Transaction: e0448764535b75b676af1026e202f1c8d5adc2e3

Included in block 16,254,390 at 2017/10/12 03:28:39 (UTC).

Transaction overview

Loading...
Transaction info
transaction_id e0448764535b75b676af1026e202f1c8d5adc2e3
ref_block_num 1,456
block_num16,254,390
ref_block_prefix 281,179,562
expiration2017/10/12T03:29:30
transaction_num 1
extensions[]
signatures 201815a9c67db9f8b00e4e928a56284be195b937579a95af6434bef2438892e6ce0a02e29fd99816998ef1590e90df9c97ed8fdb8032f8c9de96c4b0521c279c46
operations
comment
"parent_author":"haejin",<br>"parent_permlink":"bitcoin-btc-elliott-wave-analysis-all-time-new-highs-dead-ahead",<br>"author":"znog",<br>"permlink":"re-haejin-bitcoin-btc-elliott-wave-analysis-all-time-new-highs-dead-ahead-20171012t032831680z",<br>"title":"",<br>"body":"Does TA suggest alts going down too after BTC wave c completes? Or are we just assuming they will follow Bitcoin? Could they (some) not only become non-phasic but actually completely decouple?",<br>"json_metadata":" \"tags\":[\"bitcoin\" ,<br>\"app\":\"steemit\/0.1\" "
* The API used to generate this page is provided by @steemchiller.