Ecoer Logo
VOTING POWER100.00%
DOWNVOTE POWER100.00%
RESOURCE CREDITS100.00%
REPUTATION PROGRESS0.00%
Net Worth
0.012USD
STEEM
0.001STEEM
SBD
0.009SBD
Effective Power
5.001SP
├── Own SP
0.132SP
└── Incoming Deleg
+4.869SP

Detailed Balance

STEEM
balance
0.001STEEM
market_balance
0.000STEEM
savings_balance
0.000STEEM
reward_steem_balance
0.000STEEM
STEEM POWER
Own SP
0.132SP
Delegated Out
0.000SP
Delegation In
4.869SP
Effective Power
5.001SP
Reward SP (pending)
0.000SP
SBD
sbd_balance
0.009SBD
sbd_conversions
0.000SBD
sbd_market_balance
0.000SBD
savings_sbd_balance
0.000SBD
reward_sbd_balance
0.000SBD
{
  "balance": "0.001 STEEM",
  "savings_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "reward_steem_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "vesting_shares": "215.599280 VESTS",
  "delegated_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "received_vesting_shares": "7928.060526 VESTS",
  "sbd_balance": "0.009 SBD",
  "savings_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
  "reward_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
  "conversions": []
}

Account Info

namecdcrenshaw
id1014182
rank339,345
reputation249067126
created2018-05-24T13:31:57
recovery_accountsteem
proxyNone
post_count6
comment_count0
lifetime_vote_count0
witnesses_voted_for0
last_post2018-05-28T20:36:39
last_root_post2018-05-28T20:36:39
last_vote_time2018-05-28T20:36:48
proxied_vsf_votes0, 0, 0, 0
can_vote1
voting_power0
delayed_votes0
balance0.001 STEEM
savings_balance0.000 STEEM
sbd_balance0.009 SBD
savings_sbd_balance0.000 SBD
vesting_shares215.599280 VESTS
delegated_vesting_shares0.000000 VESTS
received_vesting_shares7928.060526 VESTS
reward_vesting_balance0.000000 VESTS
vesting_balance0.000 STEEM
vesting_withdraw_rate0.000000 VESTS
next_vesting_withdrawal1969-12-31T23:59:59
withdrawn0
to_withdraw0
withdraw_routes0
savings_withdraw_requests0
last_account_recovery1970-01-01T00:00:00
reset_accountnull
last_owner_update1970-01-01T00:00:00
last_account_update2018-05-28T19:04:33
minedNo
sbd_seconds0
sbd_last_interest_payment1970-01-01T00:00:00
savings_sbd_last_interest_payment1970-01-01T00:00:00
{
  "id": 1014182,
  "name": "cdcrenshaw",
  "owner": {
    "weight_threshold": 1,
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM6CUVkG5MVZrPQHuKUfzhFYVBEP9csSJXq3UmMZoM2sWQXg95Rh",
        1
      ]
    ]
  },
  "active": {
    "weight_threshold": 1,
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM6UqNDe1349SBz6HggyvgEUYHKfrZBXaRsfJbsHjVPmwHCsm7QR",
        1
      ]
    ]
  },
  "posting": {
    "weight_threshold": 1,
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM6y35iPVnQx7sPGXkjBd6huJmT7Rv7JGb4pTEC73Nii5RdKErZ4",
        1
      ]
    ]
  },
  "memo_key": "STM61mQTMsNtR8aWez48ebpSNnxZwqub4z9q8NaQBzsGb29kcEP2b",
  "json_metadata": "{\"profile\":{\"profile_image\":\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQma4fwvgvZ2VEZCJ8Xp27yjFaNNfBCJpJeD5GKr6sWFxfy/IMG_7210.JPG\",\"cover_image\":\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmU7ZxUb8r7LbhR4aaDgx57HDxB7nokbU1344yqZnW1HV3/IMG_6640.JPG\",\"name\":\"Christopher\",\"location\":\"San Antonio, Texas\"}}",
  "posting_json_metadata": "{\"profile\":{\"profile_image\":\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQma4fwvgvZ2VEZCJ8Xp27yjFaNNfBCJpJeD5GKr6sWFxfy/IMG_7210.JPG\",\"cover_image\":\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmU7ZxUb8r7LbhR4aaDgx57HDxB7nokbU1344yqZnW1HV3/IMG_6640.JPG\",\"name\":\"Christopher\",\"location\":\"San Antonio, Texas\"}}",
  "proxy": "",
  "last_owner_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "last_account_update": "2018-05-28T19:04:33",
  "created": "2018-05-24T13:31:57",
  "mined": false,
  "recovery_account": "steem",
  "last_account_recovery": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "reset_account": "null",
  "comment_count": 0,
  "lifetime_vote_count": 0,
  "post_count": 6,
  "can_vote": true,
  "voting_manabar": {
    "current_mana": "8143659806",
    "last_update_time": 1779057174
  },
  "downvote_manabar": {
    "current_mana": 2035914951,
    "last_update_time": 1779057174
  },
  "voting_power": 0,
  "balance": "0.001 STEEM",
  "savings_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "sbd_balance": "0.009 SBD",
  "sbd_seconds": "0",
  "sbd_seconds_last_update": "2018-06-05T21:21:45",
  "sbd_last_interest_payment": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "savings_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
  "savings_sbd_seconds": "0",
  "savings_sbd_seconds_last_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "savings_sbd_last_interest_payment": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
  "savings_withdraw_requests": 0,
  "reward_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
  "reward_steem_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "reward_vesting_balance": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "reward_vesting_steem": "0.000 STEEM",
  "vesting_shares": "215.599280 VESTS",
  "delegated_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "received_vesting_shares": "7928.060526 VESTS",
  "vesting_withdraw_rate": "0.000000 VESTS",
  "next_vesting_withdrawal": "1969-12-31T23:59:59",
  "withdrawn": 0,
  "to_withdraw": 0,
  "withdraw_routes": 0,
  "curation_rewards": 0,
  "posting_rewards": 11,
  "proxied_vsf_votes": [
    0,
    0,
    0,
    0
  ],
  "witnesses_voted_for": 0,
  "last_post": "2018-05-28T20:36:39",
  "last_root_post": "2018-05-28T20:36:39",
  "last_vote_time": "2018-05-28T20:36:48",
  "post_bandwidth": 0,
  "pending_claimed_accounts": 0,
  "vesting_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
  "reputation": 249067126,
  "transfer_history": [],
  "market_history": [],
  "post_history": [],
  "vote_history": [],
  "other_history": [],
  "witness_votes": [],
  "tags_usage": [],
  "guest_bloggers": [],
  "rank": 339345
}

Withdraw Routes

IncomingOutgoing
Empty
Empty
{
  "incoming": [],
  "outgoing": []
}
From Date
To Date
steemdelegated 4.869 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2026/05/17 22:32:54
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares7928.060526 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #106141411/Trx 781878b6a1dbb9988a7c3152b939144ded964fac
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "781878b6a1dbb9988a7c3152b939144ded964fac",
  "block": 106141411,
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2026-05-17T22:32:54",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "7928.060526 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 3.203 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2026/05/11 21:03:51
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares5215.850121 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #105967599/Trx 5120fa6bd4738d5384b893b5d1e8dea23866c921
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "5120fa6bd4738d5384b893b5d1e8dea23866c921",
  "block": 105967599,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2026-05-11T21:03:51",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "5215.850121 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 4.876 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2026/04/25 21:56:30
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares7940.576282 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #105509112/Trx 41f48673a2bbe02e795bd70dcd34cdd51ddce278
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "41f48673a2bbe02e795bd70dcd34cdd51ddce278",
  "block": 105509112,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2026-04-25T21:56:30",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "7940.576282 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 3.228 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2026/01/23 03:18:33
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares5257.396940 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #102846434/Trx 1a90678c0924aefa357bbc8b9cb6b424ebdfe8e3
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "1a90678c0924aefa357bbc8b9cb6b424ebdfe8e3",
  "block": 102846434,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2026-01-23T03:18:33",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "5257.396940 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 3.329 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2024/12/16 22:37:48
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares5421.616137 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #91292838/Trx 8be1624ef1879dc19b3c67fb11b09c00c582c896
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "8be1624ef1879dc19b3c67fb11b09c00c582c896",
  "block": 91292838,
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2024-12-16T22:37:48",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "5421.616137 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 3.433 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2023/11/13 14:22:48
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares5590.749669 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #79847100/Trx c1ffe0c64c2566327978b7bab749222bd98dc4f7
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "c1ffe0c64c2566327978b7bab749222bd98dc4f7",
  "block": 79847100,
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2023-11-13T14:22:48",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "5590.749669 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 5.237 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2023/09/21 19:50:57
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares8528.028455 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #78345465/Trx 7358edcc4d4a4c08004cc471e6e0199e42da34fe
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "7358edcc4d4a4c08004cc471e6e0199e42da34fe",
  "block": 78345465,
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2023-09-21T19:50:57",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "8528.028455 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 5.373 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2022/11/03 09:52:03
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares8749.709893 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #69111068/Trx db3dbb20cb42a02c3e71d4b3344700e11d447c36
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "db3dbb20cb42a02c3e71d4b3344700e11d447c36",
  "block": 69111068,
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-11-03T09:52:03",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "8749.709893 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 5.508 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2022/01/17 09:16:54
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares8970.243124 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #60807416/Trx a3f7aaaad1a690d8661b44255495640566302aad
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "a3f7aaaad1a690d8661b44255495640566302aad",
  "block": 60807416,
  "trx_in_block": 48,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2022-01-17T09:16:54",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "8970.243124 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 5.621 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2021/06/13 23:16:09
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares9154.011782 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #54605886/Trx cd3147546b828b5ddfc5c45bbb2a1ca0c6adfeb0
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "cd3147546b828b5ddfc5c45bbb2a1ca0c6adfeb0",
  "block": 54605886,
  "trx_in_block": 8,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2021-06-13T23:16:09",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "9154.011782 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 5.736 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2020/12/11 09:37:12
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares9341.433756 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #49353405/Trx 40fcd9161e874e2b852e4dc3206937cc54fe1881
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "40fcd9161e874e2b852e4dc3206937cc54fe1881",
  "block": 49353405,
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2020-12-11T09:37:12",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "9341.433756 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 1.174 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2020/12/06 03:14:42
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares1912.543513 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #49204976/Trx 57ea74aaa460448409e5ccda9cd859d89e326351
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "57ea74aaa460448409e5ccda9cd859d89e326351",
  "block": 49204976,
  "trx_in_block": 2,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2020-12-06T03:14:42",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "1912.543513 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 5.740 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2020/12/05 11:11:39
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares9347.800395 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #49186082/Trx a972a39cfbf97e99299d9870d66cfc73e1251b81
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "a972a39cfbf97e99299d9870d66cfc73e1251b81",
  "block": 49186082,
  "trx_in_block": 3,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2020-12-05T11:11:39",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "9347.800395 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 1.179 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2020/11/02 12:20:21
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares1920.017158 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #48253919/Trx f7793e42f75a56f43d64c931cf1bca63fc06843d
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "f7793e42f75a56f43d64c931cf1bca63fc06843d",
  "block": 48253919,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2020-11-02T12:20:21",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "1920.017158 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 5.865 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2020/05/09 04:10:09
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares9550.446969 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #43215197/Trx 38b21740241fbf6718a297ed0a540335c0bfc0ed
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "38b21740241fbf6718a297ed0a540335c0bfc0ed",
  "block": 43215197,
  "trx_in_block": 17,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2020-05-09T04:10:09",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "9550.446969 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 1.200 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2020/05/08 07:32:39
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares1953.311140 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #43191025/Trx 7a1bb1468040246b1d69852e60dbac2e278e8f74
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "7a1bb1468040246b1d69852e60dbac2e278e8f74",
  "block": 43191025,
  "trx_in_block": 20,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2020-05-08T07:32:39",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "1953.311140 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 5.957 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2019/08/19 05:46:48
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares9700.789894 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #35680702/Trx bb49f77a513270ae0c47afddb30736f7101f7023
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "bb49f77a513270ae0c47afddb30736f7101f7023",
  "block": 35680702,
  "trx_in_block": 7,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-08-19T05:46:48",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "9700.789894 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
2019/05/24 14:16:27
parent authorcdcrenshaw
parent permlinkstate-s-secession-rights
authorsteemitboard
permlinksteemitboard-notify-cdcrenshaw-20190524t141626000z
title
bodyCongratulations @cdcrenshaw! You received a personal award! <table><tr><td>https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@cdcrenshaw/birthday1.png</td><td>Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 1 year!</td></tr></table> <sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@cdcrenshaw) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](http://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=cdcrenshaw)_</sub> ###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes!
json metadata{"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png"]}
Transaction InfoBlock #33190106/Trx 94ae602727561ae780f9ff1fb7256223d744ba3c
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "94ae602727561ae780f9ff1fb7256223d744ba3c",
  "block": 33190106,
  "trx_in_block": 0,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2019-05-24T14:16:27",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "parent_permlink": "state-s-secession-rights",
      "author": "steemitboard",
      "permlink": "steemitboard-notify-cdcrenshaw-20190524t141626000z",
      "title": "",
      "body": "Congratulations @cdcrenshaw! You received a personal award!\n\n<table><tr><td>https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@cdcrenshaw/birthday1.png</td><td>Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 1 year!</td></tr></table>\n\n<sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@cdcrenshaw) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](http://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=cdcrenshaw)_</sub>\n\n\n###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes!",
      "json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png\"]}"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 6.079 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2018/09/04 21:56:54
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares9899.126706 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #25676161/Trx 3f53334de85badb077f4710f16fcfad3a2e93955
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "3f53334de85badb077f4710f16fcfad3a2e93955",
  "block": 25676161,
  "trx_in_block": 17,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-09-04T21:56:54",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "9899.126706 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
cdcrenshawclaimed reward balance: 0.001 STEEM, 0.009 SBD, 0.007 SP
2018/06/05 21:21:45
accountcdcrenshaw
reward steem0.001 STEEM
reward sbd0.009 SBD
reward vests12.197064 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #23066631/Trx b320c1b8c30f57e64278e7f26bf7b7b9e80929a1
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "b320c1b8c30f57e64278e7f26bf7b7b9e80929a1",
  "block": 23066631,
  "trx_in_block": 33,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-06-05T21:21:45",
  "op": [
    "claim_reward_balance",
    {
      "account": "cdcrenshaw",
      "reward_steem": "0.001 STEEM",
      "reward_sbd": "0.009 SBD",
      "reward_vests": "12.197064 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
cdcrenshawreceived 0.001 STEEM, 0.009 SBD, 0.007 SP author reward for @cdcrenshaw / privacy-is-a-global-issue
2018/06/04 19:37:36
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkprivacy-is-a-global-issue
sbd payout0.009 SBD
steem payout0.001 STEEM
vesting payout12.197064 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #23035757/Virtual Operation #27
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "block": 23035757,
  "trx_in_block": 4294967295,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 27,
  "timestamp": "2018-06-04T19:37:36",
  "op": [
    "author_reward",
    {
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "privacy-is-a-global-issue",
      "sbd_payout": "0.009 SBD",
      "steem_payout": "0.001 STEEM",
      "vesting_payout": "12.197064 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 21:04:30
voterdavidfnck
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkstate-s-secession-rights
weight3000 (30.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #22835959/Trx 1f651de4c9e140c59ac5d128dd8a66138697dda4
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "1f651de4c9e140c59ac5d128dd8a66138697dda4",
  "block": 22835959,
  "trx_in_block": 10,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T21:04:30",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "davidfnck",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "state-s-secession-rights",
      "weight": 3000
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:54:06
votersensation
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkprivacy-is-a-global-issue
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #22835751/Trx cdb37e5c62a6224bb697f988156c30d67d77ba02
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "cdb37e5c62a6224bb697f988156c30d67d77ba02",
  "block": 22835751,
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:54:06",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "sensation",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "privacy-is-a-global-issue",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:40:30
required auths[]
required posting auths["cdcrenshaw"]
idfollow
json["follow",{"follower":"cdcrenshaw","following":"chrisee","what":["blog"]}]
Transaction InfoBlock #22835479/Trx 89c18d8be0ea295a9a4f99810e4fda0ac907dd4d
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "89c18d8be0ea295a9a4f99810e4fda0ac907dd4d",
  "block": 22835479,
  "trx_in_block": 38,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:40:30",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cdcrenshaw"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"cdcrenshaw\",\"following\":\"chrisee\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:40:24
required auths[]
required posting auths["cdcrenshaw"]
idfollow
json["follow",{"follower":"cdcrenshaw","following":"bekirsolak","what":["blog"]}]
Transaction InfoBlock #22835477/Trx 801041dd3c6380b089b7303311aea116061dc339
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "801041dd3c6380b089b7303311aea116061dc339",
  "block": 22835477,
  "trx_in_block": 21,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:40:24",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cdcrenshaw"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"cdcrenshaw\",\"following\":\"bekirsolak\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:40:18
required auths[]
required posting auths["cdcrenshaw"]
idfollow
json["follow",{"follower":"cdcrenshaw","following":"ballo","what":["blog"]}]
Transaction InfoBlock #22835475/Trx b70fc67c11ca5b0b5814fba7ea05b3b766f9659b
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "b70fc67c11ca5b0b5814fba7ea05b3b766f9659b",
  "block": 22835475,
  "trx_in_block": 37,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:40:18",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cdcrenshaw"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"cdcrenshaw\",\"following\":\"ballo\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:40:15
required auths[]
required posting auths["cdcrenshaw"]
idfollow
json["follow",{"follower":"cdcrenshaw","following":"amadim","what":["blog"]}]
Transaction InfoBlock #22835474/Trx 0d63e1654583652edc59faf42134afc0e29cd59c
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "0d63e1654583652edc59faf42134afc0e29cd59c",
  "block": 22835474,
  "trx_in_block": 19,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:40:15",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cdcrenshaw"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"cdcrenshaw\",\"following\":\"amadim\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:40:12
required auths[]
required posting auths["cdcrenshaw"]
idfollow
json["follow",{"follower":"cdcrenshaw","following":"alexaz","what":["blog"]}]
Transaction InfoBlock #22835473/Trx d62e6d7357d06b3fcdbbfc8fc8c1da77c5680dbb
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "d62e6d7357d06b3fcdbbfc8fc8c1da77c5680dbb",
  "block": 22835473,
  "trx_in_block": 54,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:40:12",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cdcrenshaw"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"cdcrenshaw\",\"following\":\"alexaz\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:36:48
votercdcrenshaw
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkstate-s-secession-rights
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #22835405/Trx e59270a78cc0a074492171579168adc689c6c117
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "e59270a78cc0a074492171579168adc689c6c117",
  "block": 22835405,
  "trx_in_block": 31,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:36:48",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cdcrenshaw",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "state-s-secession-rights",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:36:39
parent author
parent permlinkpolitics
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkstate-s-secession-rights
titleState's Secession Rights
body![126_0062 (2).JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcKVQRFm7qB3mVSiopBzrnyCDm2jc6z3M4Beyss91X1bn/126_0062%20(2).JPG) After the British referendum to leave the European Union narrowly passed in June of 2016, the idea of state secession has been revived. In Texas especially, have secessionist movements recently become more vocal. Although Britain's’ decision to leave the E.U. cannot exactly be compared to a state leaving the Union, we do have relatively recent history and experience with this issue. The most serious attempt at secession was the 1860s Civil War, which resulted in the creation of the Confederate States of America, and later its defeat and “rejoining” of the South and the North. Ever since, many politicians have argued for a constitutional amendment to specifically allow a state to separate from the Union, but none have succeeded. Many courts have debated this issue, garnering responses from multiple Supreme and District court Justice throughout American history. From the founding fathers and their extensive work on the Constitution to the Civil War and through court cases such as Texas v. White, many guarantees to the state have been created. Pattani’s article in the Texas Tribune sums up how the Civil War impacted the state’s rights to secede, “The war played a very big role in establishing the power of the federal government and cementing that the federal government has the final say in these issues”. But, even before the war, the constitution was very specific that the union be indestructible. Our constitution guarantees, “a state may be neither divided nor combined with another state without the consent of Congress and state legislatures. Each state is guaranteed a representative government, two federal level senators, and at least one federal representative” (Brown et. al. 2016). Many have argued that from the beginnings of the country, states have not had a legal basis to leave the Union. But, that obviously didn’t stop Texas and ten other states from forming the Confederate States of America in the early 1860s or stop recent movements from spreading the “legend [that Texas] retains its own special secession clause” (Wile 2016). Texas is unique in its history of secession movements, having successfully left two countries: Mexico and the United States. Both times were never immediately recognized by the respective governments. Mexico only gave up claim on Texas after fighting a bloody war with the U.S. Texas only rejoined the Union after agreeing to surrender and going through the lengthy annexation process. Texas, however, reserved a few rights. For instance, it is the only state to have the power to divide itself into as many as five states (Brown et. al. 2016). This process of partitioning the state is much different than secession. In other states, some movements have attempted to partition and add states, which both have legal processes set in the fourth Article of the Constitution, but no other state has the right that Texas does. Again, Pattani’s article summed this up perfectly by stating, “the U.S. Constitution contains procedures for admitting new states into the nation, but none for a state to leave (2016). Texas is also unique in that it has had more than its fair share of legal battles over the legality of the issue. Texas v. White resulted in the Court finding individual states could not secede from the Union and that the acts of the then current Texas Legislature to fight certain federal annexation requirements, “ even if ratified by a majority of Texans — were absolutely null" (Pattani 2016). The case went all the way to the Supreme Court, where Justice Salmon P. Chase was author of the majority opinion, writing: “When Texas became one of the United States, she entered into an indissoluble relation. All the obligations of perpetual union, and all the guaranties of republican government in the Union, attached at once to the State. The act which consummated her admission into the Union was something more than a compact; it was the incorporation of a new member into the political body. And it was final” (Wile 2016). Many historians believe that when the Confederacy surrendered in 1865, the idea of secession was also defeated. The North’s victory set a precedent that states could not legally secede. However, that hasn’t stopped attempts throughout the country and especially in Texas to leave the Union. The State of Texas is the only state where secession and survival of a theoretical new nation would possibly survive. Bob Smiley’s Business Insider article summarized the legitimate reasons why Texas could survive leaving the Union: historical precedence, defense reasons, access to natural resources, utilities, and the powerhouse that is the Texas economy. Texas not only has the economy comparable to “Canada”, but it has the resources to support and drive it (Smiley 2016). The state’s utilities are also separate from every other state. For example, the Texas power system isn’t completely connected to any of the nation’s other grids. Another aspect of Texas’ unique rights is its ability to maintain its own ability to maintain and operate four different state military outfits, not to mention the many military bases on Texas soil. Although there are many reasons why Texas could succeed in seceding, the chances of it actually happening are very low. Bump’s article on Business Insider’s website weighed the odds that states gain the right to secede. He theorizes that “ask[ing] politely” and “withdrawing by force” have zero chance of happening, while rating the chance of amending the constitution as “low”. Most importantly, he observes that there may be a one hundred percent chance that the experiment that is America will come to an end in the future, just as every major empire in human history has. Even with all of the history our nation has had with this issue, it still will remain a heated discussion for perhaps centuries to come. At the moment, secession cannot legally happen for any state, but as we’ve seen with the Civil War, sometimes legality is the last thing these governments and citizens can or will care about. In the future, secession may be necessary, or even legally possible, but as of this moment all of the discussion is just talk.
json metadata{"tags":["politics","secession","rights","economy","texas"],"image":["https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcKVQRFm7qB3mVSiopBzrnyCDm2jc6z3M4Beyss91X1bn/126_0062%20(2).JPG"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
Transaction InfoBlock #22835402/Trx 5fd4b31adbb1c7871305a760bdbc7fe6099e2849
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "5fd4b31adbb1c7871305a760bdbc7fe6099e2849",
  "block": 22835402,
  "trx_in_block": 15,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:36:39",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "politics",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "state-s-secession-rights",
      "title": "State's Secession Rights",
      "body": "![126_0062 (2).JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcKVQRFm7qB3mVSiopBzrnyCDm2jc6z3M4Beyss91X1bn/126_0062%20(2).JPG)\n\nAfter the British referendum to leave the European Union narrowly passed in June of 2016, the idea of state secession has been revived. In Texas especially, have secessionist movements recently become more vocal. Although Britain's’ decision to leave the E.U. cannot exactly be compared to a state leaving the Union, we do have relatively recent history and experience with this issue.  The most serious attempt at secession was the 1860s Civil War, which resulted in the creation of the Confederate States of America, and later its defeat and “rejoining” of  the South and the North. Ever since, many politicians have argued for a constitutional amendment to specifically allow a state to separate from the Union, but none have succeeded. Many courts have debated this issue, garnering responses from multiple Supreme and District court Justice throughout American history. \n\nFrom the founding fathers and their extensive work on the Constitution to the Civil War and through court cases such as Texas v. White, many guarantees to the state have been created. Pattani’s article in the Texas Tribune sums up how the Civil War impacted the state’s rights to secede, “The war played a very big role in establishing the power of the federal government and cementing that the federal government has the final say in these issues”. But, even before the war, the constitution was very specific that the union be indestructible.\n\nOur constitution guarantees, “a state may be neither divided nor combined with another state without the consent of Congress and state legislatures. Each state is guaranteed a representative government, two federal level senators, and at least one federal representative” (Brown et. al. 2016).  Many have argued that from the beginnings of the country, states have not had a legal basis to leave the Union. But, that obviously didn’t stop Texas and ten other states from forming the Confederate States of America in the early 1860s or stop recent movements from spreading the “legend [that Texas] retains its own special secession clause” (Wile 2016). \n\nTexas is unique in its history of secession movements, having successfully left two countries: Mexico and the United States. Both times were never immediately recognized by the respective governments. Mexico only gave up claim on Texas after fighting a bloody war with the U.S. Texas only rejoined the Union after agreeing to surrender and going through the lengthy annexation process. Texas, however, reserved a few rights. For instance, it is the only state to have the power to divide itself into as many as five states (Brown et. al. 2016). This process of partitioning the state is much different than secession.  In other states, some movements have attempted to partition and add states, which both have legal processes set in the fourth Article of the Constitution, but no other state has the right that Texas does. Again, Pattani’s article summed this up perfectly by stating, “the U.S. Constitution contains procedures for admitting new states into the nation, but none for a state to leave (2016). \n\nTexas is also unique in that it has had more than its fair share of legal battles over the legality of the issue.  Texas v. White resulted in the Court finding individual states could not secede from the Union and that the acts of the then current Texas Legislature to fight certain federal annexation requirements, “ even if ratified by a majority of Texans — were absolutely null\" (Pattani 2016). The case went all the way to the Supreme Court, where  Justice Salmon P. Chase was author of the majority opinion, writing:\n\n“When Texas became one of the United States, she entered into an \tindissoluble relation. All the obligations of perpetual union, and all the guaranties of republican government in the Union, attached at once to the State. The act which consummated her admission into the Union was something more than a compact; it was the incorporation of a new member into the political body. And it was final” (Wile 2016). \n\nMany historians believe that when the Confederacy surrendered in 1865, the idea of secession was also defeated. The North’s victory set a precedent that states could not legally secede. However, that hasn’t stopped attempts throughout the country and especially in Texas to leave the Union. The State of Texas is the only state where secession and survival of a theoretical new nation would possibly survive. Bob Smiley’s Business Insider article summarized the legitimate reasons why Texas could survive leaving the Union: historical precedence, defense reasons, access to natural resources, utilities, and the powerhouse that is the Texas economy. Texas not only has the economy comparable to “Canada”, but it has the resources to support and drive it (Smiley 2016). The state’s utilities are also separate from every other state. For example, the Texas power system isn’t completely connected to any of the nation’s other grids. Another aspect of Texas’ unique rights is its ability to maintain its own ability to maintain and operate four different state military outfits, not to mention the many military bases on Texas soil. Although there are many reasons why Texas could succeed in seceding, the chances of it actually happening are very low. \n\nBump’s article on Business Insider’s website weighed the odds that states gain the right to secede. He theorizes that “ask[ing] politely” and “withdrawing by force” have zero chance of happening, while rating the chance of amending the constitution as “low”. Most importantly, he observes that there may be a one hundred percent chance that the experiment that is America will come to an end in the future, just as every major empire in human history has.\nEven with all of the history our nation has had with this issue, it still will remain a heated discussion for perhaps centuries to come. At the moment, secession cannot legally happen for any state, but as we’ve seen with the Civil War, sometimes legality is the last thing these governments and citizens can or will care about. In the future, secession may be necessary, or even legally possible, but as of this moment all of the discussion is just talk.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"politics\",\"secession\",\"rights\",\"economy\",\"texas\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcKVQRFm7qB3mVSiopBzrnyCDm2jc6z3M4Beyss91X1bn/126_0062%20(2).JPG\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:23:24
votercdcrenshaw
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkwest-texas-sunset-photo-collection
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #22835137/Trx 0c0be1b33233fcf3f2df0e83d85174c7a777bc60
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "0c0be1b33233fcf3f2df0e83d85174c7a777bc60",
  "block": 22835137,
  "trx_in_block": 44,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:23:24",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cdcrenshaw",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "west-texas-sunset-photo-collection",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:23:18
votercdcrenshaw
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkabstract-photo-collection-may-28-2018
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #22835135/Trx 8620766f3d1a7e4007fffe14594ea051ea23242d
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "8620766f3d1a7e4007fffe14594ea051ea23242d",
  "block": 22835135,
  "trx_in_block": 26,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:23:18",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cdcrenshaw",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "abstract-photo-collection-may-28-2018",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:23:12
votercdcrenshaw
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkorder-number-3915-2017-of-the-office-of-the-deputy-attorney-general-the-appointment-of-special-counsel-to-investigate-russian
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #22835133/Trx f26a9c037efddaa90cbfdf4379163b3d0167bc89
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "f26a9c037efddaa90cbfdf4379163b3d0167bc89",
  "block": 22835133,
  "trx_in_block": 67,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:23:12",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cdcrenshaw",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "order-number-3915-2017-of-the-office-of-the-deputy-attorney-general-the-appointment-of-special-counsel-to-investigate-russian",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:22:09
parent author
parent permlinkamerica
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkorder-number-3915-2017-of-the-office-of-the-deputy-attorney-general-the-appointment-of-special-counsel-to-investigate-russian
titleOrder Number 3915-2017 of the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Appointment of Special Counsel to Investigate Russian Interference with the 2016 Presidential Election and Related Matters.
body![3182556796_a55295c9ba_o.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmZubu2ahFCgS85vueejPfjFCXJ97DcKz1rNez7yQedjXe/3182556796_a55295c9ba_o.jpg) The National Archives and Records Administration’s publication “One Hundred Milestone Documents” in United States history lists various public laws, court cases, treaties, speeches, and other documents that reflect the American commitment to continue work towards the formation of a more perfect Union. The first document included is the Lee Resolution of 1776, with the list wrapping up in 1965 with the Voting Rights Act. The Administration purposefully does not list documents after 1965 in acknowledgement that historians are rarely objective when dealing with recent events. One document with the potential to be placed on a future milestone document list is Order Number 3915-2017 of the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Appointment of Special Counsel to Investigate Russian Interference with the 2016 Presidential Election and Related Matters. The order was executed on May 15, 2017 by Acting Attorney General Rod Jay Rosenstein. In this document, Rod Rosenstein appointed Robert Swan Mueller, III to serve as Special Counsel for the Department of Justice and authorized the Special Counsel to conduct the inquiry the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Director James Comey had confirmed in Congressional testimony. The authorized scope of the investigation included determining whether any links and coordination existed between the Russian government and associates of the campaign of Donald Trump, any matters that arose or arise from the investigation, and other matters that are within the scope of Title 28, Part 600, Section 4 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The Special Counsel’s mandate includes in ‘Section C’ power of the Special Counsel to prosecute federal crimes that were discovered during the investigation and a declaration of the section of the Code of Federal Regulations that are applicable to Mueller. Section 1 of Title 28 states a Special Counsel should be appointed by the Attorney General, or in cases of recusal, the Acting or Deputy Attorney General to oversee an investigation or prosecution of individuals and matters where a conflict of interest in the Department of Justice exists so great that it would be in the interest of the public for an outside person to lead the inquiry (28 C.F.R. § 600.1). Section 3 of Tile 28 details that no ordinary individual should be appointed Special Counsel, requiring a lawyer, “with a reputation for integrity and impartial decision making, and with appropriate experience to ensure both that the investigation will be conducted ably, expeditiously and thoroughly” (28 C.F.R. § 600.3). Robert Mueller certainly meets these requirements as a Juris Doctor, Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, Attorney for the Northern District of California, Acting Deputy Attorney General, and 6th Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, let alone a highly decorated Vietnam War. Section 4 of Title 28 gives authority to the Special Counsel to investigate and prosecute federal crimes, “in the course of, and with intent to interfere with, the Special Counsel's investigation, such as perjury, obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence, and intimidation of witnesses” (28 C.F.R. § 600.4). Sections One, Three, and Four of Title 28 are pertinent to the ongoing investigation and relate to current news and events in which details of an ever-growing effort to obstruct the Special Counsel’s investigation have come to light. A conflict of interest existed between the President as chief administrator of the Executive Branch and the Attorney General Jefferson Sessions, III, who as a Trump campaign executive met with Russian foreign nationals and government officials and had knowledge of communications between those Russians and other Trump campaign employees. With the Attorney General’s involvement and subsequent recusal, Rod Rosenstein was fully within his authority under Section One to appoint Robert Mueller top oversee any investigation into the conspiracy. Currently, a coordinated campaign to impugn the integrity of Mueller is ongoing, with various attempts to declare he has conflicts of interest concerning donations to certain campaigns and a spat over membership at a Trump owned golf course. More perturbing though, are attempts by President Trump himself to keep the investigation “down” (Shear), including his firing of numerous Department of Justice Officials including two F.B.I. directors. More recently, it has been disclosed that President Trump has attempted to fire Robert Mueller and is considering firing Rod Rosenstein as well as Jeff Sessions and the latest Trump appointed FBI director, Christopher Wray. These attempts, among others, to obstruct and delay the investigations fall under the authority granted in Section 4 of Mueller to examine. In less than one year, the Special Counsel has produced multiple grand jury indictments of Trump associates, Russian nationals and business entities, as well as Americans not associated with the President, guilty pleas, and at least one prison sentence so far. The Trump presidency has broken records in terms of fastest special counsel appointment but more importantly has broken several government institutions, the law, and the trust of the American voters and global community. The Special Counsel must be allowed to continue his investigation for the benefit of our election system, the public, and the rule of law. References General Powers of Special Counsel, Title 28 C.F.R., Chapter VI, § § 600.1-601.10 Rosenstein, R. J., Deputy Attorney General of the United States. (2017). Order Number 3915 - 2017 - Appointment of Special Counsel to Investigate Russian Interference with the 2016 Presidential Election and Related Matters. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pressrelease/file/967231/download Shear, Michael D. “Trump Reacts to Cohen Raid, Syria and More: An Annotated Transcript.”
json metadata{"tags":["america","politics","law","crime","trump"],"image":["https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmZubu2ahFCgS85vueejPfjFCXJ97DcKz1rNez7yQedjXe/3182556796_a55295c9ba_o.jpg"],"links":["https://www.justice.gov/opa/pressrelease/file/967231/download"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
Transaction InfoBlock #22835112/Trx 73bad6f8474cb6f3e204696cc9c5fcb5e0c27421
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "73bad6f8474cb6f3e204696cc9c5fcb5e0c27421",
  "block": 22835112,
  "trx_in_block": 26,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:22:09",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "america",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "order-number-3915-2017-of-the-office-of-the-deputy-attorney-general-the-appointment-of-special-counsel-to-investigate-russian",
      "title": "Order Number 3915-2017 of the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Appointment of Special Counsel to Investigate Russian Interference with the 2016 Presidential Election and Related Matters.",
      "body": "![3182556796_a55295c9ba_o.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmZubu2ahFCgS85vueejPfjFCXJ97DcKz1rNez7yQedjXe/3182556796_a55295c9ba_o.jpg)\nThe National Archives and Records Administration’s publication “One Hundred Milestone Documents” in United States history lists various public laws, court cases, treaties, speeches, and other documents that reflect the American commitment to continue work towards the formation of a more perfect Union. The first document included is the Lee Resolution of 1776, with the list wrapping up in 1965 with the Voting Rights Act. The Administration purposefully does not list documents after 1965 in acknowledgement that historians are rarely objective when dealing with recent events. \n\nOne document with the potential to be placed on a future milestone document list is Order Number 3915-2017 of the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Appointment of Special Counsel to Investigate Russian Interference with the 2016 Presidential Election and Related Matters. The order was executed on May 15, 2017 by Acting Attorney General Rod Jay Rosenstein.  In this document, Rod Rosenstein appointed Robert Swan Mueller, III to serve as Special Counsel for the Department of Justice and authorized the Special Counsel to conduct the inquiry the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Director James Comey had confirmed in Congressional testimony. The authorized scope of the investigation included determining whether any links and coordination existed between the Russian government and associates of the campaign of Donald Trump, any matters that arose or arise from the investigation, and other matters that are within the scope of Title 28, Part 600, Section 4 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The Special Counsel’s mandate includes in ‘Section C’ power of the Special Counsel to prosecute federal crimes that were discovered during the investigation and a declaration of the section of the Code of Federal Regulations that are applicable to Mueller. \n\nSection 1 of Title 28 states a Special Counsel should be appointed by the Attorney General, or in cases of recusal, the Acting or Deputy Attorney General to oversee an investigation or prosecution of individuals and matters where a conflict of interest in the Department of Justice exists so great that it would be in the interest of the public for an outside person to lead the inquiry (28 C.F.R. § 600.1).  Section 3 of Tile 28 details that no ordinary individual should be appointed Special Counsel, requiring a lawyer, “with a reputation for integrity and impartial decision making, and with appropriate experience to ensure both that the investigation will be conducted ably, expeditiously and thoroughly” (28 C.F.R. § 600.3).  Robert Mueller certainly meets these requirements as a Juris Doctor, Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, Attorney for the Northern District of California, Acting Deputy Attorney General, and 6th Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, let alone a highly decorated Vietnam War. Section 4 of Title 28 gives authority to the Special Counsel to investigate and prosecute federal crimes, “in the course of, and with intent to interfere with, the Special Counsel's investigation, such as perjury, obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence, and intimidation of witnesses” (28 C.F.R. § 600.4).   \n\nSections One, Three, and Four of Title 28 are pertinent to the ongoing investigation and relate to current news and events in which details of an ever-growing effort to obstruct the Special Counsel’s investigation have come to light. A conflict of interest existed between the President as chief administrator of the Executive Branch and the Attorney General Jefferson Sessions, III, who as a Trump campaign executive met with Russian foreign nationals and government officials and had knowledge of communications between those Russians and other Trump campaign employees. With the Attorney General’s involvement and subsequent recusal, Rod Rosenstein was fully within his authority under Section One to appoint Robert Mueller top oversee any investigation into the conspiracy. Currently, a coordinated campaign to impugn the integrity of Mueller is ongoing, with various attempts to declare he has conflicts of interest concerning donations to certain campaigns and a spat over membership at a Trump owned golf course. More perturbing though, are attempts by President Trump himself to keep the investigation “down” (Shear), including his firing of numerous Department of Justice Officials including two F.B.I. directors. More recently, it has been disclosed that President Trump has attempted to fire Robert Mueller and is considering firing Rod Rosenstein as well as Jeff Sessions and the latest Trump appointed FBI director, Christopher Wray. These attempts, among others, to obstruct and delay the investigations fall under the authority granted in Section 4 of Mueller to examine.\n \nIn less than one year, the Special Counsel has produced multiple grand jury indictments of Trump associates, Russian nationals and business entities, as well as Americans not associated with the President, guilty pleas, and at least one prison sentence so far. The Trump presidency has broken records in terms of fastest special counsel appointment but more importantly has broken several government institutions, the law, and the trust of the American voters and global community. The Special Counsel must be allowed to continue his investigation for the benefit of our election system, the public, and the rule of law. \n\nReferences\nGeneral Powers of Special Counsel, Title 28 C.F.R., Chapter VI, § § 600.1-601.10\n\nRosenstein, R. J., Deputy Attorney General of the United States. (2017). Order Number 3915 -\n2017 - Appointment of Special Counsel to Investigate Russian Interference with the 2016\nPresidential Election and Related Matters. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pressrelease/file/967231/download\n\nShear, Michael D. “Trump Reacts to Cohen Raid, Syria and More: An Annotated Transcript.”",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"america\",\"politics\",\"law\",\"crime\",\"trump\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmZubu2ahFCgS85vueejPfjFCXJ97DcKz1rNez7yQedjXe/3182556796_a55295c9ba_o.jpg\"],\"links\":[\"https://www.justice.gov/opa/pressrelease/file/967231/download\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:09:54
voterswagger
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkthe-american-voter-s-conflict-between-passion-and-reason
weight3 (0.03%)
Transaction InfoBlock #22834867/Trx 4c25725ee751cbd9cad57dd4dd8b3811c1f1e8d2
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "4c25725ee751cbd9cad57dd4dd8b3811c1f1e8d2",
  "block": 22834867,
  "trx_in_block": 25,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:09:54",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "swagger",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "the-american-voter-s-conflict-between-passion-and-reason",
      "weight": 3
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:09:33
required auths[]
required posting auths["cdcrenshaw"]
idfollow
json["follow",{"follower":"cdcrenshaw","following":"introduce.bot","what":["blog"]}]
Transaction InfoBlock #22834860/Trx d0991d239a0482dd759ea0cc89b2d179b0268815
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "d0991d239a0482dd759ea0cc89b2d179b0268815",
  "block": 22834860,
  "trx_in_block": 43,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:09:33",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cdcrenshaw"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"cdcrenshaw\",\"following\":\"introduce.bot\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:09:30
votercdcrenshaw
authorintroduce.bot
permlinkintroduce-bot-re-cdcrenshawprivacy-is-a-global-issue
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #22834859/Trx 8ba6f94be14d7972c85e2642108258464cdef741
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "8ba6f94be14d7972c85e2642108258464cdef741",
  "block": 22834859,
  "trx_in_block": 47,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:09:30",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cdcrenshaw",
      "author": "introduce.bot",
      "permlink": "introduce-bot-re-cdcrenshawprivacy-is-a-global-issue",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:08:24
parent authorcdcrenshaw
parent permlinkprivacy-is-a-global-issue
authorintroduce.bot
permlinkintroduce-bot-re-cdcrenshawprivacy-is-a-global-issue
title
body✅ @cdcrenshaw, I gave you an upvote on your first post! **Please give me a follow** and I will give you a follow in return!<br><br>Please also take a moment to read [this post](https://steemit.com/spam/@pleasestop/introducing-pleasestop-here-to-reduce-comment-spam) regarding bad behavior on Steemit.
json metadata
Transaction InfoBlock #22834837/Trx 8179f8b6a6e93e64cef94451aa0e14b9c6b1c0ca
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "8179f8b6a6e93e64cef94451aa0e14b9c6b1c0ca",
  "block": 22834837,
  "trx_in_block": 64,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:08:24",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "parent_permlink": "privacy-is-a-global-issue",
      "author": "introduce.bot",
      "permlink": "introduce-bot-re-cdcrenshawprivacy-is-a-global-issue",
      "title": "",
      "body": "✅  @cdcrenshaw, I gave you an upvote on your first post! **Please give me a follow** and I will give you a follow in return!<br><br>Please also take a moment to read [this post](https://steemit.com/spam/@pleasestop/introducing-pleasestop-here-to-reduce-comment-spam) regarding bad behavior on Steemit.",
      "json_metadata": ""
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:08:12
votercdcrenshaw
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkthe-american-voter-s-conflict-between-passion-and-reason
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #22834833/Trx 7f5323e91ae4079843d852ef5eaa8e4f0a4b421c
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "7f5323e91ae4079843d852ef5eaa8e4f0a4b421c",
  "block": 22834833,
  "trx_in_block": 5,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:08:12",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cdcrenshaw",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "the-american-voter-s-conflict-between-passion-and-reason",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:08:03
voterintroduce.bot
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkprivacy-is-a-global-issue
weight158 (1.58%)
Transaction InfoBlock #22834830/Trx 3ddf2ec7b7d2385aabd76595c5d1c350b6f22e95
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "3ddf2ec7b7d2385aabd76595c5d1c350b6f22e95",
  "block": 22834830,
  "trx_in_block": 54,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:08:03",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "introduce.bot",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "privacy-is-a-global-issue",
      "weight": 158
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:07:54
votercdcrenshaw
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkprivacy-is-a-global-issue
weight10000 (100.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #22834827/Trx 596380da7879aca71cbe1873be1855711b760aa6
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "596380da7879aca71cbe1873be1855711b760aa6",
  "block": 22834827,
  "trx_in_block": 31,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:07:54",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "cdcrenshaw",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "privacy-is-a-global-issue",
      "weight": 10000
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:07:24
parent author
parent permlinkabstract
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkabstract-photo-collection-may-28-2018
titleAbstract Photo Collection May 28, 2018
bodyYou are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. ![IMG_0219.JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcLXktV3UJbHn4jBY4xJX71RMS5W7jCk1PDBo1QG1g4WN/IMG_0219.JPG) ![IMG_0220.JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmWNixNjgFC7z6TJd78BAgaL7BrrvjhMRFfwsbNDgVFRC3/IMG_0220.JPG) ![IMG_0217.JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmSnCGFnP9uxLadx4U9huX37kid1s9WtVQ5Qf1oDDupYNE/IMG_0217.JPG) ![Gumgif2.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmZhHNiUxNUgqjjLnFr9cv66XN1HkdBDSwfzLcu5pdsm38/Gumgif2.jpg) ![IMG_1228.JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbDcAHqJjxKBAVyGQ6SHEb7jixFLreXwfPEz2k6TRFX6M/IMG_1228.JPG)
json metadata{"tags":["abstract","photo","freeuse","bokeh"],"image":["https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcLXktV3UJbHn4jBY4xJX71RMS5W7jCk1PDBo1QG1g4WN/IMG_0219.JPG","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmWNixNjgFC7z6TJd78BAgaL7BrrvjhMRFfwsbNDgVFRC3/IMG_0220.JPG","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmSnCGFnP9uxLadx4U9huX37kid1s9WtVQ5Qf1oDDupYNE/IMG_0217.JPG","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmZhHNiUxNUgqjjLnFr9cv66XN1HkdBDSwfzLcu5pdsm38/Gumgif2.jpg","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbDcAHqJjxKBAVyGQ6SHEb7jixFLreXwfPEz2k6TRFX6M/IMG_1228.JPG"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
Transaction InfoBlock #22834817/Trx 97be0e226ede020280698b577c32c5c136258bfb
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "97be0e226ede020280698b577c32c5c136258bfb",
  "block": 22834817,
  "trx_in_block": 9,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:07:24",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "abstract",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "abstract-photo-collection-may-28-2018",
      "title": "Abstract Photo Collection May 28, 2018",
      "body": "You are free to:\nShare — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format\nAdapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material\nfor any purpose, even commercially.\n\n![IMG_0219.JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcLXktV3UJbHn4jBY4xJX71RMS5W7jCk1PDBo1QG1g4WN/IMG_0219.JPG)\n\n![IMG_0220.JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmWNixNjgFC7z6TJd78BAgaL7BrrvjhMRFfwsbNDgVFRC3/IMG_0220.JPG)\n\n![IMG_0217.JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmSnCGFnP9uxLadx4U9huX37kid1s9WtVQ5Qf1oDDupYNE/IMG_0217.JPG)\n\n![Gumgif2.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmZhHNiUxNUgqjjLnFr9cv66XN1HkdBDSwfzLcu5pdsm38/Gumgif2.jpg)\n\n![IMG_1228.JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbDcAHqJjxKBAVyGQ6SHEb7jixFLreXwfPEz2k6TRFX6M/IMG_1228.JPG)",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"abstract\",\"photo\",\"freeuse\",\"bokeh\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcLXktV3UJbHn4jBY4xJX71RMS5W7jCk1PDBo1QG1g4WN/IMG_0219.JPG\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmWNixNjgFC7z6TJd78BAgaL7BrrvjhMRFfwsbNDgVFRC3/IMG_0220.JPG\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmSnCGFnP9uxLadx4U9huX37kid1s9WtVQ5Qf1oDDupYNE/IMG_0217.JPG\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmZhHNiUxNUgqjjLnFr9cv66XN1HkdBDSwfzLcu5pdsm38/Gumgif2.jpg\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmbDcAHqJjxKBAVyGQ6SHEb7jixFLreXwfPEz2k6TRFX6M/IMG_1228.JPG\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:02:18
parent author
parent permlinktexas
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkwest-texas-sunset-photo-collection
titleWest Texas Sunset Photo Collection
bodyYou are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. ![IMG_0732.JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPduUcfL72dbP5qqQZiMQL4LJoN5oUHh98NVCFuQvS9ao/IMG_0732.JPG) ![IMG_0777.JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUR1E71hXriDLKaz8Q3gbNRLrompojHYQDvdXyLzCuREX/IMG_0777.JPG) ![IMG_0700 (2).JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmW8Qr4hEZj7VQW9H1j6oRq5AaYU6cqP84HGSFkPU9PZvR/IMG_0700%20(2).JPG) ![IMG_0473.JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmXz1iMkJvPR3Kaq4c2kg2LoHQiztEKXfX82reCoVQAsjV/IMG_0473.JPG) ![IMG_0733.JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQme92mQKp1gJgDW5Lxv6mMNeMsa2g4VwN5o3hjq17aDNNv/IMG_0733.JPG)
json metadata{"tags":["texas","sunset","photo","freeuse"],"image":["https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPduUcfL72dbP5qqQZiMQL4LJoN5oUHh98NVCFuQvS9ao/IMG_0732.JPG","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUR1E71hXriDLKaz8Q3gbNRLrompojHYQDvdXyLzCuREX/IMG_0777.JPG","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmW8Qr4hEZj7VQW9H1j6oRq5AaYU6cqP84HGSFkPU9PZvR/IMG_0700%20(2).JPG","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmXz1iMkJvPR3Kaq4c2kg2LoHQiztEKXfX82reCoVQAsjV/IMG_0473.JPG","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQme92mQKp1gJgDW5Lxv6mMNeMsa2g4VwN5o3hjq17aDNNv/IMG_0733.JPG"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
Transaction InfoBlock #22834715/Trx c6fa6312d4a44bd580b8ca616bed917298e0c3bb
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "c6fa6312d4a44bd580b8ca616bed917298e0c3bb",
  "block": 22834715,
  "trx_in_block": 11,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:02:18",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "texas",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "west-texas-sunset-photo-collection",
      "title": "West Texas Sunset Photo Collection",
      "body": "You are free to:\nShare — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format\nAdapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material\nfor any purpose, even commercially.\n\n![IMG_0732.JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPduUcfL72dbP5qqQZiMQL4LJoN5oUHh98NVCFuQvS9ao/IMG_0732.JPG)\n\n![IMG_0777.JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUR1E71hXriDLKaz8Q3gbNRLrompojHYQDvdXyLzCuREX/IMG_0777.JPG)\n\n![IMG_0700 (2).JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmW8Qr4hEZj7VQW9H1j6oRq5AaYU6cqP84HGSFkPU9PZvR/IMG_0700%20(2).JPG)\n\n![IMG_0473.JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmXz1iMkJvPR3Kaq4c2kg2LoHQiztEKXfX82reCoVQAsjV/IMG_0473.JPG)\n\n![IMG_0733.JPG](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQme92mQKp1gJgDW5Lxv6mMNeMsa2g4VwN5o3hjq17aDNNv/IMG_0733.JPG)",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"texas\",\"sunset\",\"photo\",\"freeuse\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmPduUcfL72dbP5qqQZiMQL4LJoN5oUHh98NVCFuQvS9ao/IMG_0732.JPG\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUR1E71hXriDLKaz8Q3gbNRLrompojHYQDvdXyLzCuREX/IMG_0777.JPG\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmW8Qr4hEZj7VQW9H1j6oRq5AaYU6cqP84HGSFkPU9PZvR/IMG_0700%20(2).JPG\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmXz1iMkJvPR3Kaq4c2kg2LoHQiztEKXfX82reCoVQAsjV/IMG_0473.JPG\",\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQme92mQKp1gJgDW5Lxv6mMNeMsa2g4VwN5o3hjq17aDNNv/IMG_0733.JPG\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 20:01:57
voteryehey
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkprivacy-is-a-global-issue
weight1000 (10.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #22834708/Trx f85dccbc3156561a8b520b16fa6b13a053f34dc7
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "f85dccbc3156561a8b520b16fa6b13a053f34dc7",
  "block": 22834708,
  "trx_in_block": 9,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T20:01:57",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "yehey",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "privacy-is-a-global-issue",
      "weight": 1000
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 19:52:42
required auths[]
required posting auths["cdcrenshaw"]
idfollow
json["follow",{"follower":"cdcrenshaw","following":"superpromoter","what":["blog"]}]
Transaction InfoBlock #22834523/Trx ac4f3395f001da41c813a0098088478c38fdaeee
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "ac4f3395f001da41c813a0098088478c38fdaeee",
  "block": 22834523,
  "trx_in_block": 31,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T19:52:42",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cdcrenshaw"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"cdcrenshaw\",\"following\":\"superpromoter\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 19:52:39
required auths[]
required posting auths["cdcrenshaw"]
idfollow
json["follow",{"follower":"cdcrenshaw","following":"raise-me-up","what":["blog"]}]
Transaction InfoBlock #22834522/Trx 3f042267d0872ac0a7ca8ce1b3af66b34ed64ac5
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "3f042267d0872ac0a7ca8ce1b3af66b34ed64ac5",
  "block": 22834522,
  "trx_in_block": 12,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T19:52:39",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cdcrenshaw"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"cdcrenshaw\",\"following\":\"raise-me-up\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 19:52:36
required auths[]
required posting auths["cdcrenshaw"]
idfollow
json["follow",{"follower":"cdcrenshaw","following":"ladano","what":["blog"]}]
Transaction InfoBlock #22834521/Trx 394d673b29d826d5f30ca5bf833ffce95fc80701
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "394d673b29d826d5f30ca5bf833ffce95fc80701",
  "block": 22834521,
  "trx_in_block": 22,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T19:52:36",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cdcrenshaw"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"cdcrenshaw\",\"following\":\"ladano\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 19:52:33
required auths[]
required posting auths["cdcrenshaw"]
idfollow
json["follow",{"follower":"cdcrenshaw","following":"hasiba","what":["blog"]}]
Transaction InfoBlock #22834520/Trx 90d1e802017629a89211b95a9edce93169c71fac
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "90d1e802017629a89211b95a9edce93169c71fac",
  "block": 22834520,
  "trx_in_block": 20,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T19:52:33",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cdcrenshaw"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"cdcrenshaw\",\"following\":\"hasiba\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 19:52:30
required auths[]
required posting auths["cdcrenshaw"]
idfollow
json["follow",{"follower":"cdcrenshaw","following":"halak","what":["blog"]}]
Transaction InfoBlock #22834519/Trx b0ca2aecf1a9d4f26fd6ff6806055d1bf723b3cd
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "b0ca2aecf1a9d4f26fd6ff6806055d1bf723b3cd",
  "block": 22834519,
  "trx_in_block": 34,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T19:52:30",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cdcrenshaw"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"cdcrenshaw\",\"following\":\"halak\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 19:52:27
required auths[]
required posting auths["cdcrenshaw"]
idfollow
json["follow",{"follower":"cdcrenshaw","following":"ax3","what":["blog"]}]
Transaction InfoBlock #22834518/Trx 3a7bd147cc3161570bf7a6150758282ede775b10
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "3a7bd147cc3161570bf7a6150758282ede775b10",
  "block": 22834518,
  "trx_in_block": 53,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T19:52:27",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cdcrenshaw"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"cdcrenshaw\",\"following\":\"ax3\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 19:52:24
required auths[]
required posting auths["cdcrenshaw"]
idfollow
json["follow",{"follower":"cdcrenshaw","following":"adran","what":["blog"]}]
Transaction InfoBlock #22834517/Trx 4aa0de9fb29ed0249935776c4851d2a1a497af5a
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "4aa0de9fb29ed0249935776c4851d2a1a497af5a",
  "block": 22834517,
  "trx_in_block": 15,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T19:52:24",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cdcrenshaw"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"cdcrenshaw\",\"following\":\"adran\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 19:51:51
parent author
parent permlinkamerican
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkthe-american-voter-s-conflict-between-passion-and-reason
titleThe American Voter’s Conflict Between Passion and Reason
body![3460098364_e06b8ddc19_o.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmasmfrp7ZNCpYPwYSpucQJo8hqMXjKYdvCzpakNgq3dxf/3460098364_e06b8ddc19_o.jpg) The American democratic system is based on compromises made to the Virginia Plan of the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The Virginia Plan called on Congress to elect the President. Among many of the committee members there was fear that if the president were elected by a select group of regularly meeting men, the independence of the president could falter. The initial legislators recognized what can be called the “paradox of democracy”. That is, classes of passionate citizens are more politically active, yet may not make the best voting decisions for the welfare of the democracy, whereas more rational voters are less likely to voice their opinions. When voters are engaged only with similar viewpoints, they fail to compromise with the beliefs of others. While passionate citizens have made decisions at the will of their collective mind, deliberative citizens have not voted or voiced opinions in similar numbers. Those that are more capable of making rational decisions have allowed passionate, irrational citizens, classes, or parties decide the outcome of democracies for millennia. No democracy is the same, just as no individual’s idea of a perfect democracy is to another. To Diana Mutz, an ideal participatory democracy was, “a throng of highly politically active citizens carrying signs, shouting slogans, and cheering at speeches of their political leaders, who possessed an unparalleled level of enthusiasm and passion borne out of shared purpose and a camaraderie that emerged from the sheer amount of time spent together” (Mutz 16). Participation in groups with similar political goals and ideologies motivated others to even high levels of action or lifted spirits in times of trouble, “convincing [voters] that win or lose, promoting the candidate or cause was truly worth their time and efforts” (Mutz 16). Contrary to participatory democracies, deliberative democracies have consisted of citizens who debate with and listen to groups with different political ideologies. Deliberative voters listen to the other side’s reasonings, and allow these new ideas to influence old, deeply held beliefs. Unfortunately, it is easier for many voters to fall in line with like minded ideas, especially when guided by authoritarian leaders and systems. In other words, it is easier to be passionate about ideas when reinforced by the collective action of those with similar viewpoints, than to sympathize with different perspectives and further update individual belief. Voters in deliberative democracies have not been as politically active as those more participatory voters, but tended to be the more rational deciders. Rational citizens take time to control their actions rather than run about and shout slogans at every passerby on the street. Previous conceptions of democracy, “blend[ed] participatory democracy with deliberative democracy in a seamless fashion” (Mutz 3). Those theories argued that deliberation was a subset of political participation. The passion involved in participatory democracies, however, did not appear to Mutz to be as seamlessly compatible with the rational in more deliberative individuals. This compatibility issue between deliberation and participation has been discussed by philosophers and political scientists for millennia, with the original argument based in the conflict between passion and reason. The incompatibilities between participatory citizens and deliberative citizens are rooted in the fundamental conflict of passion and reason. To understand what causes the conflict between passion and reason and therefore participation and deliberation, one must look deep into the human mind. The nature of human thought and action can be described as a dual process of sorts. Our brains appraise sensory inputs in preconscious thought, which we then use to deliberate upon and rationalize in conscious thought, comparing the new information to prior experiences and innate tendencies. Although the difference between preconscious and conscious thought may only last approximately five hundred milliseconds, passion and reason may not be compatible because of this delay. Humans rationalize only after they have acted or felt emotionally. Because of this, it is unlikely an exceedingly activist political culture can be a highly deliberative environment, thus creating the paradox of democracy. Deliberate democracies foster diverse, decentralized, political networks where citizens are more aware of the multitude of perspectives on issues that exist. These democracies are more tolerant to differing ideologies, but individuals who are more averse to conflict are less likely to participate. Mutz argued, “those with diverse networks refrain from participation in part because of the social awkwardness that accompanies publicly taking a stand that friends or associates oppose”, (Mutz 3). She was intrigued with the idea of discovering where people encountered political ideas they disliked, how they handled the situation, and what kind of effects it had when it occurred. She wrote of her father who always had much more thoughtful political debate with his dentist than with her family. In daily relationships, Mutz argued discussion was influenced by the desire of the participants to “get along with another on a day to day basis” (Mutz 3). These relationships do not easily allow for the type of deliberation required to foster a healthy democracy because no one will truly voice their opinions, or will align themselves with likeminded others, ignoring diverse ideas. According to prior social theories, democracy can only survive if “citizens come out of their bunkers and start talking” (Mutz 7). The issue in this lies in the incompatibility between passion and reason as well as the social conflicts in domestic relationships. Not only should the quantity of political discussions be a standard for the success of a democracy, but so should the quality. Democracy then will not survive if citizens just come out of their safe space and start yelling at others on the streets, or talking solely with those of mutual ideologies and obligations. A successful democracy will have citizens that have vibrant discussions over opposing views, who then take a moment to reflect and even allow differing views to influence deeply held beliefs. The internal struggle between passion and reason could not have been more evident in the 2016 elections. The Republican Party was extremely passionate about beating whoever the Democratic Candidate was, but more so when it was officially declared Hillary Clinton was to be the nominee. Republican and even a close majority of democratic voters were united in their front against Hillary Clinton from the primary to the general and even today. These passionate voters in some cases did not think clearly. Take for example the single-issue voters who elected Republican legislators and President Donald Trump to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, or the blue-collar voters who were promised manufacturing jobs in return for a vote, all who are experiencing voter’s remorse as evidenced by wide swings towards the democratic candidates in districts Trump overwhelmingly won. American voters elected a candidate who had no prior experience in government except the inside of courtrooms, over a candidate who could easily have been the most well qualified candidate who had worked in high level positions from being First Lady to Senator and then Secretary of State. This irrational choice by passionate voters has not served American democracy well. The entire 2016 election has been called into question regarding the influence a foreign government had on Trump’s associates and employees. The Special Counsel investigation into such matter has resulted in numerous felony indictments and guilty pleas, from members of the Trump campaign, only a year into the Presidency (Bump). Moreover, a Federal Judge has allowed the State Attorneys General of Maryland and the District of Columbia to proceed with a case that alleges violation of the emoluments clause in the constitution since Trump’s first day in office (Braun). Looking forward to the elections in November 2018 and 2020, the American populace will be better served by reason over passion. In the past year of the Trump Presidency, Americans have had a chance to reflect and be more rational voters. These deliberations have led to a debate across political parties, where even members of the Republican party have spoken against some of Trump’s key campaign promises. Regardless of what happens between now and November 2018 and November 2020, Americans will benefit from the debate that is ongoing in society, so long as all sides are heard, all individuals can form their own opinions, and all are just passionate enough to make it to the ballot box. Voters should not however just reflect on the man who won the office or the next man or woman to do so, but should also consider that the American electoral system failed to elect a candidate who won the popular vote, for the fifth time since the twelfth amendment. If American democracy is to survive, today’s voters must acknowledge the conflict between passion and reason, and recognize the paradox of democracy just as ancient philosophers and the American founding fathers had.
json metadata{"tags":["american","politics","philosophy","democracy"],"image":["https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmasmfrp7ZNCpYPwYSpucQJo8hqMXjKYdvCzpakNgq3dxf/3460098364_e06b8ddc19_o.jpg"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
Transaction InfoBlock #22834506/Trx 7fdaa10541b2f8c670af2cfb8a2c927502ac66c2
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "7fdaa10541b2f8c670af2cfb8a2c927502ac66c2",
  "block": 22834506,
  "trx_in_block": 14,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T19:51:51",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "american",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "the-american-voter-s-conflict-between-passion-and-reason",
      "title": "The American Voter’s Conflict Between Passion and Reason",
      "body": "![3460098364_e06b8ddc19_o.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmasmfrp7ZNCpYPwYSpucQJo8hqMXjKYdvCzpakNgq3dxf/3460098364_e06b8ddc19_o.jpg)\nThe American democratic system is based on compromises made to the Virginia Plan of the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The Virginia Plan called on Congress to elect the President. Among many of the committee members there was fear that if the president were elected by a select group of regularly meeting men, the independence of the president could falter. The initial legislators recognized what can be called the “paradox of democracy”. That is, classes of passionate citizens are more politically active, yet may not make the best voting decisions for the welfare of the democracy, whereas more rational voters are less likely to voice their opinions. When voters are engaged only with similar viewpoints, they fail to compromise with the beliefs of others. While passionate citizens have made decisions at the will of their collective mind, deliberative citizens have not voted or voiced opinions in similar numbers. Those that are more capable of making rational decisions have allowed passionate, irrational citizens, classes, or parties decide the outcome of democracies for millennia. No democracy is the same, just as no individual’s idea of a perfect democracy is to another. \n\tTo Diana Mutz, an ideal participatory democracy was, “a throng of highly politically active citizens carrying signs, shouting slogans, and cheering at speeches of their political leaders, who possessed an unparalleled level of enthusiasm and passion borne out of shared purpose and a camaraderie that emerged from the sheer amount of time spent together” (Mutz 16). Participation in groups with similar political goals and ideologies motivated others to even high levels of action or lifted spirits in times of trouble, “convincing [voters] that win or lose, promoting the candidate or cause was truly worth their time and efforts” (Mutz 16). Contrary to participatory democracies, deliberative democracies have consisted of citizens who debate with and listen to groups with different political ideologies. Deliberative voters listen to the other side’s reasonings, and allow these new ideas to influence old, deeply held beliefs. Unfortunately, it is easier for many voters to fall in line with like minded ideas, especially when guided by authoritarian leaders and systems. In other words, it is easier to be passionate about ideas when reinforced by the collective action of those with similar viewpoints, than to sympathize with different perspectives and further update individual belief. Voters in deliberative democracies have not been as politically active as those more participatory voters, but tended to be the more rational deciders. Rational citizens take time to control their actions rather than run about and shout slogans at every passerby on the street. Previous conceptions of democracy, “blend[ed] participatory democracy with deliberative democracy in a seamless fashion” (Mutz 3). Those theories argued that deliberation was a subset of political participation. The passion involved in participatory democracies, however, did not appear to Mutz to be as seamlessly compatible with the rational in more deliberative individuals. \n\tThis compatibility issue between deliberation and participation has been discussed by philosophers and political scientists for millennia, with the original argument based in the conflict between passion and reason.  The incompatibilities between participatory citizens and deliberative citizens are rooted in the fundamental conflict of passion and reason. To understand what causes the conflict between passion and reason and therefore participation and deliberation, one must look deep into the human mind. The nature of human thought and action can be described as a dual process of sorts. Our brains appraise sensory inputs in preconscious thought, which we then use to deliberate upon and rationalize in conscious thought, comparing the new information to prior experiences and innate tendencies. Although the difference between preconscious and conscious thought may only last approximately five hundred milliseconds, passion and reason may not be compatible because of this delay. Humans rationalize only after they have acted or felt emotionally. Because of this, it is unlikely an exceedingly activist political culture can be a highly deliberative environment, thus creating the paradox of democracy. \n\tDeliberate democracies foster diverse, decentralized, political networks where citizens are more aware of the multitude of perspectives on issues that exist. These democracies are more tolerant to differing ideologies, but individuals who are more averse to conflict are less likely to participate. Mutz argued, “those with diverse networks refrain from participation in part because of the social awkwardness that accompanies publicly taking a stand that friends or associates oppose”, (Mutz 3). She was intrigued with the idea of discovering where people encountered political ideas they disliked, how they handled the situation, and what kind of effects it had when it occurred. She wrote of her father who always had much more thoughtful political debate with his dentist than with her family. In daily relationships, Mutz argued discussion was influenced by the desire of the participants to “get along with another on a day to day basis” (Mutz 3). These relationships do not easily allow for the type of deliberation required to foster a healthy democracy because no one will truly voice their opinions, or will align themselves with likeminded others, ignoring diverse ideas. According to prior social theories, democracy can only survive if “citizens come out of their bunkers and start talking” (Mutz 7). The issue in this lies in the incompatibility between passion and reason as well as the social conflicts in domestic relationships. Not only should the quantity of political discussions be a standard for the success of a democracy, but so should the quality. Democracy then will not survive if citizens just come out of their safe space and start yelling at others on the streets, or talking solely with those of mutual ideologies and obligations. A successful democracy will have citizens that have vibrant discussions over opposing views, who then take a moment to reflect and even allow differing views to influence deeply held beliefs. \n\tThe internal struggle between passion and reason could not have been more evident in the 2016 elections. The Republican Party was extremely passionate about beating whoever the Democratic Candidate was, but more so when it was officially declared Hillary Clinton was to be the nominee. Republican and even a close majority of democratic voters were united in their front against Hillary Clinton from the primary to the general and even today. These passionate voters in some cases did not think clearly. Take for example the single-issue voters who elected Republican legislators and President Donald Trump to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, or the blue-collar voters who were promised manufacturing jobs in return for a vote, all who are experiencing voter’s remorse as evidenced by wide swings towards the democratic candidates in districts Trump overwhelmingly won. American voters elected a candidate who had no prior experience in government except the inside of courtrooms, over a candidate who could easily have been the most well qualified candidate who had worked in high level positions from being First Lady to Senator and then Secretary of State. \n\tThis irrational choice by passionate voters has not served American democracy well. The entire 2016 election has been called into question regarding the influence a foreign government had on Trump’s associates and employees. The Special Counsel investigation into such matter has resulted in numerous felony indictments and guilty pleas, from members of the Trump campaign, only a year into the Presidency (Bump). Moreover, a Federal Judge has allowed the State Attorneys General of Maryland and the District of Columbia to proceed with a case that alleges violation of the emoluments clause in the constitution since Trump’s first day in office (Braun). \n\tLooking forward to the elections in November 2018 and 2020, the American populace will be better served by reason over passion. In the past year of the Trump Presidency, Americans have had a chance to reflect and be more rational voters. These deliberations have led to a debate across political parties, where even members of the Republican party have spoken against some of Trump’s key campaign promises. Regardless of what happens between now and November 2018 and November 2020, Americans will benefit from the debate that is ongoing in society, so long as all sides are heard, all individuals can form their own opinions, and all are just passionate enough to make it to the ballot box. Voters should not however just reflect on the man who won the office or the next man or woman to do so, but should also consider that the American electoral system failed to elect a candidate who won the popular vote, for the fifth time since the twelfth amendment.   If American democracy is to survive, today’s voters must acknowledge the conflict between passion and reason, and recognize the paradox of democracy just as ancient philosophers and the American founding fathers had.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"american\",\"politics\",\"philosophy\",\"democracy\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmasmfrp7ZNCpYPwYSpucQJo8hqMXjKYdvCzpakNgq3dxf/3460098364_e06b8ddc19_o.jpg\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 19:37:45
voterax3
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkprivacy-is-a-global-issue
weight100 (1.00%)
Transaction InfoBlock #22834224/Trx e76823effe1cc8cd56dae508e0b9de2873c04824
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "e76823effe1cc8cd56dae508e0b9de2873c04824",
  "block": 22834224,
  "trx_in_block": 65,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T19:37:45",
  "op": [
    "vote",
    {
      "voter": "ax3",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "privacy-is-a-global-issue",
      "weight": 100
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 19:37:36
parent author
parent permlinkprivacy
authorcdcrenshaw
permlinkprivacy-is-a-global-issue
titlePrivacy is a Global Issue
body![17765606909_dd920932a4_o.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNM7L7aXKWNjJsUdY8LiWtFdETgai5jvVAtzNb7gp8ZaK/17765606909_dd920932a4_o.jpg) The privacy rights of United States citizens are in no way explicitly guaranteed by the country’s Constitution. However, certain clauses in the document reflect the founding fathers’ “concern” for citizens’ and their right to privacy (Linder). In the United States, the privacy of beliefs, home, person and possessions, and personal information by the first, second, fifth, and other amendments. The constitution, though, is far from the only law that affects the day to day lives of ordinary civilians, and perhaps non citizens as well (Kedmey). As new technologies and devices are created and new laws are written, more people are watched, more communications are collected, more movements tracked, and more data is collected, examined, and used. An average United States citizen can be added to watch lists, have phone data, internet history, location data, travel data, and personal information collected by many different corporate and government agencies. Data and metadata are shared between these groups, sold even, and in some cases used to prevent crime. In today’s highly connected, fast paced society, very few people are not being tracked in some fashion, leading to terabytes of data collected. Privacy concerns arise from not only this data collection but the methods and legality of it all. Terrorism, drones, healthcare, private information regarding lifestyles, from same sex marriages to the legalization of marijuana are all influential topics of the times, but the concern of privacy factors into all of these widely debated issues and more. The right of a private life, although only implied in the Constitution, is of grave concern and importance to many in the country, and around the globe. There are many major laws that affect the day to day life of a U.S. citizens, from health care laws such as HIPPA, student privacy laws, wiretap and investigatory laws, to defense laws such as the National Defense Authorization Act and the Patriot Act, and finally to the ‘law of the land’, the Constitution. Many corporations play a role in privacy through their terms of service and the data they collect from applications, devices, and the user. These business and government agencies take advantage of billions of dollars in defense industry spending, their own new technologies, devices and methods to practically spy on their target or customer. This has become more apparent after leaks from government officials and journalists such as Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, among other whistleblowers (Nakashima). Edward Snowden, the most well known figure of those three, leaked the United States’ National Security Agency’s mass surveillance programs to the public. Even though the leaks are well known, the true extent of the eavesdropping is unknown, with new leaks coming out every few months. What is even less well known is how long the N.S.A. has ran these domestic surveillance programs. Congressional investigations uncovered warrantless interception of telegrams and other communications during World War Two through the 70s (Lee). We now know the N.S.A. has grown their number of interception programs, especially with the advent and spread of the internet, cell phones, and computers. Their reach is truly global with, “virtually no foreign government off-limits for the National Security Agency, which has been authorized to intercept information “concerning” all but four countries, according to top-secret documents,” wrote Ellen Nakashima, of the Washington Post. All of the N.S.A.’s powers (that we know about) were granted by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts and congress. Lawmakers and other government officials insist privacy is a concern, and that “in short, there must be a particular intelligence need, policy approval and legal authorization,” for all investigations, said Vanne Vines, an N.S.A. Spokeswoman. Other than the Foreign Intelligence Courts and congressional committees, there is little oversight, and almost unlimited access to citizen's data to certain government officials. There have been many lawsuits targeting these programs (E.F.F.). Many unions, such as the American Civil Liberties Union, as well as private citizens, and companies have sued, spoken out against, and highlighted these collection actions by the government, resulting in some of the N.S.A.’s powers stripped, and certain laws rewritten. Major cases such as Jewel v. N.S.A., Wilner vs. N.S.A., A.C.L.U v. Clapper, among many others have been taken up by Federal Courts, yet have been declined to be heard by the Supreme Court (C.C.R.). The security departments of the government have fought these cases, lost some, but overall have gained powers as fast as technology has advanced. From the 1970s with phone data collection, to today’s wide variety of bugging, intercepting, and investigating abilities, new laws have been created to allow domestic and foreign spying. There are many reasons these laws and programs have been used, such as terrorism, wars, corporate and industry espionage. Certain events, such as the September 11th attacks, have forced congress to pass laws such as the Patriot Act in 2001. All of those factors have influenced state and federal legislation, court decisions, and criminal trials. There are differences though between state and federal laws regarding every aspect of this issue. A good example of a fight between states and the federal government would be Texas’ attempt to pass state bill HB 3916 in May of 2015, which would cut off electricity and water to the Texas Cryptologic Center in San Antonio Texas (Wilonsky) This is just the tip of the iceberg, with a massive fight looming for privacy rights in the country, and globally. Not only is the United States spying on people around the world, in many ways, other countries and corporations are doing the same. Therefore, the fight for privacy will not be just an American issue, but a global issue because many countries have similar surveillance organizations, such as Britain’s G.C.H.Q, China’s corporations, or even North Korea’s “army of hackers” (Tamblyn) who all take part in information collection every day. As more people buy new devices and communicate more, laws will be adapted and new laws written to govern and watch over and ‘protect’ society. In the future, there will be many more privacy issues and legal fights that stem from advances in technology and events that some say will require a sacrifice of privacy in the pursuit for security. A balance between security and privacy should be found, especially when everyone who owns a phone, uses the internet, goes out in public, and travels are impacted by mass surveillance. If anything could change how the information is collected, or if it should be at all, will be voters and the officials they elect in the coming generation. Works Cited Kedmey, Dan. "Report: NSA Authorized to Spy on 193 Countries." Time. Time, n.d. Web. 27 Nov. 2015. Lee, Timothy. "In the 1970s, Congress Investigated Intelligence Abuses. Time to Do It Again?" Washington Post. The Washington Post, 27 June 2013. Web. 27 Nov. 2015. Linder, Doug. "The Right of Privacy: Is It Protected by the Constitution?" The Right of Privacy: Is It Protected by the Constitution? University of Missouri, n.d. Web. 27 Nov. 2015. Nakashima, Ellen, and Barton Gellman. "Court Gave NSA Broad Leeway in Surveillance, Documents Show." Washington Post. The Washington Post, 30 Jun. 2015. Web. 27 Nov. 2015. Tamblyn, Thomas. "North Korea Could 'Destroy A City' Using The Internet."The Huffington Post UK. The Huffington Post, 29 May 2015. Web. 27 Nov. 2015. "Timeline of NSA Domestic Spying." Electronic Frontier Foundation, n.d. Web. "Wilner v. National Security Agency (NSA)." Center for Constitutional Rights. C.C.R., n.d. Web. 27 Nov. 2015. Wilonsky, Robert. "State Rep. Stickland Wants to Pull the Plug on the National Security Agency Texas. Literally." Trail Blazers Blog. Dallas Morning News, 13 Mar. 2015. Web. 27 Nov. 2015.
json metadata{"tags":["privacy","law","legal","spy","college"],"image":["https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNM7L7aXKWNjJsUdY8LiWtFdETgai5jvVAtzNb7gp8ZaK/17765606909_dd920932a4_o.jpg"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
Transaction InfoBlock #22834221/Trx 3456edf7c79705ac24757362a30d1ebfd8144b90
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "3456edf7c79705ac24757362a30d1ebfd8144b90",
  "block": 22834221,
  "trx_in_block": 59,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T19:37:36",
  "op": [
    "comment",
    {
      "parent_author": "",
      "parent_permlink": "privacy",
      "author": "cdcrenshaw",
      "permlink": "privacy-is-a-global-issue",
      "title": "Privacy is a Global Issue",
      "body": "![17765606909_dd920932a4_o.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNM7L7aXKWNjJsUdY8LiWtFdETgai5jvVAtzNb7gp8ZaK/17765606909_dd920932a4_o.jpg)\n     The privacy rights of United States citizens are in no way explicitly guaranteed by the country’s Constitution. However, certain clauses in the document reflect the founding fathers’ “concern” for citizens’ and their right to privacy (Linder). In the United States, the privacy of beliefs, home, person and possessions, and personal information by the first, second, fifth, and other amendments. The constitution, though, is far from the only law that affects the day to day lives of ordinary civilians, and perhaps non citizens as well (Kedmey). As new technologies and devices are created and new laws are written, more people are watched, more communications are collected, more movements tracked, and more data is collected, examined, and used. An average United States citizen can be added to watch lists, have phone data, internet history, location data, travel data, and personal information collected by many different corporate and government agencies. Data and metadata are shared between these groups, sold even, and in some cases used to prevent crime. In today’s highly connected, fast paced society, very few people are not being tracked in some fashion, leading to terabytes of data collected. Privacy concerns arise from not only this data collection but the methods and legality of it all. Terrorism, drones, healthcare, private information regarding lifestyles, from same sex marriages to the legalization of marijuana are all influential topics of the times, but the concern of privacy factors into all of these widely debated issues and more. The right of a private life, although only implied in the Constitution, is of grave concern and importance to many in the country, and around the globe. \n\tThere are many major laws that affect the day to day life of a U.S. citizens, from health care laws such as HIPPA, student privacy laws, wiretap and investigatory laws, to defense laws such as the National Defense Authorization Act and the Patriot Act, and finally to the ‘law of the land’, the Constitution. Many corporations play a role in privacy through their terms of service and the data they collect from applications, devices, and the user. These business and government agencies take advantage of billions of dollars in defense industry spending, their own new technologies, devices and methods to practically spy on their target or customer. This has become more apparent after leaks from government officials and journalists such as Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, among other whistleblowers (Nakashima). Edward Snowden, the most well known figure of those three, leaked the United States’ National Security Agency’s mass surveillance programs to the public. Even though the leaks are well known, the true extent of the eavesdropping is unknown, with new leaks coming out every few months. What is even less well known is how long the N.S.A. has ran these domestic surveillance programs. Congressional investigations uncovered warrantless interception of telegrams and other communications during World War Two through the 70s (Lee). We now know the N.S.A. has grown their number of interception programs, especially with the advent and spread of the internet, cell phones, and computers. Their reach is truly global with, “virtually no foreign government off-limits for the National Security Agency, which has been authorized to intercept information “concerning” all but four countries, according to top-secret documents,” wrote Ellen Nakashima, of the Washington Post. \n\tAll of the N.S.A.’s powers (that we know about) were granted by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts and congress. Lawmakers and other government officials insist privacy is a concern, and that “in short, there must be a particular intelligence need, policy approval and legal authorization,” for all investigations, said Vanne Vines, an N.S.A. Spokeswoman. Other than the Foreign Intelligence Courts and congressional committees, there is little oversight, and almost unlimited access to citizen's data to certain government officials. There have been many lawsuits targeting these programs (E.F.F.). Many unions, such as the American Civil Liberties Union, as well as private citizens, and companies have sued, spoken out against, and highlighted these collection actions by the government, resulting in some of the N.S.A.’s powers stripped, and certain laws rewritten. Major cases such as Jewel v. N.S.A., Wilner vs. N.S.A., A.C.L.U v. Clapper, among many others have been taken up by Federal Courts, yet have been declined to be heard by the Supreme Court (C.C.R.). The security departments of the government have fought these cases, lost some, but overall have gained powers as fast as technology has advanced. From the 1970s with phone data collection, to today’s wide variety of bugging, intercepting, and investigating abilities, new laws have been created to allow domestic and foreign spying. There are many reasons these laws and programs have been used, such as terrorism, wars, corporate and industry espionage. Certain events, such as the September 11th attacks, have forced congress to pass laws such as the Patriot Act in 2001. All of those factors have influenced state and federal legislation, court decisions, and criminal trials. There are differences though between state and federal laws regarding every aspect of this issue. A good example of a fight between states and the federal government would be Texas’ attempt to pass state bill HB 3916 in May of 2015, which would cut off electricity and water to the Texas Cryptologic Center in San Antonio Texas (Wilonsky) This is just the tip of the iceberg, with a massive fight looming for privacy rights in the country, and globally. Not only is the United States spying on people around the world, in many ways, other countries and corporations are doing the same. \nTherefore, the fight for privacy will not be just an American issue, but a global issue because many countries have similar surveillance organizations, such as Britain’s G.C.H.Q, China’s corporations, or even North Korea’s “army of hackers” (Tamblyn) who all take part in information collection every day. As more people buy new devices and communicate more, laws will be adapted and new laws written to govern and watch over and ‘protect’ society. In the future,  there will be many more privacy issues and legal fights that stem from advances in technology and events that some say will require a sacrifice of privacy in the pursuit for security.  A balance between security and privacy should be found, especially when everyone who owns a phone, uses the internet, goes out in public, and travels are  impacted by mass surveillance. If anything could change how the information is collected, or if it should be at all,  will be voters and the officials they elect in the coming generation. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nWorks Cited\n\nKedmey, Dan. \"Report: NSA Authorized to Spy on 193 Countries.\" Time. Time, n.d. Web. 27 Nov. 2015.\n\nLee, Timothy. \"In the 1970s, Congress Investigated Intelligence Abuses. Time to Do It Again?\" Washington Post. The Washington Post, 27 June 2013. Web. 27 Nov. 2015.\n\nLinder, Doug. \"The Right of Privacy: Is It Protected by the Constitution?\" The Right of Privacy: Is It Protected by the Constitution? University of Missouri, n.d. Web. 27 Nov. 2015.\n\nNakashima, Ellen, and Barton Gellman. \"Court Gave NSA Broad Leeway in Surveillance, \tDocuments Show.\" Washington Post. The Washington Post, 30 Jun. 2015. Web. 27 Nov. 2015.\n\nTamblyn, Thomas. \"North Korea Could 'Destroy A City' Using The Internet.\"The Huffington Post UK. The Huffington Post, 29 May 2015. Web. 27 Nov. 2015.\n\n\"Timeline of NSA Domestic Spying.\" Electronic Frontier Foundation, n.d. Web.\n\n\"Wilner v. National Security Agency (NSA).\" Center for Constitutional Rights. C.C.R., n.d. Web. 27 Nov. 2015.\n\nWilonsky, Robert. \"State Rep. Stickland Wants to Pull the Plug on the National Security Agency Texas. Literally.\" Trail Blazers Blog. Dallas Morning News, 13 Mar. 2015. Web. 27 Nov. 2015.",
      "json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"privacy\",\"law\",\"legal\",\"spy\",\"college\"],\"image\":[\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNM7L7aXKWNjJsUdY8LiWtFdETgai5jvVAtzNb7gp8ZaK/17765606909_dd920932a4_o.jpg\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}"
    }
  ]
}
cdcrenshawupdated their account properties
2018/05/28 19:04:33
accountcdcrenshaw
memo keySTM61mQTMsNtR8aWez48ebpSNnxZwqub4z9q8NaQBzsGb29kcEP2b
json metadata{"profile":{"profile_image":"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQma4fwvgvZ2VEZCJ8Xp27yjFaNNfBCJpJeD5GKr6sWFxfy/IMG_7210.JPG","cover_image":"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmU7ZxUb8r7LbhR4aaDgx57HDxB7nokbU1344yqZnW1HV3/IMG_6640.JPG","name":"Christopher","location":"San Antonio, Texas"}}
Transaction InfoBlock #22833561/Trx 62b44e06f06f5663bbda4a5daf060a3106bbb52c
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "62b44e06f06f5663bbda4a5daf060a3106bbb52c",
  "block": 22833561,
  "trx_in_block": 14,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T19:04:33",
  "op": [
    "account_update",
    {
      "account": "cdcrenshaw",
      "memo_key": "STM61mQTMsNtR8aWez48ebpSNnxZwqub4z9q8NaQBzsGb29kcEP2b",
      "json_metadata": "{\"profile\":{\"profile_image\":\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQma4fwvgvZ2VEZCJ8Xp27yjFaNNfBCJpJeD5GKr6sWFxfy/IMG_7210.JPG\",\"cover_image\":\"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmU7ZxUb8r7LbhR4aaDgx57HDxB7nokbU1344yqZnW1HV3/IMG_6640.JPG\",\"name\":\"Christopher\",\"location\":\"San Antonio, Texas\"}}"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/28 18:52:24
required auths[]
required posting auths["cdcrenshaw"]
idfollow
json["follow",{"follower":"cdcrenshaw","following":"cryptoriddler","what":["blog"]}]
Transaction InfoBlock #22833318/Trx b503afedca85bb9e020cb3156148e714ddf70a03
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "b503afedca85bb9e020cb3156148e714ddf70a03",
  "block": 22833318,
  "trx_in_block": 4,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-28T18:52:24",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cdcrenshaw"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"cdcrenshaw\",\"following\":\"cryptoriddler\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/24 19:10:57
required auths[]
required posting auths["cdcrenshaw"]
idfollow
json["follow",{"follower":"cdcrenshaw","following":"amreshchandra","what":["blog"]}]
Transaction InfoBlock #22718512/Trx 99460bf9e694dc212a2d41d5fbab68a196c997fc
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "99460bf9e694dc212a2d41d5fbab68a196c997fc",
  "block": 22718512,
  "trx_in_block": 35,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-24T19:10:57",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cdcrenshaw"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"cdcrenshaw\",\"following\":\"amreshchandra\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}
2018/05/24 19:09:36
required auths[]
required posting auths["cdcrenshaw"]
idfollow
json["follow",{"follower":"cdcrenshaw","following":"happymoneyman","what":["blog"]}]
Transaction InfoBlock #22718485/Trx 7622cf2aef3ae734ab034a9bd6037c138866737f
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "7622cf2aef3ae734ab034a9bd6037c138866737f",
  "block": 22718485,
  "trx_in_block": 59,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-24T19:09:36",
  "op": [
    "custom_json",
    {
      "required_auths": [],
      "required_posting_auths": [
        "cdcrenshaw"
      ],
      "id": "follow",
      "json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"cdcrenshaw\",\"following\":\"happymoneyman\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]"
    }
  ]
}
steemdelegated 18.611 SP to @cdcrenshaw
2018/05/24 15:18:54
delegatorsteem
delegateecdcrenshaw
vesting shares30306.820986 VESTS
Transaction InfoBlock #22713872/Trx 630beb34536f2a542e21522f0bf5c64cb53007af
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "630beb34536f2a542e21522f0bf5c64cb53007af",
  "block": 22713872,
  "trx_in_block": 1,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-24T15:18:54",
  "op": [
    "delegate_vesting_shares",
    {
      "delegator": "steem",
      "delegatee": "cdcrenshaw",
      "vesting_shares": "30306.820986 VESTS"
    }
  ]
}
steemcreated a new account: @cdcrenshaw
2018/05/24 13:31:57
fee0.100 STEEM
delegation30690.000000 VESTS
creatorsteem
new account namecdcrenshaw
owner{"weight_threshold":1,"account_auths":[],"key_auths":[["STM6CUVkG5MVZrPQHuKUfzhFYVBEP9csSJXq3UmMZoM2sWQXg95Rh",1]]}
active{"weight_threshold":1,"account_auths":[],"key_auths":[["STM6UqNDe1349SBz6HggyvgEUYHKfrZBXaRsfJbsHjVPmwHCsm7QR",1]]}
posting{"weight_threshold":1,"account_auths":[],"key_auths":[["STM6y35iPVnQx7sPGXkjBd6huJmT7Rv7JGb4pTEC73Nii5RdKErZ4",1]]}
memo keySTM61mQTMsNtR8aWez48ebpSNnxZwqub4z9q8NaQBzsGb29kcEP2b
json metadata{}
extensions[]
Transaction InfoBlock #22711738/Trx 8bbcbbdd12baf855c2066123c2f78ab555bf5741
View Raw JSON Data
{
  "trx_id": "8bbcbbdd12baf855c2066123c2f78ab555bf5741",
  "block": 22711738,
  "trx_in_block": 6,
  "op_in_trx": 0,
  "virtual_op": 0,
  "timestamp": "2018-05-24T13:31:57",
  "op": [
    "account_create_with_delegation",
    {
      "fee": "0.100 STEEM",
      "delegation": "30690.000000 VESTS",
      "creator": "steem",
      "new_account_name": "cdcrenshaw",
      "owner": {
        "weight_threshold": 1,
        "account_auths": [],
        "key_auths": [
          [
            "STM6CUVkG5MVZrPQHuKUfzhFYVBEP9csSJXq3UmMZoM2sWQXg95Rh",
            1
          ]
        ]
      },
      "active": {
        "weight_threshold": 1,
        "account_auths": [],
        "key_auths": [
          [
            "STM6UqNDe1349SBz6HggyvgEUYHKfrZBXaRsfJbsHjVPmwHCsm7QR",
            1
          ]
        ]
      },
      "posting": {
        "weight_threshold": 1,
        "account_auths": [],
        "key_auths": [
          [
            "STM6y35iPVnQx7sPGXkjBd6huJmT7Rv7JGb4pTEC73Nii5RdKErZ4",
            1
          ]
        ]
      },
      "memo_key": "STM61mQTMsNtR8aWez48ebpSNnxZwqub4z9q8NaQBzsGb29kcEP2b",
      "json_metadata": "{}",
      "extensions": []
    }
  ]
}

Account Metadata

POSTING JSON METADATA
profile{"profile_image":"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQma4fwvgvZ2VEZCJ8Xp27yjFaNNfBCJpJeD5GKr6sWFxfy/IMG_7210.JPG","cover_image":"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmU7ZxUb8r7LbhR4aaDgx57HDxB7nokbU1344yqZnW1HV3/IMG_6640.JPG","name":"Christopher","location":"San Antonio, Texas"}
JSON METADATA
profile{"profile_image":"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQma4fwvgvZ2VEZCJ8Xp27yjFaNNfBCJpJeD5GKr6sWFxfy/IMG_7210.JPG","cover_image":"https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmU7ZxUb8r7LbhR4aaDgx57HDxB7nokbU1344yqZnW1HV3/IMG_6640.JPG","name":"Christopher","location":"San Antonio, Texas"}
{
  "posting_json_metadata": {
    "profile": {
      "profile_image": "https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQma4fwvgvZ2VEZCJ8Xp27yjFaNNfBCJpJeD5GKr6sWFxfy/IMG_7210.JPG",
      "cover_image": "https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmU7ZxUb8r7LbhR4aaDgx57HDxB7nokbU1344yqZnW1HV3/IMG_6640.JPG",
      "name": "Christopher",
      "location": "San Antonio, Texas"
    }
  },
  "json_metadata": {
    "profile": {
      "profile_image": "https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQma4fwvgvZ2VEZCJ8Xp27yjFaNNfBCJpJeD5GKr6sWFxfy/IMG_7210.JPG",
      "cover_image": "https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmU7ZxUb8r7LbhR4aaDgx57HDxB7nokbU1344yqZnW1HV3/IMG_6640.JPG",
      "name": "Christopher",
      "location": "San Antonio, Texas"
    }
  }
}

Auth Keys

Owner
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM6CUVkG5MVZrPQHuKUfzhFYVBEP9csSJXq3UmMZoM2sWQXg95Rh1/1
Active
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM6UqNDe1349SBz6HggyvgEUYHKfrZBXaRsfJbsHjVPmwHCsm7QR1/1
Posting
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM6y35iPVnQx7sPGXkjBd6huJmT7Rv7JGb4pTEC73Nii5RdKErZ41/1
Memo
STM61mQTMsNtR8aWez48ebpSNnxZwqub4z9q8NaQBzsGb29kcEP2b
{
  "owner": {
    "weight_threshold": 1,
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM6CUVkG5MVZrPQHuKUfzhFYVBEP9csSJXq3UmMZoM2sWQXg95Rh",
        1
      ]
    ]
  },
  "active": {
    "weight_threshold": 1,
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM6UqNDe1349SBz6HggyvgEUYHKfrZBXaRsfJbsHjVPmwHCsm7QR",
        1
      ]
    ]
  },
  "posting": {
    "weight_threshold": 1,
    "account_auths": [],
    "key_auths": [
      [
        "STM6y35iPVnQx7sPGXkjBd6huJmT7Rv7JGb4pTEC73Nii5RdKErZ4",
        1
      ]
    ]
  },
  "memo": "STM61mQTMsNtR8aWez48ebpSNnxZwqub4z9q8NaQBzsGb29kcEP2b"
}

Witness Votes

0 / 30
No active witness votes.
[]