| operations |
| comment | | "parent_author":"erh.germany",<br>"parent_permlink":"q5dms0",<br>"author":"hone.heke",<br>"permlink":"q5dpu5",<br>"title":"",<br>"body":"Thanks for the well thought out reply. \n\n>It is impossible to hold elections that have a meaningful character because of the possibility of setting up multiple accounts.\n\nYes,<br> if Steemit were to adopt democratic principals it would be pointless to base voting on each individual account. It would most definitely need to be based on one person. That would be the end of the illusion of being completely anonymous as each person would need to verify their identity and have that linked to at least one account for the privilege of voting. \n\nI believe there would a huge upside and the possibility of mass adoption if it went down that road. Especially if there were no compulsion to register identity to open an account,<br> only to vote on issues and for Witness selection.\n\nMaybe that answers the other valid point you raised below?\n\n> you can't send one \"player\" against the other \"serious taker\",<br> because it's impossible to reconcile these two mentalities.",<br>"json_metadata":" \"app\":\"steemit\/0.1\" " |
|