Transaction: 379af33b121fe0157c13165ba9afa869e2ae12b4

Included in block 18,272,523 at 2017/12/21 06:19:51 (UTC).

Transaction overview

Loading...
Transaction info
transaction_id 379af33b121fe0157c13165ba9afa869e2ae12b4
ref_block_num 53,496
block_num18,272,523
ref_block_prefix 238,857,667
expiration2017/12/21T06:29:45
transaction_num 2
extensions[]
signatures 1f6ecc892dee9640cda936c228ad5da63d36af86c081848eac550beba7f5f482ec24eb382a2ace5e012d4cb343a4334c1c73ac05437514d61e0c1d890dd5e961cf
operations
comment
"parent_author":"hilarski",<br>"parent_permlink":"bitcoin-you-are-here",<br>"author":"denmarkguy",<br>"permlink":"re-hilarski-bitcoin-you-are-here-20171221t061945812z",<br>"title":"",<br>"body":"You're pretty brave to go after those ICOs @hilarski... but you've been in this game for a long time. From my unskilled perspective,<br> it feels like half of what's coming to market has no reason for being aside from some people deciding they can \"make a lot of money\" if they create a White Paper and use the word blockchain enough times. \n\nI like things like Steem and Bitshares because it feels like there's a \"something\" behind all the semantics. But maybe I'm just stuck in an old paradigm that an idea needs to have an \"underlying reason\" in order to become something. In cryptopia,<br> it often seems like simply \"the idea\" is enough,<br> and nobody cares about a functional application...",<br>"json_metadata":" \"tags\":[\"bitcoin\" ,<br>\"users\":[\"hilarski\" ,<br>\"app\":\"steemit\/0.1\" "
* The API used to generate this page is provided by @steemchiller.