| operations |
| comment | | "parent_author":"maneki-neko",<br>"parent_permlink":"re-r351574nc3-re-firedream-re-r351574nc3-re-firedream-open-letter-to-grumpycat-20180120t055250857z",<br>"author":"r351574nc3",<br>"permlink":"re-maneki-neko-re-r351574nc3-re-firedream-re-r351574nc3-re-firedream-open-letter-to-grumpycat-20180120t061853989z",<br>"title":"",<br>"body":"@@ -1810,<br>8 +1810,<br>711 @@\n t logic.\n+%0A%0A%3E By the way,<br> grumpy doesnt need to hide behind good intentions,<br> nor does grumpy have to do any of this,<br> he could simply self upvote and call it a day.%0A%0ABTW and now we come to understand why good intentions are the shield. Your brain can't reconcile passed:%0A%3E Why would someone downvote if they could just upvote? You don't benefit from a downvote. Must be good intentions.%0A%0AI'm not sure whether you're lulled into this sense of thinking or you're just too lazy to dig deeper,<br> but if you do,<br> you find that @grumpycat may have an interest in harming others **not voting bots**.%0A%0AMy theory is that @grumpycat is **not** trying to eliminate voting bots,<br> but rather,<br> divert users to specific voting bots.\n",<br>"json_metadata":" \"tags\":[\"life\" ,<br>\"users\":[\"grumpycat\",<br>\"r351574nc3\",<br>\"steem\" ,<br>\"links\":[\"https:\/\/steemit.com\/life\/@firedream\/open-letter-to-grumpycat##r351574nc3\/re-firedream-re-r351574nc3-re-firedream-open-letter-to-grumpycat-20180119t195210332z\" ,<br>\"app\":\"steemit\/0.1\" " |
|