VOTING POWER100.00%
DOWNVOTE POWER100.00%
RESOURCE CREDITS100.00%
REPUTATION PROGRESS0.00%
Net Worth
0.037USD
STEEM
0.000STEEM
SBD
0.000SBD
Effective Power
5.007SP
├── Own SP
0.636SP
└── Incoming DelegationsDeleg
+4.371SP
Detailed Balance
| STEEM | ||
| balance | 0.000STEEM | STEEM |
| market_balance | 0.000STEEM | STEEM |
| savings_balance | 0.000STEEM | STEEM |
| reward_steem_balance | 0.000STEEM | STEEM |
| STEEM POWER | ||
| Own SP | 0.636SP | SP |
| Delegated Out | 0.000SP | SP |
| Delegation In | 4.371SP | SP |
| Effective Power | 5.007SP | SP |
| Reward SP (pending) | 0.000SP | SP |
| SBD | ||
| sbd_balance | 0.000SBD | SBD |
| sbd_conversions | 0.000SBD | SBD |
| sbd_market_balance | 0.000SBD | SBD |
| savings_sbd_balance | 0.000SBD | SBD |
| reward_sbd_balance | 0.000SBD | SBD |
{
"balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"savings_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"reward_steem_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"vesting_shares": "1034.258934 VESTS",
"delegated_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
"received_vesting_shares": "7109.400872 VESTS",
"sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"savings_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"reward_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"conversions": []
}Account Info
| name | bollingbrook |
| id | 241869 |
| rank | 988,610 |
| reputation | 27137118 |
| created | 2017-07-03T22:39:48 |
| recovery_account | steem |
| proxy | None |
| post_count | 1 |
| comment_count | 0 |
| lifetime_vote_count | 0 |
| witnesses_voted_for | 0 |
| last_post | 2017-07-04T18:35:54 |
| last_root_post | 2017-07-04T18:35:54 |
| last_vote_time | 2017-07-04T18:35:54 |
| proxied_vsf_votes | 0, 0, 0, 0 |
| can_vote | 1 |
| voting_power | 0 |
| delayed_votes | 0 |
| balance | 0.000 STEEM |
| savings_balance | 0.000 STEEM |
| sbd_balance | 0.000 SBD |
| savings_sbd_balance | 0.000 SBD |
| vesting_shares | 1034.258934 VESTS |
| delegated_vesting_shares | 0.000000 VESTS |
| received_vesting_shares | 7109.400872 VESTS |
| reward_vesting_balance | 0.000000 VESTS |
| vesting_balance | 0.000 STEEM |
| vesting_withdraw_rate | 0.000000 VESTS |
| next_vesting_withdrawal | 1969-12-31T23:59:59 |
| withdrawn | 0 |
| to_withdraw | 0 |
| withdraw_routes | 0 |
| savings_withdraw_requests | 0 |
| last_account_recovery | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
| reset_account | null |
| last_owner_update | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
| last_account_update | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
| mined | No |
| sbd_seconds | 0 |
| sbd_last_interest_payment | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
| savings_sbd_last_interest_payment | 1970-01-01T00:00:00 |
{
"active": {
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM5d5bm2Mx1fGMho2XBAf38tTPdFb61YKttqqJ9wjwYGXzyYbZNQ",
1
]
],
"weight_threshold": 1
},
"balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"can_vote": true,
"comment_count": 0,
"created": "2017-07-03T22:39:48",
"curation_rewards": 0,
"delegated_vesting_shares": "0.000000 VESTS",
"downvote_manabar": {
"current_mana": 2035914951,
"last_update_time": 1779056058
},
"guest_bloggers": [],
"id": 241869,
"json_metadata": "",
"last_account_recovery": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"last_account_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"last_owner_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"last_post": "2017-07-04T18:35:54",
"last_root_post": "2017-07-04T18:35:54",
"last_vote_time": "2017-07-04T18:35:54",
"lifetime_vote_count": 0,
"market_history": [],
"memo_key": "STM7ZxWgjWGvsHXGNxGqUiWezynTiSANHqkZvkTzA9qyuxewiK2FG",
"mined": false,
"name": "bollingbrook",
"next_vesting_withdrawal": "1969-12-31T23:59:59",
"other_history": [],
"owner": {
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM53RsTVoxa5vB43agSpMJj3uDwm6nB7NuiQQPggPvFY6qnohE5q",
1
]
],
"weight_threshold": 1
},
"pending_claimed_accounts": 0,
"post_bandwidth": 0,
"post_count": 1,
"post_history": [],
"posting": {
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM7HzLu1vn4nNZ9KMVvEcHaNge7rqnHWNj51nQzbBtHZGKj96iCY",
1
]
],
"weight_threshold": 1
},
"posting_json_metadata": "",
"posting_rewards": 0,
"proxied_vsf_votes": [
0,
0,
0,
0
],
"proxy": "",
"received_vesting_shares": "7109.400872 VESTS",
"recovery_account": "steem",
"reputation": 27137118,
"reset_account": "null",
"reward_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"reward_steem_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"reward_vesting_balance": "0.000000 VESTS",
"reward_vesting_steem": "0.000 STEEM",
"savings_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"savings_sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"savings_sbd_last_interest_payment": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"savings_sbd_seconds": "0",
"savings_sbd_seconds_last_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"savings_withdraw_requests": 0,
"sbd_balance": "0.000 SBD",
"sbd_last_interest_payment": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"sbd_seconds": "0",
"sbd_seconds_last_update": "1970-01-01T00:00:00",
"tags_usage": [],
"to_withdraw": 0,
"transfer_history": [],
"vesting_balance": "0.000 STEEM",
"vesting_shares": "1034.258934 VESTS",
"vesting_withdraw_rate": "0.000000 VESTS",
"vote_history": [],
"voting_manabar": {
"current_mana": "8143659806",
"last_update_time": 1779056058
},
"voting_power": 0,
"withdraw_routes": 0,
"withdrawn": 0,
"witness_votes": [],
"witnesses_voted_for": 0,
"rank": 988610
}Withdraw Routes
| Incoming | Outgoing |
|---|---|
Empty | Empty |
{
"incoming": [],
"outgoing": []
}From Date
To Date
steemdelegated 4.371 SP to @bollingbrook2026/05/17 22:14:18
steemdelegated 4.371 SP to @bollingbrook
2026/05/17 22:14:18
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 7109.400872 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #106141041/Trx b108331dfa084ecacd085e879d590f23292851a0 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 106141041,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "7109.400872 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2026-05-17T22:14:18",
"trx_id": "b108331dfa084ecacd085e879d590f23292851a0",
"trx_in_block": 2,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 2.704 SP to @bollingbrook2026/05/11 19:53:18
steemdelegated 2.704 SP to @bollingbrook
2026/05/11 19:53:18
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 4397.190467 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #105966196/Trx 6285eeb78ef66a0b3955ffe7f22116f32aaaa1aa |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 105966196,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "4397.190467 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2026-05-11T19:53:18",
"trx_id": "6285eeb78ef66a0b3955ffe7f22116f32aaaa1aa",
"trx_in_block": 0,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 4.379 SP to @bollingbrook2026/04/25 21:38:18
steemdelegated 4.379 SP to @bollingbrook
2026/04/25 21:38:18
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 7121.916628 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #105508750/Trx 51bfe5452fc12e30eff656a2543dcea472cdde18 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 105508750,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "7121.916628 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2026-04-25T21:38:18",
"trx_id": "51bfe5452fc12e30eff656a2543dcea472cdde18",
"trx_in_block": 0,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 2.729 SP to @bollingbrook2026/01/23 02:29:45
steemdelegated 2.729 SP to @bollingbrook
2026/01/23 02:29:45
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 4438.737286 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #102845461/Trx 143c0e061e4c90fe570d623087c9f09c96070c26 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 102845461,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "4438.737286 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2026-01-23T02:29:45",
"trx_id": "143c0e061e4c90fe570d623087c9f09c96070c26",
"trx_in_block": 2,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 2.830 SP to @bollingbrook2024/12/16 21:49:15
steemdelegated 2.830 SP to @bollingbrook
2024/12/16 21:49:15
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 4602.956483 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #91291871/Trx d238233a0db159d04af391cd42000d035446fa07 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 91291871,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "4602.956483 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2024-12-16T21:49:15",
"trx_id": "d238233a0db159d04af391cd42000d035446fa07",
"trx_in_block": 5,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 2.934 SP to @bollingbrook2023/11/13 13:34:21
steemdelegated 2.934 SP to @bollingbrook
2023/11/13 13:34:21
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 4772.090015 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #79846133/Trx bfc40a206d33c285879961bbb1f01f8dabe01883 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 79846133,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "4772.090015 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2023-11-13T13:34:21",
"trx_id": "bfc40a206d33c285879961bbb1f01f8dabe01883",
"trx_in_block": 0,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 4.740 SP to @bollingbrook2023/09/21 19:29:33
steemdelegated 4.740 SP to @bollingbrook
2023/09/21 19:29:33
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 7709.368801 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #78345037/Trx 0fc645afc1eecd72e824e1af7a88af88276c6ab8 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 78345037,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "7709.368801 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2023-09-21T19:29:33",
"trx_id": "0fc645afc1eecd72e824e1af7a88af88276c6ab8",
"trx_in_block": 1,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 4.876 SP to @bollingbrook2022/11/03 09:32:54
steemdelegated 4.876 SP to @bollingbrook
2022/11/03 09:32:54
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 7931.050239 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #69110687/Trx a21e0fa34277fc76bf2aa726cbd177aa2f4e380b |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 69110687,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "7931.050239 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2022-11-03T09:32:54",
"trx_id": "a21e0fa34277fc76bf2aa726cbd177aa2f4e380b",
"trx_in_block": 1,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 5.012 SP to @bollingbrook2022/01/17 08:59:12
steemdelegated 5.012 SP to @bollingbrook
2022/01/17 08:59:12
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 8151.583470 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #60807066/Trx 6e6a9bb210d1782a9d2a770d7dec6a87a6adeed6 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 60807066,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "8151.583470 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2022-01-17T08:59:12",
"trx_id": "6e6a9bb210d1782a9d2a770d7dec6a87a6adeed6",
"trx_in_block": 2,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 5.125 SP to @bollingbrook2021/06/13 22:59:21
steemdelegated 5.125 SP to @bollingbrook
2021/06/13 22:59:21
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 8335.352128 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #54605552/Trx 6e2d1cce0ea8af02d8bd273ec3b2d4ca1c18c8ef |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 54605552,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "8335.352128 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2021-06-13T22:59:21",
"trx_id": "6e2d1cce0ea8af02d8bd273ec3b2d4ca1c18c8ef",
"trx_in_block": 3,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 5.240 SP to @bollingbrook2020/12/11 09:20:45
steemdelegated 5.240 SP to @bollingbrook
2020/12/11 09:20:45
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 8522.774102 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #49353081/Trx 14dd2b141c5968977c56b8e7e892f40b6ade3b51 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 49353081,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "8522.774102 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-12-11T09:20:45",
"trx_id": "14dd2b141c5968977c56b8e7e892f40b6ade3b51",
"trx_in_block": 2,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 1.176 SP to @bollingbrook2020/12/06 02:58:12
steemdelegated 1.176 SP to @bollingbrook
2020/12/06 02:58:12
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 1912.543513 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #49204653/Trx 7bea898153f14051f4546c93e20d3ec7dccfd1b4 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 49204653,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "1912.543513 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-12-06T02:58:12",
"trx_id": "7bea898153f14051f4546c93e20d3ec7dccfd1b4",
"trx_in_block": 6,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 5.244 SP to @bollingbrook2020/12/05 10:55:09
steemdelegated 5.244 SP to @bollingbrook
2020/12/05 10:55:09
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 8529.140741 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #49185756/Trx 0f430743839cd4b9112ec47552a41bf05cb8f201 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 49185756,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "8529.140741 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-12-05T10:55:09",
"trx_id": "0f430743839cd4b9112ec47552a41bf05cb8f201",
"trx_in_block": 3,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 1.181 SP to @bollingbrook2020/11/02 11:46:21
steemdelegated 1.181 SP to @bollingbrook
2020/11/02 11:46:21
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 1920.017158 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #48253252/Trx fc8fa9766281a762f2c389de5b2566231efebf8c |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 48253252,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "1920.017158 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-11-02T11:46:21",
"trx_id": "fc8fa9766281a762f2c389de5b2566231efebf8c",
"trx_in_block": 0,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 5.369 SP to @bollingbrook2020/05/09 03:53:27
steemdelegated 5.369 SP to @bollingbrook
2020/05/09 03:53:27
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 8731.787315 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #43214870/Trx 5f5da1160ca2e7f652215b57551e0b8d7a2ba881 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 43214870,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "8731.787315 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-05-09T03:53:27",
"trx_id": "5f5da1160ca2e7f652215b57551e0b8d7a2ba881",
"trx_in_block": 3,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 1.201 SP to @bollingbrook2020/05/08 07:13:03
steemdelegated 1.201 SP to @bollingbrook
2020/05/08 07:13:03
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 1953.311140 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #43190644/Trx 816c275c7ab11770e6f1e1058d584ef0a28935da |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 43190644,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "1953.311140 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-05-08T07:13:03",
"trx_id": "816c275c7ab11770e6f1e1058d584ef0a28935da",
"trx_in_block": 18,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 5.377 SP to @bollingbrook2020/04/15 20:26:33
steemdelegated 5.377 SP to @bollingbrook
2020/04/15 20:26:33
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 8744.764734 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #42561198/Trx 497c1f9d96406268846e1b253b70fc205042dcce |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 42561198,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "8744.764734 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2020-04-15T20:26:33",
"trx_id": "497c1f9d96406268846e1b253b70fc205042dcce",
"trx_in_block": 17,
"virtual_op": 0
}2019/07/03 23:58:15
2019/07/03 23:58:15
| author | steemitboard |
| body | Congratulations @bollingbrook! You received a personal award! <table><tr><td>https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@bollingbrook/birthday2.png</td><td>Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years!</td></tr></table> <sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@bollingbrook) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=bollingbrook)_</sub> ###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes! |
| json metadata | {"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png"]} |
| parent author | bollingbrook |
| parent permlink | a-salient-and-largely-unbiased-view-on-current-ico-madness-well-written-by-market-research-director-for-r3-tim-swanson |
| permlink | steemitboard-notify-bollingbrook-20190703t235815000z |
| title | |
| Transaction Info | Block #34352080/Trx ae58ac5042462206e7453201c789dfcf38c9b63c |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 34352080,
"op": [
"comment",
{
"author": "steemitboard",
"body": "Congratulations @bollingbrook! You received a personal award!\n\n<table><tr><td>https://steemitimages.com/70x70/http://steemitboard.com/@bollingbrook/birthday2.png</td><td>Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years!</td></tr></table>\n\n<sub>_You can view [your badges on your Steem Board](https://steemitboard.com/@bollingbrook) and compare to others on the [Steem Ranking](https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?name=bollingbrook)_</sub>\n\n\n###### [Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1) to get one more award and increased upvotes!",
"json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png\"]}",
"parent_author": "bollingbrook",
"parent_permlink": "a-salient-and-largely-unbiased-view-on-current-ico-madness-well-written-by-market-research-director-for-r3-tim-swanson",
"permlink": "steemitboard-notify-bollingbrook-20190703t235815000z",
"title": ""
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2019-07-03T23:58:15",
"trx_id": "ae58ac5042462206e7453201c789dfcf38c9b63c",
"trx_in_block": 9,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 5.497 SP to @bollingbrook2019/05/12 13:41:24
steemdelegated 5.497 SP to @bollingbrook
2019/05/12 13:41:24
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 8940.387539 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #32844031/Trx 325088a6f262251ae7cfd7e684de5d8170cee5f6 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 32844031,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "8940.387539 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2019-05-12T13:41:24",
"trx_id": "325088a6f262251ae7cfd7e684de5d8170cee5f6",
"trx_in_block": 4,
"virtual_op": 0
}smitopblockchain operation: transfer from savings2018/08/31 18:19:15
smitopblockchain operation: transfer from savings
2018/08/31 18:19:15
| amount | 3.333 SBD |
| from | smitop |
| memo | Hi, it looks like you're not voting for any witnesses. Witnesses help secure the Steem network. You should vote for some, at https://steemit.com/~witnesses, or by pressing 'Vote for witnesses' in the Steemit sidebar (top right corner). I'm a bot. |
| request id | 15799 |
| to | bollingbrook |
| Transaction Info | Block #25556688/Trx 8478b442877987eb385c54555124fc76e760f15a |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 25556688,
"op": [
"transfer_from_savings",
{
"amount": "3.333 SBD",
"from": "smitop",
"memo": "Hi, it looks like you're not voting for any witnesses. Witnesses help secure the Steem network. You should vote for some, at https://steemit.com/~witnesses, or by pressing 'Vote for witnesses' in the Steemit sidebar (top right corner). I'm a bot.",
"request_id": 15799,
"to": "bollingbrook"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2018-08-31T18:19:15",
"trx_id": "8478b442877987eb385c54555124fc76e760f15a",
"trx_in_block": 1,
"virtual_op": 0
}2018/07/04 02:00:00
2018/07/04 02:00:00
| author | steemitboard |
| body | Congratulations @bollingbrook! You have received a personal award! [](http://steemitboard.com/@bollingbrook) 1 Year on Steemit <sub>_Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor._</sub> **Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:** [SteemitBoard World Cup Contest - Round of 16 - Day 4](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-world-cup-contest-round-of-16-day-4) --- **Participate in the [SteemitBoard World Cup Contest](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-world-cup-contest-collect-badges-and-win-free-sbd)!** Collect World Cup badges and win free SBD Support the Gold Sponsors of the contest: [@good-karma](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=good-karma&approve=1) and [@lukestokes](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=lukestokes.mhth&approve=1) --- > Do you like [SteemitBoard's project](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard)? Then **[Vote for its witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1)** and **get one more award**! |
| json metadata | {"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png"]} |
| parent author | bollingbrook |
| parent permlink | a-salient-and-largely-unbiased-view-on-current-ico-madness-well-written-by-market-research-director-for-r3-tim-swanson |
| permlink | steemitboard-notify-bollingbrook-20180704t020002000z |
| title | |
| Transaction Info | Block #23868018/Trx 76c00d206a6201b8cca62d140a269d26775c1b7e |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 23868018,
"op": [
"comment",
{
"author": "steemitboard",
"body": "Congratulations @bollingbrook! You have received a personal award!\n\n[](http://steemitboard.com/@bollingbrook) 1 Year on Steemit\n<sub>_Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor._</sub>\n\n\n**Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:**\n[SteemitBoard World Cup Contest - Round of 16 - Day 4](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-world-cup-contest-round-of-16-day-4)\n\n---\n**Participate in the [SteemitBoard World Cup Contest](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-world-cup-contest-collect-badges-and-win-free-sbd)!**\nCollect World Cup badges and win free SBD\nSupport the Gold Sponsors of the contest: [@good-karma](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=good-karma&approve=1) and [@lukestokes](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=lukestokes.mhth&approve=1)\n\n---\n\n> Do you like [SteemitBoard's project](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard)? Then **[Vote for its witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1)** and **get one more award**!",
"json_metadata": "{\"image\":[\"https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png\"]}",
"parent_author": "bollingbrook",
"parent_permlink": "a-salient-and-largely-unbiased-view-on-current-ico-madness-well-written-by-market-research-director-for-r3-tim-swanson",
"permlink": "steemitboard-notify-bollingbrook-20180704t020002000z",
"title": ""
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2018-07-04T02:00:00",
"trx_id": "76c00d206a6201b8cca62d140a269d26775c1b7e",
"trx_in_block": 64,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 5.620 SP to @bollingbrook2018/05/16 20:08:57
steemdelegated 5.620 SP to @bollingbrook
2018/05/16 20:08:57
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 9139.939974 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #22489680/Trx 36e425b843bc870438879641fac6c2757bf9b008 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 22489680,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "9139.939974 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2018-05-16T20:08:57",
"trx_id": "36e425b843bc870438879641fac6c2757bf9b008",
"trx_in_block": 26,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 18.256 SP to @bollingbrook2018/01/09 06:35:39
steemdelegated 18.256 SP to @bollingbrook
2018/01/09 06:35:39
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 29690.930358 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #18819513/Trx 93be16f3330e352703d28e6f65434f9827a1a4ac |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 18819513,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "29690.930358 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2018-01-09T06:35:39",
"trx_id": "93be16f3330e352703d28e6f65434f9827a1a4ac",
"trx_in_block": 17,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemdelegated 18.410 SP to @bollingbrook2017/08/04 05:15:51
steemdelegated 18.410 SP to @bollingbrook
2017/08/04 05:15:51
| delegatee | bollingbrook |
| delegator | steem |
| vesting shares | 29941.741066 VESTS |
| Transaction Info | Block #14271397/Trx c91e15c30f4532456965bb5e84aa0d2103069386 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 14271397,
"op": [
"delegate_vesting_shares",
{
"delegatee": "bollingbrook",
"delegator": "steem",
"vesting_shares": "29941.741066 VESTS"
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-08-04T05:15:51",
"trx_id": "c91e15c30f4532456965bb5e84aa0d2103069386",
"trx_in_block": 11,
"virtual_op": 0
}bollingbrookfollowed @financialcritic2017/07/04 22:01:36
bollingbrookfollowed @financialcritic
2017/07/04 22:01:36
| id | follow |
| json | ["follow",{"follower":"bollingbrook","following":"financialcritic","what":["blog"]}] |
| required auths | [] |
| required posting auths | ["bollingbrook"] |
| Transaction Info | Block #13399884/Trx 4c38715f7839265c93bb79c0573b43b9e3c03c41 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 13399884,
"op": [
"custom_json",
{
"id": "follow",
"json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"bollingbrook\",\"following\":\"financialcritic\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]",
"required_auths": [],
"required_posting_auths": [
"bollingbrook"
]
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-07-04T22:01:36",
"trx_id": "4c38715f7839265c93bb79c0573b43b9e3c03c41",
"trx_in_block": 13,
"virtual_op": 0
}2017/07/04 18:37:33
2017/07/04 18:37:33
| author | cheetah |
| body | Hi! I am a robot. I just upvoted you! I found similar content that readers might be interested in: http://www.ofnumbers.com/2017/06/02/a-high-level-overview-of-icos/ |
| json metadata | |
| parent author | bollingbrook |
| parent permlink | a-salient-and-largely-unbiased-view-on-current-ico-madness-well-written-by-market-research-director-for-r3-tim-swanson |
| permlink | cheetah-re-bollingbrooka-salient-and-largely-unbiased-view-on-current-ico-madness-well-written-by-market-research-director-for-r3-tim-swanson |
| title | |
| Transaction Info | Block #13395808/Trx dc122762340f1f29db6926d62efe1aba37ecbd41 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 13395808,
"op": [
"comment",
{
"author": "cheetah",
"body": "Hi! I am a robot. I just upvoted you! I found similar content that readers might be interested in:\nhttp://www.ofnumbers.com/2017/06/02/a-high-level-overview-of-icos/",
"json_metadata": "",
"parent_author": "bollingbrook",
"parent_permlink": "a-salient-and-largely-unbiased-view-on-current-ico-madness-well-written-by-market-research-director-for-r3-tim-swanson",
"permlink": "cheetah-re-bollingbrooka-salient-and-largely-unbiased-view-on-current-ico-madness-well-written-by-market-research-director-for-r3-tim-swanson",
"title": ""
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-07-04T18:37:33",
"trx_id": "dc122762340f1f29db6926d62efe1aba37ecbd41",
"trx_in_block": 5,
"virtual_op": 0
}2017/07/04 18:37:27
2017/07/04 18:37:27
| author | bollingbrook |
| permlink | a-salient-and-largely-unbiased-view-on-current-ico-madness-well-written-by-market-research-director-for-r3-tim-swanson |
| voter | cheetah |
| weight | 100 (1.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #13395806/Trx 452201a51ac9372cf3734809ebb1d6a94554d30e |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 13395806,
"op": [
"vote",
{
"author": "bollingbrook",
"permlink": "a-salient-and-largely-unbiased-view-on-current-ico-madness-well-written-by-market-research-director-for-r3-tim-swanson",
"voter": "cheetah",
"weight": 100
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-07-04T18:37:27",
"trx_id": "452201a51ac9372cf3734809ebb1d6a94554d30e",
"trx_in_block": 6,
"virtual_op": 0
}2017/07/04 18:35:54
2017/07/04 18:35:54
| author | bollingbrook |
| permlink | a-salient-and-largely-unbiased-view-on-current-ico-madness-well-written-by-market-research-director-for-r3-tim-swanson |
| voter | bollingbrook |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #13395775/Trx 14189a937efa1c3e1b757e058faade4668c49b7c |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 13395775,
"op": [
"vote",
{
"author": "bollingbrook",
"permlink": "a-salient-and-largely-unbiased-view-on-current-ico-madness-well-written-by-market-research-director-for-r3-tim-swanson",
"voter": "bollingbrook",
"weight": 10000
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-07-04T18:35:54",
"trx_id": "14189a937efa1c3e1b757e058faade4668c49b7c",
"trx_in_block": 11,
"virtual_op": 0
}2017/07/04 18:35:54
2017/07/04 18:35:54
| author | bollingbrook |
| body | A high level overview of ICOs Posted on June 2, 2017 [Note: I neither own nor have any trading position on any cryptocurrency. The views expressed below are solely my own and do not necessarily represent the views of my employer or any organization I advise.] Just as I did with the COIN ETF proposal last year, I have also written a 50-page paper for internal use diving into the world of ICOs. I am not sure if or when it will be made public, but here are a few salient points: ICO stands for “initial coin offering.” Depending on what cryptocurrency group is pitching an ICO, it may be in exchange for company equity, but often times there is no explicit contractual link between control of the coin itself with some kind of equity or financial performance of the company… because there is often no formal contract provided to investors. Not all ICOs are alike and any prospective user or investor should look into the specific operational and funding arrangements. Since January 1, 2017, more than $200 million has been raised by more than a dozen ICO-related projects and companies, a figure that will likely double by the end of the summer and triple by the end of the year as turn-key platforms such as Prism, Swap, 0x, and Iconomi, are flipped on. The primary method of raising and funding an ICO is through bitcoin and ether deposits. This has driven (mostly) retail investors to create accounts at cryptocurrency exchanges – most of which have poor track records such as Bitfinex – and acquire BTC and ETH. This demand in turn has been a key driver in the current all-time highs seen by many cryptocurrencies including bitcoin and ether. There is very little regulatory or independent oversight of any of these coin offerings. Most of the projects attempt to shield themselves from scrutiny from securities, commodities, and money-transmission regulators by setting up a non-profit organization or foundation. These foundations are typically registered in a couple specific countries, each of which is now home to more than a dozen non-profit organizations specifically managing ICOs. In addition, ICO promoters will often use euphemisms such as “tokens” instead of coins, or call their fundraiser a “crowdsale” or “donation” or “contribution” that the non-profit organization will later re-distribute after the ICO is over. Some of these non-profit entities sign exclusive development contracts with a for-profit entity that is run by the same people who operate the foundation. That is to say, the foundation will hire the for-profit company to develop and advise the project that the ICO fundraiser marketed and advertised, yet often with no independent oversight. Ignoring accreditation status: very few, only a handful at most, of these ICOs are done in compliance with any KYC, AML, CFT gathering and sharing requirements. This is problematic. For instance, over $1 billion in ransomware was liquidated (largely) through cryptocurrencies last year thus it could be relatively easy for bad actors (hackers) to liquidate their bitcoin and ether holdings into ICOs and not be easily caught due to the inability to link real world identities to specific blockchain activity. Last week Valerie Szczepanik, the head of the SEC’s distributed ledger group, made several public comments. This included: “Whether or not you are regulated by the SEC, you still have fiduciary duties to your investor. If you want this industry to flourish, protection of investors should be at the forefront.” As of right now, there are just a handful of ICOs that have explicitly attempted to protect investors by providing full transparency into their organizations. Most do not disclose the principals, directors, and insiders involved within these organizations. Some have private offerings called a pre-sale. A pre-sale allows participants to acquire coins at a discount (e.g., pre-sale investors might receive 2x the amount of coins that the public coin sale will have at the same price). In addition, the participants in a pre-sale are not typically named or made public prior to the public offering of the coins; nor are the conditions by which these participants able to sell their holdings typically disclosed. Historically companies which file paperwork in order to be listed on a public stock exchange have to submit an S-1 or its equivalent to regulators. The S-1 is important and helpful to the rest of the market because it lays out who the insiders are, who the principals and directors are, how governance is handled, who is responsible, what the business is, what the liabilities are, etc.. In contrast, most ICOs currently have nebulous governance on purpose: because the operators do not want anyone to be held responsible in case the project is unsuccessful or the coin loses its value. Caveat emptor is the name of the game. Tulip euphoria In any given month I am provided inside information about ICOs. Complete strangers will send me pitch decks that outline their pre-sale and listing opportunities. Yes, some exchanges are paid to list these coins, often through a percentage negotiated beforehand with the ICO operator. And there are market makers and underwriters in the form of family offices, high net worth individuals and small hedge funds. There is an entire ecosystem that is completely opaque and opaque on purpose because many of these participants are trying to deflect responsibility in case a coin crashes or a project is unsuccessful or because they are found in non-compliance with a variety of regulations (e.g., not declaring taxes, self-dealing, insider trading, etc.). One project involved in building a distributed computer recently offered me about $50,000 over the course of 6 months in addition to the native coin they were pitching to the public. All they wanted me to do: act as an advisor and promote their coin on social media. I said no to all of them but others said yes and that project above raised a couple million in USD. Last week I attended several events including Consensus and a different private conference held later in the week. I gave a short presentation at one of the events and afterwards I walked to the buffet outside the room to get some food. While gathering some grilled fish, the audio/visual operator for the event came up to me and told me: “Tim, I just put $100 into bitcoin and also ether. How much more should I put into them?” My presentation wasn’t even about cryptocurrency investing or about ICOs, but this illustrates the exuberance of the current time period. There is a lot of fear of missing out yet few people are actually looking at what these ICO-funded platforms or projects are attempting to do. How can unsophisticated, technically unsavvy people learn more about them? Media publications? But conflict of interest is rife. I have mentioned this multiple times over the years: unfortunately many “coin” media sites and magazines are not helping the due diligence situation. Most “coin” reporters, if not all of them, own cryptocurrencies and benefit directly from increased demand of the cryptocurrency, but they often do not disclose it. In fact, many times they report on coins they own and/or that their parent company owns. Several small buy-side analysts and their firms also have published uncritical marketing material for cryptocurrencies and some do not disclose their coin holdings or outline the major risks involved in operating these types of networks, in effect white-washing the risks of anarchic chains. Others in privileged positions including some of the VCs that are active in this space are now also promoting ICOs but few disclose their active long or short positions. Some of these VCs were entrepreneurs who have pivoted multiple times and this is a last ditch effort to drum up support for their sagging portfolio. 1 2 You just don’t understand the technology! One common refrain I often hear from ICO promoters is that ICOs are a new form of technology that empowers retail investors like never before and that the traditional world of institutions and laws has no place in the new economy. And that naysayers and critics just don’t understand the transformative power of ICOs and cryptocurrencies. That may be true but in my case, definitely is not. In late 2014 I worked with a company called Melotic. Melotic is a tech startup that raised about $1.2 million in the summer of 2014 to build a digital asset exchange: a trading platform that new cryptocurrency projects could be listed on, GDAX before GDAX. For about 9 months I spent the bulk of my time talking to dozens of cryptocurrency projects and operators to find out what unique thing their company did and why they should be listed on Melotic. Nearly all of them were half-baked scams, and others were just impractical (Urea Coin). 3 In May 2015, Melotic announced it was closing its exchange and moving into cross-border payments where it currently operates under the brand, Kleering. While Melotic deserves its own dedicated post, the takeaways we learned at the time were that traders (who were most of the user base) only cared about two specific things: (1) Anonymity. Some traders publicly complained when we implemented a set of KYC and AML policies. They said we should snub our noses at the government and banks and provide traders the ability to exchange cryptocurrencies without complying with local or national laws surrounding identity gathering and verification. This is an opinion that is still very prevalent as shown by similar comments on /r/bitcoinmarkets and /r/ethtrader. (2) Pump and dump. Day traders love volatility and cryptocurrencies often provide that volatile environment. Because new cryptocurrencies such as an ICO are often even more illiquid and thinly traded than say bitcoin (which itself is relatively illiquid), whales and insiders without vesting and lock-up periods can quickly move the market up and down due to the large amounts of coin holdings they have. This creates the booms and busts that many cryptocurrency traders savor. Yet at Melotic, we were apprehensive about listing every single cryptocurrency under the sun, and tried to filter those we thought had unique utility and less volatile. In the end we only listed about 10. Yet empirically the most successful exchanges – as measured in volume – were those that listed every single coin that was launched. Quantity over quality continues to persist today as exchanges compete for volume and liquidity of new coins. This contrasts with regulated exchanges such as NASDAQ (pdf) and NYSE (pdf) which have listing requirements, including transparency into the companies principals. Most cryptocurrency exchanges do not ask for similar requirements and in fact, some take a cut of the coins – similar to payola – in order to be listed. Over two years ago I wrote a post that looked at around 20 different ICOs and projects that did some kind of public coin distribution. My new paper looks at them in more detail. What were the findings? While we wait for that paper to be published another key takeaway is that: almost none of the projects lived up to the advertised utility or expectations that their promoters marketed to the community and investors that bought their coins. Yet most of the cryptocurrencies, even ones that lack a real development community, are seeing all-time highs on the cryptocurrency markets. In other words: utility is completely divorced from market value of the coins; a phenomenon that seems unlikely to change in the short term. This is compounded by the fact that ICOs are by their nature, not designed for cash flow or optimized to be profitable. Why is that? Because at its core: the non-profit entities that runs them are by definition, not-for-profit. As a result, these projects largely rely on their token holdings and the price appreciation thereof, in order to be sustainable. Thus the incentive to focus on marketing and create buzz to further increase the price appreciation of the coin holdings. And ignoring the informational asymmetries above, there are some other interesting wrinkles. Earlier this week I participated on a fintech panel and during the group discussion one specific ICO was briefly mentioned, the Basic Attention Token (BAT). Brave, the company behind the BAT, had just raised $35 million in a crowdsale (unregistered securities?). Notable to this sale was that over $6,000 in fees to miners were included in the transactions related to the ICO. How many transactions can you fit into an Ethereum block during high demand times? It depends on the complexity of the contract. For the BAT, it was about 90. 90ish people were able to participate in the first block of the BAT’s ICO. Those 90 ICO seats went to whoever attached the largest transaction fees. An unsavvy retail investor would need a lot of mempool luck if there is high demand and larger players investing millions are paying $1,000 USD fees just to increase their chance to get one of those scarce seats in the first block. This could mean that in the long run, all the “good” ICOs will be bought up by sophisticated investors aware of this limitation and only sub-par ICOs will run long enough (more than one block) to let unsophisticated retail investors in.4 Conclusions ICO organizers often exchange coins for explicit support by outside endorsements and lobbying in their favor (e.g., advisors and influential personas are given a cut of coins). Therefore researchers, regulators, developers and potential investors looking at an ICO should look for paper trails to identify investors, users, organizers, insiders, and potential malicious actors.5 This also includes exchange operators and their principals who may learn weeks beforehand when a cryptocurrency will get listed and thus, may have material, asymmetric information they can act on. Investors should look very hard at what the risks and recourse there is in the event of a hard fork, what happens if their assets end up on a deprecated chain? If it is an ERC20 token, what fork will the developers consider the “legitimate” chain? Ethereum forked multiple times last year and currently, investors of ICOs based on ERC20 have few, if any, protections or recourse in the event an ICO organizer fails to deliver its promises let alone a technical problem occurs. For instance, what happens if the network becomes too top heavy and open to the Hold-Up Problem? Who has legal standing or recourse? ICOs can be done with existing technology – no blockchains are needed (just ask Beenz and Liberty Reserve) – yet because ICOs are being done on anarchic blockchains where reversibility is economically cumbersome and identification is non-existence, it can create new risks and challenges for investors. Potential investors need to be able to answer: in case a dispute arises, how can recourse take place if key counterparties are not identifiable? Cryptocurrencies and the coins that piggy back on their network will likely continue to exist so as long as these non-profit entities have enough coins to liquidate to pay for marketing and advertisements. And so as long as there are others willing to buy their coins (e.g., liquidity). And while it may be too early to distinguish and separate the specific ICOs that are outright scams from poorly run companies, keep in mind that a couple dozen Pyramid schemes failing in 1997 led to massive unrest and a civil war in Albania. We have already witnessed enormous strain and virtual fighting within the cryptocurrency community (e.g., the never ending Bitcoin block size debate and the Ethereum hard fork because of The DAO attack). What would happen to the aggregate cryptocurrency market if the investors and insiders in a couple dozen ICO platforms (Pyramid or not) tried to liquidate their holdings onto an illiquid market? If you’re looking for dramatic excitement (currently) without many investor protections, the ICO world may have what you’re looking for. But if you’re looking for sustainable operations with repeat revenue and cash flow connected to mainstream utility and accountability – aka a business – then you might want to do a double-take. |
| json metadata | {"tags":["ico","blockchain","bitcoin","r3","timswanson"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"} |
| parent author | |
| parent permlink | ico |
| permlink | a-salient-and-largely-unbiased-view-on-current-ico-madness-well-written-by-market-research-director-for-r3-tim-swanson |
| title | A salient and largely unbiased view on current ICO madness. Well written by market research director for R3 Tim Swanson. |
| Transaction Info | Block #13395775/Trx 14189a937efa1c3e1b757e058faade4668c49b7c |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 13395775,
"op": [
"comment",
{
"author": "bollingbrook",
"body": "A high level overview of ICOs\nPosted on June 2, 2017\n[Note: I neither own nor have any trading position on any cryptocurrency. The views expressed below are solely my own and do not necessarily represent the views of my employer or any organization I advise.]\n\nJust as I did with the COIN ETF proposal last year, I have also written a 50-page paper for internal use diving into the world of ICOs.\n\nI am not sure if or when it will be made public, but here are a few salient points:\n\nICO stands for “initial coin offering.” Depending on what cryptocurrency group is pitching an ICO, it may be in exchange for company equity, but often times there is no explicit contractual link between control of the coin itself with some kind of equity or financial performance of the company… because there is often no formal contract provided to investors. Not all ICOs are alike and any prospective user or investor should look into the specific operational and funding arrangements.\nSince January 1, 2017, more than $200 million has been raised by more than a dozen ICO-related projects and companies, a figure that will likely double by the end of the summer and triple by the end of the year as turn-key platforms such as Prism, Swap, 0x, and Iconomi, are flipped on.\n\nThe primary method of raising and funding an ICO is through bitcoin and ether deposits. This has driven (mostly) retail investors to create accounts at cryptocurrency exchanges – most of which have poor track records such as Bitfinex – and acquire BTC and ETH. This demand in turn has been a key driver in the current all-time highs seen by many cryptocurrencies including bitcoin and ether.\n\nThere is very little regulatory or independent oversight of any of these coin offerings. Most of the projects attempt to shield themselves from scrutiny from securities, commodities, and money-transmission regulators by setting up a non-profit organization or foundation. These foundations are typically registered in a couple specific countries, each of which is now home to more than a dozen non-profit organizations specifically managing ICOs. In addition, ICO promoters will often use euphemisms such as “tokens” instead of coins, or call their fundraiser a “crowdsale” or “donation” or “contribution” that the non-profit organization will later re-distribute after the ICO is over.\n\nSome of these non-profit entities sign exclusive development contracts with a for-profit entity that is run by the same people who operate the foundation. That is to say, the foundation will hire the for-profit company to develop and advise the project that the ICO fundraiser marketed and advertised, yet often with no independent oversight.\n\nIgnoring accreditation status: very few, only a handful at most, of these ICOs are done in compliance with any KYC, AML, CFT gathering and sharing requirements. This is problematic. For instance, over $1 billion in ransomware was liquidated (largely) through cryptocurrencies last year thus it could be relatively easy for bad actors (hackers) to liquidate their bitcoin and ether holdings into ICOs and not be easily caught due to the inability to link real world identities to specific blockchain activity.\nLast week Valerie Szczepanik, the head of the SEC’s distributed ledger group, made several public comments. This included: “Whether or not you are regulated by the SEC, you still have fiduciary duties to your investor. If you want this industry to flourish, protection of investors should be at the forefront.”\n\nAs of right now, there are just a handful of ICOs that have explicitly attempted to protect investors by providing full transparency into their organizations. Most do not disclose the principals, directors, and insiders involved within these organizations. Some have private offerings called a pre-sale. A pre-sale allows participants to acquire coins at a discount (e.g., pre-sale investors might receive 2x the amount of coins that the public coin sale will have at the same price). In addition, the participants in a pre-sale are not typically named or made public prior to the public offering of the coins; nor are the conditions by which these participants able to sell their holdings typically disclosed.\n\nHistorically companies which file paperwork in order to be listed on a public stock exchange have to submit an S-1 or its equivalent to regulators. The S-1 is important and helpful to the rest of the market because it lays out who the insiders are, who the principals and directors are, how governance is handled, who is responsible, what the business is, what the liabilities are, etc..\n\nIn contrast, most ICOs currently have nebulous governance on purpose: because the operators do not want anyone to be held responsible in case the project is unsuccessful or the coin loses its value. Caveat emptor is the name of the game.\n\nTulip euphoria\n\nIn any given month I am provided inside information about ICOs. Complete strangers will send me pitch decks that outline their pre-sale and listing opportunities.\n\nYes, some exchanges are paid to list these coins, often through a percentage negotiated beforehand with the ICO operator. And there are market makers and underwriters in the form of family offices, high net worth individuals and small hedge funds. There is an entire ecosystem that is completely opaque and opaque on purpose because many of these participants are trying to deflect responsibility in case a coin crashes or a project is unsuccessful or because they are found in non-compliance with a variety of regulations (e.g., not declaring taxes, self-dealing, insider trading, etc.).\n\nOne project involved in building a distributed computer recently offered me about $50,000 over the course of 6 months in addition to the native coin they were pitching to the public. All they wanted me to do: act as an advisor and promote their coin on social media.\n\nI said no to all of them but others said yes and that project above raised a couple million in USD.\n\nLast week I attended several events including Consensus and a different private conference held later in the week. I gave a short presentation at one of the events and afterwards I walked to the buffet outside the room to get some food. While gathering some grilled fish, the audio/visual operator for the event came up to me and told me: “Tim, I just put $100 into bitcoin and also ether. How much more should I put into them?”\n\nMy presentation wasn’t even about cryptocurrency investing or about ICOs, but this illustrates the exuberance of the current time period. There is a lot of fear of missing out yet few people are actually looking at what these ICO-funded platforms or projects are attempting to do. How can unsophisticated, technically unsavvy people learn more about them?\n\nMedia publications? But conflict of interest is rife.\n\nI have mentioned this multiple times over the years: unfortunately many “coin” media sites and magazines are not helping the due diligence situation. Most “coin” reporters, if not all of them, own cryptocurrencies and benefit directly from increased demand of the cryptocurrency, but they often do not disclose it. In fact, many times they report on coins they own and/or that their parent company owns. Several small buy-side analysts and their firms also have published uncritical marketing material for cryptocurrencies and some do not disclose their coin holdings or outline the major risks involved in operating these types of networks, in effect white-washing the risks of anarchic chains.\n\nOthers in privileged positions including some of the VCs that are active in this space are now also promoting ICOs but few disclose their active long or short positions. Some of these VCs were entrepreneurs who have pivoted multiple times and this is a last ditch effort to drum up support for their sagging portfolio. 1 2\n\nYou just don’t understand the technology!\n\nOne common refrain I often hear from ICO promoters is that ICOs are a new form of technology that empowers retail investors like never before and that the traditional world of institutions and laws has no place in the new economy. And that naysayers and critics just don’t understand the transformative power of ICOs and cryptocurrencies.\n\nThat may be true but in my case, definitely is not.\n\nIn late 2014 I worked with a company called Melotic. Melotic is a tech startup that raised about $1.2 million in the summer of 2014 to build a digital asset exchange: a trading platform that new cryptocurrency projects could be listed on, GDAX before GDAX. For about 9 months I spent the bulk of my time talking to dozens of cryptocurrency projects and operators to find out what unique thing their company did and why they should be listed on Melotic. Nearly all of them were half-baked scams, and others were just impractical (Urea Coin). 3\n\nIn May 2015, Melotic announced it was closing its exchange and moving into cross-border payments where it currently operates under the brand, Kleering.\n\nWhile Melotic deserves its own dedicated post, the takeaways we learned at the time were that traders (who were most of the user base) only cared about two specific things:\n\n(1) Anonymity. Some traders publicly complained when we implemented a set of KYC and AML policies. They said we should snub our noses at the government and banks and provide traders the ability to exchange cryptocurrencies without complying with local or national laws surrounding identity gathering and verification. This is an opinion that is still very prevalent as shown by similar comments on /r/bitcoinmarkets and /r/ethtrader.\n\n(2) Pump and dump. Day traders love volatility and cryptocurrencies often provide that volatile environment. Because new cryptocurrencies such as an ICO are often even more illiquid and thinly traded than say bitcoin (which itself is relatively illiquid), whales and insiders without vesting and lock-up periods can quickly move the market up and down due to the large amounts of coin holdings they have. This creates the booms and busts that many cryptocurrency traders savor. Yet at Melotic, we were apprehensive about listing every single cryptocurrency under the sun, and tried to filter those we thought had unique utility and less volatile. In the end we only listed about 10. Yet empirically the most successful exchanges – as measured in volume – were those that listed every single coin that was launched. Quantity over quality continues to persist today as exchanges compete for volume and liquidity of new coins. This contrasts with regulated exchanges such as NASDAQ (pdf) and NYSE (pdf) which have listing requirements, including transparency into the companies principals. Most cryptocurrency exchanges do not ask for similar requirements and in fact, some take a cut of the coins – similar to payola – in order to be listed.\n\nOver two years ago I wrote a post that looked at around 20 different ICOs and projects that did some kind of public coin distribution. My new paper looks at them in more detail. What were the findings?\n\nWhile we wait for that paper to be published another key takeaway is that: almost none of the projects lived up to the advertised utility or expectations that their promoters marketed to the community and investors that bought their coins. Yet most of the cryptocurrencies, even ones that lack a real development community, are seeing all-time highs on the cryptocurrency markets.\n\nIn other words: utility is completely divorced from market value of the coins; a phenomenon that seems unlikely to change in the short term.\n\nThis is compounded by the fact that ICOs are by their nature, not designed for cash flow or optimized to be profitable.\n\nWhy is that? Because at its core: the non-profit entities that runs them are by definition, not-for-profit. As a result, these projects largely rely on their token holdings and the price appreciation thereof, in order to be sustainable. Thus the incentive to focus on marketing and create buzz to further increase the price appreciation of the coin holdings.\n\nAnd ignoring the informational asymmetries above, there are some other interesting wrinkles.\n\nEarlier this week I participated on a fintech panel and during the group discussion one specific ICO was briefly mentioned, the Basic Attention Token (BAT). Brave, the company behind the BAT, had just raised $35 million in a crowdsale (unregistered securities?). Notable to this sale was that over $6,000 in fees to miners were included in the transactions related to the ICO.\n\nHow many transactions can you fit into an Ethereum block during high demand times? It depends on the complexity of the contract. For the BAT, it was about 90. 90ish people were able to participate in the first block of the BAT’s ICO. Those 90 ICO seats went to whoever attached the largest transaction fees.\n\nAn unsavvy retail investor would need a lot of mempool luck if there is high demand and larger players investing millions are paying $1,000 USD fees just to increase their chance to get one of those scarce seats in the first block. This could mean that in the long run, all the “good” ICOs will be bought up by sophisticated investors aware of this limitation and only sub-par ICOs will run long enough (more than one block) to let unsophisticated retail investors in.4\n\nConclusions\n\nICO organizers often exchange coins for explicit support by outside endorsements and lobbying in their favor (e.g., advisors and influential personas are given a cut of coins). Therefore researchers, regulators, developers and potential investors looking at an ICO should look for paper trails to identify investors, users, organizers, insiders, and potential malicious actors.5 This also includes exchange operators and their principals who may learn weeks beforehand when a cryptocurrency will get listed and thus, may have material, asymmetric information they can act on.\n\nInvestors should look very hard at what the risks and recourse there is in the event of a hard fork, what happens if their assets end up on a deprecated chain? If it is an ERC20 token, what fork will the developers consider the “legitimate” chain? Ethereum forked multiple times last year and currently, investors of ICOs based on ERC20 have few, if any, protections or recourse in the event an ICO organizer fails to deliver its promises let alone a technical problem occurs. For instance, what happens if the network becomes too top heavy and open to the Hold-Up Problem? Who has legal standing or recourse?\n\nICOs can be done with existing technology – no blockchains are needed (just ask Beenz and Liberty Reserve) – yet because ICOs are being done on anarchic blockchains where reversibility is economically cumbersome and identification is non-existence, it can create new risks and challenges for investors. Potential investors need to be able to answer: in case a dispute arises, how can recourse take place if key counterparties are not identifiable?\n\nCryptocurrencies and the coins that piggy back on their network will likely continue to exist so as long as these non-profit entities have enough coins to liquidate to pay for marketing and advertisements. And so as long as there are others willing to buy their coins (e.g., liquidity).\n\nAnd while it may be too early to distinguish and separate the specific ICOs that are outright scams from poorly run companies, keep in mind that a couple dozen Pyramid schemes failing in 1997 led to massive unrest and a civil war in Albania. We have already witnessed enormous strain and virtual fighting within the cryptocurrency community (e.g., the never ending Bitcoin block size debate and the Ethereum hard fork because of The DAO attack). What would happen to the aggregate cryptocurrency market if the investors and insiders in a couple dozen ICO platforms (Pyramid or not) tried to liquidate their holdings onto an illiquid market?\n\nIf you’re looking for dramatic excitement (currently) without many investor protections, the ICO world may have what you’re looking for. But if you’re looking for sustainable operations with repeat revenue and cash flow connected to mainstream utility and accountability – aka a business – then you might want to do a double-take.",
"json_metadata": "{\"tags\":[\"ico\",\"blockchain\",\"bitcoin\",\"r3\",\"timswanson\"],\"app\":\"steemit/0.1\",\"format\":\"markdown\"}",
"parent_author": "",
"parent_permlink": "ico",
"permlink": "a-salient-and-largely-unbiased-view-on-current-ico-madness-well-written-by-market-research-director-for-r3-tim-swanson",
"title": "A salient and largely unbiased view on current ICO madness. Well written by market research director for R3 Tim Swanson."
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-07-04T18:35:54",
"trx_id": "14189a937efa1c3e1b757e058faade4668c49b7c",
"trx_in_block": 11,
"virtual_op": 0
}bollingbrookfollowed @heiditravels2017/07/04 13:46:57
bollingbrookfollowed @heiditravels
2017/07/04 13:46:57
| id | follow |
| json | ["follow",{"follower":"bollingbrook","following":"heiditravels","what":["blog"]}] |
| required auths | [] |
| required posting auths | ["bollingbrook"] |
| Transaction Info | Block #13389998/Trx 901eac8e108ba44554148c4a75e3fdbafad21f1c |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 13389998,
"op": [
"custom_json",
{
"id": "follow",
"json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"bollingbrook\",\"following\":\"heiditravels\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]",
"required_auths": [],
"required_posting_auths": [
"bollingbrook"
]
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-07-04T13:46:57",
"trx_id": "901eac8e108ba44554148c4a75e3fdbafad21f1c",
"trx_in_block": 29,
"virtual_op": 0
}bollingbrookfollowed @bithubpl2017/07/03 23:38:39
bollingbrookfollowed @bithubpl
2017/07/03 23:38:39
| id | follow |
| json | ["follow",{"follower":"bollingbrook","following":"bithubpl","what":["blog"]}] |
| required auths | [] |
| required posting auths | ["bollingbrook"] |
| Transaction Info | Block #13373050/Trx 69a64e7620bdf4488e34a58e77b52b9669e8b2ce |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 13373050,
"op": [
"custom_json",
{
"id": "follow",
"json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"bollingbrook\",\"following\":\"bithubpl\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]",
"required_auths": [],
"required_posting_auths": [
"bollingbrook"
]
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-07-03T23:38:39",
"trx_id": "69a64e7620bdf4488e34a58e77b52b9669e8b2ce",
"trx_in_block": 9,
"virtual_op": 0
}bollingbrookfollowed @nivesh2017/07/03 23:26:27
bollingbrookfollowed @nivesh
2017/07/03 23:26:27
| id | follow |
| json | ["follow",{"follower":"bollingbrook","following":"nivesh","what":["blog"]}] |
| required auths | [] |
| required posting auths | ["bollingbrook"] |
| Transaction Info | Block #13372806/Trx f6353501ace3ac785658984c678dc22b402c8305 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 13372806,
"op": [
"custom_json",
{
"id": "follow",
"json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"bollingbrook\",\"following\":\"nivesh\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]",
"required_auths": [],
"required_posting_auths": [
"bollingbrook"
]
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-07-03T23:26:27",
"trx_id": "f6353501ace3ac785658984c678dc22b402c8305",
"trx_in_block": 10,
"virtual_op": 0
}bollingbrookfollowed @haraldbuerbaumer2017/07/03 23:04:57
bollingbrookfollowed @haraldbuerbaumer
2017/07/03 23:04:57
| id | follow |
| json | ["follow",{"follower":"bollingbrook","following":"haraldbuerbaumer","what":["blog"]}] |
| required auths | [] |
| required posting auths | ["bollingbrook"] |
| Transaction Info | Block #13372377/Trx c4d25e0c5164d8b0c7c7a138ea980a377d19a622 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 13372377,
"op": [
"custom_json",
{
"id": "follow",
"json": "[\"follow\",{\"follower\":\"bollingbrook\",\"following\":\"haraldbuerbaumer\",\"what\":[\"blog\"]}]",
"required_auths": [],
"required_posting_auths": [
"bollingbrook"
]
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-07-03T23:04:57",
"trx_id": "c4d25e0c5164d8b0c7c7a138ea980a377d19a622",
"trx_in_block": 2,
"virtual_op": 0
}bollingbrookupvoted (100.00%) @haraldbuerbaumer / smart-people-in-the-crypto-space2017/07/03 23:04:42
bollingbrookupvoted (100.00%) @haraldbuerbaumer / smart-people-in-the-crypto-space
2017/07/03 23:04:42
| author | haraldbuerbaumer |
| permlink | smart-people-in-the-crypto-space |
| voter | bollingbrook |
| weight | 10000 (100.00%) |
| Transaction Info | Block #13372372/Trx 9b0e44354278769a6383bb6bb4d63bc13c3611d5 |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 13372372,
"op": [
"vote",
{
"author": "haraldbuerbaumer",
"permlink": "smart-people-in-the-crypto-space",
"voter": "bollingbrook",
"weight": 10000
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-07-03T23:04:42",
"trx_id": "9b0e44354278769a6383bb6bb4d63bc13c3611d5",
"trx_in_block": 17,
"virtual_op": 0
}steemcreated a new account: @bollingbrook2017/07/03 22:39:48
steemcreated a new account: @bollingbrook
2017/07/03 22:39:48
| active | {"account_auths":[],"key_auths":[["STM5d5bm2Mx1fGMho2XBAf38tTPdFb61YKttqqJ9wjwYGXzyYbZNQ",1]],"weight_threshold":1} |
| creator | steem |
| delegation | 57000.000000 VESTS |
| extensions | [] |
| fee | 0.500 STEEM |
| json metadata | |
| memo key | STM7ZxWgjWGvsHXGNxGqUiWezynTiSANHqkZvkTzA9qyuxewiK2FG |
| new account name | bollingbrook |
| owner | {"account_auths":[],"key_auths":[["STM53RsTVoxa5vB43agSpMJj3uDwm6nB7NuiQQPggPvFY6qnohE5q",1]],"weight_threshold":1} |
| posting | {"account_auths":[],"key_auths":[["STM7HzLu1vn4nNZ9KMVvEcHaNge7rqnHWNj51nQzbBtHZGKj96iCY",1]],"weight_threshold":1} |
| Transaction Info | Block #13371874/Trx c863137eac58dfa6563145a5708b970f17e38b8b |
View Raw JSON Data
{
"block": 13371874,
"op": [
"account_create_with_delegation",
{
"active": {
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM5d5bm2Mx1fGMho2XBAf38tTPdFb61YKttqqJ9wjwYGXzyYbZNQ",
1
]
],
"weight_threshold": 1
},
"creator": "steem",
"delegation": "57000.000000 VESTS",
"extensions": [],
"fee": "0.500 STEEM",
"json_metadata": "",
"memo_key": "STM7ZxWgjWGvsHXGNxGqUiWezynTiSANHqkZvkTzA9qyuxewiK2FG",
"new_account_name": "bollingbrook",
"owner": {
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM53RsTVoxa5vB43agSpMJj3uDwm6nB7NuiQQPggPvFY6qnohE5q",
1
]
],
"weight_threshold": 1
},
"posting": {
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM7HzLu1vn4nNZ9KMVvEcHaNge7rqnHWNj51nQzbBtHZGKj96iCY",
1
]
],
"weight_threshold": 1
}
}
],
"op_in_trx": 0,
"timestamp": "2017-07-03T22:39:48",
"trx_id": "c863137eac58dfa6563145a5708b970f17e38b8b",
"trx_in_block": 9,
"virtual_op": 0
}Manabar
Voting Power100.00%
Downvote Power100.00%
Resource Credits100.00%
Reputation Progress0.00%
{
"voting_manabar": {
"current_mana": "8143659806",
"last_update_time": 1779056058
},
"downvote_manabar": {
"current_mana": 2035914951,
"last_update_time": 1779056058
},
"rc_account": {
"account": "bollingbrook",
"max_rc": "10164408779",
"max_rc_creation_adjustment": {
"amount": "2020748973",
"nai": "@@000000037",
"precision": 6
},
"rc_manabar": {
"current_mana": "10164408779",
"last_update_time": 1779056058
}
}
}Account Metadata
| POSTING JSON METADATA | |
| None | |
| JSON METADATA | |
| None |
{
"posting_json_metadata": {},
"json_metadata": {}
}Auth Keys
Owner
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM53RsTVoxa5vB43agSpMJj3uDwm6nB7NuiQQPggPvFY6qnohE5q1/1
Active
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM5d5bm2Mx1fGMho2XBAf38tTPdFb61YKttqqJ9wjwYGXzyYbZNQ1/1
Posting
Single Signature
Public Keys
STM7HzLu1vn4nNZ9KMVvEcHaNge7rqnHWNj51nQzbBtHZGKj96iCY1/1
Memo
STM7ZxWgjWGvsHXGNxGqUiWezynTiSANHqkZvkTzA9qyuxewiK2FG
{
"owner": {
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM53RsTVoxa5vB43agSpMJj3uDwm6nB7NuiQQPggPvFY6qnohE5q",
1
]
],
"weight_threshold": 1
},
"active": {
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM5d5bm2Mx1fGMho2XBAf38tTPdFb61YKttqqJ9wjwYGXzyYbZNQ",
1
]
],
"weight_threshold": 1
},
"posting": {
"account_auths": [],
"key_auths": [
[
"STM7HzLu1vn4nNZ9KMVvEcHaNge7rqnHWNj51nQzbBtHZGKj96iCY",
1
]
],
"weight_threshold": 1
},
"memo": "STM7ZxWgjWGvsHXGNxGqUiWezynTiSANHqkZvkTzA9qyuxewiK2FG"
}Witness Votes
0 / 30
No active witness votes.
[]