island doesn't exist* (although he can *believe* that it doesn't) because he simply doesn't have any evidence for it, because John is claiming the opposite and showing some evidences. Thus, the best position for James would be agnosticism. (Of course, that doesn't mean that James can no longer *believe* that that island doesn't exit. But that's not equal to saying that the island doesn't exist. For one reason that the first one is a belief about how the world is, and the second one is how the world really is).",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"religion\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}"
}
]
}2017/08/14 20:52:21
2017/08/14 20:52:21
| parent author | platosophia |
| parent permlink | has-the-gardener-showed-up |
| author | discernente |
| permlink | re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170814t205221682z |
| title | |
| body | “absence of evidence does not mean the evidence of absence.” I disagree with that sentence, because everything that you do not believe, it is just because you don't have any evidence for that. What else could be? |
| json metadata | {"tags":["religion"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14576994/Trx 44426fc4bafb181c27731d7d0357b5f1ea5bcba9 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "44426fc4bafb181c27731d7d0357b5f1ea5bcba9",
"block": 14576994,
"trx_in_block": 7,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-14T20:52:21",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "platosophia",
"parent_permlink": "has-the-gardener-showed-up",
"author": "discernente",
"permlink": "re-platosophia-has-the-gardener-showed-up-20170814t205221682z",
"title": "",
"body": "“absence of evidence does not mean the evidence of absence.”\n\nI disagree with that sentence, because everything that you do not believe, it is just because you don't have any evidence for that. What else could be?",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"religion\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}"
}
]
}discernenteupvoted (100.00%) @platosophia / has-the-gardener-showed-up2017/08/14 20:51:00
discernenteupvoted (100.00%) @platosophia / has-the-gardener-showed-up
2017/08/14 20:51:00
| voter | discernente |
| author | platosophia |
| permlink | has-the-gardener-showed-up |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #14576967/Trx ab3ed0400f527373ed2a5b25369d08dc9e6ca0ca |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "ab3ed0400f527373ed2a5b25369d08dc9e6ca0ca",
"block": 14576967,
"trx_in_block": 5,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-14T20:51:00",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "discernente",
"author": "platosophia",
"permlink": "has-the-gardener-showed-up",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}2017/08/14 17:52:39
2017/08/14 17:52:39
| parent author | platosophia |
| parent permlink | has-the-gardener-showed-up |
| author | steemitboard |
| permlink | steemitboard-notify-platosophia-20170814t175239000z |
| title | |
| body | Congratulations @platosophia! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) : [](http://steemitboard.com/@platosophia) You published your First Post Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard. For more information about SteemitBoard, click [here](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard) If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word `STOP` > By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how [here](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/http-i-cubeupload-com-7ciqeo-png)! |
| json metadata | {"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notifications.png"]} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14573401/Trx 9505b9f21b5ec5c44d4366628b14d72d1bf98de9 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "9505b9f21b5ec5c44d4366628b14d72d1bf98de9",
"block": 14573401,
"trx_in_block": 4,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-14T17:52:39",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "platosophia",
"parent_permlink": "has-the-gardener-showed-up",
"author": "steemitboard",
"permlink": "steemitboard-notify-platosophia-20170814t175239000z",
"title": "",
"body": "Congratulations @platosophia! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :\n\n[](http://steemitboard.com/@platosophia) You published your First Post\n\nClick on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.\nFor more information about SteemitBoard, click [here](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard)\n\nIf you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word `STOP`\n\n> By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how [here](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/http-i-cubeupload-com-7ciqeo-png)!",
"json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notifications.png\"]}"
}
]
}platosophiaupdated their account properties2017/08/14 15:02:06
platosophiaupdated their account properties
2017/08/14 15:02:06
| account | platosophia |
| memo key | STM63SdEzxVvnJ8m8Aok98DxhYbmUB3bz3upzQgb8RANxs4CcPqSV |
| json metadata | {"profile":{"profile_image":"https://s12.postimg.org/cpr1wsynx/i_KIXzkh7_400x400.jpg","about":"Bachelors in Science in Computer Science. Masters of Arts in Philosophy. Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/jairohtuada","website":"https://whoneedstruth.wordpress.com"}} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14569990/Trx da71ad441725d3dab0d0662f970dcff9732011a2 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "da71ad441725d3dab0d0662f970dcff9732011a2",
"block": 14569990,
"trx_in_block": 29,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-14T15:02:06",
"op": [
"account_update",
{
"account": "platosophia",
"memo_key": "STM63SdEzxVvnJ8m8Aok98DxhYbmUB3bz3upzQgb8RANxs4CcPqSV",
"json_metadata": "{\"profile\":{\"profile_image\":\"https://s12.postimg.org/cpr1wsynx/i_KIXzkh7_400x400.jpg\",\"about\":\"Bachelors in Science in Computer Science. Masters of Arts in Philosophy. Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/jairohtuada\",\"website\":\"https://whoneedstruth.wordpress.com\"}}"
}
]
}platosophiaupdated their account properties2017/08/14 15:01:21
platosophiaupdated their account properties
2017/08/14 15:01:21
| account | platosophia |
| memo key | STM63SdEzxVvnJ8m8Aok98DxhYbmUB3bz3upzQgb8RANxs4CcPqSV |
| json metadata | {"profile":{"profile_image":"https://s12.postimg.org/cpr1wsynx/i_KIXzkh7_400x400.jpg","about":"Bachelors in Science in Computer Science; Masters of Arts in Philosophy. Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/jairohtuada","website":"https://whoneedstruth.wordpress.com"}} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14569975/Trx a38b9dc29e23674928a972975b4194bbefa4ecf2 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "a38b9dc29e23674928a972975b4194bbefa4ecf2",
"block": 14569975,
"trx_in_block": 16,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-14T15:01:21",
"op": [
"account_update",
{
"account": "platosophia",
"memo_key": "STM63SdEzxVvnJ8m8Aok98DxhYbmUB3bz3upzQgb8RANxs4CcPqSV",
"json_metadata": "{\"profile\":{\"profile_image\":\"https://s12.postimg.org/cpr1wsynx/i_KIXzkh7_400x400.jpg\",\"about\":\"Bachelors in Science in Computer Science; Masters of Arts in Philosophy. Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/jairohtuada\",\"website\":\"https://whoneedstruth.wordpress.com\"}}"
}
]
}platosophiapublished a new post: has-the-gardener-showed-up2017/08/14 14:56:06
platosophiapublished a new post: has-the-gardener-showed-up
2017/08/14 14:56:06
| parent author | |
| parent permlink | religion |
| author | platosophia |
| permlink | has-the-gardener-showed-up |
| title | Has the gardener showed up? |
| body | @@ -1,8 +1,184 @@ +https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/64/Creaci%25C3%25B3n_de_Ad%25C3%25A1n_%2528Miguel_%25C3%2581ngel%2529.jpg/1200px-Creaci%25C3%25B3n_de_Ad%25C3%25A1n_%2528Miguel_%25C3%2581ngel%2529.jpg%0A%0A *Does Go @@ -4019,8 +4019,33 @@ : 45-75. +%0A%0AImage Source: Wikipedia |
| json metadata | {"tags":["religion","philosophy","atheism","christianity","apologetics"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown","image":["https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/64/Creaci%C3%B3n_de_Ad%C3%A1n_%28Miguel_%C3%81ngel%29.jpg/1200px-Creaci%C3%B3n_de_Ad%C3%A1n_%28Miguel_%C3%81ngel%29.jpg"]} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14569870/Trx 4bdfd0f9753a25041d6f581c36469d9d6bfd4b2a |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "4bdfd0f9753a25041d6f581c36469d9d6bfd4b2a",
"block": 14569870,
"trx_in_block": 3,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-14T14:56:06",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "",
"parent_permlink": "religion",
"author": "platosophia",
"permlink": "has-the-gardener-showed-up",
"title": "Has the gardener showed up?",
"body": "@@ -1,8 +1,184 @@\n+https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/64/Creaci%25C3%25B3n_de_Ad%25C3%25A1n_%2528Miguel_%25C3%2581ngel%2529.jpg/1200px-Creaci%25C3%25B3n_de_Ad%25C3%25A1n_%2528Miguel_%25C3%2581ngel%2529.jpg%0A%0A\n *Does Go\n@@ -4019,8 +4019,33 @@\n : 45-75.\n+%0A%0AImage Source: Wikipedia\n",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"religion\",\"philosophy\",\"atheism\",\"christianity\",\"apologetics\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\",\"image\":[\"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/64/Creaci%C3%B3n_de_Ad%C3%A1n_%28Miguel_%C3%81ngel%29.jpg/1200px-Creaci%C3%B3n_de_Ad%C3%A1n_%28Miguel_%C3%81ngel%29.jpg\"]}"
}
]
}platosophiapublished a new post: has-the-gardener-showed-up2017/08/14 14:52:30
platosophiapublished a new post: has-the-gardener-showed-up
2017/08/14 14:52:30
| parent author | |
| parent permlink | religion |
| author | platosophia |
| permlink | has-the-gardener-showed-up |
| title | Has the gardener showed up? |
| body | *Does God exist?* <b>Scientific naturalists</b> often claim that we don’t have any evidence for that. A lot of them identify themselves as atheists. That is, positively claiming that <b>God does not exist</b>. But generally, the “absence of evidence does not mean the evidence of absence.” Thus, the consistent position should be <b>agnosticism</b> (i.e., claiming to <b>know nothing</b> positive or negative about the issue). Atheism, however, has been defended by the late philosopher <b>Antony Flew</b> (1923-2010) for much of his life. He was even considered as the most widely read skeptic for half a century. His popularity was also factored by his popularization of the *<b>Parable of the Invisible Gardener</b>*: _Once upon a time two explorers came upon a clearing in the jungle. In the clearing were growing many flowers and many weeds. One explorer says, "Some gardener must tend this plot." The other disagrees, "There is no gardener." So they pitch their tents and set a watch. No gardener is ever seen. "But perhaps he is an invisible gardener." So they set up a barbed-wire fence. They electrify it. They patrol with bloodhounds. (For they remember how H. G. Well's The Invisible Man could be both smelt and touched though he could not be seen.) But no shrieks ever suggest that some intruder has received a shock. No movements of the wire ever betray an invisible climber. The bloodhounds never give cry. Yet still the Believer is not convinced. "But there is a gardener, invisible, intangible, insensible, to electric shocks, a gardener who has no scent and makes no sound, a gardener who comes secretly to look after the garden which he loves. At last the Sceptic despairs, "But what remains of your original assertion? Just how does what you call an invisible, intangible, eternally elusive gardener differ from an imaginary gardener or even from no gardener at all?" (Flew 1950)._ However, few years before his death, Flew changed his mind. He renounced atheism and began to consider himself as a <b>deist</b>. And that conversion lead him to publish his last book entitled *There Is a God* (2007). How come? Well, Flew admits that the discovery of <b>DNA</b> “has shown [him], by the almost unbelievable complexity of the arrangements which are needed to produce life, that intelligence must have been involved.” In other words, *the information in the DNA cries out for an intelligence!* As Bill Gates confessed: “DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created” (1995). Unfortunately, deism only leaves you with a god who doesn’t care. Or perhaps a father who abandoned and walked his own way, while leaving his children bewildered. But this is not the case for <b>Christianity</b>. As the scholar <b>John Warwick Montgomery</b> responded to Flew’s parable: _In Christianity we do not have merely an allegation that the garden of this world is tended by a loving Gardener; we have the actual empirical entrance of the Gardener into the human scene in the person of <b>Jesus Christ</b> (John 20:14-15), and this entrance is verifiable by way of his resurrection (see Montgomery 1956 on issues of theological verification)._ So to answer the title, yes, the gardener showed up. He was not only the gardener but the <b>Creator</b> as well (c.f., John 1:3). And he went even further to die with two pieces of wood for the sins of the world, just to offer forgiveness and life for those who believe in him. <h2>References:</h2> Flew, Antony. "Theology and Falsification." (1950). —. *There is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind*. New York: HarperCollins, 2007. Print. Gates, Bill. *The Road Ahead*. 1995: Viking Press, n.d. Print. Montgomery, John W. "Inspiration and Innerancy: A New Departure." *Evangelical Society Bulletin 8 1956*: 45-75. |
| json metadata | {"tags":["religion","philosophy","atheism","christianity","apologetics"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14569798/Trx f3f9aba11966f0c0ebd4e55bd93e3d8bca06c08e |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "f3f9aba11966f0c0ebd4e55bd93e3d8bca06c08e",
"block": 14569798,
"trx_in_block": 25,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-14T14:52:30",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "",
"parent_permlink": "religion",
"author": "platosophia",
"permlink": "has-the-gardener-showed-up",
"title": "Has the gardener showed up?",
"body": "*Does God exist?* \n\n<b>Scientific naturalists</b> often claim that we don’t have any evidence for that. A lot of them identify themselves as atheists. That is, positively claiming that <b>God does not exist</b>. \n\nBut generally, the “absence of evidence does not mean the evidence of absence.” Thus, the consistent position should be <b>agnosticism</b> (i.e., claiming to <b>know nothing</b> positive or negative about the issue). \n\nAtheism, however, has been defended by the late philosopher <b>Antony Flew</b> (1923-2010) for much of his life. He was even considered as the most widely read skeptic for half a century. His popularity was also factored by his popularization of the *<b>Parable of the Invisible Gardener</b>*: \n\n_Once upon a time two explorers came upon a clearing in the jungle. In the clearing were growing many flowers and many weeds. One explorer says, \"Some gardener must tend this plot.\" The other disagrees, \"There is no gardener.\" So they pitch their tents and set a watch. No gardener is ever seen. \"But perhaps he is an invisible gardener.\" So they set up a barbed-wire fence. They electrify it. They patrol with bloodhounds. (For they remember how H. G. Well's The Invisible Man could be both smelt and touched though he could not be seen.) But no shrieks ever suggest that some intruder has received a shock. No movements of the wire ever betray an invisible climber. The bloodhounds never give cry. Yet still the Believer is not convinced. \"But there is a gardener, invisible, intangible, insensible, to electric shocks, a gardener who has no scent and makes no sound, a gardener who comes secretly to look after the garden which he loves. At last the Sceptic despairs, \"But what remains of your original assertion? Just how does what you call an invisible, intangible, eternally elusive gardener differ from an imaginary gardener or even from no gardener at all?\" (Flew 1950)._\n\nHowever, few years before his death, Flew changed his mind. He renounced atheism and began to consider himself as a <b>deist</b>. And that conversion lead him to publish his last book entitled *There Is a God* (2007). \n\nHow come? \n\nWell, Flew admits that the discovery of <b>DNA</b> “has shown [him], by the almost unbelievable complexity of the arrangements which are needed to produce life, that intelligence must have been involved.” In other words, *the information in the DNA cries out for an intelligence!* As Bill Gates confessed: “DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created” (1995).\n\nUnfortunately, deism only leaves you with a god who doesn’t care. Or perhaps a father who abandoned and walked his own way, while leaving his children bewildered. \n\nBut this is not the case for <b>Christianity</b>. As the scholar <b>John Warwick Montgomery</b> responded to Flew’s parable:\n\n_In Christianity we do not have merely an allegation that the garden of this world is tended by a loving Gardener; we have the actual empirical entrance of the Gardener into the human scene in the person of <b>Jesus Christ</b> (John 20:14-15), and this entrance is verifiable by way of his resurrection (see Montgomery 1956 on issues of theological verification)._\n\nSo to answer the title, yes, the gardener showed up. He was not only the gardener but the <b>Creator</b> as well (c.f., John 1:3). And he went even further to die with two pieces of wood for the sins of the world, just to offer forgiveness and life for those who believe in him.\n\n<h2>References:</h2> \nFlew, Antony. \"Theology and Falsification.\" (1950).\n—. *There is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind*. New York: HarperCollins, 2007. Print.\nGates, Bill. *The Road Ahead*. 1995: Viking Press, n.d. Print.\nMontgomery, John W. \"Inspiration and Innerancy: A New Departure.\" *Evangelical Society Bulletin 8 1956*: 45-75.",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"religion\",\"philosophy\",\"atheism\",\"christianity\",\"apologetics\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
}
]
}platosophiapublished a new post: has-the-gardener-showed-up2017/08/14 14:39:36
platosophiapublished a new post: has-the-gardener-showed-up
2017/08/14 14:39:36
| parent author | |
| parent permlink | religion |
| author | platosophia |
| permlink | has-the-gardener-showed-up |
| title | Has the gardener showed up? |
| body | *Does God exist?* <b>Scientific naturalists</b> often claim that we don’t have any evidence for that. A lot of them identify themselves as atheists. That is, positively claiming that <b>God does not exist</b>. But generally, the “absence of evidence does not mean the evidence of absence.” Thus, the consistent position should be <b>agnosticism</b> (i.e., claiming to <b>know nothing</b> positive or negative about the issue). Atheism, however, has been defended by the late philosopher <b>Antony Flew</b> (1923-2010) for much of his life. He was even considered as the most widely read skeptic for half a century. His popularity was also factored by his popularization of the *<b>Parable of the Invisible Gardener</b>*: _Once upon a time two explorers came upon a clearing in the jungle. In the clearing were growing many flowers and many weeds. One explorer says, "Some gardener must tend this plot." The other disagrees, "There is no gardener." So they pitch their tents and set a watch. No gardener is ever seen. "But perhaps he is an invisible gardener." So they set up a barbed-wire fence. They electrify it. They patrol with bloodhounds. (For they remember how H. G. Well's The Invisible Man could be both smelt and touched though he could not be seen.) But no shrieks ever suggest that some intruder has received a shock. No movements of the wire ever betray an invisible climber. The bloodhounds never give cry. Yet still the Believer is not convinced. "But there is a gardener, invisible, intangible, insensible, to electric shocks, a gardener who has no scent and makes no sound, a gardener who comes secretly to look after the garden which he loves. At last the Sceptic despairs, "But what remains of your original assertion? Just how does what you call an invisible, intangible, eternally elusive gardener differ from an imaginary gardener or even from no gardener at all?" (Flew 1950)._ However, few years before his death, Flew changed his mind. He renounced atheism and began to consider himself as a <b>deist</b>. And that conversion lead him to publish his last book entitled *There Is a God* (2007). How come? Well, Flew admits that the discovery of <b>DNA</b> “has shown [him], by the almost unbelievable complexity of the arrangements which are needed to produce life, that intelligence must have been involved.” In other words, *the information in the DNA cries out for an intelligence!* As Bill Gates confessed: “DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created” (1995). Unfortunately, deism only leaves you with a god who doesn’t care. Or perhaps a father who abandoned and walked his own way, while leaving his children bewildered. But this is not the case for <b>Christianity</b>. As the scholar <b>John Warwick Montgomery</b> responded to Flew’s parable: _In Christianity we do not have merely an allegation that the garden of this world is tended by a loving Gardener; we have the actual empirical entrance of the Gardener into the human scene in the person of <b>Jesus Christ</b> (John 20:14-15), and this entrance is verifiable by way of his resurrection (see Montgomery 1956 on issues of theological verification)._ So to answer the title, yes, the gardener showed up. He was not only the gardener but the <b>Creator</b> as well (c.f., John 1:3). And he went even further to die with two pieces of wood for the sins of the world, just to offer forgiveness and life for those who believe in him. <h2>References:</h2> Flew, Antony. "Theology and Falsification." (1950). —. *There is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind*. New York: HarperCollins, 2007. Print. Gates, Bill. *The Road Ahead*. 1995: Viking Press, n.d. Print. Montgomery, John W. "Inspiration and Innerancy: A New Departure." *Evangelical Society Bulletin 8 1956*: 45-75. |
| json metadata | {"tags":["religion","philosophy","atheism","christianity","apologetics"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14569540/Trx 20821700a8489da4fc06116c559b1920ac099c2d |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "20821700a8489da4fc06116c559b1920ac099c2d",
"block": 14569540,
"trx_in_block": 15,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-14T14:39:36",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "",
"parent_permlink": "religion",
"author": "platosophia",
"permlink": "has-the-gardener-showed-up",
"title": "Has the gardener showed up?",
"body": "*Does God exist?* \n\n<b>Scientific naturalists</b> often claim that we don’t have any evidence for that. A lot of them identify themselves as atheists. That is, positively claiming that <b>God does not exist</b>. \n\nBut generally, the “absence of evidence does not mean the evidence of absence.” Thus, the consistent position should be <b>agnosticism</b> (i.e., claiming to <b>know nothing</b> positive or negative about the issue). \n\nAtheism, however, has been defended by the late philosopher <b>Antony Flew</b> (1923-2010) for much of his life. He was even considered as the most widely read skeptic for half a century. His popularity was also factored by his popularization of the *<b>Parable of the Invisible Gardener</b>*: \n\n_Once upon a time two explorers came upon a clearing in the jungle. In the clearing were growing many flowers and many weeds. One explorer says, \"Some gardener must tend this plot.\" The other disagrees, \"There is no gardener.\" So they pitch their tents and set a watch. No gardener is ever seen. \"But perhaps he is an invisible gardener.\" So they set up a barbed-wire fence. They electrify it. They patrol with bloodhounds. (For they remember how H. G. Well's The Invisible Man could be both smelt and touched though he could not be seen.) But no shrieks ever suggest that some intruder has received a shock. No movements of the wire ever betray an invisible climber. The bloodhounds never give cry. Yet still the Believer is not convinced. \"But there is a gardener, invisible, intangible, insensible, to electric shocks, a gardener who has no scent and makes no sound, a gardener who comes secretly to look after the garden which he loves. At last the Sceptic despairs, \"But what remains of your original assertion? Just how does what you call an invisible, intangible, eternally elusive gardener differ from an imaginary gardener or even from no gardener at all?\" (Flew 1950)._\n\nHowever, few years before his death, Flew changed his mind. He renounced atheism and began to consider himself as a <b>deist</b>. And that conversion lead him to publish his last book entitled *There Is a God* (2007). \n\nHow come? \n\nWell, Flew admits that the discovery of <b>DNA</b> “has shown [him], by the almost unbelievable complexity of the arrangements which are needed to produce life, that intelligence must have been involved.” In other words, *the information in the DNA cries out for an intelligence!* As Bill Gates confessed: “DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created” (1995).\n\nUnfortunately, deism only leaves you with a god who doesn’t care. Or perhaps a father who abandoned and walked his own way, while leaving his children bewildered. \n\nBut this is not the case for <b>Christianity</b>. As the scholar <b>John Warwick Montgomery</b> responded to Flew’s parable:\n\n_In Christianity we do not have merely an allegation that the garden of this world is tended by a loving Gardener; we have the actual empirical entrance of the Gardener into the human scene in the person of <b>Jesus Christ</b> (John 20:14-15), and this entrance is verifiable by way of his resurrection (see Montgomery 1956 on issues of theological verification)._\n\nSo to answer the title, yes, the gardener showed up. He was not only the gardener but the <b>Creator</b> as well (c.f., John 1:3). And he went even further to die with two pieces of wood for the sins of the world, just to offer forgiveness and life for those who believe in him.\n\n<h2>References:</h2> \nFlew, Antony. \"Theology and Falsification.\" (1950).\n—. *There is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind*. New York: HarperCollins, 2007. Print.\nGates, Bill. *The Road Ahead*. 1995: Viking Press, n.d. Print.\nMontgomery, John W. \"Inspiration and Innerancy: A New Departure.\" *Evangelical Society Bulletin 8 1956*: 45-75.",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"religion\",\"philosophy\",\"atheism\",\"christianity\",\"apologetics\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
}
]
}platosophiapublished a new post: has-the-gardener-showed-up2017/08/14 14:38:54
platosophiapublished a new post: has-the-gardener-showed-up
2017/08/14 14:38:54
| parent author | |
| parent permlink | religion |
| author | platosophia |
| permlink | has-the-gardener-showed-up |
| title | Has the gardener showed up? |
| body | *Does God exist?* <b>Scientific naturalists</b> often claim that we don’t have any evidence for that. A lot of them identify themselves as atheists. That is, positively claiming that <b>God does not exist</b>. But generally, the “absence of evidence does not mean the evidence of absence.” Thus, the consistent position should be <b>agnosticism</b> (i.e., claiming to <b>know nothing</b> positive or negative about the issue). Atheism, however, has been defended by the late philosopher <b>Antony Flew</b> (1923-2010) for much of his life. He was even considered as the most widely read skeptic for half a century. His popularity was also factored by his popularization of the *<b>Parable of the Invisible Gardener</b>*: _Once upon a time two explorers came upon a clearing in the jungle. In the clearing were growing many flowers and many weeds. One explorer says, "Some gardener must tend this plot." The other disagrees, "There is no gardener." So they pitch their tents and set a watch. No gardener is ever seen. "But perhaps he is an invisible gardener." So they set up a barbed-wire fence. They electrify it. They patrol with bloodhounds. (For they remember how H. G. Well's The Invisible Man could be both smelt and touched though he could not be seen.) But no shrieks ever suggest that some intruder has received a shock. No movements of the wire ever betray an invisible climber. The bloodhounds never give cry. Yet still the Believer is not convinced. "But there is a gardener, invisible, intangible, insensible, to electric shocks, a gardener who has no scent and makes no sound, a gardener who comes secretly to look after the garden which he loves. At last the Sceptic despairs, "But what remains of your original assertion? Just how does what you call an invisible, intangible, eternally elusive gardener differ from an imaginary gardener or even from no gardener at all?" (Flew 1950)._ However, few years before his death, Flew changed his mind. He renounced atheism and began to consider himself as a <b>deist</b>. And that conversion lead him to publish his last book entitled *There Is a God* (2007). How come? Well, Flew admits that the discovery of <b>DNA</b> “has shown [him], by the almost unbelievable complexity of the arrangements which are needed to produce life, that intelligence must have been involved.” In other words, *the information in the DNA cries out for an intelligence!* As Bill Gates confessed: “DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created” (1995). Unfortunately, deism only leaves you with a god who doesn’t care. Or perhaps a father who abandoned and walked his own way, while leaving his children bewildered. But this is not the case for <b>Christianity</b>. As the scholar <b>John Warwick Montgomery</b> responded to Flew’s parable: _In Christianity we do not have merely an allegation that the garden of this world is tended by a loving Gardener; we have the actual empirical entrance of the Gardener into the human scene in the person of <b>Jesus Christ</b> (John 20:14-15), and this entrance is verifiable by way of his resurrection (see Montgomery 1956 on issues of theological verification)._ So to answer the title, yes, the gardener showed up. He was not only the gardener but the <b>Creator</b> as well (c.f., John 1:3). And he went even further to die with two pieces of wood for the sins of the world, just to offer forgiveness and life for those who believe in him. <h2>References:</h2> Flew, Antony. "Theology and Falsification." (1950). —. *There is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind*. New York: HarperCollins, 2007. Print. Gates, Bill. *The Road Ahead*. 1995: Viking Press, n.d. Print. Montgomery, John W. "Inspiration and Innerancy: A New Departure." *Evangelical Society Bulletin 8 1956*: 45-75. |
| json metadata | {"tags":["religion"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14569526/Trx 378ab0b80e9405f9624299e42512b346a5562bcf |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "378ab0b80e9405f9624299e42512b346a5562bcf",
"block": 14569526,
"trx_in_block": 22,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-14T14:38:54",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "",
"parent_permlink": "religion",
"author": "platosophia",
"permlink": "has-the-gardener-showed-up",
"title": "Has the gardener showed up?",
"body": "*Does God exist?* \n\n<b>Scientific naturalists</b> often claim that we don’t have any evidence for that. A lot of them identify themselves as atheists. That is, positively claiming that <b>God does not exist</b>. \n\nBut generally, the “absence of evidence does not mean the evidence of absence.” Thus, the consistent position should be <b>agnosticism</b> (i.e., claiming to <b>know nothing</b> positive or negative about the issue). \n\nAtheism, however, has been defended by the late philosopher <b>Antony Flew</b> (1923-2010) for much of his life. He was even considered as the most widely read skeptic for half a century. His popularity was also factored by his popularization of the *<b>Parable of the Invisible Gardener</b>*: \n\n_Once upon a time two explorers came upon a clearing in the jungle. In the clearing were growing many flowers and many weeds. One explorer says, \"Some gardener must tend this plot.\" The other disagrees, \"There is no gardener.\" So they pitch their tents and set a watch. No gardener is ever seen. \"But perhaps he is an invisible gardener.\" So they set up a barbed-wire fence. They electrify it. They patrol with bloodhounds. (For they remember how H. G. Well's The Invisible Man could be both smelt and touched though he could not be seen.) But no shrieks ever suggest that some intruder has received a shock. No movements of the wire ever betray an invisible climber. The bloodhounds never give cry. Yet still the Believer is not convinced. \"But there is a gardener, invisible, intangible, insensible, to electric shocks, a gardener who has no scent and makes no sound, a gardener who comes secretly to look after the garden which he loves. At last the Sceptic despairs, \"But what remains of your original assertion? Just how does what you call an invisible, intangible, eternally elusive gardener differ from an imaginary gardener or even from no gardener at all?\" (Flew 1950)._\n\nHowever, few years before his death, Flew changed his mind. He renounced atheism and began to consider himself as a <b>deist</b>. And that conversion lead him to publish his last book entitled *There Is a God* (2007). \n\nHow come? \n\nWell, Flew admits that the discovery of <b>DNA</b> “has shown [him], by the almost unbelievable complexity of the arrangements which are needed to produce life, that intelligence must have been involved.” In other words, *the information in the DNA cries out for an intelligence!* As Bill Gates confessed: “DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created” (1995).\n\nUnfortunately, deism only leaves you with a god who doesn’t care. Or perhaps a father who abandoned and walked his own way, while leaving his children bewildered. \n\nBut this is not the case for <b>Christianity</b>. As the scholar <b>John Warwick Montgomery</b> responded to Flew’s parable:\n\n_In Christianity we do not have merely an allegation that the garden of this world is tended by a loving Gardener; we have the actual empirical entrance of the Gardener into the human scene in the person of <b>Jesus Christ</b> (John 20:14-15), and this entrance is verifiable by way of his resurrection (see Montgomery 1956 on issues of theological verification)._\n\nSo to answer the title, yes, the gardener showed up. He was not only the gardener but the <b>Creator</b> as well (c.f., John 1:3). And he went even further to die with two pieces of wood for the sins of the world, just to offer forgiveness and life for those who believe in him.\n\n<h2>References:</h2> \nFlew, Antony. \"Theology and Falsification.\" (1950).\n—. *There is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind*. New York: HarperCollins, 2007. Print.\nGates, Bill. *The Road Ahead*. 1995: Viking Press, n.d. Print.\nMontgomery, John W. \"Inspiration and Innerancy: A New Departure.\" *Evangelical Society Bulletin 8 1956*: 45-75.",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"religion\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
}
]
}2017/08/14 08:21:39
2017/08/14 08:21:39
| parent author | thecryptofiend |
| parent permlink | the-missing-faq-a-beginners-guide-to-using-steemit |
| author | platosophia |
| permlink | re-thecryptofiend-the-missing-faq-a-beginners-guide-to-using-steemit-20170814t231931246z |
| title | |
| body | This post is very helpful. I'll be visiting this once in a while. Thank you! |
| json metadata | {"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14561982/Trx 27ecb1648859cdcc0bdd5e16025488b5c55b40d7 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "27ecb1648859cdcc0bdd5e16025488b5c55b40d7",
"block": 14561982,
"trx_in_block": 18,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-14T08:21:39",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "thecryptofiend",
"parent_permlink": "the-missing-faq-a-beginners-guide-to-using-steemit",
"author": "platosophia",
"permlink": "re-thecryptofiend-the-missing-faq-a-beginners-guide-to-using-steemit-20170814t231931246z",
"title": "",
"body": "This post is very helpful. I'll be visiting this once in a while. Thank you!",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"steemit\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}"
}
]
}platosophiaupvoted (100.00%) @thecryptofiend / the-missing-faq-a-beginners-guide-to-using-steemit2017/08/14 08:20:39
platosophiaupvoted (100.00%) @thecryptofiend / the-missing-faq-a-beginners-guide-to-using-steemit
2017/08/14 08:20:39
| voter | platosophia |
| author | thecryptofiend |
| permlink | the-missing-faq-a-beginners-guide-to-using-steemit |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #14561962/Trx 0acc2007d7c8349f888f59b56f72ae6640c07422 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "0acc2007d7c8349f888f59b56f72ae6640c07422",
"block": 14561962,
"trx_in_block": 7,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-14T08:20:39",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "platosophia",
"author": "thecryptofiend",
"permlink": "the-missing-faq-a-beginners-guide-to-using-steemit",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}platosophiaupdated their account properties2017/08/14 08:00:54
platosophiaupdated their account properties
2017/08/14 08:00:54
| account | platosophia |
| memo key | STM63SdEzxVvnJ8m8Aok98DxhYbmUB3bz3upzQgb8RANxs4CcPqSV |
| json metadata | {"profile":{"profile_image":"https://s12.postimg.org/cpr1wsynx/i_KIXzkh7_400x400.jpg"}} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14561567/Trx 773e7570346e2e3acb3ad0a23d094cf2e7e095fc |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "773e7570346e2e3acb3ad0a23d094cf2e7e095fc",
"block": 14561567,
"trx_in_block": 5,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-14T08:00:54",
"op": [
"account_update",
{
"account": "platosophia",
"memo_key": "STM63SdEzxVvnJ8m8Aok98DxhYbmUB3bz3upzQgb8RANxs4CcPqSV",
"json_metadata": "{\"profile\":{\"profile_image\":\"https://s12.postimg.org/cpr1wsynx/i_KIXzkh7_400x400.jpg\"}}"
}
]
}platosophiaupdated their account properties2017/08/14 08:00:21
platosophiaupdated their account properties
2017/08/14 08:00:21
| account | platosophia |
| memo key | STM63SdEzxVvnJ8m8Aok98DxhYbmUB3bz3upzQgb8RANxs4CcPqSV |
| json metadata | {"profile":{"profile_image":"https://postimg.org/image/tdijzatfd/"}} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14561556/Trx 55cec2b04d8be11558813e69c7a73584d5612ea9 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "55cec2b04d8be11558813e69c7a73584d5612ea9",
"block": 14561556,
"trx_in_block": 4,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-14T08:00:21",
"op": [
"account_update",
{
"account": "platosophia",
"memo_key": "STM63SdEzxVvnJ8m8Aok98DxhYbmUB3bz3upzQgb8RANxs4CcPqSV",
"json_metadata": "{\"profile\":{\"profile_image\":\"https://postimg.org/image/tdijzatfd/\"}}"
}
]
}platosophiaupdated their account properties2017/08/14 07:40:12
platosophiaupdated their account properties
2017/08/14 07:40:12
| account | platosophia |
| memo key | STM63SdEzxVvnJ8m8Aok98DxhYbmUB3bz3upzQgb8RANxs4CcPqSV |
| json metadata | {"profile":{"profile_image":"https://plus.google.com/u/0/photos/106853380886891679260/albums/profile/6317915473659518690"}} |
| Transaction Info | Block #14561153/Trx 54aa323e48e2756a63af7819915dc711b981eaeb |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "54aa323e48e2756a63af7819915dc711b981eaeb",
"block": 14561153,
"trx_in_block": 16,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-14T07:40:12",
"op": [
"account_update",
{
"account": "platosophia",
"memo_key": "STM63SdEzxVvnJ8m8Aok98DxhYbmUB3bz3upzQgb8RANxs4CcPqSV",
"json_metadata": "{\"profile\":{\"profile_image\":\"https://plus.google.com/u/0/photos/106853380886891679260/albums/profile/6317915473659518690\"}}"
}
]
}steemcreated a new account: @platosophia2017/08/12 12:52:48
steemcreated a new account: @platosophia
2017/08/12 12:52:48
| fee | 0.500 STEEM |
| delegation | 57000.000000 VESTS |
| creator | steem |
| new account name | platosophia |
| owner | {"weight_threshold":1,"account_auths":[],"key_auths":[["STM7P1qeyyf8mWLCP393qGEqi8o9gZLPwr6yPWKG15FmuPEmA3H4P",1]]} |
| active | {"weight_threshold":1,"account_auths":[],"key_auths":[["STM5uZ41LLp52QTwfcCrapw7bKVETdQHQTAPUB6hW4qDzKWqNCP2y",1]]} |
| posting | {"weight_threshold":1,"account_auths":[],"key_auths":[["STM6xmfedSHCtD2pbeyGJsa8bg8xqBc4pHnaUyq5KyScfW9kGWQXc",1]]} |
| memo key | STM63SdEzxVvnJ8m8Aok98DxhYbmUB3bz3upzQgb8RANxs4CcPqSV |
| json metadata | |
| extensions | [] |
| Transaction Info | Block #14510506/Trx ff6e5a62c3df29631449f357bb5d97d2eb327d74 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "ff6e5a62c3df29631449f357bb5d97d2eb327d74",
"block": 14510506,
"trx_in_block": 22,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-12T12:52:48",
"op": [
"account_create_with_delegation",
{
"fee": "0.500 STEEM",
"delegation": "57000.000000 VESTS",
"creator": "steem",
"new_account_name": "platosophia",
"owner": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM7P1qeyyf8mWLCP393qGEqi8o9gZLPwr6yPWKG15FmuPEmA3H4P",
1
]
]
},
"active": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM5uZ41LLp52QTwfcCrapw7bKVETdQHQTAPUB6hW4qDzKWqNCP2y",
1
]
]
},
"posting": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM6xmfedSHCtD2pbeyGJsa8bg8xqBc4pHnaUyq5KyScfW9kGWQXc",
1
]
]
},
"memo_key": "STM63SdEzxVvnJ8m8Aok98DxhYbmUB3bz3upzQgb8RANxs4CcPqSV",
"json_metadata": "",
"extensions": []
}
]
}Manabar
Voting Power100.00%
Downvote Power100.00%
Resource Credits100.00%
Reputation Progress0.00%
{
"voting_manabar": {
"current_mana": "8143659806",
"last_update_time": 1779080943
},
"downvote_manabar": {
"current_mana": 2035914951,
"last_update_time": 1779080943
},
"rc_account": {
"account": "platosophia",
"rc_manabar": {
"current_mana": "10164408779",
"last_update_time": 1779080943
},
"max_rc_creation_adjustment": {
"amount": "2020748973",
"precision": 6,
"nai": "@@000000037"
},
"max_rc": "10164408779"
}
}Account Metadata
| POSTING JSON METADATA | |
| profile | {"profile_image":"https://s12.postimg.org/cpr1wsynx/i_KIXzkh7_400x400.jpg","about":"Bachelors in Science in Computer Science. Masters of Arts in Philosophy. Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/jairohtuada","website":"https://whoneedstruth.wordpress.com"} |
| JSON METADATA | |
| profile | {"profile_image":"https://s12.postimg.org/cpr1wsynx/i_KIXzkh7_400x400.jpg","about":"Bachelors in Science in Computer Science. Masters of Arts in Philosophy. Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/jairohtuada","website":"https://whoneedstruth.wordpress.com"} |
{
"posting_json_metadata": {
"profile": {
"profile_image": "https://s12.postimg.org/cpr1wsynx/i_KIXzkh7_400x400.jpg",
"about": "Bachelors in Science in Computer Science. Masters of Arts in Philosophy. Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/jairohtuada",
"website": "https://whoneedstruth.wordpress.com"
}
},
"json_metadata": {
"profile": {
"profile_image": "https://s12.postimg.org/cpr1wsynx/i_KIXzkh7_400x400.jpg",
"about": "Bachelors in Science in Computer Science. Masters of Arts in Philosophy. Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/jairohtuada",
"website": "https://whoneedstruth.wordpress.com"
}
}
}Auth Keys
Owner
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM7P1qeyyf8mWLCP393qGEqi8o9gZLPwr6yPWKG15FmuPEmA3H4P1/1
Active
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM5uZ41LLp52QTwfcCrapw7bKVETdQHQTAPUB6hW4qDzKWqNCP2y1/1
Posting
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM6xmfedSHCtD2pbeyGJsa8bg8xqBc4pHnaUyq5KyScfW9kGWQXc1/1
Memo
STM63SdEzxVvnJ8m8Aok98DxhYbmUB3bz3upzQgb8RANxs4CcPqSV
{
"owner": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM7P1qeyyf8mWLCP393qGEqi8o9gZLPwr6yPWKG15FmuPEmA3H4P",
1
]
]
},
"active": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM5uZ41LLp52QTwfcCrapw7bKVETdQHQTAPUB6hW4qDzKWqNCP2y",
1
]
]
},
"posting": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM6xmfedSHCtD2pbeyGJsa8bg8xqBc4pHnaUyq5KyScfW9kGWQXc",
1
]
]
},
"memo": "STM63SdEzxVvnJ8m8Aok98DxhYbmUB3bz3upzQgb8RANxs4CcPqSV"
}Witness Votes
0 / 30
No active witness votes.
[]