VOTING POWER100.00%
DOWNVOTE POWER100.00%
RESOURCE CREDITS100.00%
REPUTATION PROGRESS22.13%
Net Worth
0.140USD
STEEM
0.002STEEM
SBD
0.000SBD
Effective Power
5.001SP
├── Own SP
2.609SP
└── Incoming DelegationsDeleg
+2.392SP
Detailed Balance
| STEEM | ||
| balance | 0.002STEEM | STEEM |
| market_balance | 0.000STEEM | STEEM |
| savings_balance | 0.000STEEM | STEEM |
| reward_steem_balance | 0.000STEEM | STEEM |
| STEEM POWER | ||
| Own SP | 2.609SP | SP |
| Delegated Out | 0.000SP | SP |
| Delegation In | 2.392SP | SP |
| Effective Power | 5.001SP | SP |
| Reward SP (pending) | 0.000SP | SP |
| SBD | ||
| sbd_balance | 0.000SBD | SBD |
| sbd_conversions | 0.000SBD | SBD |
| sbd_market_balance | 0.000SBD | SBD |
| savings_sbd_balance | 0.000SBD | SBD |
| reward_sbd_balance | 0.000SBD | SBD |
{
"balance": "0.002 STEEM",
"savings_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"reward_steem_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"vesting_shares": "4248.344070 VESTS",
"delegated_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
"received_vesting_shares": "3895.315736 VESTS",
"sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"savings_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"reward_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"conversions": []
}Account Info
| name | invictus6 |
| id | 184039 |
| rank | 1,036,841 |
| reputation | 17652773380 |
| created | 2017-06-09T13:43:39 |
| recovery_account | steem |
| proxy | None |
| post_count | 12 |
| comment_count | 0 |
| lifetime_vote_count | 0 |
| witnesses_voted_for | 0 |
| last_post | 2020-09-01T11:24:09 |
| last_root_post | 2020-09-01T11:24:09 |
| last_vote_time | 2020-09-01T11:30:30 |
| proxied_vsf_votes | 0, 0, 0, 0 |
| can_vote | 1 |
| voting_power | 0 |
| delayed_votes | 0 |
| balance | 0.002 STEEM |
| savings_balance | 0.000 STEEM |
| sbd_balance | 0.000 SBD |
| savings_sbd_balance | 0.000 SBD |
| vesting_shares | 4248.344070 VESTS |
| delegated_vesting_shares | 0.000000 VESTS |
| received_vesting_shares | 3895.315736 VESTS |
| reward_vesting_balance | 0.000000 VESTS |
| vesting_balance | 0.000 STEEM |
| vesting_withdraw_rate | 0.000000 VESTS |
| next_vesting_withdrawal | 1969-12-31T23:59:59 |
| withdrawn | 0 |
| to_withdraw | 0 |
| withdraw_routes | 0 |
| savings_withdraw_requests | 0 |
| last_account_recovery | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
| reset_account | null |
| last_owner_update | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
| last_account_update | 2017-06-10T03:35:00 |
| mined | No |
| sbd_seconds | 82,601,220 |
| sbd_last_interest_payment | 2017-06-10T02:25:03 |
| savings_sbd_last_interest_payment | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
{
"id": 184039,
"name": "invictus6",
"owner": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM5JydJgZZFuoditNrYuQxPriZhxsCwAGS76vxFJX3X7jUTicAJj",
1
]
]
},
"active": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM7tpAH1e6Hd9EbNyNBb5iR8rcr3c5HSBB73suMRA9YUHtHBgKrm",
1
]
]
},
"posting": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM6KhxjV3faPiZ5QcxGKYb38mJEHdZ1D74CkmHJbN5s3MDH5cvE2",
1
]
]
},
"memo_key": "STM8Z6YUVr6ck1dUQmR9mijRnjwZjQpPLwnmiisHy7jhcHYR1EPuv",
"json_metadata": "{\"profile\":{\"profile_image\":\"https://s2.postimg.org/49htwwxt5/IMG_1823.jpg\",\"name\":\"Invictus\",\"about\":\"Crypto connoisseur and aspiring writer\",\"location\":\"🇦🇺 \"}}",
"posting_json_metadata": "{\"profile\":{\"profile_image\":\"https://s2.postimg.org/49htwwxt5/IMG_1823.jpg\",\"name\":\"Invictus\",\"about\":\"Crypto connoisseur and aspiring writer\",\"location\":\"🇦🇺 \"}}",
"proxy": "",
"last_owner_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"last_account_update": "2017-06-10T03:35:00",
"created": "2017-06-09T13:43:39",
"mined": false,
"recovery_account": "steem",
"last_account_recovery": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"reset_account": "null",
"comment_count": 0,
"lifetime_vote_count": 0,
"post_count": 12,
"can_vote": true,
"voting_manabar": {
"current_mana": "8143659806",
"last_update_time": 1779067752
},
"downvote_manabar": {
"current_mana": 2035914951,
"last_update_time": 1779067752
},
"voting_power": 0,
"balance": "0.002 STEEM",
"savings_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"sbd_seconds": "82601220",
"sbd_seconds_last_update": "2017-06-18T03:16:54",
"sbd_last_interest_payment": "2017-06-10T02:25:03",
"savings_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"savings_sbd_seconds": "0",
"savings_sbd_seconds_last_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"savings_sbd_last_interest_payment": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"savings_withdraw_requests": 0,
"reward_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"reward_steem_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"reward_vesting_balance": "0.000000 VESTS",
"reward_vesting_steem": "0.000 STEEM",
"vesting_shares": "4248.344070 VESTS",
"delegated_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
"received_vesting_shares": "3895.315736 VESTS",
"vesting_withdraw_rate": "0.000000 VESTS",
"next_vesting_withdrawal": "1969-12-31T23:59:59",
"withdrawn": 0,
"to_withdraw": 0,
"withdraw_routes": 0,
"curation_rewards": 1,
"posting_rewards": 1600,
"proxied_vsf_votes": [
0,
0,
0,
0
],
"witnesses_voted_for": 0,
"last_post": "2020-09-01T11:24:09",
"last_root_post": "2020-09-01T11:24:09",
"last_vote_time": "2020-09-01T11:30:30",
"post_bandwidth": 0,
"pending_claimed_accounts": 0,
"vesting_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"reputation": "17652773380",
"transfer_history": [],
"market_history": [],
"post_history": [],
"vote_history": [],
"other_history": [],
"witness_votes": [],
"tags_usage": [],
"guest_bloggers": [],
"rank": 1036841
}Withdraw Routes
| Incoming | Outgoing |
|---|---|
Empty | Empty |
{
"incoming": [],
"outgoing": []
}From Date
To Date
steemdelegated 2.392 SP to @invictus62026/05/18 01:29:12
steemdelegated 2.392 SP to @invictus6
2026/05/18 01:29:12
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 3895.315736 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #106144919/Trx 4eec7a9ebf8473f7a5f02ee712fad19389fdc6ec |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "4eec7a9ebf8473f7a5f02ee712fad19389fdc6ec",
"block": 106144919,
"trx_in_block": 0,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2026-05-18T01:29:12",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "3895.315736 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 1.001 SP to @invictus62026/05/12 08:51:03
steemdelegated 1.001 SP to @invictus6
2026/05/12 08:51:03
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 1629.434820 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #105981711/Trx 28429096b5a325ef9e13803c7018a8808a5a2ea9 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "28429096b5a325ef9e13803c7018a8808a5a2ea9",
"block": 105981711,
"trx_in_block": 1,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2026-05-12T08:51:03",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "1629.434820 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 2.400 SP to @invictus62026/04/26 00:48:06
steemdelegated 2.400 SP to @invictus6
2026/04/26 00:48:06
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 3907.831492 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #105512538/Trx cf8eada27c69c2e339b825b2555c962307b0db4d |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "cf8eada27c69c2e339b825b2555c962307b0db4d",
"block": 105512538,
"trx_in_block": 0,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2026-04-26T00:48:06",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "3907.831492 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 1.070 SP to @invictus62023/11/13 22:06:30
steemdelegated 1.070 SP to @invictus6
2023/11/13 22:06:30
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 1741.904685 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #79856335/Trx 6d0a37a9262da5433b37cb80fd3e361bcbd8391d |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "6d0a37a9262da5433b37cb80fd3e361bcbd8391d",
"block": 79856335,
"trx_in_block": 3,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2023-11-13T22:06:30",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "1741.904685 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 2.761 SP to @invictus62023/09/21 23:17:21
steemdelegated 2.761 SP to @invictus6
2023/09/21 23:17:21
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 4495.283665 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #78349576/Trx e3db69801ec71c106094c60a6829a1fd49e69dfd |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "e3db69801ec71c106094c60a6829a1fd49e69dfd",
"block": 78349576,
"trx_in_block": 3,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2023-09-21T23:17:21",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "4495.283665 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 2.897 SP to @invictus62022/11/03 12:53:24
steemdelegated 2.897 SP to @invictus6
2022/11/03 12:53:24
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 4716.965103 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #69114678/Trx 1b7884a1f75d6da3fba3cbd2a450ff12fdb4415e |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "1b7884a1f75d6da3fba3cbd2a450ff12fdb4415e",
"block": 69114678,
"trx_in_block": 7,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2022-11-03T12:53:24",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "4716.965103 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 3.036 SP to @invictus62022/01/09 21:29:09
steemdelegated 3.036 SP to @invictus6
2022/01/09 21:29:09
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 4943.513805 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #60592815/Trx 4c97937633f62562d9b06ceb8821d23ef800a5f0 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "4c97937633f62562d9b06ceb8821d23ef800a5f0",
"block": 60592815,
"trx_in_block": 8,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2022-01-09T21:29:09",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "4943.513805 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 3.149 SP to @invictus62021/06/07 13:49:39
steemdelegated 3.149 SP to @invictus6
2021/06/07 13:49:39
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 5127.372499 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #54423119/Trx a9b930ed206b787ac5935027b8d91ca2f09fdf68 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "a9b930ed206b787ac5935027b8d91ca2f09fdf68",
"block": 54423119,
"trx_in_block": 1,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2021-06-07T13:49:39",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "5127.372499 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 3.264 SP to @invictus62020/12/05 15:50:42
steemdelegated 3.264 SP to @invictus6
2020/12/05 15:50:42
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 5314.896820 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #49191555/Trx 2f94248fdcb4009dd2869c5d6e72d653b74681d3 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "2f94248fdcb4009dd2869c5d6e72d653b74681d3",
"block": 49191555,
"trx_in_block": 1,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-12-05T15:50:42",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "5314.896820 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 1.175 SP to @invictus62020/12/01 21:58:54
steemdelegated 1.175 SP to @invictus6
2020/12/01 21:58:54
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 1913.482850 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #49085670/Trx d371998cd7ea6b0c3e9f2936ea630472b0fad1b0 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "d371998cd7ea6b0c3e9f2936ea630472b0fad1b0",
"block": 49085670,
"trx_in_block": 0,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-12-01T21:58:54",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "1913.482850 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 3.286 SP to @invictus62020/11/02 17:54:57
steemdelegated 3.286 SP to @invictus6
2020/11/02 17:54:57
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 5351.741720 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #48260484/Trx 360e2496c6c22dec134ac8dea233192703a6170a |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "360e2496c6c22dec134ac8dea233192703a6170a",
"block": 48260484,
"trx_in_block": 2,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-11-02T17:54:57",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "5351.741720 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 16.392 SP to @invictus62020/10/28 10:28:36
steemdelegated 16.392 SP to @invictus6
2020/10/28 10:28:36
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 26693.401875 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #48110401/Trx 12675fc0bfced5f63b49984a45dca7b12349e8bf |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "12675fc0bfced5f63b49984a45dca7b12349e8bf",
"block": 48110401,
"trx_in_block": 2,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-10-28T10:28:36",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "26693.401875 VESTS"
}
]
}steemsheepupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-12020/09/01 13:14:27
steemsheepupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1
2020/09/01 13:14:27
| voter | steemsheep |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1 |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #46493678/Trx 047a3393ef14dcbf7dd583d421fcb38b829fd355 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "047a3393ef14dcbf7dd583d421fcb38b829fd355",
"block": 46493678,
"trx_in_block": 5,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-09-01T13:14:27",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "steemsheep",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}invictus6published a new post: fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-12020/09/01 12:03:21
invictus6published a new post: fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1
2020/09/01 12:03:21
| parent author | |
| parent permlink | hive-122315 |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1 |
| title | Fact checking the fact checkers: 'Plandemic: Indoctornation' [Part 1] |
| body | @@ -6262,16 +6262,18 @@ ve been +a 'modifie @@ -6274,16 +6274,40 @@ odified' + form of the coronavirus in orde @@ -6808,16 +6808,17 @@ gal.%E2%80%9D%0A%0A%0A +# #### If |
| json metadata | {"image":["https://i.imgur.com/LkvUzR4.png"],"links":["https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/","https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome","https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf","https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf","https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379","https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html","https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment","https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents","https://indoctornation.site"],"app":"steemit/0.2","format":"markdown","tags":["covid19","coronavirus","plandemic","pandemic","covid","usa","journalism"]} |
| Transaction Info | Block #46492271/Trx cefa745e4f680a2ba70c179ff3883562e9a01473 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "cefa745e4f680a2ba70c179ff3883562e9a01473",
"block": 46492271,
"trx_in_block": 5,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-09-01T12:03:21",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "",
"parent_permlink": "hive-122315",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1",
"title": "Fact checking the fact checkers: 'Plandemic: Indoctornation' [Part 1]",
"body": "@@ -6262,16 +6262,18 @@\n ve been \n+a \n 'modifie\n@@ -6274,16 +6274,40 @@\n odified'\n+ form of the coronavirus\n in orde\n@@ -6808,16 +6808,17 @@\n gal.%E2%80%9D%0A%0A%0A\n+#\n #### If \n",
"json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://i.imgur.com/LkvUzR4.png\"],\"links\":[\"https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/\",\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome\",\"https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf\",\"https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf\",\"https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379\",\"https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html\",\"https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment\",\"https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents\",\"https://indoctornation.site\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\",\"tags\":[\"covid19\",\"coronavirus\",\"plandemic\",\"pandemic\",\"covid\",\"usa\",\"journalism\"]}"
}
]
}invictus6upvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-12020/09/01 11:30:30
invictus6upvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1
2020/09/01 11:30:30
| voter | invictus6 |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1 |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #46491624/Trx bc786cf62282db121cbdef46f8c79cb6c8c34315 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "bc786cf62282db121cbdef46f8c79cb6c8c34315",
"block": 46491624,
"trx_in_block": 1,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-09-01T11:30:30",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "invictus6",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}invictus6published a new post: fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-12020/09/01 11:25:27
invictus6published a new post: fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1
2020/09/01 11:25:27
| parent author | |
| parent permlink | hive-122315 |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1 |
| title | Fact checking the fact checkers: 'Plandemic: Indoctornation' [Part 1] |
| body | ### USA Today's fact check can be accessed [here](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/). Today I will be fact checking the portion of the article that is located below. Let's begin.  First note that only one fact checker (from what I’ve seen) has contested the patent claim made in the documentary. This is very telling. As the 'check' states, products of nature are not eligible for patent protection, and *complimentary DNA* is. Notice the last part that they added? It’s completely irrelevant, yet they still go on to elaborate upon it with: >“About 20 pages of the patent describe the process of isolating the genome, including the synthesis of cDNA.” In this context specifically, there is only one part of the patent that matters. USA Today discloses it. >"Coronavirus isolated from humans," Patent #7,220,852 B1 — includes the "**isolated coronavirus genome**, isolated coronavirus proteins, and isolated nucleic acid molecules." Up to scratch? The patent includes the isolated GENOME of the virus. A [genome](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome) is the “genetic material of an organism”, consisting of DNA or RNA. To reiterate, the patent, accessible [here](https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf), makes it very clear that the **"invention relates to a newly isolated human coronavirus. More particularly, it relates to an isolated coronavirus genome…”** (kind of ironic how they use the word 'invention'). In 2013, "*Justice Thomas’s unanimous opinion in Myriad held that isolated DNA segments were nonpatentable products of nature because the patent claimed naturally occurring genetic information*" (https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf, pg. 17). ​ To this point, the fact check has been effectively useless. Let’s see what else it mentions. >Experts also noted that other steps in the process — like stripping genetic material from its chromosome and creating copies, or the use of biotechnology in general — likely made the patent viable. Which ‘experts’? I thought this was a fact check, not an appeal to authority. Anyway, let's see what these experts had to say. ​ ### Key quotes from [article 1](https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379): Regarding the general principles shared by countries with regard to patent law: >You can’t patent something that is naturally occurring, \[Schwartz\] says, but if an organism is modified in some way, it is patentable. Yep, that makes sense. SARS-CoV could be a coronavirus that has been ‘modified’, or optimised, for both severity and transmissibility in humans. >In the case of a gene, modifying its information or removing it from its chromosome typically would be enough to warrant a patent, says Schwartz, because the snippet of chromosome would not appear in nature by itself. Sure thing! The patent is for an entire virus though! Does this mean that the virus would not appear in nature by itself? Because that’s the only way it could be legal. >*This is a key point in the case of the novel coronavirus.* Oh wait... **THIS ARTICLE IS OLD. IT IS ABOUT MERS.** Its subtitle? *“Dutch group patented genome of Middle East coronavirus, which has killed more than 30 people”.* MERS was the novel coronavirus at the time of publishing. Looks like it’s irrelevant to the fact-check at hand. Article dismissed. ​ ### [Article 2](https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html) \- published May 29, 2003 **The ONLY relevant quote:** >Today, naturally occurring life forms remain ineligible for patent protection… However, **one could arguably patent any gene or life form that has been modified by biotechnology**, including genetic engineering. Right, so only one that's been **modified** can be patented. Like SARS-CoV? ​ ### Back to the fact check To recap, the fact check hasn’t argued anything relating to the point put forward by Dr. David E. Martin yet. >But just because the SARS-CoV patent was legal does not mean the virus was **man-made** or **manufactured**, as the video alleges. In a general sense, their own sources just corroborated that it would have to have been ‘man-made’. The only way the patent can be legal is if the genome was modified (e.g. “by biotechnology”). However, this sentence of the fact check is just a play on words. On the basis of semantics, the USA Today could argue that their statement is correct; said coronavirus was not ‘man-made', it was 'modified'. Equally, to modify does not mean to manufacture. ​ The author then mentions some seemingly obscure technology to befuddle the reader. >“The patent includes man-made technology used to sequence the virus' genome, not to manufacture the virus itself.” Scroll to page 16 of the patent document. Here, we see an ‘Overview of Several Embodiments’. It then, again, states what the patent is for; “A newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV).” A [patent embodiment](https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment) is defined as the "description of the production, use, practice, or expression of an invention in the patent application." As Dr. Martin correctly states within the documentary, the patent was filed "not only on the virus," but also **"on its detection and a kit to measure it."** This is what said ‘embodiments’ refer to, which constitute precisely the type of "*man-made technology used to sequence the virus' genome*" mentioned within the fact check. **For example (pg. 16):** >“An additional embodiment includes a kit for detecting a SARS-CoV in a sample”. No one ever made the claim that there was ‘man-made’ technology inside the patent to “manufacture the virus itself”. It is unclear why USA Today mentioned this. ​ ### Wrapping up In effect, the fact check accomplished **nothing**. [Another](https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents) fact check also acknowledges that the U.S. Supreme Court “ruled in 2013 that simply isolating a natural product is not enough to warrant a patent." Therefore, SARS-CoV MUST have been 'modified' in order for it to be patented. This is why it is IDIOTIC to trust fact checkers. **As Dr. Martin states:** > “Under 35 USC §101, nature is prohibited from being patented. Either SARS coronavirus was manufactured, therefore making a patent on it legal – or it was natural, therefore making a patent on it illegal. If it was manufactured, it was a violation of biological and chemical weapons, treaties and laws. If it was natural, filing a patent on it was illegal. In either outcome, both are illegal.” #### If you haven't already watched it, you can access the documentary at [indoctornation.site](https://indoctornation.site). |
| json metadata | {"image":["https://i.imgur.com/LkvUzR4.png"],"links":["https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/","https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome","https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf","https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf","https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379","https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html","https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment","https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents","https://indoctornation.site"],"app":"steemit/0.2","format":"markdown","tags":["covid19","coronavirus","plandemic","pandemic","covid","usa","journalism"]} |
| Transaction Info | Block #46491523/Trx 749ba36ecf5328e72170c18d23258e08d72d876b |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "749ba36ecf5328e72170c18d23258e08d72d876b",
"block": 46491523,
"trx_in_block": 1,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-09-01T11:25:27",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "",
"parent_permlink": "hive-122315",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1",
"title": "Fact checking the fact checkers: 'Plandemic: Indoctornation' [Part 1]",
"body": "### USA Today's fact check can be accessed [here](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/). Today I will be fact checking the portion of the article that is located below. Let's begin.\n\n\n\nFirst note that only one fact checker (from what I’ve seen) has contested the patent claim made in the documentary. This is very telling.\n\nAs the 'check' states, products of nature are not eligible for patent protection, and *complimentary DNA* is. Notice the last part that they added? It’s completely irrelevant, yet they still go on to elaborate upon it with:\n\n>“About 20 pages of the patent describe the process of isolating the genome, including the synthesis of cDNA.”\n\nIn this context specifically, there is only one part of the patent that matters. USA Today discloses it.\n\n>\"Coronavirus isolated from humans,\" Patent #7,220,852 B1 — includes the \"**isolated coronavirus genome**, isolated coronavirus proteins, and isolated nucleic acid molecules.\"\n\nUp to scratch? The patent includes the isolated GENOME of the virus. A [genome](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome) is the “genetic material of an organism”, consisting of DNA or RNA. To reiterate, the patent, accessible [here](https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf), makes it very clear that the **\"invention relates to a newly isolated human coronavirus. More particularly, it relates to an isolated coronavirus genome…”** (kind of ironic how they use the word 'invention').\n\nIn 2013, \"*Justice Thomas’s unanimous opinion in Myriad held that isolated DNA segments were nonpatentable products of nature because the patent claimed naturally occurring genetic information*\" (https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf, pg. 17).\n\n​\n\nTo this point, the fact check has been effectively useless. Let’s see what else it mentions.\n\n>Experts also noted that other steps in the process — like stripping genetic material from its chromosome and creating copies, or the use of biotechnology in general — likely made the patent viable.\n\nWhich ‘experts’? I thought this was a fact check, not an appeal to authority. Anyway, let's see what these experts had to say.\n\n​\n\n\n### Key quotes from [article 1](https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379):\n\nRegarding the general principles shared by countries with regard to patent law:\n\n>You can’t patent something that is naturally occurring, \\[Schwartz\\] says, but if an organism is modified in some way, it is patentable.\n\nYep, that makes sense. SARS-CoV could be a coronavirus that has been ‘modified’, or optimised, for both severity and transmissibility in humans.\n\n>In the case of a gene, modifying its information or removing it from its chromosome typically would be enough to warrant a patent, says Schwartz, because the snippet of chromosome would not appear in nature by itself.\n\nSure thing! The patent is for an entire virus though! Does this mean that the virus would not appear in nature by itself? Because that’s the only way it could be legal.\n\n>*This is a key point in the case of the novel coronavirus.*\n\nOh wait... **THIS ARTICLE IS OLD. IT IS ABOUT MERS.** Its subtitle? *“Dutch group patented genome of Middle East coronavirus, which has killed more than 30 people”.* MERS was the novel coronavirus at the time of publishing. Looks like it’s irrelevant to the fact-check at hand. Article dismissed.\n\n​\n\n### [Article 2](https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html) \\- published May 29, 2003\n\n**The ONLY relevant quote:**\n\n>Today, naturally occurring life forms remain ineligible for patent protection… However, **one could arguably patent any gene or life form that has been modified by biotechnology**, including genetic engineering.\n\nRight, so only one that's been **modified** can be patented. Like SARS-CoV?\n\n​\n\n### Back to the fact check\n\nTo recap, the fact check hasn’t argued anything relating to the point put forward by Dr. David E. Martin yet.\n\n>But just because the SARS-CoV patent was legal does not mean the virus was **man-made** or **manufactured**, as the video alleges.\n\nIn a general sense, their own sources just corroborated that it would have to have been ‘man-made’. The only way the patent can be legal is if the genome was modified (e.g. “by biotechnology”). However, this sentence of the fact check is just a play on words. On the basis of semantics, the USA Today could argue that their statement is correct; said coronavirus was not ‘man-made', it was 'modified'. Equally, to modify does not mean to manufacture.\n\n​\nThe author then mentions some seemingly obscure technology to befuddle the reader.\n>“The patent includes man-made technology used to sequence the virus' genome, not to manufacture the virus itself.”\n\nScroll to page 16 of the patent document. Here, we see an ‘Overview of Several Embodiments’. It then, again, states what the patent is for; “A newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV).” A [patent embodiment](https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment) is defined as the \"description of the production, use, practice, or expression of an invention in the patent application.\"\n\nAs Dr. Martin correctly states within the documentary, the patent was filed \"not only on the virus,\" but also **\"on its detection and a kit to measure it.\"** This is what said ‘embodiments’ refer to, which constitute precisely the type of \"*man-made technology used to sequence the virus' genome*\" mentioned within the fact check.\n\n**For example (pg. 16):**\n\n>“An additional embodiment includes a kit for detecting a SARS-CoV in a sample”.\n\nNo one ever made the claim that there was ‘man-made’ technology inside the patent to “manufacture the virus itself”. It is unclear why USA Today mentioned this.\n\n\n​\n### Wrapping up\n\nIn effect, the fact check accomplished **nothing**.\n\n[Another](https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents) fact check also acknowledges that the U.S. Supreme Court “ruled in 2013 that simply isolating a natural product is not enough to warrant a patent.\" Therefore, SARS-CoV MUST have been 'modified' in order for it to be patented. This is why it is IDIOTIC to trust fact checkers.\n\n\n**As Dr. Martin states:**\n\n> “Under 35 USC §101, nature is prohibited from being patented. Either SARS coronavirus was manufactured, therefore making a patent on it legal – or it was natural, therefore making a patent on it illegal. If it was manufactured, it was a violation of biological and chemical weapons, treaties and laws. If it was natural, filing a patent on it was illegal. In either outcome, both are illegal.”\n\n\n#### If you haven't already watched it, you can access the documentary at [indoctornation.site](https://indoctornation.site).",
"json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://i.imgur.com/LkvUzR4.png\"],\"links\":[\"https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/\",\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome\",\"https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf\",\"https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf\",\"https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379\",\"https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html\",\"https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment\",\"https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents\",\"https://indoctornation.site\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\",\"tags\":[\"covid19\",\"coronavirus\",\"plandemic\",\"pandemic\",\"covid\",\"usa\",\"journalism\"]}"
}
]
}invictus6published a new post: fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-12020/09/01 11:24:42
invictus6published a new post: fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1
2020/09/01 11:24:42
| parent author | |
| parent permlink | hive-122315 |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1 |
| title | Fact checking the fact checkers: 'Plandemic: Indoctornation' [Part 1] |
| body | ### USA Today's fact check can be accessed [here](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/). Today I will be fact checking the portion of the article that is located below. Let's begin.  First note that only one fact checker (from what I’ve seen) has contested the patent claim made in the documentary. This is very telling. As the 'check' states, products of nature are not eligible for patent protection, and *complimentary DNA* is. Notice the last part that they added? It’s completely irrelevant, yet they still go on to elaborate upon it with: >“About 20 pages of the patent describe the process of isolating the genome, including the synthesis of cDNA.” In this context specifically, there is only one part of the patent that matters. USA Today discloses it. >"Coronavirus isolated from humans," Patent #7,220,852 B1 — includes the "**isolated coronavirus genome**, isolated coronavirus proteins, and isolated nucleic acid molecules." Up to scratch? The patent includes the isolated GENOME of the virus. A [genome](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome) is the “genetic material of an organism”, consisting of DNA or RNA. To reiterate, the patent, accessible [here](https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf), makes it very clear that the **"invention relates to a newly isolated human coronavirus. More particularly, it relates to an isolated coronavirus genome…”** (kind of ironic how they use the word 'invention'). In 2013, "*Justice Thomas’s unanimous opinion in Myriad held that isolated DNA segments were nonpatentable products of nature because the patent claimed naturally occurring genetic information*" (https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf, pg. 17). ​ To this point, the fact check has been effectively useless. Let’s see what else it mentions. >Experts also noted that other steps in the process — like stripping genetic material from its chromosome and creating copies, or the use of biotechnology in general — likely made the patent viable. Which ‘experts’? I thought this was a fact check, not an appeal to authority. Anyway, let's see what these experts had to say. ​ ### Key quotes from [article 1](https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379): Regarding the general principles shared by countries with regard to patent law: >You can’t patent something that is naturally occurring, \[Schwartz\] says, but if an organism is modified in some way, it is patentable. Yep, that makes sense. SARS-CoV could be a coronavirus that has been ‘modified’, or optimised, for both severity and transmissibility in humans. >In the case of a gene, modifying its information or removing it from its chromosome typically would be enough to warrant a patent, says Schwartz, because the snippet of chromosome would not appear in nature by itself. Sure thing! The patent is for an entire virus though! Does this mean that the virus would not appear in nature by itself? Because that’s the only way it could be legal. >*This is a key point in the case of the novel coronavirus.* Oh wait... **THIS ARTICLE IS OLD. IT IS ABOUT MERS.** Its subtitle? *“Dutch group patented genome of Middle East coronavirus, which has killed more than 30 people”.* MERS was the novel coronavirus at the time of publishing. Looks like it’s irrelevant to the fact-check at hand. Article dismissed. ​ ### [Article 2](https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html) \- published May 29, 2003 **The ONLY relevant quote:** >Today, naturally occurring life forms remain ineligible for patent protection… However, **one could arguably patent any gene or life form that has been modified by biotechnology**, including genetic engineering. Right, so only one that's been **modified** can be patented. Like SARS-CoV? ​ ### Back to the fact check To recap, the fact check hasn’t argued anything relating to the point put forward by Dr. David E. Martin yet. >But just because the SARS-CoV patent was legal does not mean the virus was **man-made** or **manufactured**, as the video alleges. In a general sense, their own sources just corroborated that it would have to have been ‘man-made’. The only way the patent can be legal is if the genome was modified (e.g. “by biotechnology”). However, this sentence of the fact check is just a play on words. On the basis of semantics, the USA Today could argue that their statement is correct; said coronavirus was not ‘man-made', it was 'modified'. Equally, to modify does not mean to manufacture. ​ The author then mentions some seemingly obscure technology to befuddle the reader. >“The patent includes man-made technology used to sequence the virus' genome, not to manufacture the virus itself.” Scroll to page 16 of the patent document. Here, we see an ‘Overview of Several Embodiments’. It then, again, states what the patent is for; “A newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV).” A [patent embodiment](https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment) is defined as the "description of the production, use, practice, or expression of an invention in the patent application." As Dr. Martin correctly states within the documentary, the patent was filed "not only on the virus," but also **"on its detection and a kit to measure it."** This is what said ‘embodiments’ refer to, which constitute precisely the type of "*man-made technology used to sequence the virus' genome*" mentioned within the fact check. **For example (pg. 16):** >“An additional embodiment includes a kit for detecting a SARS-CoV in a sample”. No one ever made the claim that there was ‘man-made’ technology inside the patent to “manufacture the virus itself”. It is unclear why USA Today mentioned this. ​ ### Wrapping up In effect, the fact check accomplished **nothing**. [Another](https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents) fact check also acknowledges that the U.S. Supreme Court “ruled in 2013 that simply isolating a natural product is not enough to warrant a patent." Therefore, SARS-CoV MUST have been 'modified' in order for it to be patented. This is why it is IDIOTIC to trust fact checkers. **As Dr. Martin states:** > “Under 35 USC §101, nature is prohibited from being patented. Either SARS coronavirus was manufactured, therefore making a patent on it legal – or it was natural, therefore making a patent on it illegal. If it was manufactured, it was a violation of biological and chemical weapons, treaties and laws. If it was natural, filing a patent on it was illegal. In either outcome, both are illegal.” #### If you haven't already watched it, you can access the documentary at [indoctornation.site](https://indoctornation.site). |
| json metadata | {"image":["https://i.imgur.com/LkvUzR4.png"],"links":["https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/","https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome","https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf","https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf","https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379","https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html","https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment","https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents","https://indoctornation.site"],"app":"steemit/0.2","format":"markdown"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #46491509/Trx e9b2d97f694cf1613b4031273140678fa4d99168 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "e9b2d97f694cf1613b4031273140678fa4d99168",
"block": 46491509,
"trx_in_block": 2,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-09-01T11:24:42",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "",
"parent_permlink": "hive-122315",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1",
"title": "Fact checking the fact checkers: 'Plandemic: Indoctornation' [Part 1]",
"body": "### USA Today's fact check can be accessed [here](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/). Today I will be fact checking the portion of the article that is located below. Let's begin.\n\n\n\nFirst note that only one fact checker (from what I’ve seen) has contested the patent claim made in the documentary. This is very telling.\n\nAs the 'check' states, products of nature are not eligible for patent protection, and *complimentary DNA* is. Notice the last part that they added? It’s completely irrelevant, yet they still go on to elaborate upon it with:\n\n>“About 20 pages of the patent describe the process of isolating the genome, including the synthesis of cDNA.”\n\nIn this context specifically, there is only one part of the patent that matters. USA Today discloses it.\n\n>\"Coronavirus isolated from humans,\" Patent #7,220,852 B1 — includes the \"**isolated coronavirus genome**, isolated coronavirus proteins, and isolated nucleic acid molecules.\"\n\nUp to scratch? The patent includes the isolated GENOME of the virus. A [genome](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome) is the “genetic material of an organism”, consisting of DNA or RNA. To reiterate, the patent, accessible [here](https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf), makes it very clear that the **\"invention relates to a newly isolated human coronavirus. More particularly, it relates to an isolated coronavirus genome…”** (kind of ironic how they use the word 'invention').\n\nIn 2013, \"*Justice Thomas’s unanimous opinion in Myriad held that isolated DNA segments were nonpatentable products of nature because the patent claimed naturally occurring genetic information*\" (https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf, pg. 17).\n\n​\n\nTo this point, the fact check has been effectively useless. Let’s see what else it mentions.\n\n>Experts also noted that other steps in the process — like stripping genetic material from its chromosome and creating copies, or the use of biotechnology in general — likely made the patent viable.\n\nWhich ‘experts’? I thought this was a fact check, not an appeal to authority. Anyway, let's see what these experts had to say.\n\n​\n\n\n### Key quotes from [article 1](https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379):\n\nRegarding the general principles shared by countries with regard to patent law:\n\n>You can’t patent something that is naturally occurring, \\[Schwartz\\] says, but if an organism is modified in some way, it is patentable.\n\nYep, that makes sense. SARS-CoV could be a coronavirus that has been ‘modified’, or optimised, for both severity and transmissibility in humans.\n\n>In the case of a gene, modifying its information or removing it from its chromosome typically would be enough to warrant a patent, says Schwartz, because the snippet of chromosome would not appear in nature by itself.\n\nSure thing! The patent is for an entire virus though! Does this mean that the virus would not appear in nature by itself? Because that’s the only way it could be legal.\n\n>*This is a key point in the case of the novel coronavirus.*\n\nOh wait... **THIS ARTICLE IS OLD. IT IS ABOUT MERS.** Its subtitle? *“Dutch group patented genome of Middle East coronavirus, which has killed more than 30 people”.* MERS was the novel coronavirus at the time of publishing. Looks like it’s irrelevant to the fact-check at hand. Article dismissed.\n\n​\n\n### [Article 2](https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html) \\- published May 29, 2003\n\n**The ONLY relevant quote:**\n\n>Today, naturally occurring life forms remain ineligible for patent protection… However, **one could arguably patent any gene or life form that has been modified by biotechnology**, including genetic engineering.\n\nRight, so only one that's been **modified** can be patented. Like SARS-CoV?\n\n​\n\n### Back to the fact check\n\nTo recap, the fact check hasn’t argued anything relating to the point put forward by Dr. David E. Martin yet.\n\n>But just because the SARS-CoV patent was legal does not mean the virus was **man-made** or **manufactured**, as the video alleges.\n\nIn a general sense, their own sources just corroborated that it would have to have been ‘man-made’. The only way the patent can be legal is if the genome was modified (e.g. “by biotechnology”). However, this sentence of the fact check is just a play on words. On the basis of semantics, the USA Today could argue that their statement is correct; said coronavirus was not ‘man-made', it was 'modified'. Equally, to modify does not mean to manufacture.\n\n​\nThe author then mentions some seemingly obscure technology to befuddle the reader.\n>“The patent includes man-made technology used to sequence the virus' genome, not to manufacture the virus itself.”\n\nScroll to page 16 of the patent document. Here, we see an ‘Overview of Several Embodiments’. It then, again, states what the patent is for; “A newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV).” A [patent embodiment](https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment) is defined as the \"description of the production, use, practice, or expression of an invention in the patent application.\"\n\nAs Dr. Martin correctly states within the documentary, the patent was filed \"not only on the virus,\" but also **\"on its detection and a kit to measure it.\"** This is what said ‘embodiments’ refer to, which constitute precisely the type of \"*man-made technology used to sequence the virus' genome*\" mentioned within the fact check.\n\n**For example (pg. 16):**\n\n>“An additional embodiment includes a kit for detecting a SARS-CoV in a sample”.\n\nNo one ever made the claim that there was ‘man-made’ technology inside the patent to “manufacture the virus itself”. It is unclear why USA Today mentioned this.\n\n\n​\n### Wrapping up\n\nIn effect, the fact check accomplished **nothing**.\n\n[Another](https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents) fact check also acknowledges that the U.S. Supreme Court “ruled in 2013 that simply isolating a natural product is not enough to warrant a patent.\" Therefore, SARS-CoV MUST have been 'modified' in order for it to be patented. This is why it is IDIOTIC to trust fact checkers.\n\n\n**As Dr. Martin states:**\n\n> “Under 35 USC §101, nature is prohibited from being patented. Either SARS coronavirus was manufactured, therefore making a patent on it legal – or it was natural, therefore making a patent on it illegal. If it was manufactured, it was a violation of biological and chemical weapons, treaties and laws. If it was natural, filing a patent on it was illegal. In either outcome, both are illegal.”\n\n\n#### If you haven't already watched it, you can access the documentary at [indoctornation.site](https://indoctornation.site).",
"json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://i.imgur.com/LkvUzR4.png\"],\"links\":[\"https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/\",\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome\",\"https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf\",\"https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf\",\"https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379\",\"https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html\",\"https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment\",\"https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents\",\"https://indoctornation.site\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
}
]
}invictus6published a new post: fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-12020/09/01 11:24:09
invictus6published a new post: fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1
2020/09/01 11:24:09
| parent author | |
| parent permlink | hive-122315 |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1 |
| title | ## Fact checking the fact checkers: 'Plandemic: Indoctornation' [Part 1] |
| body | ### USA Today's fact check can be accessed [here](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/). Today I will be fact checking the portion of the article that is located below. Let's begin.  First note that only one fact checker (from what I’ve seen) has contested the patent claim made in the documentary. This is very telling. As the 'check' states, products of nature are not eligible for patent protection, and *complimentary DNA* is. Notice the last part that they added? It’s completely irrelevant, yet they still go on to elaborate upon it with: >“About 20 pages of the patent describe the process of isolating the genome, including the synthesis of cDNA.” In this context specifically, there is only one part of the patent that matters. USA Today discloses it. >"Coronavirus isolated from humans," Patent #7,220,852 B1 — includes the "**isolated coronavirus genome**, isolated coronavirus proteins, and isolated nucleic acid molecules." Up to scratch? The patent includes the isolated GENOME of the virus. A [genome](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome) is the “genetic material of an organism”, consisting of DNA or RNA. To reiterate, the patent, accessible [here](https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf), makes it very clear that the **"invention relates to a newly isolated human coronavirus. More particularly, it relates to an isolated coronavirus genome…”** (kind of ironic how they use the word 'invention'). In 2013, "*Justice Thomas’s unanimous opinion in Myriad held that isolated DNA segments were nonpatentable products of nature because the patent claimed naturally occurring genetic information*" (https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf, pg. 17). ​ To this point, the fact check has been effectively useless. Let’s see what else it mentions. >Experts also noted that other steps in the process — like stripping genetic material from its chromosome and creating copies, or the use of biotechnology in general — likely made the patent viable. Which ‘experts’? I thought this was a fact check, not an appeal to authority. Anyway, let's see what these experts had to say. ​ ### Key quotes from [article 1](https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379): Regarding the general principles shared by countries with regard to patent law: >You can’t patent something that is naturally occurring, \[Schwartz\] says, but if an organism is modified in some way, it is patentable. Yep, that makes sense. SARS-CoV could be a coronavirus that has been ‘modified’, or optimised, for both severity and transmissibility in humans. >In the case of a gene, modifying its information or removing it from its chromosome typically would be enough to warrant a patent, says Schwartz, because the snippet of chromosome would not appear in nature by itself. Sure thing! The patent is for an entire virus though! Does this mean that the virus would not appear in nature by itself? Because that’s the only way it could be legal. >*This is a key point in the case of the novel coronavirus.* Oh wait... **THIS ARTICLE IS OLD. IT IS ABOUT MERS.** Its subtitle? *“Dutch group patented genome of Middle East coronavirus, which has killed more than 30 people”.* MERS was the novel coronavirus at the time of publishing. Looks like it’s irrelevant to the fact-check at hand. Article dismissed. ​ ### [Article 2](https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html) \- published May 29, 2003 **The ONLY relevant quote:** >Today, naturally occurring life forms remain ineligible for patent protection… However, **one could arguably patent any gene or life form that has been modified by biotechnology**, including genetic engineering. Right, so only one that's been **modified** can be patented. Like SARS-CoV? ​ ### Back to the fact check To recap, the fact check hasn’t argued anything relating to the point put forward by Dr. David E. Martin yet. >But just because the SARS-CoV patent was legal does not mean the virus was **man-made** or **manufactured**, as the video alleges. In a general sense, their own sources just corroborated that it would have to have been ‘man-made’. The only way the patent can be legal is if the genome was modified (e.g. “by biotechnology”). However, this sentence of the fact check is just a play on words. On the basis of semantics, the USA Today could argue that their statement is correct; said coronavirus was not ‘man-made', it was 'modified'. Equally, to modify does not mean to manufacture. ​ The author then mentions some seemingly obscure technology to befuddle the reader. >“The patent includes man-made technology used to sequence the virus' genome, not to manufacture the virus itself.” Scroll to page 16 of the patent document. Here, we see an ‘Overview of Several Embodiments’. It then, again, states what the patent is for; “A newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV).” A [patent embodiment](https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment) is defined as the "description of the production, use, practice, or expression of an invention in the patent application." As Dr. Martin correctly states within the documentary, the patent was filed "not only on the virus," but also **"on its detection and a kit to measure it."** This is what said ‘embodiments’ refer to, which constitute precisely the type of "*man-made technology used to sequence the virus' genome*" mentioned within the fact check. **For example (pg. 16):** >“An additional embodiment includes a kit for detecting a SARS-CoV in a sample”. No one ever made the claim that there was ‘man-made’ technology inside the patent to “manufacture the virus itself”. It is unclear why USA Today mentioned this. ​ ### Wrapping up In effect, the fact check accomplished **nothing**. [Another](https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents) fact check also acknowledges that the U.S. Supreme Court “ruled in 2013 that simply isolating a natural product is not enough to warrant a patent." Therefore, SARS-CoV MUST have been 'modified' in order for it to be patented. This is why it is IDIOTIC to trust fact checkers. **As Dr. Martin states:** > “Under 35 USC §101, nature is prohibited from being patented. Either SARS coronavirus was manufactured, therefore making a patent on it legal – or it was natural, therefore making a patent on it illegal. If it was manufactured, it was a violation of biological and chemical weapons, treaties and laws. If it was natural, filing a patent on it was illegal. In either outcome, both are illegal.” #### If you haven't already watched it, you can access the documentary at [indoctornation.site](https://indoctornation.site). |
| json metadata | {"image":["https://i.imgur.com/LkvUzR4.png"],"links":["https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/","https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome","https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf","https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf","https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379","https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html","https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment","https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents","https://indoctornation.site"],"app":"steemit/0.2","format":"markdown"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #46491498/Trx 59c7bcd88818e21a83f5b0b2be2e43e9f84029c6 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "59c7bcd88818e21a83f5b0b2be2e43e9f84029c6",
"block": 46491498,
"trx_in_block": 6,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-09-01T11:24:09",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "",
"parent_permlink": "hive-122315",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-part-1",
"title": "## Fact checking the fact checkers: 'Plandemic: Indoctornation' [Part 1]",
"body": "### USA Today's fact check can be accessed [here](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/). Today I will be fact checking the portion of the article that is located below. Let's begin.\n\n\n\nFirst note that only one fact checker (from what I’ve seen) has contested the patent claim made in the documentary. This is very telling.\n\nAs the 'check' states, products of nature are not eligible for patent protection, and *complimentary DNA* is. Notice the last part that they added? It’s completely irrelevant, yet they still go on to elaborate upon it with:\n\n>“About 20 pages of the patent describe the process of isolating the genome, including the synthesis of cDNA.”\n\nIn this context specifically, there is only one part of the patent that matters. USA Today discloses it.\n\n>\"Coronavirus isolated from humans,\" Patent #7,220,852 B1 — includes the \"**isolated coronavirus genome**, isolated coronavirus proteins, and isolated nucleic acid molecules.\"\n\nUp to scratch? The patent includes the isolated GENOME of the virus. A [genome](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome) is the “genetic material of an organism”, consisting of DNA or RNA. To reiterate, the patent, accessible [here](https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf), makes it very clear that the **\"invention relates to a newly isolated human coronavirus. More particularly, it relates to an isolated coronavirus genome…”** (kind of ironic how they use the word 'invention').\n\nIn 2013, \"*Justice Thomas’s unanimous opinion in Myriad held that isolated DNA segments were nonpatentable products of nature because the patent claimed naturally occurring genetic information*\" (https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf, pg. 17).\n\n​\n\nTo this point, the fact check has been effectively useless. Let’s see what else it mentions.\n\n>Experts also noted that other steps in the process — like stripping genetic material from its chromosome and creating copies, or the use of biotechnology in general — likely made the patent viable.\n\nWhich ‘experts’? I thought this was a fact check, not an appeal to authority. Anyway, let's see what these experts had to say.\n\n​\n\n\n### Key quotes from [article 1](https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379):\n\nRegarding the general principles shared by countries with regard to patent law:\n\n>You can’t patent something that is naturally occurring, \\[Schwartz\\] says, but if an organism is modified in some way, it is patentable.\n\nYep, that makes sense. SARS-CoV could be a coronavirus that has been ‘modified’, or optimised, for both severity and transmissibility in humans.\n\n>In the case of a gene, modifying its information or removing it from its chromosome typically would be enough to warrant a patent, says Schwartz, because the snippet of chromosome would not appear in nature by itself.\n\nSure thing! The patent is for an entire virus though! Does this mean that the virus would not appear in nature by itself? Because that’s the only way it could be legal.\n\n>*This is a key point in the case of the novel coronavirus.*\n\nOh wait... **THIS ARTICLE IS OLD. IT IS ABOUT MERS.** Its subtitle? *“Dutch group patented genome of Middle East coronavirus, which has killed more than 30 people”.* MERS was the novel coronavirus at the time of publishing. Looks like it’s irrelevant to the fact-check at hand. Article dismissed.\n\n​\n\n### [Article 2](https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html) \\- published May 29, 2003\n\n**The ONLY relevant quote:**\n\n>Today, naturally occurring life forms remain ineligible for patent protection… However, **one could arguably patent any gene or life form that has been modified by biotechnology**, including genetic engineering.\n\nRight, so only one that's been **modified** can be patented. Like SARS-CoV?\n\n​\n\n### Back to the fact check\n\nTo recap, the fact check hasn’t argued anything relating to the point put forward by Dr. David E. Martin yet.\n\n>But just because the SARS-CoV patent was legal does not mean the virus was **man-made** or **manufactured**, as the video alleges.\n\nIn a general sense, their own sources just corroborated that it would have to have been ‘man-made’. The only way the patent can be legal is if the genome was modified (e.g. “by biotechnology”). However, this sentence of the fact check is just a play on words. On the basis of semantics, the USA Today could argue that their statement is correct; said coronavirus was not ‘man-made', it was 'modified'. Equally, to modify does not mean to manufacture.\n\n​\nThe author then mentions some seemingly obscure technology to befuddle the reader.\n>“The patent includes man-made technology used to sequence the virus' genome, not to manufacture the virus itself.”\n\nScroll to page 16 of the patent document. Here, we see an ‘Overview of Several Embodiments’. It then, again, states what the patent is for; “A newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV).” A [patent embodiment](https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment) is defined as the \"description of the production, use, practice, or expression of an invention in the patent application.\"\n\nAs Dr. Martin correctly states within the documentary, the patent was filed \"not only on the virus,\" but also **\"on its detection and a kit to measure it.\"** This is what said ‘embodiments’ refer to, which constitute precisely the type of \"*man-made technology used to sequence the virus' genome*\" mentioned within the fact check.\n\n**For example (pg. 16):**\n\n>“An additional embodiment includes a kit for detecting a SARS-CoV in a sample”.\n\nNo one ever made the claim that there was ‘man-made’ technology inside the patent to “manufacture the virus itself”. It is unclear why USA Today mentioned this.\n\n\n​\n### Wrapping up\n\nIn effect, the fact check accomplished **nothing**.\n\n[Another](https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents) fact check also acknowledges that the U.S. Supreme Court “ruled in 2013 that simply isolating a natural product is not enough to warrant a patent.\" Therefore, SARS-CoV MUST have been 'modified' in order for it to be patented. This is why it is IDIOTIC to trust fact checkers.\n\n\n**As Dr. Martin states:**\n\n> “Under 35 USC §101, nature is prohibited from being patented. Either SARS coronavirus was manufactured, therefore making a patent on it legal – or it was natural, therefore making a patent on it illegal. If it was manufactured, it was a violation of biological and chemical weapons, treaties and laws. If it was natural, filing a patent on it was illegal. In either outcome, both are illegal.”\n\n\n#### If you haven't already watched it, you can access the documentary at [indoctornation.site](https://indoctornation.site).",
"json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://i.imgur.com/LkvUzR4.png\"],\"links\":[\"https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/\",\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome\",\"https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf\",\"https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf\",\"https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379\",\"https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html\",\"https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment\",\"https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents\",\"https://indoctornation.site\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
}
]
}invictus6custom json: community2020/09/01 11:23:36
invictus6custom json: community
2020/09/01 11:23:36
| required auths | [] |
| required posting auths | ["invictus6"] |
| id | community |
| json | ["subscribe",{"community":"hive-122315"}] |
| Transaction Info | Block #46491488/Trx 4e1edc3380a4acf7c89b94f816695003acd9b539 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "4e1edc3380a4acf7c89b94f816695003acd9b539",
"block": 46491488,
"trx_in_block": 1,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-09-01T11:23:36",
"op": [
"custom_json",
{
"required_auths": [],
"required_posting_auths": [
"invictus6"
],
"id": "community",
"json": "[\"subscribe\",{\"community\":\"hive-122315\"}]"
}
]
}steemdelegated 16.510 SP to @invictus62020/09/01 06:14:00
steemdelegated 16.510 SP to @invictus6
2020/09/01 06:14:00
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 26885.988236 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #46485367/Trx 9de86637955ebadb75249dfdf07f201177061dc9 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "9de86637955ebadb75249dfdf07f201177061dc9",
"block": 46485367,
"trx_in_block": 3,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-09-01T06:14:00",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "26885.988236 VESTS"
}
]
}invictus6deleted a comment or post2020/08/31 20:58:24
invictus6deleted a comment or post
2020/08/31 20:58:24
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-edition-part-1 |
| Transaction Info | Block #46474390/Trx 3c48f4c2ce8d563935a66cec7f7f90db3386a5e7 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "3c48f4c2ce8d563935a66cec7f7f90db3386a5e7",
"block": 46474390,
"trx_in_block": 66,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-08-31T20:58:24",
"op": [
"delete_comment",
{
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-edition-part-1"
}
]
}future.witnesssent 0.001 STEEM to @invictus6- "⚠️ Please be careful with any website or discord link that you receive from other users, those are mostly phishing attempts."2020/08/31 20:50:00
future.witnesssent 0.001 STEEM to @invictus6- "⚠️ Please be careful with any website or discord link that you receive from other users, those are mostly phishing attempts."
2020/08/31 20:50:00
| from | future.witness |
| to | invictus6 |
| amount | 0.001 STEEM |
| memo | ⚠️ Please be careful with any website or discord link that you receive from other users, those are mostly phishing attempts. |
| Transaction Info | Block #46474223/Trx 6024772ccd092785b148062a01adaf0c47865967 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "6024772ccd092785b148062a01adaf0c47865967",
"block": 46474223,
"trx_in_block": 2,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-08-31T20:50:00",
"op": [
"transfer",
{
"from": "future.witness",
"to": "invictus6",
"amount": "0.001 STEEM",
"memo": "⚠️ Please be careful with any website or discord link that you receive from other users, those are mostly phishing attempts."
}
]
}executive-boardsent 0.001 STEEM to @invictus6- "❗ Hello invictus6, great that you are using the STEEM blockchain. The Executive Board hereby invites you to https://discord.gg/KyBbmhh where you will get some insider infos on how you will earn the mo..."2020/08/31 20:49:00
executive-boardsent 0.001 STEEM to @invictus6- "❗ Hello invictus6, great that you are using the STEEM blockchain. The Executive Board hereby invites you to https://discord.gg/KyBbmhh where you will get some insider infos on how you will earn the mo..."
2020/08/31 20:49:00
| from | executive-board |
| to | invictus6 |
| amount | 0.001 STEEM |
| memo | ❗ Hello invictus6, great that you are using the STEEM blockchain. The Executive Board hereby invites you to https://discord.gg/KyBbmhh where you will get some insider infos on how you will earn the most coins. It's easy, just follow the instructions. Warm regards, The Executive Board. |
| Transaction Info | Block #46474204/Trx 4802b115397a1e799f7f2af6183339258f398094 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "4802b115397a1e799f7f2af6183339258f398094",
"block": 46474204,
"trx_in_block": 12,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-08-31T20:49:00",
"op": [
"transfer",
{
"from": "executive-board",
"to": "invictus6",
"amount": "0.001 STEEM",
"memo": "❗ Hello invictus6, great that you are using the STEEM blockchain. The Executive Board hereby invites you to https://discord.gg/KyBbmhh where you will get some insider infos on how you will earn the most coins. It's easy, just follow the instructions. Warm regards, The Executive Board."
}
]
}invictus6published a new post: fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-edition-part-12020/08/31 20:47:03
invictus6published a new post: fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-edition-part-1
2020/08/31 20:47:03
| parent author | |
| parent permlink | plandemic |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-edition-part-1 |
| title | Fact Checking the Fact Checkers: 'Plandemic: Indoctornation' Edition [PART 1] |
| body | https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/ This is the part of the fact check that I will be rebutting today: https://imgur.com/a/IHVG75D -- First note that only one fact checker (from what I’ve seen) has contested the patent claim made in the documentary. This is very telling. As the 'check' states, products of nature are not eligible for patent protection, and *complimentary DNA* is. Notice the last part that they added? It’s completely irrelevant, yet they still go on to elaborate upon it with: >“About 20 pages of the patent describe the process of isolating the genome, including the synthesis of cDNA.” USA Today's trick, in this instance, was their inclusion of the "including" part. In this context specifically, there is only one part of the patent that matters. USA Today discloses it. >"Coronavirus isolated from humans," Patent #7,220,852 B1 — includes the "**isolated coronavirus genome**, isolated coronavirus proteins, and isolated nucleic acid molecules." Up to scratch? The patent includes the isolated GENOME of the virus. A [genome](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome) is the “genetic material of an organism”, consisting of DNA or RNA. To reiterate, the patent, accessible [here](https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf), makes it very clear that the **"invention relates to a newly isolated human coronavirus. More particularly, it relates to an isolated coronavirus genome…”** (kind of ironic how they use the word 'invention'). In 2013, "Justice Thomas’s unanimous opinion in Myriad held that isolated DNA segments were nonpatentable products of nature because the patent claimed naturally occurring genetic information" (https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf, pg. 17). ​ To this point, the fact check has been effectively useless. Let’s see what else it mentions. >Experts also noted that other steps in the process — like stripping genetic material from its chromosome and creating copies, or the use of biotechnology in general — likely made the patent viable. Which ‘experts’? I thought this was a fact check, not an appeal to authority. ​ **Key quotes from [article 1](https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379):** Regarding the general principles shared by countries with regard to patent law: >You can’t patent something that is naturally occurring, \[Schwartz\] says, but if an organism is modified in some way, it is patentable. Yep, we know that. >In the case of a gene, modifying its information or removing it from its chromosome typically would be enough to warrant a patent, says Schwartz, because the snippet of chromosome would not appear in nature by itself. Sure thing! >*This is a key point in the case of the novel coronavirus.* Oh wait... **THIS ARTICLE IS OLD. IT IS ABOUT MERS.** Its subtitle? *“Dutch group patented genome of Middle East coronavirus, which has killed more than 30 people”.* MERS was the novel coronavirus at the time of publishing. **There was NO MODIFICATION to the genome of SARS-CoV patented by the CDC.** Article dismissed. ​ [Article 2](https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html) \- published May 29, 2003. **THE ONLY RELEVANT QUOTE:** >Today, naturally occurring life forms remain ineligible for patent protection… However, **one could arguably patent any gene or life form that has been modified by biotechnology**, including genetic engineering. Right, so only one that's been **modified** can be patented. ​ ***Back to the fact check:*** >But just because the SARS-CoV patent was legal does not mean the virus was man-made or manufactured, as the video alleges. In a general sense, their own sources just corroborated that it would have to be man-made. This sentence is just a play on words, however. The patent being legal could indicate that the virus was "**modified by biotechnology**" in order to be *transmissible by humans* (literally what the patent is for), and technically, the USA Today could still argue that their judgement was correct. It was not 'made', it was 'modified'. ​ >“The patent includes man-made technology used to sequence the virus' genome, not to manufacture the virus itself.” Scroll to page 16 of the patent document. Here, we see an ‘Overview of Several Embodiments’. It then, again, states what the patent is for: “*A newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is disclosed herein. The entire genomic nucleic-acid sequence of this virus is also provided herein.*” [Patent embodiment](https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment) is defined as the "description of the production, use, practice, or expression of an invention in the patent application." As Dr. Martin correctly states within the documentary: **"They actually filed patents not only on the virus, they also filed patents on its detection and a kit to measure it.** This is what said ‘embodiments’ refer to, which constitute precisely the type of "*man-made technology used to sequence the virus' genome*" mentioned within the fact check. **For example (pg. 16):** >“An additional embodiment includes a kit for detecting a SARS-CoV in a sample”. The author then throws in "not to manufacture the virus itself" to mislead the reader once again. THE PATENT WAS NEVER ABOUT THAT, IT IS NOT RELEVANT. Know what else the patent includes? **THE VIRUS.** ​ In effect, what did the fact check do? **Nothing.** ​ **From** [another](https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents) **fact check: “the U.S. Supreme Court… ruled in 2013 that simply isolating a natural product is not enough to warrant a patent."** Therefore, SARS-CoV MUST be 'modified' (man-made) or else it cannot be patented. This is why it is IDIOTIC to trust fact checkers. If you haven't already watched it, you can access the documentary at https://indoctornation.site/ |
| json metadata | {"tags":["plandemic","coronavirus","hoax","factcheck","msm","pandemic"],"links":["https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/","https://imgur.com/a/IHVG75D","https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome","https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf","https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf","https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379","https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html","https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment","https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents","https://indoctornation.site/"],"app":"steemit/0.2","format":"markdown"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #46474166/Trx b59f486112222caeb7b75f0cbd74e4cf021a844e |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "b59f486112222caeb7b75f0cbd74e4cf021a844e",
"block": 46474166,
"trx_in_block": 3,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-08-31T20:47:03",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "",
"parent_permlink": "plandemic",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-plandemic-indoctornation-edition-part-1",
"title": "Fact Checking the Fact Checkers: 'Plandemic: Indoctornation' Edition [PART 1]",
"body": "https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/\n\nThis is the part of the fact check that I will be rebutting today: https://imgur.com/a/IHVG75D\n\n--\n\nFirst note that only one fact checker (from what I’ve seen) has contested the patent claim made in the documentary. This is very telling.\n\nAs the 'check' states, products of nature are not eligible for patent protection, and *complimentary DNA* is. Notice the last part that they added? It’s completely irrelevant, yet they still go on to elaborate upon it with:\n\n>“About 20 pages of the patent describe the process of isolating the genome, including the synthesis of cDNA.”\n\nUSA Today's trick, in this instance, was their inclusion of the \"including\" part. In this context specifically, there is only one part of the patent that matters. USA Today discloses it.\n\n>\"Coronavirus isolated from humans,\" Patent #7,220,852 B1 — includes the \"**isolated coronavirus genome**, isolated coronavirus proteins, and isolated nucleic acid molecules.\"\n\nUp to scratch? The patent includes the isolated GENOME of the virus. A [genome](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome) is the “genetic material of an organism”, consisting of DNA or RNA. To reiterate, the patent, accessible [here](https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf), makes it very clear that the **\"invention relates to a newly isolated human coronavirus. More particularly, it relates to an isolated coronavirus genome…”** (kind of ironic how they use the word 'invention').\n\nIn 2013, \"Justice Thomas’s unanimous opinion in Myriad held that isolated DNA segments were nonpatentable products of nature because the patent claimed naturally occurring genetic information\" (https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf, pg. 17).\n\n​\n\nTo this point, the fact check has been effectively useless. Let’s see what else it mentions.\n\n>Experts also noted that other steps in the process — like stripping genetic material from its chromosome and creating copies, or the use of biotechnology in general — likely made the patent viable.\n\nWhich ‘experts’? I thought this was a fact check, not an appeal to authority.\n\n​\n\n\n**Key quotes from [article 1](https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379):**\n\nRegarding the general principles shared by countries with regard to patent law:\n\n>You can’t patent something that is naturally occurring, \\[Schwartz\\] says, but if an organism is modified in some way, it is patentable.\n\nYep, we know that.\n\n>In the case of a gene, modifying its information or removing it from its chromosome typically would be enough to warrant a patent, says Schwartz, because the snippet of chromosome would not appear in nature by itself.\n\nSure thing!\n\n>*This is a key point in the case of the novel coronavirus.*\n\nOh wait... **THIS ARTICLE IS OLD. IT IS ABOUT MERS.** Its subtitle? *“Dutch group patented genome of Middle East coronavirus, which has killed more than 30 people”.* MERS was the novel coronavirus at the time of publishing. **There was NO MODIFICATION to the genome of SARS-CoV patented by the CDC.** Article dismissed.\n\n​\n\n[Article 2](https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html) \\- published May 29, 2003.\n\n**THE ONLY RELEVANT QUOTE:**\n\n>Today, naturally occurring life forms remain ineligible for patent protection… However, **one could arguably patent any gene or life form that has been modified by biotechnology**, including genetic engineering.\n\nRight, so only one that's been **modified** can be patented.\n\n​\n\n***Back to the fact check:***\n\n>But just because the SARS-CoV patent was legal does not mean the virus was man-made or manufactured, as the video alleges.\n\nIn a general sense, their own sources just corroborated that it would have to be man-made. This sentence is just a play on words, however. The patent being legal could indicate that the virus was \"**modified by biotechnology**\" in order to be *transmissible by humans* (literally what the patent is for), and technically, the USA Today could still argue that their judgement was correct. It was not 'made', it was 'modified'.\n\n​\n\n>“The patent includes man-made technology used to sequence the virus' genome, not to manufacture the virus itself.”\n\nScroll to page 16 of the patent document. Here, we see an ‘Overview of Several Embodiments’. It then, again, states what the patent is for: “*A newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is disclosed herein. The entire genomic nucleic-acid sequence of this virus is also provided herein.*”\n\n[Patent embodiment](https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment) is defined as the \"description of the production, use, practice, or expression of an invention in the patent application.\" As Dr. Martin correctly states within the documentary: **\"They actually filed patents not only on the virus, they also filed patents on its detection and a kit to measure it.** This is what said ‘embodiments’ refer to, which constitute precisely the type of \"*man-made technology used to sequence the virus' genome*\" mentioned within the fact check.\n\n**For example (pg. 16):**\n\n>“An additional embodiment includes a kit for detecting a SARS-CoV in a sample”.\n\nThe author then throws in \"not to manufacture the virus itself\" to mislead the reader once again. THE PATENT WAS NEVER ABOUT THAT, IT IS NOT RELEVANT. Know what else the patent includes? **THE VIRUS.**\n\n​\n\nIn effect, what did the fact check do? **Nothing.**\n\n​\n\n**From** [another](https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents) **fact check: “the U.S. Supreme Court… ruled in 2013 that simply isolating a natural product is not enough to warrant a patent.\"**\n\nTherefore, SARS-CoV MUST be 'modified' (man-made) or else it cannot be patented. This is why it is IDIOTIC to trust fact checkers.\n\n\nIf you haven't already watched it, you can access the documentary at https://indoctornation.site/",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"plandemic\",\"coronavirus\",\"hoax\",\"factcheck\",\"msm\",\"pandemic\"],\"links\":[\"https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/23/fact-check-plandemic-ii-alleges-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/\",\"https://imgur.com/a/IHVG75D\",\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome\",\"https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6b/c3/21/a62eb55a0e678c/US7220852.pdf\",\"https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45918.pdf\",\"https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/can-you-patent-a-disease-1.1355379\",\"https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/sars-and-the-patent-race.html\",\"https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-embodiment\",\"https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-pseudoscience/patently-false-disinformation-over-coronavirus-patents\",\"https://indoctornation.site/\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
}
]
}steemdelegated 3.388 SP to @invictus62020/05/09 06:48:12
steemdelegated 3.388 SP to @invictus6
2020/05/09 06:48:12
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 5517.702179 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #43218285/Trx e13f11a738fc502525f298fc81ba9bb2e10a2a2e |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "e13f11a738fc502525f298fc81ba9bb2e10a2a2e",
"block": 43218285,
"trx_in_block": 4,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-05-09T06:48:12",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "5517.702179 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 1.200 SP to @invictus62020/05/08 10:34:09
steemdelegated 1.200 SP to @invictus6
2020/05/08 10:34:09
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 1953.311140 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #43194572/Trx 641732c7e74c144fe9763df54bf7e23c366ddb1c |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "641732c7e74c144fe9763df54bf7e23c366ddb1c",
"block": 43194572,
"trx_in_block": 24,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-05-08T10:34:09",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "1953.311140 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 3.396 SP to @invictus62020/04/16 00:35:33
steemdelegated 3.396 SP to @invictus6
2020/04/16 00:35:33
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 5530.589627 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #42566019/Trx d7e363188697f645ae2c3112412fd1406ce622e3 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "d7e363188697f645ae2c3112412fd1406ce622e3",
"block": 42566019,
"trx_in_block": 3,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-04-16T00:35:33",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "5530.589627 VESTS"
}
]
}ashleymayreplied to @invictus6 / q166xw2019/11/18 14:58:45
ashleymayreplied to @invictus6 / q166xw
2019/11/18 14:58:45
| parent author | invictus6 |
| parent permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| author | ashleymay |
| permlink | q166xw |
| title | |
| body | I understand that animal testing is a significant part of <a href="https://www.chaban-medical.com/gallery-14.html">medical device testing</a>, but isn't there a way to do it more gently, without causing these poor creatures so much pain? |
| json metadata | {"links":["https://www.chaban-medical.com/gallery-14.html"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #38285372/Trx c22363146b7b1683cd6be4aed5cd18b303ab0a59 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "c22363146b7b1683cd6be4aed5cd18b303ab0a59",
"block": 38285372,
"trx_in_block": 12,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2019-11-18T14:58:45",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "invictus6",
"parent_permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"author": "ashleymay",
"permlink": "q166xw",
"title": "",
"body": "I understand that animal testing is a significant part of <a href=\"https://www.chaban-medical.com/gallery-14.html\">medical device testing</a>, but isn't there a way to do it more gently, without causing these poor creatures so much pain?",
"json_metadata": "{\"links\":[\"https://www.chaban-medical.com/gallery-14.html\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}"
}
]
}2019/06/09 15:04:09
2019/06/09 15:04:09
| parent author | invictus6 |
| parent permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| author | steemitboard |
| permlink | steemitboard-notify-invictus6-20190609t150408000z |
| title | |
| body | Congratulations @invictus6! You received a personal award! <table><tr><td>https://steemitimages.com/70x70/https://steemitboard.com/@invictus6/birthday2.png</td><td>Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years!</td></tr></table> <sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@invictus6) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=invictus6)_</sub> ###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes! |
| json metadata | {"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png"]} |
| Transaction Info | Block #33651357/Trx 6034af2eb0516a72579171802751e3b909a7190b |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "6034af2eb0516a72579171802751e3b909a7190b",
"block": 33651357,
"trx_in_block": 26,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2019-06-09T15:04:09",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "invictus6",
"parent_permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"author": "steemitboard",
"permlink": "steemitboard-notify-invictus6-20190609t150408000z",
"title": "",
"body": "Congratulations @invictus6! You received a personal award!\n\n<table><tr><td>https://steemitimages.com/70x70/https://steemitboard.com/@invictus6/birthday2.png</td><td>Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years!</td></tr></table>\n\n<sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@invictus6) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=invictus6)_</sub>\n\n\n###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes!",
"json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png\"]}"
}
]
}steemdelegated 3.516 SP to @invictus62019/05/12 17:40:51
steemdelegated 3.516 SP to @invictus6
2019/05/12 17:40:51
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 5726.206440 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #32848820/Trx 820b942e8adadf40dbd3d6d9e415b834826b7114 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "820b942e8adadf40dbd3d6d9e415b834826b7114",
"block": 32848820,
"trx_in_block": 35,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2019-05-12T17:40:51",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "5726.206440 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 3.639 SP to @invictus62018/05/16 20:21:51
steemdelegated 3.639 SP to @invictus6
2018/05/16 20:21:51
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 5925.854838 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #22489938/Trx e24de0c04c1ebee94d763e918cb33437cffb53fb |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "e24de0c04c1ebee94d763e918cb33437cffb53fb",
"block": 22489938,
"trx_in_block": 13,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2018-05-16T20:21:51",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "5925.854838 VESTS"
}
]
}retzgerbnerupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2018/01/24 17:46:24
retzgerbnerupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2018/01/24 17:46:24
| voter | retzgerbner |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #19264656/Trx a82cca3a89291ef652924d043ee094944a3b0b50 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "a82cca3a89291ef652924d043ee094944a3b0b50",
"block": 19264656,
"trx_in_block": 70,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2018-01-24T17:46:24",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "retzgerbner",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}steemdelegated 16.259 SP to @invictus62018/01/09 06:39:45
steemdelegated 16.259 SP to @invictus6
2018/01/09 06:39:45
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 26476.845222 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #18819593/Trx 5d57b9f4aecc7d567a53a8881242a262744bece0 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "5d57b9f4aecc7d567a53a8881242a262744bece0",
"block": 18819593,
"trx_in_block": 11,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2018-01-09T06:39:45",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "26476.845222 VESTS"
}
]
}steemdelegated 16.413 SP to @invictus62017/08/04 05:19:51
steemdelegated 16.413 SP to @invictus6
2017/08/04 05:19:51
| delegator | steem |
| delegatee | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 26727.655930 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #14271473/Trx 00c303a94560277612859ac9564df23dbf10a56b |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "00c303a94560277612859ac9564df23dbf10a56b",
"block": 14271473,
"trx_in_block": 11,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-04T05:19:51",
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegator": "steem",
"delegatee": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "26727.655930 VESTS"
}
]
}invictus6cancelled power down2017/07/14 08:40:06
invictus6cancelled power down
2017/07/14 08:40:06
| account | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 0.000000 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #13671155/Trx 22c16d55b9dce45bd72b721679c11e2050448de6 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "22c16d55b9dce45bd72b721679c11e2050448de6",
"block": 13671155,
"trx_in_block": 27,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-07-14T08:40:06",
"op": [
"withdraw_vesting",
{
"account": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS"
}
]
}invictus6started power down of 2.609 SP2017/07/14 08:39:57
invictus6started power down of 2.609 SP
2017/07/14 08:39:57
| account | invictus6 |
| vesting shares | 4248.344070 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #13671152/Trx 884d087bc7ffc70f6e7e946370a4b4ec26fa226a |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "884d087bc7ffc70f6e7e946370a4b4ec26fa226a",
"block": 13671152,
"trx_in_block": 13,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-07-14T08:39:57",
"op": [
"withdraw_vesting",
{
"account": "invictus6",
"vesting_shares": "4248.344070 VESTS"
}
]
}2017/07/06 16:43:36
2017/07/06 16:43:36
| parent author | invictus6 |
| parent permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| author | realm |
| permlink | re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170706t164337685z |
| title | |
| body | I recommend reading <a href="https://steemit.com/animal/@realm/the-monkey-business-of-laboratory-animals">The Monkey Business of Laboratory Animals</a>. Think it will speak to you :) |
| json metadata | {"tags":["animals"],"links":["https://steemit.com/animal/@realm/the-monkey-business-of-laboratory-animals"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #13450669/Trx f8c3b7437303c66c072657e236a41b13ea7fdfa5 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "f8c3b7437303c66c072657e236a41b13ea7fdfa5",
"block": 13450669,
"trx_in_block": 26,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-07-06T16:43:36",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "invictus6",
"parent_permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"author": "realm",
"permlink": "re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170706t164337685z",
"title": "",
"body": "I recommend reading <a href=\"https://steemit.com/animal/@realm/the-monkey-business-of-laboratory-animals\">The Monkey Business of Laboratory Animals</a>. Think it will speak to you :)",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"animals\"],\"links\":[\"https://steemit.com/animal/@realm/the-monkey-business-of-laboratory-animals\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}"
}
]
}invictus6powered up 0.750 STEEM to @invictus62017/06/23 03:12:00
invictus6powered up 0.750 STEEM to @invictus6
2017/06/23 03:12:00
| from | invictus6 |
| to | invictus6 |
| amount | 0.750 STEEM |
| Transaction Info | Block #13060947/Trx 8093b54b86fbcef2d86e32e467ccf898bd427b62 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "8093b54b86fbcef2d86e32e467ccf898bd427b62",
"block": 13060947,
"trx_in_block": 14,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-23T03:12:00",
"op": [
"transfer_to_vesting",
{
"from": "invictus6",
"to": "invictus6",
"amount": "0.750 STEEM"
}
]
}invictus6conversion request filled: received 0.750 STEEM in exchange of 1.654 SBD2017/06/21 15:16:54
invictus6conversion request filled: received 0.750 STEEM in exchange of 1.654 SBD
2017/06/21 15:16:54
| owner | invictus6 |
| requestid | 1497755810 |
| amount in | 1.654 SBD |
| amount out | 0.750 STEEM |
| Transaction Info | Block #13017863/Virtual Operation #2 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"block": 13017863,
"trx_in_block": 4294967295,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 2,
"timestamp": "2017-06-21T15:16:54",
"op": [
"fill_convert_request",
{
"owner": "invictus6",
"requestid": 1497755810,
"amount_in": "1.654 SBD",
"amount_out": "0.750 STEEM"
}
]
}invictus6started an SBD to STEEM conversion: 1.654 SBD2017/06/18 03:16:54
invictus6started an SBD to STEEM conversion: 1.654 SBD
2017/06/18 03:16:54
| owner | invictus6 |
| requestid | 1497755810 |
| amount | 1.654 SBD |
| Transaction Info | Block #12917386/Trx 533223045852058bf30978f3f2f5521ada29456d |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "533223045852058bf30978f3f2f5521ada29456d",
"block": 12917386,
"trx_in_block": 4,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-18T03:16:54",
"op": [
"convert",
{
"owner": "invictus6",
"requestid": 1497755810,
"amount": "1.654 SBD"
}
]
}invictus6upvoted (100.00%) @bitcoinparadise / guide-steemspeak-chat-on-discord2017/06/18 03:15:18
invictus6upvoted (100.00%) @bitcoinparadise / guide-steemspeak-chat-on-discord
2017/06/18 03:15:18
| voter | invictus6 |
| author | bitcoinparadise |
| permlink | guide-steemspeak-chat-on-discord |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12917354/Trx 1dea55394470e05d0bb485888c551e494f8e9d52 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "1dea55394470e05d0bb485888c551e494f8e9d52",
"block": 12917354,
"trx_in_block": 4,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-18T03:15:18",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "invictus6",
"author": "bitcoinparadise",
"permlink": "guide-steemspeak-chat-on-discord",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}invictus6claimed reward balance: 1.654 SBD, 1.020 SP2017/06/17 16:19:06
invictus6claimed reward balance: 1.654 SBD, 1.020 SP
2017/06/17 16:19:06
| account | invictus6 |
| reward steem | 0.000 STEEM |
| reward sbd | 1.654 SBD |
| reward vests | 1660.448271 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #12904242/Trx 1ca8fedc58f34aaa12aba9b6316c2fcbd8955f1d |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "1ca8fedc58f34aaa12aba9b6316c2fcbd8955f1d",
"block": 12904242,
"trx_in_block": 11,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-17T16:19:06",
"op": [
"claim_reward_balance",
{
"account": "invictus6",
"reward_steem": "0.000 STEEM",
"reward_sbd": "1.654 SBD",
"reward_vests": "1660.448271 VESTS"
}
]
}aviiupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/17 12:03:45
aviiupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/17 12:03:45
| voter | avii |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12899137/Trx eec957aaf5cf00364a7506506f869543b49cbfe2 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "eec957aaf5cf00364a7506506f869543b49cbfe2",
"block": 12899137,
"trx_in_block": 1,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-17T12:03:45",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "avii",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}invictus6received 0.001 SP curation reward for @bitcoinparadise / some-tips-for-new-users-on-steemit2017/06/17 05:57:33
invictus6received 0.001 SP curation reward for @bitcoinparadise / some-tips-for-new-users-on-steemit
2017/06/17 05:57:33
| curator | invictus6 |
| reward | 2.070369 VESTS |
| comment author | bitcoinparadise |
| comment permlink | some-tips-for-new-users-on-steemit |
| Transaction Info | Block #12891817/Virtual Operation #410 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"block": 12891817,
"trx_in_block": 4294967295,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 410,
"timestamp": "2017-06-17T05:57:33",
"op": [
"curation_reward",
{
"curator": "invictus6",
"reward": "2.070369 VESTS",
"comment_author": "bitcoinparadise",
"comment_permlink": "some-tips-for-new-users-on-steemit"
}
]
}invictus6received 0.033 SBD, 0.020 SP author reward for @invictus6 / re-goingpaper-re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170610t053111347z2017/06/17 05:31:12
invictus6received 0.033 SBD, 0.020 SP author reward for @invictus6 / re-goingpaper-re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170610t053111347z
2017/06/17 05:31:12
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | re-goingpaper-re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170610t053111347z |
| sbd payout | 0.033 SBD |
| steem payout | 0.000 STEEM |
| vesting payout | 33.125941 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #12891290/Virtual Operation #3 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"block": 12891290,
"trx_in_block": 4294967295,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 3,
"timestamp": "2017-06-17T05:31:12",
"op": [
"author_reward",
{
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "re-goingpaper-re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170610t053111347z",
"sbd_payout": "0.033 SBD",
"steem_payout": "0.000 STEEM",
"vesting_payout": "33.125941 VESTS"
}
]
}invictus6received 0.020 SBD, 0.014 SP author reward for @invictus6 / re-skypal-re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170610t030236774z2017/06/17 03:02:36
invictus6received 0.020 SBD, 0.014 SP author reward for @invictus6 / re-skypal-re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170610t030236774z
2017/06/17 03:02:36
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | re-skypal-re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170610t030236774z |
| sbd payout | 0.020 SBD |
| steem payout | 0.000 STEEM |
| vesting payout | 22.774210 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #12888318/Virtual Operation #11 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"block": 12888318,
"trx_in_block": 4294967295,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 11,
"timestamp": "2017-06-17T03:02:36",
"op": [
"author_reward",
{
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "re-skypal-re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170610t030236774z",
"sbd_payout": "0.020 SBD",
"steem_payout": "0.000 STEEM",
"vesting_payout": "22.774210 VESTS"
}
]
}invictus6received 1.601 SBD, 0.984 SP author reward for @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/17 02:38:09
invictus6received 1.601 SBD, 0.984 SP author reward for @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/17 02:38:09
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| sbd payout | 1.601 SBD |
| steem payout | 0.000 STEEM |
| vesting payout | 1602.477751 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #12887829/Virtual Operation #37 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"block": 12887829,
"trx_in_block": 4294967295,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 37,
"timestamp": "2017-06-17T02:38:09",
"op": [
"author_reward",
{
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"sbd_payout": "1.601 SBD",
"steem_payout": "0.000 STEEM",
"vesting_payout": "1602.477751 VESTS"
}
]
}bjaeupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/16 14:20:36
bjaeupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/16 14:20:36
| voter | bjae |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12873085/Trx 007a698ebd8d23904fb60096b60a96b8c17ae75c |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "007a698ebd8d23904fb60096b60a96b8c17ae75c",
"block": 12873085,
"trx_in_block": 14,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-16T14:20:36",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "bjae",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}arsarupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/16 11:14:39
arsarupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/16 11:14:39
| voter | arsar |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12869371/Trx 7d49dd97e57f236694d64692af952b47b3f03555 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "7d49dd97e57f236694d64692af952b47b3f03555",
"block": 12869371,
"trx_in_block": 9,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-16T11:14:39",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "arsar",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}djafinoupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/16 09:55:27
djafinoupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/16 09:55:27
| voter | djafino |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12867790/Trx f1168a5d3029615f0ecea8f8cb125a3d7ca73553 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "f1168a5d3029615f0ecea8f8cb125a3d7ca73553",
"block": 12867790,
"trx_in_block": 7,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-16T09:55:27",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "djafino",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}fem-of-warupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/16 09:26:24
fem-of-warupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/16 09:26:24
| voter | fem-of-war |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12867209/Trx efa07f13fded2436e4ada0d6daaf6555f3d99894 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "efa07f13fded2436e4ada0d6daaf6555f3d99894",
"block": 12867209,
"trx_in_block": 12,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-16T09:26:24",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "fem-of-war",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}epixarupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/16 08:47:21
epixarupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/16 08:47:21
| voter | epixar |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12866429/Trx aba38fa1dd87e30aba43eac9ff842e61f3e52409 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "aba38fa1dd87e30aba43eac9ff842e61f3e52409",
"block": 12866429,
"trx_in_block": 2,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-16T08:47:21",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "epixar",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}reggaemuffinupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/16 07:26:18
reggaemuffinupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/16 07:26:18
| voter | reggaemuffin |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12864810/Trx 0b6c049007c9cc864e6d5bf5d95c516762a758a8 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "0b6c049007c9cc864e6d5bf5d95c516762a758a8",
"block": 12864810,
"trx_in_block": 3,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-16T07:26:18",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "reggaemuffin",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}2017/06/16 05:15:45
2017/06/16 05:15:45
| required auths | [] |
| required posting auths | ["invictus6"] |
| id | follow |
| json | ["follow",{"follower":"invictus6","following":"jasonb1","what":[]}] |
| Transaction Info | Block #12862202/Trx 9faeca42e55cfc8951c32ae6f619ae331ecaf5c0 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "9faeca42e55cfc8951c32ae6f619ae331ecaf5c0",
"block": 12862202,
"trx_in_block": 4,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-16T05:15:45",
"op": [
"custom_json",
{
"required_auths": [],
"required_posting_auths": [
"invictus6"
],
"id": "follow",
"json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"invictus6\",\"following\":\"jasonb1\",\"what\":[]}]"
}
]
}invictus6unfollowed @varunsangwan2017/06/16 05:15:12
invictus6unfollowed @varunsangwan
2017/06/16 05:15:12
| required auths | [] |
| required posting auths | ["invictus6"] |
| id | follow |
| json | ["follow",{"follower":"invictus6","following":"varunsangwan","what":[]}] |
| Transaction Info | Block #12862191/Trx f71f8c74d77ac95ce56e5b27ebae33c73d538011 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "f71f8c74d77ac95ce56e5b27ebae33c73d538011",
"block": 12862191,
"trx_in_block": 4,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-16T05:15:12",
"op": [
"custom_json",
{
"required_auths": [],
"required_posting_auths": [
"invictus6"
],
"id": "follow",
"json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"invictus6\",\"following\":\"varunsangwan\",\"what\":[]}]"
}
]
}cannymarkupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/16 04:13:36
cannymarkupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/16 04:13:36
| voter | cannymark |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12860960/Trx 4ec4bcfdbfe1df6a2495f6c8f4db05586d69936b |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "4ec4bcfdbfe1df6a2495f6c8f4db05586d69936b",
"block": 12860960,
"trx_in_block": 11,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-16T04:13:36",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "cannymark",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}victorvazcoupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/16 04:09:42
victorvazcoupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/16 04:09:42
| voter | victorvazco |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12860883/Trx 0897738579a6683cf0ceb744231dc82d6721f795 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "0897738579a6683cf0ceb744231dc82d6721f795",
"block": 12860883,
"trx_in_block": 5,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-16T04:09:42",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "victorvazco",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}kavaupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/16 03:18:45
kavaupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/16 03:18:45
| voter | kava |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12859865/Trx 815ff52c1010681d8db953fae455afc77520faa9 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "815ff52c1010681d8db953fae455afc77520faa9",
"block": 12859865,
"trx_in_block": 3,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-16T03:18:45",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "kava",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}elprofe62upvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/16 02:54:15
elprofe62upvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/16 02:54:15
| voter | elprofe62 |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12859375/Trx b3fc94babbab640ced821a498e86027b77d6c5f1 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "b3fc94babbab640ced821a498e86027b77d6c5f1",
"block": 12859375,
"trx_in_block": 19,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-16T02:54:15",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "elprofe62",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}joshdomskyupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/16 01:31:57
joshdomskyupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/16 01:31:57
| voter | joshdomsky |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12857732/Trx 3749052f79ff60083af40f600f4f5762362ecb38 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "3749052f79ff60083af40f600f4f5762362ecb38",
"block": 12857732,
"trx_in_block": 17,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-16T01:31:57",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "joshdomsky",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}joshua.johnsonupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/16 00:05:03
joshua.johnsonupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/16 00:05:03
| voter | joshua.johnson |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12855996/Trx a1562788932cdae994f398f8c4f64bdd77e8a262 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "a1562788932cdae994f398f8c4f64bdd77e8a262",
"block": 12855996,
"trx_in_block": 5,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-16T00:05:03",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "joshua.johnson",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}2017/06/15 23:19:15
2017/06/15 23:19:15
| parent author | invictus6 |
| parent permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| author | emptyintentions |
| permlink | re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170615t231908655z |
| title | |
| body | Wouldn't it be more effective and humane to experiment on willing humans? Or criminals in prison for life and on death row? It certainly would produce more accurate results with less steps and innocents suffering without consent. |
| json metadata | {"tags":["animals"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #12855082/Trx 4440c4003cb8a26235704da2ecb034a1b8d06293 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "4440c4003cb8a26235704da2ecb034a1b8d06293",
"block": 12855082,
"trx_in_block": 12,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-15T23:19:15",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "invictus6",
"parent_permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"author": "emptyintentions",
"permlink": "re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170615t231908655z",
"title": "",
"body": "Wouldn't it be more effective and humane to experiment on willing humans? Or criminals in prison for life and on death row? It certainly would produce more accurate results with less steps and innocents suffering without consent.",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"animals\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}"
}
]
}happychau123upvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/15 22:02:51
happychau123upvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/15 22:02:51
| voter | happychau123 |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12853557/Trx b0fbbc0f36a44390f16060bfc97e15e0f0ceabe0 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "b0fbbc0f36a44390f16060bfc97e15e0f0ceabe0",
"block": 12853557,
"trx_in_block": 4,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-15T22:02:51",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "happychau123",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}eltooniupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/15 21:44:51
eltooniupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/15 21:44:51
| voter | eltooni |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12853197/Trx 057c1428a9f88df7daf48dd9ee3b1ba3f519a868 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "057c1428a9f88df7daf48dd9ee3b1ba3f519a868",
"block": 12853197,
"trx_in_block": 7,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-15T21:44:51",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "eltooni",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}dberupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/15 21:33:00
dberupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/15 21:33:00
| voter | dber |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12852961/Trx 52a2a3e9cfee0a57b9f0ad6b55edf9a013eb3886 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "52a2a3e9cfee0a57b9f0ad6b55edf9a013eb3886",
"block": 12852961,
"trx_in_block": 13,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-15T21:33:00",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "dber",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}2017/06/15 21:18:27
2017/06/15 21:18:27
| parent author | invictus6 |
| parent permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| author | vincent4384 |
| permlink | re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170615t211814201z |
| title | |
| body | It is never ok in any circumstance to hold someone against there will and torture, mutilate, and kill them. Animals feel pain. Animals feel love. Animals feel fear. Animals do not want to do die. Just like us. |
| json metadata | {"tags":["animals"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #12852670/Trx 0741c9cc36cf324bb23e1b2f5213e1b4a99c21fd |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "0741c9cc36cf324bb23e1b2f5213e1b4a99c21fd",
"block": 12852670,
"trx_in_block": 6,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-15T21:18:27",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "invictus6",
"parent_permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"author": "vincent4384",
"permlink": "re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170615t211814201z",
"title": "",
"body": "It is never ok in any circumstance to hold someone against there will and torture, mutilate, and kill them. Animals feel pain. Animals feel love. Animals feel fear. Animals do not want to do die. Just like us.",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"animals\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}"
}
]
}2017/06/15 21:11:27
2017/06/15 21:11:27
| parent author | invictus6 |
| parent permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| author | vincent4384 |
| permlink | re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170615t211121236z |
| title | |
| body | So, if a monkey is just as concious as us its still ok to guage their eyes out and tie them up and torture them in horrific ways because a human wouldnt consent to it. |
| json metadata | {"tags":["animals"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #12852530/Trx f183522816e843c96b03f99b44922dae31d002f4 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "f183522816e843c96b03f99b44922dae31d002f4",
"block": 12852530,
"trx_in_block": 3,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-15T21:11:27",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "invictus6",
"parent_permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"author": "vincent4384",
"permlink": "re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170615t211121236z",
"title": "",
"body": "So, if a monkey is just as concious as us its still ok to guage their eyes out and tie them up and torture them in horrific ways because a human wouldnt consent to it.",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"animals\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}"
}
]
}fricibacsiupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/15 19:26:42
fricibacsiupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/15 19:26:42
| voter | fricibacsi |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12850437/Trx d8467da54bfaab7e5380f682a2616a7b27a853a9 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "d8467da54bfaab7e5380f682a2616a7b27a853a9",
"block": 12850437,
"trx_in_block": 12,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-15T19:26:42",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "fricibacsi",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}bewupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/15 16:34:36
bewupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/15 16:34:36
| voter | bew |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12846996/Trx 8b58fdd41134f48b97303aee83187e604ce66da6 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "8b58fdd41134f48b97303aee83187e604ce66da6",
"block": 12846996,
"trx_in_block": 6,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-15T16:34:36",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "bew",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}ldrupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/15 13:56:39
ldrupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/15 13:56:39
| voter | ldr |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12843838/Trx da8f1fbe6ef01c847f09a2725575e72d40fe6ebd |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "da8f1fbe6ef01c847f09a2725575e72d40fe6ebd",
"block": 12843838,
"trx_in_block": 3,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-15T13:56:39",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "ldr",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}nikhilkochrekarupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/15 12:01:45
nikhilkochrekarupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/15 12:01:45
| voter | nikhilkochrekar |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12841540/Trx eb6f468706a42fa253ef2713161767b9a47fd6d8 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "eb6f468706a42fa253ef2713161767b9a47fd6d8",
"block": 12841540,
"trx_in_block": 13,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-15T12:01:45",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "nikhilkochrekar",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}steemian69upvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/15 11:59:33
steemian69upvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/15 11:59:33
| voter | steemian69 |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12841496/Trx 25bce515634e38c0fd8e872efc83cabf0dec991c |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "25bce515634e38c0fd8e872efc83cabf0dec991c",
"block": 12841496,
"trx_in_block": 3,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-15T11:59:33",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "steemian69",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}2017/06/15 11:20:27
2017/06/15 11:20:27
| parent author | invictus6 |
| parent permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| author | deflin |
| permlink | re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170615t112029372z |
| title | |
| body | I totally agree with you, animal testing is a great way to test all kinds of medical and pharmaceutical appliances. Also, because a lot of animals also breed a lot quicker than (in respect) humans do, the consequences, of some drugs and medical appliances, can be monitored on later generations (a lot quicker). Although, I must say that I find the testing of cosmetical products on animals horrific. Those tests should be done on humans in my perspective. |
| json metadata | {"tags":["animals"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| Transaction Info | Block #12840714/Trx 0f3dc422f23881444d90c8ef930bb016f2023032 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "0f3dc422f23881444d90c8ef930bb016f2023032",
"block": 12840714,
"trx_in_block": 9,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-15T11:20:27",
"op": [
"comment",
{
"parent_author": "invictus6",
"parent_permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"author": "deflin",
"permlink": "re-invictus6-animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why-20170615t112029372z",
"title": "",
"body": "I totally agree with you, animal testing is a great way to test all kinds of medical and pharmaceutical appliances. Also, because a lot of animals also breed a lot quicker than (in respect) humans do, the consequences, of some drugs and medical appliances, can be monitored on later generations (a lot quicker). \n\nAlthough, I must say that I find the testing of cosmetical products on animals horrific. Those tests should be done on humans in my perspective.",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"animals\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\"}"
}
]
}deflinupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/15 11:16:42
deflinupvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/15 11:16:42
| voter | deflin |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12840641/Trx 8e726fea705feef24cdd40ba0b60f3a8f8262122 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "8e726fea705feef24cdd40ba0b60f3a8f8262122",
"block": 12840641,
"trx_in_block": 15,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-15T11:16:42",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "deflin",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}rao777upvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why2017/06/15 07:03:39
rao777upvoted (100.00%) @invictus6 / animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why
2017/06/15 07:03:39
| voter | rao777 |
| author | invictus6 |
| permlink | animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #12835593/Trx bbe58927674bcb08d4d1405dff3c350175485a35 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"trx_id": "bbe58927674bcb08d4d1405dff3c350175485a35",
"block": 12835593,
"trx_in_block": 1,
"op_in_trx": 0,
"virtual_op": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-06-15T07:03:39",
"op": [
"vote",
{
"voter": "rao777",
"author": "invictus6",
"permlink": "animal-testing-is-here-to-stay-here-s-why",
"weight": 10000
}
]
}Manabar
Voting Power100.00%
Downvote Power100.00%
Resource Credits100.00%
Reputation Progress22.13%
{
"voting_manabar": {
"current_mana": "8143659806",
"last_update_time": 1779067752
},
"downvote_manabar": {
"current_mana": 2035914951,
"last_update_time": 1779067752
},
"rc_account": {
"account": "invictus6",
"rc_manabar": {
"current_mana": "10164408779",
"last_update_time": 1779067752
},
"max_rc_creation_adjustment": {
"amount": "2020748973",
"precision": 6,
"nai": "@@000000037"
},
"max_rc": "10164408779"
}
}Account Metadata
| POSTING JSON METADATA | |
| profile | {"profile_image":"https://s2.postimg.org/49htwwxt5/IMG_1823.jpg","name":"Invictus","about":"Crypto connoisseur and aspiring writer","location":"🇦🇺 "} |
| JSON METADATA | |
| profile | {"profile_image":"https://s2.postimg.org/49htwwxt5/IMG_1823.jpg","name":"Invictus","about":"Crypto connoisseur and aspiring writer","location":"🇦🇺 "} |
{
"posting_json_metadata": {
"profile": {
"profile_image": "https://s2.postimg.org/49htwwxt5/IMG_1823.jpg",
"name": "Invictus",
"about": "Crypto connoisseur and aspiring writer",
"location": "🇦🇺 "
}
},
"json_metadata": {
"profile": {
"profile_image": "https://s2.postimg.org/49htwwxt5/IMG_1823.jpg",
"name": "Invictus",
"about": "Crypto connoisseur and aspiring writer",
"location": "🇦🇺 "
}
}
}Auth Keys
Owner
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM5JydJgZZFuoditNrYuQxPriZhxsCwAGS76vxFJX3X7jUTicAJj1/1
Active
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM7tpAH1e6Hd9EbNyNBb5iR8rcr3c5HSBB73suMRA9YUHtHBgKrm1/1
Posting
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM6KhxjV3faPiZ5QcxGKYb38mJEHdZ1D74CkmHJbN5s3MDH5cvE21/1
Memo
STM8Z6YUVr6ck1dUQmR9mijRnjwZjQpPLwnmiisHy7jhcHYR1EPuv
{
"owner": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM5JydJgZZFuoditNrYuQxPriZhxsCwAGS76vxFJX3X7jUTicAJj",
1
]
]
},
"active": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM7tpAH1e6Hd9EbNyNBb5iR8rcr3c5HSBB73suMRA9YUHtHBgKrm",
1
]
]
},
"posting": {
"weight_threshold": 1,
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM6KhxjV3faPiZ5QcxGKYb38mJEHdZ1D74CkmHJbN5s3MDH5cvE2",
1
]
]
},
"memo": "STM8Z6YUVr6ck1dUQmR9mijRnjwZjQpPLwnmiisHy7jhcHYR1EPuv"
}Witness Votes
0 / 30
No active witness votes.
[]