Transaction: c9978dfdcf5c29f9b21ea9cb07cc21e37b7e299b

Included in block 2,303,918 at 2016/06/13 14:27:39 (UTC).

Transaction overview

Loading...
Transaction info
transaction_id c9978dfdcf5c29f9b21ea9cb07cc21e37b7e299b
ref_block_num 10,157
block_num2,303,918
ref_block_prefix 1,437,050,587
expiration2016/06/13T14:27:51
transaction_num 0
extensions[]
signatures 2000cce78fec7f8b73ed7e030c2de58bf0258597f8aa8c67d8c3ab8202afd6e1f77c8e46c71153e60c6e935c24c521d5e3f7d7fa12f2f30895fbb10673ce740d97
operations
comment
"parent_author":"",<br>"parent_permlink":"steemit",<br>"author":"steemship",<br>"permlink":"who-owns-and-controls-social-media-they-do",<br>"title":"Who Owns and Controls Social Media? They Do. That\u2019s Why Steemit Matters.",<br>"body":"![g (http:\/\/i.imgsafe.org\/e61e68aea5.jpg)\n\nBy Richard Kaplan,<br> @steemship\n\n**Facebook,<br> Twitter,<br> and Reddit are controlled by Chase,<br> Goldman Sachs,<br> Morgan Stanley,<br> mega-corporations,<br> rich individuals,<br> and governments like the United States and Saudi Arabia. Who do you think controls content and sets their agendas?**\n\n**Facebook Users Have Become Dollar Signs**\nWall Street values Facebook at more than $350 billion. Facebook has great technology,<br> it has built a successful business,<br> and it has established itself as the face of social media. But most of Facebook\u2019s valuation comes from its users: one billion of them around the world. \n\nWhy are Facebook\u2019s users worth so much? A company with access to one billion people is a huge market for advertisers. Companies want to reach Facebook\u2019s users to sell them products and services. \n\nWhen big companies come calling,<br> Facebook and other social media sites are only too happy to sell them data they have gathered on their own users. They are only too happy to sell advertising to these companies. Advertising is content that someone has paid to put in front of you. And Facebook is happy to let big corporations dictate the content that Facebook\u2019s users see first. \n\nWhy would Facebook and other social media sites sell out their users this way? Even if the Facebooks of the world began as tiny,<br> innocent startups with good intentions,<br> they now are owned by mega-corporations and rich individuals. These owners and shareholders demand constant growth and increased profits; truth and privacy are less important to them. \n\n![r ( http:\/\/i.imgsafe.org\/e63e0c3bf3.jpg)\n\n**Control of Content and Privacy**\nThey see people as money. Users are a commodity to be squeezed and mined for information,<br> so that these same companies or their clients can turn around and target the site\u2019s users with the right kind of advertising. Then they can sell lots of products and services,<br> and make more money off the site\u2019s users. When you post there,<br> all you are doing is fueling their vicious cycle,<br> and you certainly do not get paid for posting or voting like you do on Steemit. \n\nAs @cryptoctopus wrote in one of his Steemit posts: \n\u201cFacebook allows people to share their life,<br> opinions and beliefs to people they know. But what if Facebook had a bias and kept on silencing opinions it doesn't like? Just think about the collusion with Germany to censor conversations regarding mass-immigration or the Gizmodo article about how a former Facebook worker came out and said that they routinely suppressed conservative news and finally the news about how the social network banned a Canadian libertarian\u201d for criticizing Facebook\u2019s practices. \n\n(*Note: this quote was used with @cryptoctopus\u2019 permission. A link to his post can be found at the end of this article)\n\n**Who Owns Facebook and Twitter? Mega-Banks and Government Control**\nBoth Facebook and Twitter are owned by large shareholders,<br> including J.P. Morgan Chase,<br> Goldman Sachs,<br> BlackRock,<br> Morgan Stanley,<br> Clearbridge,<br> Vanguard,<br> and T. Rowe Price,<br> each of whom own around one percent or more of one of these companies. Morgan Stanley,<br> which owns 5% of Twitter,<br> has a huge amount of potential control over that company\u2019s content. \n\nWhen your largest shareholders are mega-banks and institutional funds,<br> they either control or have the power to control the agenda and content. But they\u2019re not the only ones. Goldman Sachs,<br> Morgan Stanley,<br> and Chase are all mega-banks on the so-called \u201ctoo big to fail\u201d list of the United States government and other powerful governments worldwide. They are considered \u201csystematically important\u201d banks and the world\u2019s major governments permanently stand ready to bail them out if needed. \n\n![j ( http:\/\/i.imgsafe.org\/e647eaf94f.jpg)\n\nIn fact,<br> the connection between government and mega-banks is far closer than this. While the U.S. Federal Reserve is supposedly independent,<br> it handles the vast majority of its transactions through its 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks. And guess what? These are not independent at all. \n\nThe CEO of J.P. Morgan Chase sits on the board of the New York Federal Reserve,<br> the largest and most important of the regional central banks. The regional feds actually hand out STOCK to their member banks. Guess who these are? The same big banks who loan money to the government,<br> which loans it back to the banks,<br> who loan it out to people with the government guaranteeing the loans,<br> but the government has to go back to the banks for more money to pay interest because it can\u2019t afford to pay off its own loans,<br> and they tack on a few more zeroes every time the money moves. \n\nHere is a link to the U.S. Debt Clock,<br> which shows you in real time just how much money is being spent. The situation in most other countries is not much different in terms of governments owing money that no one has. Whether it\u2019s real or fictional,<br> we don\u2019t really know anymore: http:\/\/www.usdebtclock.org \n\n**Want Some Other Examples of Government Control? How About the Saudis?**\nIn some other countries,<br> the links between the government and private sector are even more of a sham. Saudi Arabia is 100% controlled by the Saudi royal family. The Saudi government owns Audi Aramco,<br> its state oil company,<br> which is the most valuable company in the world (valued between one and ten trillion dollars). Every senior member of the Saudi government is either a member of the royal family or extremely close to it. The royal family is descended from the founder of Saudi Arabia,<br> who had hundreds of children,<br> including 45 sons. The richest member of the royal family currently is Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Alsaud,<br> whose net worth is estimated at $30 billion. \n\nDid I mention that Prince Alwaleed owns 5% of Twitter? The Saudis have as much control over Twitter as Morgan Stanley with its 5% stake. \n\n**How about Reddit? Isn\u2019t it Clean? No,<br> Don\u2019t Go There.**\nWe didn\u2019t even touch on Reddit yet. Shall we even go there? Reddit is owned by Conde Nast publications. Oh,<br> Conde Naste,<br> they\u2019re clean,<br> right? They print those luxury travel magazines you see in dentists\u2019 offices. Nope,<br> sorry,<br> they\u2019re not clean at all. \n\n![r (http:\/\/i.imgsafe.org\/e660ec76d5.gif)\n\nAdvance Publications is the parent company of Conde Nast and of Reddit. One of the largest private companies in the United States,<br> Advance Publications has annual revenues of about $8 billion. It operates hundreds of newspapers,<br> magazines,<br> news websites,<br> TV stations,<br> and other media outlets. It is principally owned by the Newhouse family,<br> one of America\u2019s richest families. Forbes ranks them as the 11th richest family in the United States with an estimated net worth of $18 billion. \n\nThere\u2019s nothing wrong with that sort of money,<br> but how did the family accumulate so much wealth and control over the media? In her book,<br> \u201cCitizen Newhouse: Portrait of a Media Merchant,<br>\u201d Carol Felsenthal explains how the Newhouse family patriarch,<br> Sam Newhouse,<br> acquired his media empire. It is a tale of stifling content,<br> jacking up advertising rates,<br> and creating news monopolies in one market after another: \n\n*\u201cThe best tonic for Sam's bottom line was to acquire a city's first newspaper,<br> then get his hands on its second,<br> thereby allowing him to set advertising rates as high as he pleased. He would promise to keep both papers in business and in competition. But he would eventually move in for the kill by merging the two,<br> which generally meant closing the afternoon paper and keeping the morning. He thus created a monopoly money machine of the sort billionaire investor Warren Buffett likened to an \u2018unregulated toll-booth.\u2019\u201d*\n\nYes,<br> that\u2019s the family and company that owns Reddit. All of it. Do you think they have some control over Reddit\u2019s agenda and content? I don\u2019t know how the company operates,<br> so let\u2019s just call it potential control. I do know that if I were Reddit\u2019s CEO,<br> I\u2019d pick up the phone every time my ultimate bosses called. And as long as the paycheck of every single person in that building depended on it,<br> I\u2019d damn well do what those bosses told me to do. I might even hire some fascist moderators for my subgroups (okay,<br> maybe I shouldn\u2019t go that far right now). \n\nWe could go into Instagram,<br> LinkedIn,<br> YouTube,<br> and a dozen others,<br> but I\u2019ll save that article for another day. \n\n**Let\u2019s Recap**\nPowerful governments control the mega-banks or the mega-banks control the governments (take your pick). The banks and large institutional investors hold enormous control over Facebook and Twitter. A monopolistic and controlling company owns Reddit. \n\nIs it any wonder,<br> then,<br> that social media sites are being asked to bury their criticism of certain governments and companies? Is it any wonder that they collect data on their users,<br> monitor posts,<br> and value money above privacy? Is it any wonder that they control,<br> and allow their advertisers to prioritize,<br> which content people see? \n\nSteemit is controlled ONLY by its community members. There is no agenda besides freedom. Most certainly,<br> there is no large corporation or government calling the shots. \n\n\u201cWe still believe in the free and open marketplace of ideas,<br>\u201d as @cryptoctopus wrote. The Steemit community believes that when differing opinions are allowed to compete against one another,<br> everybody learns more about those issues and perspectives. Everybody has a chance to discuss and debate ideas. May the best idea win,<br> and may everyone treat each other with respect and understanding.\n\nThe money? Steemit does not have any mega-banks or billionaires to please. Not only does the Steemit community control the content; it also owns the whole project. In essence,<br> anyone posting or upvoting good content gets a chance to share in Steemit\u2019s ongoing growth and profits. \n\n-Peace,<br> Richard,<br> @steemship\n\n#steemit\n#socialmedia\n\n![j (http:\/\/i.imgsafe.org\/e66ee12fa4.png)\n\nRelated Post (source of quotes): https:\/\/steemit.com\/steem\/@cryptoctopus\/confession-of-a-facebook-ad-man-and-where-i-am-moving-to-next \n\nOther Sources (good toilet reading):\nhttps:\/\/www.federalreserve.gov\/faqs\/about_14986.htm\nhttp:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20080614141842\/http:\/\/www.fsforum.org\/about\/who_we_are.html\nhttp:\/\/www.globalresearch.ca\/who-owns-the-federal-reserve\/10489\nhttp:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/books\/first\/f\/felsenthal-newhouse.html\nhttp:\/\/qz.com\/519388\/this-saudi-prince-now-owns-more-of-twitter-than-jack-dorsey-does\/\nhttp:\/\/www.forbes.com\/profile\/newhouse\/?list=families",<br>"json_metadata":" \"tags\":[\"steemit\",<br>\"socialmedia\" ,<br>\"users\":[\"steemship\",<br>\"cryptoctopus\" ,<br>\"image\":[\"http:\/\/i.imgsafe.org\/e61e68aea5.jpg\" "
* The API used to generate this page is provided by @steemchiller.