{
  "trx_id": "0628292af6bf67944649e87f6f4dd904f3d68f52",
  "block": 61020719,
  "trx_in_block": 29,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-01-24T19:59:03",
  "op": [
    "transfer",
    {
      "from": "executive-board",
      "to": "cthugha",
      "amount": "0.001 STEEM",
      "memo": "❗ Hello cthugha, great that you are using the STEEM blockchain. The Executive Board is publishing insider infos at https://discord.gg/KyBbmhh on how you will be earning the most coins. It's easy, just follow the instructions. THE 1000X BOOSTER KEY is already waiting for you over there too. 😉 Warm regards, The Executive Board."
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "0f22cc98c5b4dd9ecfbd499e028115300525ed87",
  "block": 61020685,
  "trx_in_block": 26,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-01-24T19:57:21",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "sqube",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "bear-with-me-a-story-for-the-bear-market",
      "weight": 100
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "7ec2afc2411da6633a414e581ed7c39f31bc04ae",
  "block": 61020685,
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-01-24T19:57:21",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "resilientknows",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "bear-with-me-a-story-for-the-bear-market",
      "weight": 100
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "220fd6576cdd50fbc8083aacbf609e21d92619eb",
  "block": 61020685,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-01-24T19:57:21",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "gangstalking",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "bear-with-me-a-story-for-the-bear-market",
      "weight": 1
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "f4612eb654100755e7446e211bbcd852fafd3e6e",
  "block": 61020682,
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-01-24T19:57:12",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "bitcoin",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "bear-with-me-a-story-for-the-bear-market",
      "title": "Bear with me - a story for the bear market",
      "body": "The ancient Indo-Europeans, from whose language most of our languages derive, had words for all the common animals around them except one: the bear.\n\nDO NOT SUMMON THE BEAR!\n\nSome say they feared the bear so much they dared not speak its name --\n\nDO NOT SUMMON THE BEAR!\n\n-- while others say the bear was sacred to them, and you do not speak of the Most Holy.\n\nDO NOT UTTER ITS NAME!\n\nI say: not talking about the bear was a test.\nEveryone knew it existed.\nEveryone knew they might meet it.\nEveryone knew it was dangerous.\nBut you don't talk about it.\n\nThis -- the bear -- is the one thing you have to face without preparation, without planning, without assurances.\n\nSpeaking about the terrifying thing renders it harmless. Making plans for defeating it lulls you into a false sense of security. Those who speak of the bear will seem like experts, and everyone else will lean back and expect the experts to deal with it when it comes.\n\nDO NOT SPEAK OF THE BEAR.\n\nWhen the bear comes, everyone's real nature is revealed. The coward is revealed as a coward. Those who stay together to fight, without words, will recognize each other. Those who enter the fray for the first time, without preparation or orders, show their courage.\n\nDO NOT SUMMON THE BEAR. \n\nIt will come on its own when you are least expecting it. Then you will show if you are ready, and you will see whom you can trust.\n\nBear with me.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"bitcoin\",\"crypto\",\"history\",\"blog\",\"investing\",\"literature\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.2\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "a6d864ac0b89b82ba1ace6c451f08810b50fe499",
  "block": 35752563,
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-08-21T17:45:33",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "cthugha",
      "parent_permlink": "rent-everything",
      "author": "steemitboard",
      "permlink": "steemitboard-notify-cthugha-20190821t174533000z",
      "title": "",
      "body": "Congratulations @cthugha! You received a personal award!\n\n<table><tr><td>https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@cthugha/birthday3.png</td><td>Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 3 years!</td></tr></table>\n\n<sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@cthugha) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=cthugha)_</sub>\n\n\n###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes!",
      "json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "0e298ec7aa4b2e67bba837b1b75b8b4871cd6e71",
  "block": 14774596,
  "trx_in_block": 27,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-08-21T17:40:12",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "cthugha",
      "parent_permlink": "rent-everything",
      "author": "steemitboard",
      "permlink": "steemitboard-notify-cthugha-20170821t174014000z",
      "title": "",
      "body": "Congratulations @cthugha! You have received a personal award!\n\n[![](https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@cthugha/birthday1.png)](http://steemitboard.com/@cthugha)  Happy Birthday - 1 Year on Steemit Happy Birthday - 1 Year on Steemit\nClick on the badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.\n\nFor more information about this award, click [here](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-update-8-happy-birthday)\n> By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how [here](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/http-i-cubeupload-com-7ciqeo-png)!",
      "json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notifications.png\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "5806510a4691e90d5c07a02a42eeefd262841c16",
  "block": 9513691,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2017-02-19T20:00:12",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cthugha",
      "author": "dana-edwards",
      "permlink": "self-owned-robots-that-pay-taxes-facilitated-by-graphene",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "fc3ce4cebdaddf0b9ac855b9c3e63246f0de4323",
  "block": 5461625,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-10-01T21:46:33",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cthugha"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"cthugha\",\"following\":\"ghostwriter\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "d26aafd6642463ff8caa4111fe5967c7ece79719",
  "block": 5170386,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-09-21T18:40:45",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cthugha",
      "author": "johan-nygren",
      "permlink": "new-psychiatry-towards-a-memetic-model-for-obedience-to-coercion",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "e7a57b293ada473643bce0d45a1af063b56e2a28",
  "block": 5097273,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-09-19T05:21:03",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "kooshikoo",
      "parent_permlink": "re-cthugha-rent-everything-20160918t215539971z",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "re-kooshikoo-re-cthugha-rent-everything-20160919t052057582z",
      "title": "",
      "body": "\"I think it does not make sense economically for items of higher costs, like a house, flat, or car. The more frequent and/or regular the use of the object, the less it makes sense to rent. If you rent a car every day, then in some time you could have owned the car already with the money you have spent renting it.\"\nThat's true -- but it only works as an argument against renting if you think that owning stuff is a good thing in the first place.\nLet's take the car example. This scenario only works if you stick with the same car for all the time it takes you to pay it off -- that is, you're stuck to one model that has to work for everything you do (instead of e.g. taking a cheaper option whenever you do not need the big six-seater), that is always at the same level of technology (while progress marches on, you're still sitting in that 2010 clunker), and that you feel compelled to use all the time, even when it would be more convenient to take public transport, because you already have it, you're paying for it (not just the lease, but taxes, parking space, maintenance etc.), and it would make no sense to leave it standing in the garage.\nSo if you do it right, I'm not even sure if the economic benefits of owning-it-at-some-point (when it's long outdated and probably costs much more to operate than more recent cars would) are really that high -- and in any case, they're offset by greater flexibility. As your life changes, your transportation requirements change; look at all of the people who still drive their big family cars to work, even though their kids are long out of the house and have cars of their own. That's economical AND ecological madness. And to switch to houses, for a second, look at all the people who say \"no, I can't take this job, it's too far away and I just finished paying off the mortgage / I'll lose my deposit / I've settled down here now\". We tend not to notice this kind of opportunity cost most of the time, but I think as soon as more people live a more liberated life, this sort of clinging to belongings will seem ridiculous and outdated.\n\nAs for the post-scarcity society, I'm completely on board with this. I just think that's quite some way off yet; but then, renting everything might free up enough capital (human and otherwise) that we can get there sooner! :)",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"money\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "2af1ffb9d2806aad5cf8927ff70872037d8bcb90",
  "block": 5088373,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-09-18T21:55:06",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "cthugha",
      "parent_permlink": "rent-everything",
      "author": "kooshikoo",
      "permlink": "re-cthugha-rent-everything-20160918t215539971z",
      "title": "",
      "body": "You are making good points, but I have one issue: I think it does not make sense economically for items of higher costs, like a house, flat, or car. The more frequent and/or regular the use of the object, the less it makes sense to rent. If you rent a car every day, then in some time you could have owned the car already with the money you have spent renting it. And you are going to keep renting it in the future. Not a very happy thought.\nAlso, when you are renting, you are feeding some one else´s pocket, insted of investing.\nBut if we see it from an environmental perspective, it makes a lot of sense, it should lead to less need for consumption.\n**But what if we followed your model, and took away the need for money?**\nNow we are talking! Let´s turn all of the utilities we need into  a commons.\nWe are heading for a post scarcity society, means of production is becoming cheaper and cheaper, and in the end it will not even be possible to make money from production most goods and services, the means of productions will be easily accessible to everybody.\nBut that doesn´t mean that we should producce a lot of stuff.\nWe could have a true sharing economy, only producing what is really necessary, and sharing and reparing all of the rest.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"money\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "34cbaed7e6fb28f302d79dacc73fc70a2bc873d5",
  "block": 5088076,
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-09-18T21:40:15",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "kooshikoo",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "rent-everything",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "9f9dfb3ca4a3b168122fe9067d9a1fdb8f17d961",
  "block": 5087537,
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-09-18T21:13:12",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "money",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "rent-everything",
      "title": "Rent Everything!",
      "body": "@@ -1,21 +1,4 @@\n-Rent Everything%0A%0A\n I ow\n",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"money\",\"life\",\"minimalism\",\"optimization\",\"lifestyle\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "08cdacc29f6b79ec8b719eac05b4e054029c20c3",
  "block": 5087512,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-09-18T21:11:57",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cthugha",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "rent-everything",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "08cdacc29f6b79ec8b719eac05b4e054029c20c3",
  "block": 5087512,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-09-18T21:11:57",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "money",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "rent-everything",
      "title": "Rent Everything!",
      "body": "Rent Everything\n\nI own a circle cutter. It's a handy little tool for cutting circles out of paper, up to a diameter of 8 inches. For a while, back when my son constantly wanted the planets of our solar system cut to scale so he could color them in, I used the circle cutter at least twice a week and it saved me a lot of time. (I still had to cut Jupiter and Saturn-plus-the-rings by hand, though.)\n\nMy son's into dinosaurs now, and the circle cutter is sitting in a box on a shelf somewhere, I'm not even sure where exactly. Sure, I could easily get rid of it -- sell it on ebay, donate it to the local charity flea market, or just throw it out -- but who knows? Maybe in a few years I'll need to cut lots of circles out of paper for some purpose and be awfully glad that I held on to it. (If I can find it, that is.)\n\nThis is stupid.\n\nSome people are hoarders. It's easy to make fun of them, because they keep stuff that they obviously will not ever need again, like the little paper wrappers around tea bags (but they're so pretty!) or ugly old clothes with tears in awkward places and uncleanable stains (but what if I have to paint a room someday?). These are not the people I'm talking about, though I suppose they too could benefit from what I'll be proposing here. No, I am talking about all of us -- maybe excluding a few exceptionally strong-willed minimalists, who get by with exactly as much as they need and nothing else.\n\nWe all do this, in some way or another. Our basements are full of snowboards, barbecue equipment, or sports gear that we haven't touched in years. There are muffin baking trays, exotic cookbooks, special sushi knives, and/or funny pudding cups hidden in the back corners of our kitchens. There's this book we bought but never found the time to read. The sweater we've worn for one winter, then put away for summer and forgot to take out of the box again, three years ago.\n\nAnd yet, we tend not to think of such things as a problem. After all, we might use them again at some point; and it's better to have stuff than not have it, right?\n\nWell, no.\n\nFirst, let's take a look at this from an economic perspective. If that bores you, just skip the next five paragraphs, to where I start talking about things from the perspective of optimality. That is usually more fun.\n\nStill, economics matter. Buying things -- exchanging money for physical objects -- tends to seem like a good idea: after all, it turns this abstract thing called money into something we can actually use (provided we understand the manual). And it's not like the money is gone, then; after all, the thing that we spent it on is still there, and we could theoretically turn it back into money at any point. Whereas, if you rent something, you get some use out of the thing, but then it's gone again and so's the money.\n\nWhich sounds obvious right up until the first time you've tried to sell your barely-used $200 bread machine on ebay and ended up giving it away for a ten-dollar bill that later turned out to be forged.\n\nExchanging money for things you own always decreases the value of that money. It ties the money down, so it can neither flow nor grow (i.e. it cannot be invested and it is not available if you need it). As soon as you stop using the product, even for a while, it becomes a net negative: it takes up storage space, it may require maintenance, and even if you invest time and energy in trying to sell it, you will never be able to reclaim more than a fraction of the money that went into it.\n\nBy contrast, owning little increases your mobility (it's easier to move), frees up space (so you don't need as big a flat) and has clear psychological benefits (e.g. freeing your mind from having to keep track of your belongings).\n\nIf this sounds like an argument for minimalism rather than rent-ism, that's because it is. Minimalism is the goal; renting things instead of owning them is just a simple and effective way to get there. While it is easy to see the benefits of a minimalist, uncluttered lifestyle, most of us do not have the strength of will to keep it up. That's where renting can help: if we pay rent for everything we use, we are incentivized to limit the things we use to what is actually necessary, and to return them as soon as we do not need them any more -- knowing that we can get them again any time we need to, for a small fee proportional to the time we hold on to them.\n\nOf course, that would require an entirely new infrastructure; but as I'll argue later, we are already rapidly moving into the direction of this being possible. So, what would a rent-only existence look like?\n\nFirst, let's look at a few examples where this is already possible. You can rent a flat instad of buying it, which is a good idea if you know you'll be moving out again, or if you don't want to be responsible for keeping up all of the infrastructure. You can rent a car -- say, a small one for going to work, then a bigger one on the weekend for taking a trip with your family. On a smaller scale, instead of buying books you can borrow them from the library -- sometimes for a small fee, sometimes for free up until you hit a certain time limit.\n\nNow imagine the same principle working for everything else.\n\nSay, cutlery. You have a set for every member of your family on a cheap long-time lease. If you have guests, you get some from the home supplies store for the evening, then wash them and bring them back. (Or bring them back unwashed for a small premium.) You want to bake a cake? The home supplier has all the tools you need in a special combination offer, minimum renting time two hours, which incidentally is just as long as it takes you to finish your favorite cake. If you still get your recipes from books rather than the Internet, they've got those too.\n\nOr maybe that's too much hassle and all of those guests wouldn't fit into your small flat anyway? So you rent a room, which will also have enough chairs. If you want to cook, rent a room with a kitchen. If this sounds like an absurd luxury to you, compare it to the cost of permanently renting and maintaining a flat that has room for all of those people, and a kitchen that's big enough to cook for twelve even though on most days you never need to cook for more than three.\n\nThe only things you have at your place permanently are the things you literally use every day. That special pancake pan? Drop by the shop on Friday, or have it delivered together with the pancake mix and syrup, then have the kids take it back and let them keep the deposit. (Kids love that.) The printer? As soon as the kids are out of that phase when they ask you to print coloring pages for them all of the time, get rid of it and go down to the copyshop whenever you need something.\n\nThat assumes there is a copyshop, of course. And party rooms for rent. And a home supplier that offers all these services.\n\nBut we can make that happen. Look at how Uber and Lyft are changing the attitude to owning a car in urban centers. Look at laundry services, grocery delivery (which could provide part of the infrastructure for an easy-to-use quick renting service) and the density of copyshops in urban centers. Being able to rent everything is not that far off.\n\nIn closing, here's again what renting does for you:\n\n- It makes you pay attention to what you actually need.\n\n- It helps you keep your place uncluttered.\n\n- It makes you more flexible, not just in where you live or how many people you invite to your party, but also in how many tools you have at your disposal: not just what you have lying around or are ready to buy (and then have lying around forever), but everything that's in your home supplier's catalogue.\n\n- It lets you adapt more easily to your financial situation: If you're short on money this month, return that king-size bed and get a cheaper one instead until you're liquid again.\n\n- It allows you to live in a place that is exactly suited to your everyday needs, rather than your everyday needs plus every conceivable eventuality.\n\nSo, are you ready to rent?",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"money\",\"life\",\"minimalism\",\"optimization\",\"lifestyle\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "ef4d13a85db03ec078716199d94e75a135c7d1ae",
  "block": 4826947,
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-09-09T18:45:54",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cthugha",
      "author": "williambanks",
      "permlink": "seti-has-observed-a-strong-signal-that-may-originate-from-a-sun-like-star-or-it-may-be-bs",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "a0295fbd1dd101550b4491ff96eb2bb218d4c7bf",
  "block": 4502983,
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-29T12:04:36",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cthugha",
      "author": "anonymint",
      "permlink": "re-xcynosure-re-msgivings-why-he-prefers-the-girl-on-the-side-20160829t050900580z",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "415e79a0141734c8ca61cabf5a4fa9da7ccd1c80",
  "block": 4502976,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-29T12:04:15",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cthugha",
      "author": "karnal",
      "permlink": "re-msgivings-why-he-prefers-the-girl-on-the-side-20160829t023914600z",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "299b53c465f3c0618c69252deab198ddab9ad31d",
  "block": 4502961,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-29T12:03:30",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cthugha",
      "author": "kevinwong",
      "permlink": "re-msgivings-why-he-prefers-the-girl-on-the-side-20160829t032919911z",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "ecb19fe533a0fa5fa38a61f24abf7227e3d92a0c",
  "block": 4483304,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-28T19:39:30",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "cthugha",
      "parent_permlink": "liberating-architecture",
      "author": "steemcleaners",
      "permlink": "re-cthugha-liberating-architecture-20160828t193916041z",
      "title": "",
      "body": "Source: http://opaqueforest.blogspot.com/2016/06/libertarian-architecture.html \nNot citing sources is plagiarism, and copying pasting articles without permission is copyright infringement. If you want to share a news story, simply link to the source, and include your original commentary, and possibly small quotes from the source. \nCopy paste is discouraged by the community, and may result in action from the [cheetah bot](https://steemit.com/steemitabuse/@cheetah/cheetah-bot-explained).\n\nThank You! ☙",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"automation\"],\"links\":[\"http://opaqueforest.blogspot.com/2016/06/libertarian-architecture.html\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "456ab5a04230ea58049f1d8ed10bb23480c281b9",
  "block": 4473190,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-28T11:13:21",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cthugha"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "{\"follower\":\"cthugha\",\"following\":\"arnoldwish\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "0de7b2683fbd16af8c11014397dbd6bdfb1c1a5c",
  "block": 4473174,
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-28T11:12:33",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "arnoldwish",
      "parent_permlink": "the-definitive-list-of-websites-that-everyone-should-know-about-steemit-exclusive",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "re-arnoldwish-the-definitive-list-of-websites-that-everyone-should-know-about-steemit-exclusive-20160828t111235788z",
      "title": "",
      "body": "This is an excellent resource! As an educator I'm particularly grateful for the Education list, which  led me to quite a few places I hadn't seen before. (Though I doubt that any single person could use all of them \"on a daily basis\", as you say :p)\n\nEventually, if we want to make full use of the Internet's potential to change education, we will have to come up with a curated, searchable database of online resources, sorted by topic, level, duration, free/commercial, self-study/teaching materials, etc etc. I've seen plenty of attempts in that direction -- futurelearn is one of the better ones, iSeek (http://education.iseek.com/iseek/home.page) is more focused on teaching materials -- but so far nothing seems to have achieved the sort of fixation and widespread use that would be needed for true disruption.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"blog\"],\"links\":[\"http://education.iseek.com/iseek/home.page\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "97b09e7267a85703211292d977ede8b42b125810",
  "block": 4472977,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-28T11:02:42",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cthugha",
      "author": "arnoldwish",
      "permlink": "the-definitive-list-of-websites-that-everyone-should-know-about-steemit-exclusive",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "0e0411241cbb5570b06a835dd30caf1087c76b24",
  "block": 4472911,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-28T10:59:24",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cthugha",
      "author": "kooshikoo",
      "permlink": "re-cthugha-liberating-architecture-20160827t221148740z",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "a8de36ab8fc3df42aa38e9b9a98ea4cd90281da5",
  "block": 4457626,
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-27T22:12:09",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "cthugha",
      "parent_permlink": "liberating-architecture",
      "author": "kooshikoo",
      "permlink": "re-cthugha-liberating-architecture-20160827t221148740z",
      "title": "",
      "body": "@@ -211,10 +211,8 @@\n d. I\n-%C2%B4m\n  am \n",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"automation\"],\"links\":[\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programmable_matter\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "9edf08ac5238699d695ccc532a2ea0d78b425d2a",
  "block": 4457613,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-27T22:11:30",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "cthugha",
      "parent_permlink": "liberating-architecture",
      "author": "kooshikoo",
      "permlink": "re-cthugha-liberating-architecture-20160827t221148740z",
      "title": "",
      "body": "I agree with your final statement \" that algorithmic decision-making, contrary to the popular imagination, could actually lead to more freedom, by expanding the space of tractable possibilities.\"\nWell formulated. I´m am confident that some version of this will be forthcoming. One posssibility is [programmable matter](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programmable_matter)  of different kinds,  (like [claytronics](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claytronics) , or even synthetic biology. These approaches could be used both to fabricate any digital design, or using algoritms like you suggested. \nHere is one good article on the subject:http://spectrum.ieee.org/robotics/robotics-hardware/make-your-own-world-with-programmable-matter\n# The future is bright, and weird.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"automation\"],\"links\":[\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programmable_matter\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "68208afca57daadaa25b499725b19e04574017c4",
  "block": 4457194,
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-27T21:50:18",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "kooshikoo",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "liberating-architecture",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "fe5dd0b3bb02081a86bbe4cfe55f6ea512e2535d",
  "block": 4456513,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-27T21:16:06",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "persianqueen",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "liberating-architecture",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "7f8576343d4284e3419981e07559c4668ac2f298",
  "block": 4456496,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-27T21:15:15",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cthugha"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "{\"follower\":\"cthugha\",\"following\":\"kooshikoo\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "0bf284dc751cb78e576d8adffcaf25bb1507bd81",
  "block": 4456491,
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-27T21:15:00",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cthugha",
      "author": "kooshikoo",
      "permlink": "building-a-philosophy-of-voting-on-steemit",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "dffc2025801f8678bb48a096504878c9cdd7c6bf",
  "block": 4456467,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-27T21:13:48",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cthugha",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "liberating-architecture",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "dffc2025801f8678bb48a096504878c9cdd7c6bf",
  "block": 4456467,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-27T21:13:48",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "automation",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "liberating-architecture",
      "title": "Liberating architecture",
      "body": "I was looking at a bush recently, and thinking \"why can't cities be like this?\"\n\nThe obvious answer is, of course, _building regulations_. (And lazy thinking. But we'll get to that.)\nNow, I understand that building regulations have a point. Their most obviously legitimate purpose is to ensure the safety of both the building's inhabitants and their neighbors. You shouldn't be allowed to build a house that will collapse if you drive a nail into the wall at the wrong angle; neither should you be allowed to build a house out of flammable materials that will instantly set all neighboring buildings on fire, or fall onto them.\n(From a libertarian point of view, you could say that it's only the latter consideration that counts: your buildings should not endanger others; whether they are a danger to yourself is your own problem. But then, almost nobody ever makes a building just for themselves, to be destroyed after their death; in nearly every case, someone else will also be living inside that building at some point.)\n\nBecause of this, and because humans are fallible, building regulations usually have large safety margins and limit the range of acceptable constructions to a few well-established principles that have been known to work. Of course, architects and builders can push the envelope by requesting permission for novel types of structures; but that is a lengthy and often expensive process with a high probability of failure, and as such not open to most people.\n\nSo, computers.\n\nExisting building regulations are necessarily coarse-grained because they need to be tractable from an administrative point of view. You can't check every crazy hand-drawn plan for static viability and fire-safety and whatnot; you need applicants to operate within the limits of your well-established principles if you want to get any work done.\nAs long as you're a person and not a computer program, that is.\nImagine an architectural planning program that lets you do anything as long as you don't overstep the bounds of static viability and fire safety. The program would know those boundaries at a high level of detail, and it would be capable of calculating the interactions of far more variables, in many more ways, than could reasonably be be expected of a human being. As a result, the program would be able to permit many constructions that humans would have to fail because they don't understand them.\nNow give the program a graphical user interface with tools that make it as easy to use as the Sims construction window. Let people experiment with designs up to the very limits of feasibility. Add a cost calculator -- every construction company will be happy to supply their prices in machine-readable formats if the program allows users to directly export the specifications for every part to the construction service provider of their choice. (Ideally, those specifications wouldn't even have to be implemented by humans, but just fed directly into the machines producing the relevant parts.) Gamify the whole thing and unlock people's creativity, making cities into growing and unique places full of custom-built habitations.\n\n(To answer the obvious objection: Yes, of course it would be possible to code aesthetic requirements into the planning program. No, of course the harshest of critics wouldn't be satisified with any algorithmically encoded aesthetics; but then, those critics won't be happy with anything decided by a human committee, either.)\n\nYou might have noticed that I don't actually know much about architecture, and my experience with building regulations is mostly limited to frustration at the impossibility of building an Earthship in Austria. The above, then, is more of an intuition -- an intuition that I think might hold true for other fields as well: that algorithmic decision-making, contrary to the popular imagination, could actually lead to _more freedom_, by expanding the space of tractable possibilities.\n\nThoughts?",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"automation\",\"technology\",\"design\",\"architecture\",\"optimization\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "647333886b3a6cadb508d20641249c7e0b389539",
  "block": 4373233,
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-24T23:07:18",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "kooshikoo",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "re-kooshikoo-re-cthugha-autonomy-not-care-20160824t081612646z",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "827cc12e0ea3bbcaf561fd629e35ab63cd27d0b5",
  "block": 4355773,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-24T08:31:15",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "automation",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "autonomy-not-care",
      "title": "Autonomy, not care",
      "body": "@@ -4459,8 +4459,180 @@\n ve them.\n+%0A%0A**EDIT:** Just to clarify, this was originally posted on my blog (http://opaqueforest.blogspot.com), some parts of which I will port to Steemit and then continue it here.\n",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"automation\",\"technology\",\"design\",\"care\",\"optimization\"],\"links\":[\"http://opaqueforest.blogspot.com\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "0d7b88e57ab0b969b9eec98005cf33fdf26ba8f6",
  "block": 4355492,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-24T08:17:12",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cthugha",
      "author": "kooshikoo",
      "permlink": "re-cthugha-autonomy-not-care-20160824t070722943z",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "d4ea754ebcea01165fdbbf75b40e6e316fb57986",
  "block": 4355474,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-24T08:16:18",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "kooshikoo",
      "parent_permlink": "re-cthugha-autonomy-not-care-20160824t070722943z",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "re-kooshikoo-re-cthugha-autonomy-not-care-20160824t081612646z",
      "title": "",
      "body": "Agreed -- I don't even get into \"can/should automation be prevented\" arguments any more. Instead, the question we should ask ourselves should be: Taking automation for granted,how can we use it to benefit all of humanity?\nUnfortunately, most people don't seem to think that far, instead getting stuck at either \"automation will be the death of us all\" or \"automation is great and will solve all of our problems\". Neither of these is likely to be true -- unless we actively work to make the latter a reality. In and of itself, automation is value-neutral; it's up to us to employ it for good.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"automation\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "64a5419effe11b002538c93569469c07ea0db950",
  "block": 4354752,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-24T07:39:51",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "cthugha",
      "parent_permlink": "autonomy-not-care",
      "author": "autonomy",
      "permlink": "re-cthugha-autonomy-not-care-20160824t073951524z",
      "title": "",
      "body": "I hope your optimism is warranted. According to this account of a PlannedParenthood meeting held in 1969, de-industrializing the US was intentionally planned:\n\n\"Each part of the world will have a specialty and thus become inter-dependent, he said. The US will remain a center for agriculture, high tech, communications, and education but heavy industry would be \"transported out.\"\nhttp://henrymakow.com/confirmedrockefeller_plan_to_g.html#sthash.Mi0QRcXe.dpuf\n\nThe next statement documented by historical researcher Alan Watt paints a chilling picture of the future:\n\n\"So we’re not staggering down through time, just bumping into things and politicians get up and fix it. Far, far from it. Everything that happens on a large scale was planned well in advance, well in advance, including the mass unemployment that would be left after all the factories went off to China. That took years of negotiations through the World Trade Organization, another private organization set up by the CFR/Royal Institute of International Affairs a long time ago. And we had no say in that whatsoever. So they knew the fallout across the Western world and they basically said, we’ll bring in service economies. Service economies they discussed as far back as the 1970s in Britain, because that’s what they had planned for that, before the US and Canada and elsewhere. Because service economies, you import stuff and simply pass it around from hands to hands to the shopkeeper, and you can only float for a few years using that technique, then you sink. They used to equate it to like a dog falling into a swimming pool, that can keep dog-paddling for as long as it can, but once it’s tired out, it sinks and it drowns. That’s what a service economy was meant to do eventually.\n\nThe country that’s not manufacturing doesn’t have all the different levels, from raw ore or whatever up to the finished product, so many different processes and different companies it goes through that spreads the wealth around. If it doesn’t have that, believe you me, it’s lost a lot of its money and its wealth and its standard of living. And that’s what service economies were designed to do. But thanks again to all of the top people, all the prime ministers and presidents who were elected, and again, vetted prior to elections to be eligible for election by these private organizations, the CFR and Royal Institute of International Affairs, because they’re all members of this club. And they signed everything away a long time ago. And they’ve not finished yet, by the way.\"\n\nhttp://cuttingthroughthematrix.com/transcripts/Alan_Watt_CTTM_LIVEonRBN_1391_Bye-Bye_American_Pie__Pattern_of_History_Doesn_t_Lie_Aug092013.html",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"automation\"],\"links\":[\"http://henrymakow.com/confirmedrockefeller_plan_to_g.html#sthash.Mi0QRcXe.dpuf\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "46dfecdd6e587633b05be5e4b84064b2bb345f21",
  "block": 4354106,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-24T07:07:24",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "cthugha",
      "parent_permlink": "autonomy-not-care",
      "author": "kooshikoo",
      "permlink": "re-cthugha-autonomy-not-care-20160824t070722943z",
      "title": "",
      "body": "@@ -374,16 +374,18 @@\n ion.%0AThe\n+re\n  will be\n",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"automation\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "c1febf68bcf8325ad49947343033b7e6816e2f68",
  "block": 4354098,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-24T07:07:00",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "cthugha",
      "parent_permlink": "autonomy-not-care",
      "author": "kooshikoo",
      "permlink": "re-cthugha-autonomy-not-care-20160824t070722943z",
      "title": "",
      "body": "You are making excellent points! I wish we could spread these ideas to the mainstream. THere is a lot of fear of automation and A.I. Personallly I believe that we are heading for a post-scarcity world. And I hope for a world without money,because I don´t see the need for the monetary system with it´s profit maximation which does not take ecological values into consideration.\nThe will be some tasks to do for humans still,mainly therapy,teaching,music and arts. All the places where they sell things now could be converted to places to hang out,listen to live music,etc.\nAm I a dreamer? Yes. Can dreams come true? Yes.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"automation\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "7ef1cd474ef12d1eb16a498dc99417dfb9fe0897",
  "block": 4353945,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-24T06:59:18",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "kooshikoo",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "autonomy-not-care",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "f259a55c620f8f1c06b617e923995d67432e37b6",
  "block": 4353936,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-24T06:58:51",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "salesa",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "autonomy-not-care",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "3ff1a4606c9fd2f2538176643df7c7c8ad8fda4c",
  "block": 4353925,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-24T06:58:18",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "bloodwood",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "autonomy-not-care",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "6fff114256b4c478aa5cd838733c14f82c7440cb",
  "block": 4353914,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-24T06:57:45",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "darkweaver",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "autonomy-not-care",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "8eb5a00b8b1891a47ffa0a92b3e80663e76e2c8f",
  "block": 4353903,
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-24T06:57:12",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "lada111",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "autonomy-not-care",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "f2d294926314e98ee982ca37c240358d01ff8718",
  "block": 4353900,
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-24T06:57:03",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cthugha",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "autonomy-not-care",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "f2d294926314e98ee982ca37c240358d01ff8718",
  "block": 4353900,
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-24T06:57:03",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "automation",
      "author": "cthugha",
      "permlink": "autonomy-not-care",
      "title": "Autonomy, not care",
      "body": "In many conversations about automation, there is one criticism that comes up so often and so reliably that it seems like a reflex. Let's try it -- just mentally fill in the retort.\n\nA: They're even making robots that care for the sick and elderly!\nB: ______________________________________!\n\nBut is it, really?\n\nI've talked about this with quite a few people, and when I ask them to elaborate, most of them paint a dreary picture of senior citizen farms operated entirely by lifeless automata.\n\nOf course that idea suffers from the same problem as most futurology and naive science fiction: it simply takes some aspect of today's world and replaces humans with robots. Sure, it's a terrible idea to lock away old people in isolated places and deprive them of most types of human contact just so they don't bother us young folks -- but we are _doing that already_. The problem is not the automation of these places, but the fact that they exist in the first place; substituting robots for care workers merely serves to emphasize the inhumanity of it all.\n\nI was prompted to write this post by a conversation between two old women I heard on the bus this morning. One was telling the other that she had recently moved into a retirement home because she didn't want to impose on her family any more. However, now she felt like she was imposing on the care workers and service staff, and she felt like the fact that they were getting paid for it hardly made it any better. For some time, the conversation devolved into the familiar barrage of complaints about the impersonal treatment at the retirement home, the accents of the care workers (most of whom are immigrants), and the other ~~inmates~~ clients at the institution. The point was -- the woman said -- that she just hated having to depend on others in everything she did.\n\nYou see where this is going.\n\nRobots are not people. Less tautologically, robots do not \"replace\" people. Sometimes they are employed to do things that could also be done by people, but the way they do them is usually quite different from what people would do. (Yes, people can manufacture cars; but their bodies are not well adapted to that purpose, so they have to do it in roundabout and inefficient ways.)\n\nRobots are _tools_.\n\nI don't mind imposing on my computer to look me up the titles of some obscure TV show episode. I would mind imposing on a librarian to do the same.\n\nI'm sure my neighbor in the wheelchair often wishes he could get around without it; but he would hate it far more if he had to have two people carry him around all the time.\n\nAnd, importantly, he would use their services far less than he uses the wheelchair. (Just as I simply wouldn't look up most of the things I do now.) Cost plays a part here, but also shame and effort.\n\nUsing a tool is not dehumanizing, it's empowering. Using a tool instead of making other people serve you is even less dehumanizing, as it saves those other people from essentially being treated as tools.\n\n(Of course the usual caveats about technological unemployment apply here, but they've been amply discussed elsewhere.)\n\nWhat does this mean in practice?\n\nRather than replace the already-terrible institution of retirement homes with the even more obviously terrible institution of automated retirement homes, technology will increasingly enable old people to lead self-determined lives. Automating care means developing tools that help old people live without the need of constant human supervision and assistance -- thus obviating the need for centralized institutions where a limited number of care workers cater to the needs of a host of old people.\n\nThis is another instance of technology allowing for more fine-grained and personalized solutions -- and thus for better flexibility -- than systems dependent on human components. But to make it work, we have to move past the \"naive science fiction\" fallacy that I've described. Instead of imagining robots doing what humans have always done, we have to develop a sense for what we can do _differently_ using technology. With automated care -- or maybe we should rather call it \"autonomy solutions\" -- entirely new kinds of lifestyles will become accessible to the old and infirm. Many of the reasons why old people today move into (or get sent to) retirement homes will become obsolete -- as long as we remember that technology is supposed to optimize people's lives, rather than the institutions that currently serve them.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"automation\",\"technology\",\"design\",\"care\",\"optimization\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "2b6c9381d603501df8f480a5c5568e12d38d4f2b",
  "block": 4280369,
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-21T17:04:54",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cthugha",
      "author": "eliezeryudkowsky",
      "permlink": "how-to-integrate-steemit-with-quests-or-a-million-tiny-bids",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "a6f34a6d28f91548777739ca6d49daf6bd11013f",
  "block": 4280141,
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-21T16:53:12",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cthugha",
      "author": "eliezeryudkowsky",
      "permlink": "movable-housing-for-scalable-cities",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "21ca366b064e29b5de92ab19995c9ee4b6202d4f",
  "block": 4280114,
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-21T16:51:51",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cthugha"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "{\"follower\":\"cthugha\",\"following\":\"eliezeryudkowsky\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}"
    }
  ]
}

{
  "trx_id": "de966d50afe3fc2d76a09b5252741c288a136925",
  "block": 4280040,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2016-08-21T16:48:06",
  "op": [
    "account_create",
    {
      "fee": "3.000 STEEM",
      "creator": "steem",
      "new_account_name": "cthugha",
      "owner": {
        "weight_threshold": 1,
        "account_auths": [],
        "key_auths": [
          [
            "STM78YD4Vyc8JqwQDVVNGzUjLsR23nRkeCg1YrZpTP2PULLVe7DeR",
            1
          ]
        ]
      },
      "active": {
        "weight_threshold": 1,
        "account_auths": [],
        "key_auths": [
          [
            "STM4yUpAnM3h7xJJG75kXC35tMErM1wSCvfxJqWxgYadaBA8VrTHn",
            1
          ]
        ]
      },
      "posting": {
        "weight_threshold": 1,
        "account_auths": [],
        "key_auths": [
          [
            "STM7phGewAcEwPHixN9CHDbpyPFF6FCTwKnRGEjxt7XuZeKdHfZ8E",
            1
          ]
        ]
      },
      "memo_key": "STM7rMKxZCrNu66t71SVeTUeepQJw31tpfWBptzaGUnj1zEvjcTNS",
      "json_metadata": ""
    }
  ]
}