| operations |
| comment | | "parent_author":"j3dy",<br>"parent_permlink":"re-snowflake-re-krnel-re-snowflake-guardian-of-the-steem-universe-a-different-take-on-the-role-of-whales-within-steem-ecosystem-20170205t021120396z",<br>"author":"snowflake",<br>"permlink":"re-j3dy-re-snowflake-re-krnel-re-snowflake-guardian-of-the-steem-universe-a-different-take-on-the-role-of-whales-within-steem-ecosystem-20170205t033727900z",<br>"title":"",<br>"body":">double the pool therefore,<br> bring the scales to a bit more balanced state ,<br> then your idea is kind of meaningless ,<br> since things should work out the way they are invisioned. votes would be worth more and accounts too\n\nIf the pool's value double in value it just means that you would need $4000 instead of $8000 to add 1 cents per vote. The value would have to increase a lot more to make the idea meaningless,<br> and the value won't increase if the incentives aren't aligned with 99.8% of the site's users. \n\n>you are justifying the flagging ,<br> in your case the separation of flags and downvotes is necessary ,<br> flags to report and downvotes ,<br>\n\nI hate this term \"flagging\" because there is no such thing at the blockchain level,<br> this is purely an interface choice which is a really bad one imo. Busy uses upvote and downvote which is a lot better.\nRegarding the flag wars you've mentionned. I think it would be easy to hide whales's downvotes from the interface to avoid users misinterpreting it. People can always go look at the blockchain if they want to. Thanks for your input.",<br>"json_metadata":" \"tags\":[\"steem\" ,<br>\"app\":\"steemit\/0.1\" " |
|