| operations |
| comment | | "parent_author":"cadawg",<br>"parent_permlink":"re-trafalgar-q6x63v",<br>"author":"trafalgar",<br>"permlink":"q6x9gb",<br>"title":"",<br>"body":"I personally also don't support those changes either,<br> especially as a strong proponent of the EIP which I had tried to push for almost 2 years,<br> not constantly of course.\n\nI took him asking for safe passage out to mean under the current rules as the post itself made no mention of changing rules,<br> although they were brought up before.\n\nNotwithstanding,<br> I believe upholding property rights and defending our already besmirched DPOS consensus system is more important than prevent a dysfunctional set of voting rules.\n\nIn other words,<br> the reputation that you can freely access and participate with your stake as long as you control the private key (which we already compromised with the SF),<br> is worth defending even if I think the threat is malicious,<br> overwhelming and imminent,<br> and I don't in this case.",<br>"json_metadata":" \"app\":\"steemit\/0.2\" " |
|