Transaction: c5761bc3f33ef5c3e88c06ee165773c75f112332

Included in block 19,615,257 at 2018/02/05 22:15:51 (UTC).

Transaction overview

Loading...
Transaction info
transaction_id c5761bc3f33ef5c3e88c06ee165773c75f112332
ref_block_num 19,976
block_num19,615,257
ref_block_prefix 1,740,815,152
expiration2018/02/05T22:25:48
transaction_num 52
extensions[]
signatures 20765897ab94539aafc56757e9a34f2e2298db83ddb58bfaf1acddb6fd145a6bf306088e9ea8f5833ff2bb3ec09211507dd702efffb8ee51ebe19c72eb0977da2d
operations
comment
"parent_author":"evolved08gsr",<br>"parent_permlink":"re-tuck-fheman-lack-of-upvotes-less-freeroll-poker-tournaments-at-steem-poker-league-20180205t205151303z",<br>"author":"tuck-fheman",<br>"permlink":"re-evolved08gsr-re-tuck-fheman-lack-of-upvotes-less-freeroll-poker-tournaments-at-steem-poker-league-20180205t221547814z",<br>"title":"",<br>"body":"<blockquote>It's the lack of \"valuable\" upvotes<\/blockquote>\n\nCorrect.\n\n<blockquote>You've gotta b doing OK with the rake on the new buy-in tournaments at least?\n<\/blockquote>\n\nThere is no rake account,<br> it simply reduces the payouts.\n\n<blockquote>Have you considered lowering the payouts to 20 SBD from 30 SBD?<\/blockquote>\n\nWe did that last week on the tourneys we ended up canceling this week.\n\n<blockquote>Or modifying the payout structures so a 50 person tournament pays fewer than 19 winners (as an example)?<\/blockquote>\n\nWe had this setup in place until recently. Players seem to prefer the new larger payout structure and it gives more people chips for buyin games.\n\nThanks for the feedback and suggestions!",<br>"json_metadata":" \"tags\":[\"steemit\" ,<br>\"app\":\"steemit\/0.1\" "
* The API used to generate this page is provided by @steemchiller.