| operations |
| comment | | "parent_author":"snubbermike",<br>"parent_permlink":"re-smooth-steem-experiment-burn-post-5-20180119t114454491z",<br>"author":"smooth",<br>"permlink":"re-snubbermike-re-smooth-steem-experiment-burn-post-5-20180120t063004400z",<br>"title":"",<br>"body":"I have directly addressed this question in one of the earlier threads. It is possible that redirecting a portion of the reward pool in this manner will introduce more scarcity where then stakeholders exercise more care to see that remaining rewards are more focused on the most deserving posts. It is also possible that the total reward pool could be reduced so much that even the worst abusers share is reduced _in absolute amount_ (a sort of scorched earth strategy,<br> which could ultimately deter abuses). Or it is possible this has no beneficial effect whatsoever with respect to the reward pool.\n\nEither way I'm reasonably convinced this buy-and-burn strategy does act as a natural stabilizer for the SBD peg,<br> so that in itself is some benefit.",<br>"json_metadata":" \"tags\":[\"steem\" ,<br>\"app\":\"steemit\/0.1\" " |
|