| operations |
| comment | | "parent_author":"furion",<br>"parent_permlink":"re-burnin-a-modest-proposal-for-improving-steemit-curation-20160912t180141129z",<br>"author":"smooth",<br>"permlink":"re-furion-re-burnin-a-modest-proposal-for-improving-steemit-curation-20160913t234751300z",<br>"title":"",<br>"body":"Agree with you. Further,<br> I don't see how consistently good authors could even be rewarded at all under this system. Only with a revolving door of different voters? That seems entirely implausible.\n\nIt essentially guarantees that rewards shift around to new authors and eventually to some sort of flat distribution (which rewards Sybil attacking the author namespace) almost if not entirely regardless of merit.\n\nPeople need to step back and recognize that \"new authors\" is not always a good thing. A lot of the stuff that comes from \"new authors\",<br> and a lot of what gets upvoted by some of the well known curators who vote for a lot of \"new authors\" is pure junk,<br> or extended to its logical conclusion deliberate Sybil attacks.",<br>"json_metadata":" \"tags\":[\"steemit\" " |
|