Transaction: 0def31eeb33f7936585f1783aa3819945e5cc8ad

Included in block 4,039,033 at 2016/08/13 06:36:18 (UTC).

Transaction overview

Loading...
Transaction info
transaction_id 0def31eeb33f7936585f1783aa3819945e5cc8ad
ref_block_num 41,241
block_num4,039,033
ref_block_prefix 1,061,380,089
expiration2016/08/13T06:36:27
transaction_num 1
extensions[]
signatures 200e0b9060f8d38eaaa21a2192db2b7d1146aa409152e9fe2db35428bbe4a853556ac234c58869a9aaa6bf29fb7277460dce26caddfb6fb316cb53f0d8f152c7b0
operations
comment
"parent_author":"",<br>"parent_permlink":"steemit",<br>"author":"alifton",<br>"permlink":"so-bitcoin-isn-t-real-money-according-to-one-florida-judge-my-crypto-accounts-begs-to-differ",<br>"title":"So Bitcoin Isn't Real Money According To One Florida Judge! My Crypto Accounts Begs to Differ...",<br>"body":"# Just when I thought the American Court System was starting to understand Bitcoin,<br> they go and do something like this...\n\nhttps:\/\/www.steemimg.com\/images\/2016\/08\/13\/BitcoinDailySmalldfff1.jpg\n\nA Judge in Florida recently ruled that Bitcoin wasn't money because it was not backed by any financial institution,<br> was not a tangible good,<br> or in anyway could it be considered a service rendered so it failed to meet the state's standards for a \"Real\" currency. LOL I love judicial politics sometimes...\n\nIn summary this whole thing started as a Money Laundering case over Bitcoin but was thrown out of court because a Florida Judge ruled that Bitcoin did not meet the State Qualifications for being a \"Real\" currency. Now if only they could convince the IRS of this because they sure as hell want me to report all Bitcoin earnings and profits from exchanges on my annual income tax forms.\n\nThe IRS however still missed the mark a bit because they want to treat Bitcoin like a Stock that pays dividends. Legally as of last year I was allowed to account for the cost of all Bitcoins when acquired,<br> and would only be required to pay income tax on the net gains that resulted from the holding or trading of Bitcoins. On the flipside,<br> one was also allowed to write off any losses incurred as a result of bad trades or a decline in the price of one's holdings...\n\nI'm still not sure why,<br> but it's as if these people have never heard of Crypto's even though Bitcoin has been publicized in the mainstream media for years. CNN,<br> Forbes,<br> WSJ,<br> you name a financial publication and I can almost promise you Bitcoin has been mentioned. Even Ethereum has been drawing attention recently,<br> but I guess some people prefer to turn a blind eye towards progress and in this case the good guys won!\n\n># Florida judge: Bitcoins aren\u2019t currency,<br> so state money laws don\u2019t apply\n>Miami man sold via localbitcoins.com,<br> then undercover cop tried to target him.\n> A Florida judge has decided in favor of a bitcoin vendor charged with violating local money-laundering laws,<br> because,<br> she found,<br> the cryptocurrency is not money as defined under state law.\n\n*Published in <a href=http:\/\/arstechnica.com\/tech-policy\/2016\/07\/florida-judge-bitcoins-arent-currency-so-state-money-laws-dont-apply>Arstechnica<\/a> by CYRUS FARIVAR - 7\/27\/2016,<br> 6:40 AM<\/a>*",<br>"json_metadata":" \"tags\":[\"steemit\",<br>\"investments\",<br>\"crypto-news\",<br>\"cryptocurrency\",<br>\"bitcoin\" ,<br>\"links\":[\"http:\/\/arstechnica.com\/tech-policy\/2016\/07\/florida-judge-bitcoins-arent-currency-so-state-money-laws-dont-apply\" "
* The API used to generate this page is provided by @steemchiller.